Spironolactone dose in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: findings from TOPCAT

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163454/2/ejhf1909_am.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163454/1/ejhf1909.pd

Coronary bypass surgery with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction

Coronary bypass surgery with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction. Jones RH, Velazquez EJ, Michler RE, Sopko G, Oh JK, O'Connor CM, Hill JA, Menicanti L, Sadowski Z, Desvigne-Nickens P, Rouleau JL, Lee KL; STICH Hypothesis 2 Investigators. Collaborators (379)Bochenek A, Krejca M, Trusz-Gluza M, Wita K, Zembala M, Przybylski R, Kukulski T, Cherniavsky A, Marchenko A, Romanov A, Wos S, Deja M, Golba K, Kot J, Rao V, Iwanochko M, Renton J, Hemeon S, Rogowski J, Rynkiewicz A, Betlejewski P, Sun B, Crestanello J, Binkley P, Chang J, Ferrazzi P, Gavazzi A, Senni M, Sadowski J, Kapelak B, Sobczyk D, Wrobel K, Pirk J, Jandova R, Velazquez E, Smith P, Milano C, Adams P, Menicanti L, Di Donato M, Castelvecchio S, Dagenais F, Dussault G, Dupree C, Sheridan B, Schuler C, Yii M, Prior D, Mack J, Racine N, Bouchard D, Ducharme A, Lavoignat J, Maurer G, Grimm M, Lang I, Adlbrecht C, Religa Z, Biederman A, Szwed H, Sadowski Z, Rajda M, Ali I, Howlett J, MacFarlane M, Siepe M, Beyersdorf F, Cuerten C, Wiechowski S, Mokrzycki K, Hill J, Beaver T, Olitsky D, Bernstein V, Janusz M, O'Neill V, Grayburn P, Hebeler R, Hamman B, Aston S, Gradinac S, Vukovic M, Djokovic L, Benetis R, Jankauskiene L, Friedrich I, Buerke M, Paraforos A, Quaini E, Cirillo M, Chua L, Lim C, Kwok B, Kong S, Stefanelli G, Labia C, Bergh C, Gustafsson C, Daly R, Rodeheffer R, Nelson S, Maitland A, Isaac D, Holland M, Di Benedetto G, Attisano T, Sievers H, Schunkert H, Stierle U, Haddad H, Hendry P, Donaldson J, Birjiniuk V, Harrington M, Nawarawong W, Woragidpunpol S, Kuanprasert S, Mekara W, Konda S, Neva C, Hathaway W, Groh M, Blakely J, Lamy A, Demers C, Rizzo T, Drazner M, DiMaio J, Joy J, Benedik J, Marketa K, Beghi C, De Blasi M, Helou J, Dallaire S, Kron I, Kern J, Bergin J, Phillips J, Aldea G, Verrier E, Harrison L, Piegas L, Paulista P, Farsky P, Veiga-Kantorowitz C, Philippides G, Shemin R, Thompson J, White H, Alison P, Stewart R, Clapham T, Rich J, Herre J, Pine L, Kalil R, Nesralla I, Santos M, Pereira de Moraes M, Michler R, Swayze R, Arnold M, McKenzie N, Smith J, Nicolau J, Oliveira S, Stolf N, Ferraz M, Filgueira J, Batlle C, Rocha A, Gurgel Camara A, Huynh T, Cecere R, Finkenbine S, St-Jacques B, Ilton M, Wittstein I, Conte J, Breton E, Panza J, Boyce S, McNulty M, Starnes V, Lopez B, Biederman R, Magovern J, Dean D, Grant S, Hammon J, Wells G, De Pasquale C, Knight J, Healy H, Maia L, Souza A, McRae R, Pierson M, Gullestad L, Sorensen G, Murphy E, Ravichandran P, Avalos K, Horowitz J, Owen E, Ascheim D, Naka Y, Yushak M, Gerometta P, Arena V, Borghini E, Johnsson P, Ekmehag B, Engels K, Rosenblum W, Swayze R, Amanullah A, Krzeminska-Pakula M, Drozdz J, Larbalestier R, Wang X, Busmann C, Horkay F, Szekely L, Keltai M, Hetzer R, Knosalla C, Nienkarken T, Chiariello L, Nardi P, Arom K, Ruengsakulrach P, Hayward C, Jansz P, Stuart S, Oto O, Sariomanoglu O, Dignan R, French J, Gonzalez M, Edes I, Szathmarine V, Yakub M, Sarip S, Alotti N, Lupkovics G, Smedira N, Pryce J, Cokkinos D, Palatianos G, Kremastinos D, Stewart R, Rinkes L, Esrig B, Baptiste M, Booth D, Ramaiah C, Ferraris V, Menon S, Martin L, Couper G, Rosborough D, Vanhaecke J, Strijckmans A, Carson P, Dupree C, Miller A, Pina I, Selzman C, Wertheimer J, Goldstein S, Cohn F, Hlatky M, Kennedy K, Rankin S, Robbins R, Zaret B, Rouleau J, Desvigne-Nickens P, Jones R, Lee K, Michler R, O'Connor C, Oh J, Rankin G, Velazquez E, Hill J, Beyersdorf F, Bonow R, Desvigne-Nickens P, Jones R, Lee K, Oh J, Panza J, Rouleau J, Sadowski Z, Velazquez E, White H, Jones R, Velazquez E, O'Connor C, Rankin G, Sellers M, Sparrow-Parker B, McCormick A, Albright J, Dandridge R, Rittenhouse L, Wagstaff D, Wakeley N, Burns S, Williams M, Bailey D, Parrish L, Daniels H, Grissom G, Medlin K, Lee K, She L, McDaniel A, Lokhnygina Y, Greene D, Moore V, Pohost G, Agarwal S, Apte P, Bahukha P, Chow M, Chu X, Doyle M, Forder J, Ocon M, Reddy V, Santos N, Tripathi R, Varadarajan P, Oh J, Blahnik F, Bruce C, Lin G, Manahan B, Miller D, Miller F, Pellikka P, Springer R, Welper J, Wiste H, Mark D, Anstrom K, Baloch K, Burnette A, Clapp-Channing N, Cowper P, Davidson-Ray N, Drew L, Harding T, Hunt V, Knight D, Patterson A, Redick T, Sanderford B, Feldman A, Bristow M, Chan T, Diamond M, Maisel A, Mann D, McNamara D, Bonow R, Berman D, Helmer D, Holly T, Leonard S, Woods M, Panza J, McNulty M, Grayburn P, Aston S. SourceDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. [email protected] Abstract BACKGROUND: Surgical ventricular reconstruction is a specific procedure designed to reduce left ventricular volume in patients with heart failure caused by coronary artery disease. We conducted a trial to address the question of whether surgical ventricular reconstruction added to coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) would decrease the rate of death or hospitalization for cardiac causes, as compared with CABG alone. METHODS: Between September 2002 and January 2006, a total of 1000 patients with an ejection fraction of 35% or less, coronary artery disease that was amenable to CABG, and dominant anterior left ventricular dysfunction that was amenable to surgical ventricular reconstruction were randomly assigned to undergo either CABG alone (499 patients) or CABG with surgical ventricular reconstruction (501 patients). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause and hospitalization for cardiac causes. The median follow-up was 48 months. RESULTS: Surgical ventricular reconstruction reduced the end-systolic volume index by 19%, as compared with a reduction of 6% with CABG alone. Cardiac symptoms and exercise tolerance improved from baseline to a similar degree in the two study groups. However, no significant difference was observed in the primary outcome, which occurred in 292 patients (59%) who were assigned to undergo CABG alone and in 289 patients (58%) who were assigned to undergo CABG with surgical ventricular reconstruction (hazard ratio for the combined approach, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.17; P=0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Adding surgical ventricular reconstruction to CABG reduced the left ventricular volume, as compared with CABG alone. However, this anatomical change was not associated with a greater improvement in symptoms or exercise tolerance or with a reduction in the rate of death or hospitalization for cardiac causes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00023595.

Impact of Achieved Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial

n/

Serum potassium in the PARADIGM-HF trial

Aims: The associations between potassium level and outcomes, the effect of sacubitril–valsartan on potassium level, and whether potassium level modified the effect of sacubitril–valsartan in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction were studied in PARADIGM‐HF. Several outcomes, including cardiovascular death, sudden death, pump failure death, non‐cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization, were examined. Methods and results: A total of 8399 patients were randomized to either enalapril or sacubitril–valsartan. Potassium level at randomization and follow‐up was examined as a continuous and categorical variable (≤3.5, 3.6–4.0, 4.1–4.9, 5.0–5.4 and ≥5.5 mmol/L) in various statistical models. Hyperkalaemia was defined as K+ ≥5.5 mmol/L and hypokalaemia as K+ ≤3.5 mmol/L. Compared with potassium 4.1–4.9 mmol/L, both hypokalaemia [hazard ratio (HR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.84–3.14] and hyperkalaemia (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10–1.83) were associated with a higher risk for cardiovascular death. However, potassium abnormalities were similarly associated with sudden death and pump failure death, as well as non‐cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization. Sacubitril–valsartan had no effect on potassium overall. The benefit of sacubitril–valsartan over enalapril was consistent across the range of baseline potassium levels. Conclusions: Although both higher and lower potassium levels were independent predictors of cardiovascular death, potassium abnormalities may mainly be markers rather than mediators of risk for death

Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on investigator-reported ventricular arrhythmias in PARADIGM-HF

Background: Sudden death is a leading cause of mortality in HFrEF. In PARADIGM-HF, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the incidence of sudden death. The purpose of this post hoc study was to analyze the effect of sacubitril/valsartan, compared to enalapril, on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: Adverse event reports related to ventricular arrhythmias were examined in PARADIGM-HF. The effect of randomized treatment on two arrhythmia outcomes was analyzed: ventricular arrhythmias and the composite of a ventricular arrhythmia, ICD shock or resuscitated cardiac arrest. The risk of death related to a ventricular arrhythmia was examined in time-updated models. The interaction between heart failure aetiology, or baseline ICD/CRT-D use, and the effect of sacubitril/valsartan was analyzed. Results: Of the 8399 participants, 333 (4.0%) reported a ventricular arrhythmia and 372 (4.4%) the composite arrhythmia outcome. Ventricular arrhythmias were associated with higher mortality. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of a ventricular arrhythmia [HR 0.76 (0.62–0.95); p = 0.015] and the composite arrhythmia outcome [HR 0.79 (0.65–0.97); p = 0.025]. The treatment effect was maintained after adjustment and accounting for the competing risk of death. Baseline ICD/CRT-D use did not modify effect of sacubitril/valsartan, but aetiology did: HR in patients with an ischaemic aetiology 0.93 (0.71–1.21) versus 0.53 (0.37–0.78) in those without an ischaemic aetiology (p for interaction = 0.020). Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan reduced the incidence of investigator-reported ventricular arrhythmias in patients with HFrEF. This effect may have been greater in patients with a non-ischaemic aetiology