Topical antibiotics for preventing surgical site infection in wounds healing by primary intention

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) can delay wound healing, impair cosmetic outcome and increase healthcare costs. Topical antibiotics are sometimes used to reduce microbial contaminant exposure following surgical procedures, with the aim of reducing SSIs.OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this review was to determine whether the application of topical antibiotics to surgical wounds that are healing by primary intention reduces the incidence of SSI and whether it increases the incidence of adverse outcomes (allergic contact dermatitis, infections with patterns of antibiotic resistance and anaphylaxis).SEARCH METHODS: In May 2015 we searched: the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; the Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process &amp; Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL. We also searched clinical trial registries for ongoing studies, and bibliographies of relevant publications to identify further eligible trials. There was no restriction of language, date of study or setting. The search was repeated in May 2016 to ensure currency of included studies.SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials that assessed the effects of topical antibiotics (any formulation, including impregnated dressings) in people with surgical wounds healing by primary intention were eligible for inclusion.DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies and independently extracted data. Two authors then assessed the studies for risk of bias. Risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous variables, and when a sufficient number of comparable trials were available, trials were pooled in a meta-analysis.MAIN RESULTS: A total of 10 RCTs and four quasi-randomised trials with 6466 participants met the inclusion criteria. Six studies involved minor procedures conducted in an outpatient or emergency department setting; eight studies involved major surgery conducted in theatre. Nine different topical antibiotics were included. We included two three-arm trials, two four-arm trials and 10 two-arm trials. The control groups comprised; an alternative topical antibiotic (two studies), topical antiseptic (six studies) and no topical antibiotic (10 studies), which comprised inert ointment (five studies) no treatment (four studies) and one study with one arm of each.The risk of bias of the 14 studies varied. Seven studies were at high risk of bias, five at unclear risk of bias and two at low risk of bias. Most risk of bias concerned risk of selection bias.Twelve of the studies (6259 participants) reported infection rates, although we could not extract the data for this outcome from one study. Four studies (3334 participants) measured allergic contact dermatitis as an outcome. Four studies measured positive wound swabs for patterns of antimicrobial resistance, for which there were no outcomes reported. No episodes of anaphylaxis were reported. Topical antibiotic versus no topical antibioticWe pooled the results of eight trials (5427 participants) for the outcome of SSI. Topical antibiotics probably reduce the risk of SSI in people with surgical wounds healing by primary intention compared with no topical antibiotic (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.87; moderate-quality evidence downgraded once for risk of bias). This equates to 20 fewer SSIs per 1000 patients treated with topical antibiotics (95% CI 7 to 29) and a number needed to treat for one additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) (i.e. prevention of one SSI) of 50.We pooled the results of three trials (3012 participants) for the outcome of allergic contact dermatitis, however this comparison was underpowered, and it is unclear whether topical antibiotics affect the risk of allergic contact dermatitis (RR 3.94, 95% CI 0.46 to 34.00; very low-quality evidence, downgraded twice for risk of bias, once for imprecision). Topical antibiotic versus antiseptic We pooled the results of five trials (1299 participants) for the outcome of SSI. Topical antibiotics probably reduce the risk of SSI in people with surgical wounds healing by primary intention compared with using topical antiseptics (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.80; moderate-quality evidence downgraded once for risk of bias). This equates to 43 fewer SSIs per 1000 patients treated with topical antibiotics instead of antiseptics (95% CI 17 to 59) and an NNTB of 24.We pooled the results of two trials (541 participants) for the outcome of allergic contact dermatitis; there was no clear difference in the risk of dermatitis between topical antibiotics and antiseptics, however this comparison was underpowered and a difference cannot be ruled out (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.82; very low-quality evidence, downgraded twice for risk of bias and once for imprecision). Topical antibiotic versus topical antibioticOne study (99 participants) compared mupirocin ointment with a combination ointment of neomycin/polymyxin B/bacitracin zinc for the outcome of SSI. There was no clear difference in the risk of SSI, however this comparison was underpowered (very low-quality evidence downgraded twice for risk of bias, once for imprecision).A four-arm trial involved two antibiotic arms (neomycin sulfate/bacitracin zinc/polymyxin B sulphate combination ointment versus bacitracin zinc, 219 participants). There was no clear difference in risk of SSI between the combination ointment and the bacitracin zinc ointment. The quality of evidence for this outcome was low, downgraded once for risk of bias, and once for imprecision.AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Topical antibiotics applied to surgical wounds healing by primary intention probably reduce the risk of SSI relative to no antibiotic, and relative to topical antiseptics (moderate quality evidence). We are unable to draw conclusions regarding the effects of topical antibiotics on adverse outcomes such as allergic contact dermatitis due to lack of statistical power (small sample sizes). We are also unable to draw conclusions regarding the impact of increasing topical antibiotic use on antibiotic resistance. The relative effects of different topical antibiotics are unclear.</p

Erwartungen, Training und Evaluation von intensivmedizinischem Krankenhauspersonal in Bezug auf Simulationskurse in Deutschland - Entwicklung eines relevanten Trainingskonzeptes

Objective: Increasingly, intensive care units (ICU) are operated by teams of physicians and nurses with specialist training in anaesthesia and intensive care. The aims of our study were to evaluate any prior experience, expectations and the requisites for interprofessional ICU simulation-based training (SBT), and to evaluate a newly designed training course incorporating these findings.Methods: The study was laid out as a cross-sectional study and is projected in three steps. First, questionnaires were sent out to ICU nurses and physicians from 15 different hospitals in a greater metropolitan area (> million citizens). Based upon this survey a one-day ICU simulator course designed for 12 participants (6 nurses and 6 physicians) was developed, with evaluation data from four subsequent courses being analysed.Results: In the survey 40% of nurses and 57% of the physicians had had prior exposure to SBT. Various course formats were explored with respect to duration, day of the week, and group composition. After completing the course, the majority deemed a full working day in interprofessional setting to be most appropriate (p1 Millionen Einwohner Versorgungsgebiet) geschickt. Auf Basis der Ergebnisse wurde ein Simulationskurs mit dem Schwerpunkt "Arbeit auf der Intensivstation" für je 12 Teilnehmer (6 Pflegekräfte und 6 Ärzte) entwickeln und schließlich mit Hilfe der Teilnehmer evaluiert.Ergebnisse: In der Befragung gaben 40% des Pflegepersonals und 57% der Ärzte Vorerfahrungen mit Simulationstrainings an. Verschiedene Kursformate hinsichtlich Dauer, Veranstaltungstag und Zusammensetzung des Teilnehmerfeldes zur Bewertung vorgeschlagen. Die Teilnehmer bewerteten die Organisation als Ein-Tages-Kurs mit einer interprofessionellen Zusammensetzung als adäquat. Die vorgeschlagenen Szenarios wurden als relevant beurteilt und ein positiver Einfluss auf Kommunikation, Arbeitsabläufe und Stressverarbeitung angenommen.Schlussfolgerung: Aktuell ist ein Simulationstraining kein regelhaft eingesetztes Trainingsinstrument auf deutschen Intensivstationen für die Weiter- und Fortbildung des Personals. Die geringe Erfahrung des Personals muss in die Trainingsplanung und Vorbereitung der Kurse berücksichtigt werden. Wir haben einen Trainingskurs mit Bezug zu non-technical Skills für Intensivstationen und klinisch relevanten Inhalten entwickelt. Die Teilnehmer werteten den Kurs als relevant für die tägliche Arbeit, schätzen den Einfluss auf Arbeitsabläufe positiv ein und wünschten sich längere Trainingseinheiten

The beta-adrenergic receptor agonist, terbutaline, reduces UVB-induced mechanical sensitization in humans

Objectives Previously, we found in cultures of primary neurons and in animals that sensitized primary neurons can be desensitized by treatment with e.g. beta-adrenergic receptor agonists. We now tested whether also in human sensitization such as UVB-radiation induced sunburn-like hyperalgesia can be reduced by intradermal injection of the beta-adrenergic receptor agonist terbutaline. Methods In our prospective randomized study, 17 participants received an individual UVB dose to cause a defined local sunburn-like erythema at four locations, two on each forearm. Twenty-four hours later, the sensitized four areas were injected intradermally with terbutaline pH 4.3, terbutaline pH 7.0, saline pH 4.3 or saline pH 7.0, respectively. Pain thresholds were examined before and after induction of UVB-sensitization, and 15, 30 and 60 min after injection of the respective solution. Mechanical pain thresholds of the skin and of deeper tissues were determined by pinprick and pressure algometer measurements, respectively. Results UVB-irradiation decreased mechanical pain thresholds for pinprick and pressure algometer measurements demonstrating a successful sunburn-like sensitization. Intradermal injection of terbutaline pH 7.0 into the sensitized skin reduced the sensitization for all measured timepoints as determined by pinprick measurements. Pinprick measurements of sensitization were not reduced by injection of terbutaline pH 4.3, saline solution pH 7.0 or saline solution pH 4.3. Also, sensitization of deeper tissue nociceptors were not altered by any of the injections as measured with the pressure algometer. Conclusions Similar to our cellular observations, also in humans beta-adrenergic agonists such as terbutaline can reduce the sensitization of primary neurons in the skin. Significance We previously showed in model systems that beta-adrenergic stimulation can not only sensitize but also desensitize nociceptors. Our study shows that also in humans beta-adrenergic agonists desensitize if injected into UVB-sensitized skin. This indicates an analgesic activity of adrenergic agonists in addition to their vasoconstrictory function