58 research outputs found

    Correlation of the TIGIT-PVR immune checkpoint axis with clinicopathological features in triple-negative breast cancer

    Get PDF
    BackgroundT cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) interacts with poliovirus receptor (PVR) to contribute to cancer immune escape. Recently, TIGIT and PVR have been identified as promising immunotherapy targets. Their gene expression is upregulated in many solid tumors, but their protein expression level is not well documented, particularly in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the breast cancer subtype that most benefit from immunotherapy.MethodsTIGIT and PVR expression levels were assessed by immunohistochemistry in 243 surgically resected localized TNBC and then their relationship with clinical-pathological features and clinical outcome was analyzed.ResultsTIGIT expression was observed in immune cells from the tumor microenvironment, whereas PVR was mainly expressed by tumor cells. High TIGIT expression was significantly associated with age (p=0.010), histological grade (p=0.014), non-lobular histology (p=0.024), adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.006), and various immune cell populations (tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), CD3+, CD8+, PD-1+ cells; all p<0.0001), PD-L1+ tumor cells (p<0.0001), and PD-L1+ stromal cells (p=0.003). Infiltration by TIGIT+ cells tended to be higher in non-molecular apocrine tumors (p=0.088). PVR was significantly associated with histological grade (p<0.0001), the basal-like (p=0.003) and non-molecular apocrine phenotypes (p=0.039), high TILs infiltration (p=0.011), CD3+ (p=0.002), CD8+ (p=0.024) T cells, and PD-L1 expression in tumor (p=0.003) and stromal cells (p=0.001). In univariate analysis, only known prognostic factors (age, tumor size, lymph node status, adjuvant chemotherapy, TILs and CD3+ T-cell infiltrate) were significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival. High TIGIT and PVR expression levels tended to be associated with longer RFS (p=0.079 and 0.045, respectively). The analysis that included only non-molecular apocrine TNBC revealed longer RFS for tumors that strongly expressed TIGIT or PVR (p=0.025 for TIGIT and 0.032 for PVR).ConclusionsThese results indicated that in TNBC, TIGIT+ cells can easily interact with PVR to exert their inhibitory effects. Their wide expression in TNBC and their association with other immune checkpoint components suggest the therapeutic interest of the TIGIT-PVR axis

    Facteurs pronostiques et prédictifs dans le cancer du sein infiltrant

    No full text
    The adjuvant systemic treatment of invasive breast cancer is based on chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Several prognostic factors (age, tumoral size, nodal status, tumoral grade, vascular embols, hormonal receptors (HR), HER2) and predictive factors of response to treatment (HR and HER2) are described and have an impact on our therapeutic decisions. However, recurrences are frequent after a complete treatment and patients could avoid such treatment because of the good “intrinsic” prognosis. In this work, we aimed to identify other prognostic and / or predictive factors for the invasive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant / adjuvant settings. Firstly, we showed that the lobular histology, considered as histology of good prognosis and low chemo sensitive, should not be a decisive factor regarding systemic therapy. In the adjuvant setting, regarding chemotherapy, clinical validity and utility of the genomic tests need to be specifically evaluated in this subgroup. Then, we studied analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility of 2 molecular classification of breast cancer: PAM50 and a panel of 3 biomarkers in immunohistochemistry (estrogen receptor, HER2 and Ki-67 with a cut-off of 14%). We concluded that the data were not strong enough and that the therapeutic decisions should not be influenced by these classifications. We identified a subgroup of triple negative breast cancer that express androgen receptor and FOXA1 and which behave like luminal tumors. At last, we showed in a large neoadjuvant population, that the pathological complete response is a surrogate marker of survival in RH negative tumorsLe traitement systémique adjuvant du cancer du sein infiltrant repose sur la chimiothérapie et l’hormonothérapie. Certains facteurs sont connus pour être pronostiques (âge, taille tumorale, statut ganglionnaire, grade tumoral, emboles vasculaires, statut des récepteurs hormonaux (RH) et de HER2) ou prédictifs de réponse aux traitements (RH et HER2) et influent sur nos décisions thérapeutiques. Cependant, certaines patientes récidivent malgré un traitement complet alors que d’autres vont recevoir un traitement qui aurait pu être évité de par leur bon pronostic « intrinsèque ». Nous avons cherché à identifier dans ce travail d’autres facteurs pronostiques et / ou prédictifs dans le cancer du sein infiltrant en situation néoadjuvante / adjuvante. Premièrement, nous montrons que le type histologique lobulaire, réputé pour être une histologie de cancer du sein de bon pronostic et peu chimiosensible, ne doit pas être un facteur décisionnel quant aux traitements systémiques. En situation adjuvante et concernant la chimiothérapie, la validité et l’utilité cliniques des tests génomiques nécessitent d’être évaluées spécifiquement dans ce sous-groupe. Ensuite, nous avons étudié la validité analytique, la validité clinique et l’utilité clinique de 2 classifications moléculaires des cancers du sein selon PAM50 et l’analyse immunohistochimique de biomarqueurs : récepteur œstrogène, HER2 et Ki67 avec un cut-off à 14%. Selon nos conclusions, il n’y a actuellement pas de données suffisamment robustes pour que ces 2 classifications modifient les décisions de traitement systémique. Nous avons mis en évidence un sous-groupe de tumeurs triples négatives exprimant le récepteur androgène et FOXA1 et se comportant comme des tumeurs luminales. Enfin, nous avons montré sur une large série néoadjuvante que la réponse histologique complète est un critère substitutif de survie pour les tumeurs RH négatif

    Pronstic and predictive factors in invasive breast cancer

    No full text
    Le traitement systémique adjuvant du cancer du sein infiltrant repose sur la chimiothérapie et l’hormonothérapie. Certains facteurs sont connus pour être pronostiques (âge, taille tumorale, statut ganglionnaire, grade tumoral, emboles vasculaires, statut des récepteurs hormonaux (RH) et de HER2) ou prédictifs de réponse aux traitements (RH et HER2) et influent sur nos décisions thérapeutiques. Cependant, certaines patientes récidivent malgré un traitement complet alors que d’autres vont recevoir un traitement qui aurait pu être évité de par leur bon pronostic « intrinsèque ». Nous avons cherché à identifier dans ce travail d’autres facteurs pronostiques et / ou prédictifs dans le cancer du sein infiltrant en situation néoadjuvante / adjuvante. Premièrement, nous montrons que le type histologique lobulaire, réputé pour être une histologie de cancer du sein de bon pronostic et peu chimiosensible, ne doit pas être un facteur décisionnel quant aux traitements systémiques. En situation adjuvante et concernant la chimiothérapie, la validité et l’utilité cliniques des tests génomiques nécessitent d’être évaluées spécifiquement dans ce sous-groupe. Ensuite, nous avons étudié la validité analytique, la validité clinique et l’utilité clinique de 2 classifications moléculaires des cancers du sein selon PAM50 et l’analyse immunohistochimique de biomarqueurs : récepteur œstrogène, HER2 et Ki67 avec un cut-off à 14%. Selon nos conclusions, il n’y a actuellement pas de données suffisamment robustes pour que ces 2 classifications modifient les décisions de traitement systémique. Nous avons mis en évidence un sous-groupe de tumeurs triples négatives exprimant le récepteur androgène et FOXA1 et se comportant comme des tumeurs luminales. Enfin, nous avons montré sur une large série néoadjuvante que la réponse histologique complète est un critère substitutif de survie pour les tumeurs RH négatifsThe adjuvant systemic treatment of invasive breast cancer is based on chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Several prognostic factors (age, tumoral size, nodal status, tumoral grade, vascular embols, hormonal receptors (HR), HER2) and predictive factors of response to treatment (HR and HER2) are described and have an impact on our therapeutic decisions. However, recurrences are frequent after a complete treatment and patients could avoid such treatment because of the good “intrinsic” prognosis. In this work, we aimed to identify other prognostic and / or predictive factors for the invasive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant / adjuvant settings. Firstly, we showed that the lobular histology, considered as histology of good prognosis and low chemo sensitive, should not be a decisive factor regarding systemic therapy. In the adjuvant setting, regarding chemotherapy, clinical validity and utility of the genomic tests need to be specifically evaluated in this subgroup. Then, we studied analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility of 2 molecular classification of breast cancer: PAM50 and a panel of 3 biomarkers in immunohistochemistry (estrogen receptor, HER2 and Ki-67 with a cut-off of 14%). We concluded that the data were not strong enough and that the therapeutic decisions should not be influenced by these classifications. We identified a subgroup of triple negative breast cancer that express androgen receptor and FOXA1 and which behave like luminal tumors. At last, we showed in a large neoadjuvant population, that the pathological complete response is a surrogate marker of survival in RH negative tumor

    Direct intratumoral chemotherapy with carboplatin and epinephrine in a recurrent cervical chordoma: case report.

    No full text
    International audienceOBJECTIVE: Chordomas are rare primary bone tumors for which surgery is classically the first-line treatment. However, safe margins are often difficult to obtain, so that patients are at risk of local recurrence. Because radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy show limited effectiveness, we report the use of direct intratumoral chemotherapy (IC) to treat recurrent chordoma. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old man presented with a recurrent cervical chordoma after surgery and radiation therapy. This recurrence manifested as C4-C5 spinal cord compression. TECHNIQUE: Three 22-gauge needles were inserted at the upper, middle, and lower parts of the tumor and advanced under computed tomographic guidance while injecting local anesthetic. A 5-mg/mL carboplatin solution was combined with epinephrine (to increase the concentration and antitumor effect of carboplatin) at a final concentration of 0.01 mg/mL and an iodinated contrast agent. We injected 3 to 5 mL of this solution over 5 minutes through each needle under computed tomographic guidance. Eleven intratumoral treatments were performed during an 18-month period. CONCLUSION: A marked clinical response with regression of the spinal cord compression was observed, without specific toxicity. A good partial response was obtained with a 42% decrease in tumor volume (from 69 to 40 cm3). Moreover, the central part of the tumor showed tumor necrosis, as confirmed by histological examination. Thus, in patients with this rare tumor, intratumoral chemotherapy may be a valid treatment option when surgery and radiation therapy fail. Furthermore, intratumoral chemotherapy in combination with surgical treatment should be considered to improve the local control rate

    Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic and Predictive Factor in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review

    No full text
    Inflammatory blood markers (IBM), such as the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), have emerged as potential prognostic factors in various cancers, including breast cancer (BC), potentially allowing an easy, minimally invasive evaluation of a given cancer‘s prognosis and treatment outcome. We report here a systematic overview of the published data evaluating NLR as a prognostic factor or predictive factor for pathological complete response (PCR) and toxicity in early and advanced BC. A total of 45 articles were identified. NLR was found to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in most of the adjuvant treatment studies. However, no significant correlation was found between survival and NLR for early BC patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and advanced BC patients. Most studies failed to find a significant correlation between NLR and PCR after NACT. Finally, some data showed that IBM could be predictive of chemotherapy-related toxicity

    Targeting homologous repair deficiency in breast and ovarian cancers: Biological pathways, preclinical and clinical data

    No full text
    International audienceMutation or epigenetic silencing of homologous recombination (HR) repair genes is characteristic of a growing proportion of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. Defects in HR lead to genome instability, allowing cells to acquire the multiple genetic alterations essential for cancer development. However, this deficiency can also be exploited by using DNA damaging agents or by targeting compensatory repair pathways. A noteworthy example is treatment of TNBC and epithelial ovarian cancer harboring BRCA1/2 germline mutations using platinum salts and/or PARP inhibitors. Dramatic responses to PARP inhibitors may support a wider use in the HR-deficient population beyond those with mutated germline BRCA1 and 2. In this review, we discuss HR deficiency hallmarks as predictive biomarkers for platinum salt and PARP inhibitor sensitivity for selecting patients affected by TNBC or epithelial ovarian cancer who could benefit from these therapeutic options

    Hepatic arterial infusion of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin in a large metastasis from colon cancer

    No full text
    Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy can be performed in cases of liver-confined metastatic disease, resulting in increased local drug concentrations. Here we report the case of a 61-year-old man who presented with an isolated large unresectable liver metastasis of colon cancer after failure of surgery and multiple administration of systemic chemotherapy. The patient was treated with a combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin using HAI. The tolerance was excellent and a radiological complete response was obtained after 8 cycles of HAI. The rationale for the use of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as well as that for the combination of the 2 drugs is discussed in this paper. HAI of gemcitabine-oxaliplatin should be evaluated in further clinical trials
    • …
    corecore