318 research outputs found

    Gemcitabine as frontline treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: phase II study of 32 patients.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND. Based on the activity of gemcitabine in heavily pretreated patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), the objective of the current study was to determine the role of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced, untreated CTCL. METHODS. Between June 2002 and February 2004, 32 untreated patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) (n = 26 patients); peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified (PTCLU) with exclusive skin involvement (n = 5 patients); and Sezary syndrome (SS) (n = 1 patient) were enrolled in a 7-institution, Phase II trial and treated with gemcitabine. This drug was given on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day schedule at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes for a total of 6 cycles. RESULTS. Of the 32 patients studied, 7 (22%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 17 (53%) achieved a partial response (PR), whereas the remaining 8 patients showed no benefit from the treatment. Five of the CRs were confirmed histologically. The CR and PR rates were found to be the same for patients with MF and PTCLU, respectively. The median duration of CR was 10 months (range, 4-22 mos). Treatment appeared to be well tolerated; hematologic toxicity was mild and no nausea/emesis or organ toxicity was noted. CONCLUSIONS. The results of the current Phase II study demonstrate the activity of gemcitabine as a single agent in untreated CTCL patients. Further studies using gemcitabine in combination, either contemporary or sequentially, with other drugs in patients with advanced stage, untreated CTCL are needed

    Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management

    Full text link
    Disease OverviewCutaneous T‐cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a heterogenous group of T‐cell neoplasms involving the skin, the majority of which may be classified as Mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS).DiagnosisThe diagnosis of MF or SS requires the integration of clinical and histopathologic data.Risk‐Adapted TherapyTNMB (tumor, node, metastasis, blood) staging remains the most important prognostic factor in MF/SS and forms the basis for a “risk‐adapted,” multi‐disciplinary approach to treatment. For patients with disease limited to the skin, skin‐directed therapies are preferred, as both disease‐specific and overall survival for these patients is favorable. In contrast, patients with advanced‐stage disease with significant nodal, visceral or blood involvement are generally approached with systemic therapies. These include biologic‐response modifiers, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, or antibody‐based strategies, in an escalating fashion. In highly‐selected patients, allogeneic stem‐cell transplantation may be considered, as this may be curative in some patients.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151292/1/ajh25577_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151292/2/ajh25577.pd

    The Italian Consensus Conference on Diagnostic Criteria for Myelofibrosis with Myeloid Metaplasia

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this work was to develop a definition of myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) using diagnostic criteria that would remain valid within the set of patients with chronic myeloproliferative disorders or myelodysplastic syndromes. A list of 12 names for the disease and 37 diagnostic criteria were proposed to a Consensus Panel of 12 Italian experts who ranked them in order so as to identify a core set of criteria. The Panel was then asked to score the diagnosis of 46 patient profiles as appropriate or not appropriate for MMM. Using the experts' consensus as the gold standard, the performance of 90 possible definitions of the disease obtained through the core set was evaluated. 'Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia' ranked as the preferred name of the disease. Necessary criteria consisted of 'diffuse bone marrow fibrosis' and 'absence of Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL rearrangement in peripheral blood cells'. The six optional criteria in the core set consisted of: splenomegaly of any grade; anisopoikilocytosis with tear-drop erythrocytes; the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells; the presence of circulating erythroblasts: the presence of clusters of megakaryoblasts and anomalous megakaryocytes in bone marrow sections; myeloid metaplasia. The definition of the disease with the highest final score was as follows: necessary criteria plus any other two criteria when splenomegaly is present or any four when splenomegaly is absent. The use of this definition will help to standardize the conduct and reporting of clinical studies and should help practitioners in clinical practic

    Thrombocytopenia and Mortality Risk in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis From the START Registry

    Get PDF
    Background: Thrombocytopenia is associated with increased mortality in the general population, but few data exist in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking oral anticoagulants. We investigated factor determinants of thrombocytopenia in a large cohort of patients affected by AF and its association with total mortality. Methods and Results: Multicenter prospective cohort study, including 5215 patients with AF from the START (Survey on Anticoagulated Patients Register) registry, 3877 (74.3%) and 1338 (25.7%) on vitamin K or non\u2013vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, respectively. Thrombocytopenia was defined by a platelet count <150 7109/L. Determinants of thrombocytopenia were investigated, and all-cause mortality was the primary survival end point of the study. Thrombocytopenia was present in 592 patients (11.4%). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, chronic kidney disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.257; P=0.030), active cancer (OR, 2.065; P=0.001), liver cirrhosis (OR, 7.635; P<0.001), and the use of diuretics (OR, 1.234; P=0.046) were positively associated with thrombocytopenia, whereas female sex (OR, 0.387; P<0.001) and the use of calcium channel blockers (OR, 0.787; P=0.032) were negatively associated. During a median follow-up of 19.2 months (9942 patient-years), 391 deaths occurred (rate, 3.93%/year). Mortality rate increased from 3.8%/year to 9.9%/year in patients with normal platelet count and in those with moderate-severe thrombocytopenia, respectively (log-rank test, P=0.009). The association between moderate-severe thrombocytopenia and mortality persisted after adjustment for CHA2DS2 VASc score (hazard ratio, 2.431; 95% CI, 1.254\u20134.713; P=0.009), but not in the fully adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis model. Conclusions: Thrombocytopenia is common in patients with AF. Despite an increased incidence of mortality, thrombocytopenia was not associated with mortality at multivariable analysis. Thrombocytopenia may reflect the presence of comorbidities associated with poor survival in AF

    Managing chronic myeloid leukemia for treatment-free remission: a proposal from the GIMEMA CML WP

    Get PDF
    Several papers authored by international experts have proposed recommendations on the management of BCR-ABL1+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Following these recommendations, survival of CML patients has become very close to normal. The next, ambitious, step is to bring as many patients as possible into a condition of treatment-free remission (TFR). The Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA; Italian Group for Hematologic Diseases of the Adult) CML Working Party (WP) has developed a project aimed at selecting the treatment policies that may increase the probability of TFR, taking into account 4 variables: the need for TFR, the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the characteristics of leukemia, and the patient. A Delphi-like method was used to reach a consensus among the representatives of 50 centers of the CML WP. A consensus was reached on the assessment of disease risk (EUTOS Long Term Survival [ELTS] score), on the definition of the most appropriate age boundaries for the choice of first-line treatment, on the choice of the TKI for first-line treatment, and on the definition of the responses that do not require a change of the TKI (BCR-ABL1 6410% at 3 months, 641% at 6 months, 640.1% at 12 months, 640.01% at 24 months), and of the responses that require a change of the TKI, when the goal is TFR (BCR-ABL1 >10% at 3 and 6 months, >1% at 12 months, and >0.1% at 24 months). These suggestions may help optimize the treatment strategy for TFR
    corecore