Women in the Workforce

In this paper I set out to answer three questions 1 Where are women, in the main, located in the workforce? 2. What are the salient characteristics of this segment of the workforce? 3. What special problems face the trade union movement in dealing with the situation of women workers

Women in the Workforce

In this paper I set out to answer three questions 1 Where are women, in the main, located in the workforce? 2. What are the salient characteristics of this segment of the workforce? 3. What special problems face the trade union movement in dealing with the situation of women workers

The Iowa Homemaker vol.17, no.2

Come to Veishea by Jane Helser, page 2 Miss 4-H at Iowa State by Alvina Iverson, page 3 Date Etiquette by Jim Butterworth, page 4 King and Queen for the Day by Ruth Kunerth, page 5 Dress Your Big Moments by Jo Betty, page 6 Foot Notes in Style by Gaynold Carroll, page 7 Shoe Care by Jean Reis, page 7 Diploma in Hand – A Job in Mind by Marie Larson, page 8 An Art to Packing by Ruth Hendrix, page 9 On Lemons and Things, page 9 Lively Leisure for Summer by Betty Shoemaker, page 10 Equipment Students Travel by Virginia Berry, page 11 What’s New in Home Economics, page 12 Behind Bright Jackets, page 15 Alumnae Make News by Faithe Danielson, page 16 Money Matters Little by Gaynold Carroll, page 17 Good Looking Plates Go to Dinner, page 18 Cherry Pie Chant by Peggy Schenk, page 18 Magic of this Modern Age by Beth Cummings, page 19 Punctuate Your Dinner With Appetizers by Jane Helser, page 20 Home Management in Africa by Mary Ellen Lynch, page 21 Cap and Gown Party by Charlotte Heffner, page 22 Tips for Troubles, page 2

Number and timing of primary cleft lip and palate repair surgeries in England: whole nation study of electronic health records before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective: To quantify differences in number and timing of first primary cleft lip and palate (CLP) repair procedures during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021; 2020/2021) compared with the preceding year (1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020; 2019/2021)./ Design: National observational study of administrative hospital data./ Setting: National Health Service hospitals in England./ Study population: Children <5 years undergoing primary repair for an orofacial cleft Population Consensus and Surveys Classification of Interventions and Procedures-fourth revisions (OPCS-4) codes F031, F291)./ Main exposure: Procedure date (2020/2021 vs 2019/2020)./ Main outcomes: Numbers and timing (age in months) of first primary CLP procedures./ Results: 1716 CLP primary repair procedures were included in the analysis. In 2020/2021, 774 CLP procedures were carried out compared with 942 in 2019/2020, a reduction of 17.8% (95% CI 9.5% to 25.4%). The reduction varied over time in 2020/2021, with no surgeries at all during the first 2 months (April and May 2020). Compared with 2019/2020, first primary lip repair procedures performed in 2020/2021 were delayed by 1.6 months on average (95% CI 0.9 to 2.2 months). Delays in primary palate repairs were smaller on average but varied across the nine geographical regions./ Conclusion: There were significant reductions in the number and delays in timing of first primary CLP repair procedures in England during the first year of the pandemic, which may affect long-term outcomes

Integrated analyses of growth differentiation factor-15 concentration and cardiometabolic diseases in humans

Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF15) is a stress response cytokine that is elevated in several cardiometabolic diseases and has attracted interest as a potential therapeutic target. To further explore the association of GDF15 with human disease, we conducted a broad study into the phenotypic and genetic correlates of GDF15 concentration in up to 14,099 individuals. Assessment of 772 traits across 6610 participants in FINRISK identified associations of GDF15 concentration with a range of phenotypes including all-cause mortality, cardiometabolic disease, respiratory diseases and psychiatric disorders, as well as inflammatory markers. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of GDF15 concentration across three different assay platforms (n=14,099) confirmed significant heterogeneity due to a common missense variant (rs1058587; p.H202D) in GDF15, potentially due to epitope-binding artefacts. After conditioning on rs1058587, statistical fine mapping identified four independent putative causal signals at the locus. Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis found evidence of a causal relationship between GDF15 concentration and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) but not body mass index (BMI). Using reverse MR, we identified a potential causal association of BMI on GDF15 (IVW p(FDR) = 0.0040). Taken together, our data derived from human population cohorts do not support a role for moderately elevated GDF15 concentrations as a causal factor in human cardiometabolic disease but support its role as a biomarker of metabolic stress.Peer reviewe

Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer among 2074 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers

Circulating proteins can reveal key pathways to cancer and identify therapeutic targets for cancer prevention. We investigate 2,074 circulating proteins and risk of nine common cancers (bladder, breast, endometrium, head and neck, lung, ovary, pancreas, kidney, and malignant non-melanoma) using cis protein Mendelian randomisation and colocalization. We conduct additional analyses to identify adverse side-effects of altering risk proteins and map cancer risk proteins to drug targets. Here we find 40 proteins associated with common cancers, such as PLAUR and risk of breast cancer [odds ratio per standard deviation increment: 2.27, 1.88-2.74], and with high-mortality cancers, such as CTRB1 and pancreatic cancer [0.79, 0.73-0.85]. We also identify potential adverse effects of protein-altering interventions to reduce cancer risk, such as hypertension. Additionally, we report 18 proteins associated with cancer risk that map to existing drugs and 15 that are not currently under clinical investigation. In sum, we identify protein-cancer links that improve our understanding of cancer aetiology. We also demonstrate that the wider consequence of any protein-altering intervention on well-being and morbidity is required to interpret any utility of proteins as potential future targets for therapeutic prevention

Genomic risk prediction of coronary artery disease in nearly 500,000 adults: implications for early screening and primary prevention

Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) has substantial heritability and a polygenic architecture; however, genomic risk scores have not yet leveraged the totality of genetic information available nor been externally tested at population-scale to show potential utility in primary prevention. Methods Using a meta-analytic approach to combine large-scale genome-wide and targeted genetic association data, we developed a new genomic risk score for CAD (metaGRS), consisting of 1.7 million genetic variants. We externally tested metaGRS, individually and in combination with available conventional risk factors, in 22,242 CAD cases and 460,387 non-cases from UK Biobank. Findings In UK Biobank, a standard deviation increase in metaGRS had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.71 (95% CI 1.68–1.73) for CAD, greater than any other externally tested genetic risk score. Individuals in the top 20% of the metaGRS distribution had a HR of 4.17 (95% CI 3.97–4.38) compared with those in the bottom 20%. The metaGRS had higher C-index (C=0.623, 95% CI 0.615–0.631) for incident CAD than any of four conventional factors (smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and body mass index), and addition of the metaGRS to a model of conventional risk factors increased C-index by 3.7%. In individuals on lipid-lowering or anti-hypertensive medications at recruitment, metaGRS hazard for incident CAD was significantly but only partially attenuated with HR of 2.83 (95% CI 2.61– 3.07) between the top and bottom 20% of the metaGRS distribution. Interpretation Recent genetic association studies have yielded enough information to meaningfully stratify individuals using the metaGRS for CAD risk in both early and later life, thus enabling targeted primary intervention in combination with conventional risk factors. The metaGRS effect was partially attenuated by lipid and blood pressure-lowering medication, however other prevention strategies will be required to fully benefit from earlier genomic risk stratification. Funding National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, British Heart Foundation, Australian Heart Foundation.This study was supported by funding from National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) grant APP1062227. Supported in part by the Victorian Government’s OIS Program. M.I. was supported by an NHMRC and Australian Heart Foundation Career Development Fellowship (no. 1061435). G.A. was supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (no. 1090462). N.J.S., C.P.N. and B.K. are supported by the British Heart Foundation and N.J.S. is a NIHR Senior Investigator. R.S.P. is supported by the British Heart Foundation (FS/14/76/30933). The MRC/BHF Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit is supported by the UK Medical Research Council [MR/L003120/1], British Heart Foundation [RG/13/13/30194], and UK National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. J.D. is a British Heart Foundation Professor and NIHR Senior Investigator

Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer among 2074 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers

Circulating proteins can reveal key pathways to cancer and identify therapeutic targets for cancer prevention. We investigate 2,074 circulating proteins and risk of nine common cancers (bladder, breast, endometrium, head and neck, lung, ovary, pancreas, kidney, and malignant non-melanoma) using cis protein Mendelian randomisation and colocalization. We conduct additional analyses to identify adverse side-effects of altering risk proteins and map cancer risk proteins to drug targets. Here we find 40 proteins associated with common cancers, such as PLAUR and risk of breast cancer [odds ratio per standard deviation increment: 2.27, 1.88-2.74], and with high-mortality cancers, such as CTRB1 and pancreatic cancer [0.79, 0.73-0.85]. We also identify potential adverse effects of protein-altering interventions to reduce cancer risk, such as hypertension. Additionally, we report 18 proteins associated with cancer risk that map to existing drugs and 15 that are not currently under clinical investigation. In sum, we identify protein-cancer links that improve our understanding of cancer aetiology. We also demonstrate that the wider consequence of any protein-altering intervention on well-being and morbidity is required to interpret any utility of proteins as potential future targets for therapeutic prevention.</p