Development and validation of a repharsed phase- HPLC method for simultaneous determination of rosiglitazone and glimepiride in combined dosage forms and human plasma

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Rosiglitazone (ROZ) and glimepiride (GLM) are antidiabetic agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A survey of the literature reveals that only one spectrophotometric method has been reported for the simultaneous determination of ROS and GLM in pharmaceutical preparations. However the reported method suffers from the low sensitivity, for this reason, our target was to develop a simple sensitive HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of ROZ and GLM in their combined dosage forms and plasma.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A simple reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of Rosiglitazone (ROS) and Glimepiride (GLM) in combined dosage forms and human plasma. The separation was achieved using a 150 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm particle size Symmetry^®C18 column. Mobile phase containing a mixture of acetonitrile and 0.02 M phosphate buffer of pH 5 (60: 40, V/V) was pumped at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. UV detection was performed at 235 nm using nicardipine as an internal standard. The method was validated for accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, and sensitivity. The developed and validated method was successfully used for quantitative analysis of Avandaryl™ tablets. The chromatographic analysis time was approximately 7 min per sample with complete resolution of ROS (t_R= 3.7 min.), GLM (t_R= 4.66 min.), and nicardipine (t_R, 6.37 min). Validation studieswas performed according to ICH Guidelines revealed that the proposed method is specific, rapid, reliable and reproducible. The calibration plots were linear over the concentration ranges 0.10-25 μg/mL and 0.125-12.5 μg/mL with LOD of 0.04 μg/mL for both compounds and limits of quantification 0.13 and 0.11 μg/mL for ROS and GLM respectively.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The suggested method was successfully applied for the simultaneous analysis of the studied drugs in their co-formulated tablets and human plasma. The mean percentage recoveries in Avandaryl™ tablets were 100.88 ± 1.14 and 100.31 ± 1.93 for ROS and GLM respectively. Statistical comparison of the results with those of the reference method revealed good agreement and proved that there were no significant difference in the accuracy and precision between the two methods respectively. The interference likely to be introduced from some co-administered drugs such as glibenclamide, gliclazide, metformine, pioglitazone and nateglinide was investigated.</p

Investigating the Physicochemical Properties of Phenazopyridine Hydrochloride Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Uv-Visible Spectrophotometry

Scopu

Effect of internal standard on HPLC analysis of tablet dosage forms: An experimental study with statistical comparison

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of internal standard on precision and accuracy of an HPLC method for the analysis of tablet dosage forms. Paracetamol was chosen as a model molecule and caffeine was used as an internal standard for this purpose. An experimental procedure was applied and a statistical comparison was performed to present the effect of IS on precision and accuracy for the quality control analysis. IS was added in a constant amount (5, 20 and 40 µg mL-1) into the samples and calibration curve and internal standard techniques were used to determine the amount of PA in tablet dosage forms. As it is known, using IS corrects the loss of analyte during sample preparation or sample inlet. The results for calibration curve and internal standard techniques were statistically evaluated and discussed. According to the results in our experimental conditions, the internal standard technique statistically effected the analysis results but did not improve the precision and accuracy

Common features of anaphylaxis in children

Objective: We aimed to establish the characteristics of anaphylaxis in childhood