Br J Haematol

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare haemorrhagic disease characterised by new-onset haemorrhagic symptoms associated with a dramatic decrease in factor VIII levels and an anti-factor VIII neutralising autoantibody concentration >0.6 Bethesda units. Elderly people are often affected, whereas children are rarely affected; the paediatric incidence reported in the literature is about 0.045 case/million/year. For some time, the paediatric standard of care has been that for adults, but clinicians have often reported poor outcomes. Here, we describe the largest retrospective paediatric AHA cohort assembled to date, including eight patients diagnosed in France from 2000 to 2020

Dilemmas on emicizumab in children with haemophilia A: A survey of strategies from PedNet centres.

INTRODUCTION Haemophilia A care has changed with the introduction of emicizumab. Experience on the youngest children is still scarce and clinical practice varies between haemophilia treatment centres. AIM We aimed to assess the current clinical practice on emicizumab prophylaxis within PedNet, a collaborative research platform for paediatricians treating children with haemophilia. METHODS An electronic survey was sent to all PedNet members (n = 32) between October 2022 and February 2023. The survey included questions on the availability of emicizumab, on the practice of initiating prophylaxis in previously untreated or minimally treated patients (PUPs or MTPs) and emicizumab use in patients with or without inhibitors. RESULTS All but four centres (28/32; 88%) responded. Emicizumab was available in clinical practice in 25/28 centres (89%), and in 3/28 for selected patients only (e.g. with inhibitors). Emicizumab was the preferred choice for prophylaxis in PUPs or MTPs in 20/25 centres; most (85%) started emicizumab prophylaxis before 1 year of age (30% before 6 months of age) and without concomitant FVIII (16/20; 80%). After the loading dose, 13/28 centres administered the recommended dosing, while the others adjusted the interval of injections to give whole vials. In inhibitor patients, the use of emicizumab during ITI was common, with low-dose ITI being the preferred protocol. CONCLUSION Most centres choose to initiate prophylaxis with emicizumab before 12 months of age and without concomitant FVIII. In inhibitor patients, ITI is mostly given in addition to emicizumab, but there was no common practice on how to proceed after successful ITI

Blood

Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) is a rare inherited platelet function disorder caused by a quantitative and/or qualitative defect of the αIIbβ3 integrin. Pregnancy and delivery is a recognized risk period for bleeding in women with GT. The newborn may also be affected by fetal and neonatal immune thrombocytopenia induced by the transplacental passage of maternal anti-αIIbβ3 antibodies, which can lead to severe hemorrhage and fetal loss. Pregnancy in GT women thus requires a multidisciplinary approach, including prepregnancy counseling, and a treatment plan for delivery for both the mother and child. In this article, we summarize the current knowledge on pregnancy in women with GT and describe how we manage this severe platelet disorder in our clinical practice

Evaluation of Algorithms for the Treatment of Problem Bleeding Episodes in Patients With Hemophilia Having Inhibitors.

The correlation between real-world clinical decisions and adherence to published treatment algorithms for problem bleeding episodes in patients with severe hemophilia and inhibitors and the resultant impact on clinical outcomes were assessed. Nine cases documenting treatment for problem bleeding episodes in patients with severe hemophilia and inhibitors were retrospectively reviewed. Adherence to treatment algorithms was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being no adherence and 5 being very high adherence. Adherence ratings >3 were assigned to 7 cases in which high adherence was associated with ≤4 days to achieve hemostatic control; hospitalization for ≤7 days was noted in 6 of these cases. In cases rated ≤3 (n = 2), time to hemostatic control ranged from 5 to 8 days and hospitalization duration ranged from 10 to 16 days. These findings suggest that adherence to treatment algorithms may be beneficial in treating problem bleeding events in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors

New insights into the treatment of Glanzmann thrombasthenia

AbstractGlanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) is a rare inherited autosomal recessive bleeding disorder of platelet function caused by a quantitative or qualitative defect of platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (integrin αIIbβ3), a fibrinogen receptor required for platelet aggregation. Bleeds in GT are variable and may be severe and unpredictable. Bleeding not responsive to local and adjunctive measures, as well as surgical procedures, is treated with platelets, recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), or antifibrinolytics, alone or in combination. Although platelets are the standard treatment for GT, their use is associated with the risk of blood-borne infection transmission and may also cause the development of platelet antibodies (to human leukocyte antigens and/or αIIbβ3), potentially resulting in platelet refractoriness. Currently, where rFVIIa is approved for use in GT, this is mostly for patients with platelet antibodies and/or a history of platelet refractoriness. However, data from the prospective Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia Registry (829 bleeds and 206 procedures in 218 GT patients) show that rFVIIa was frequently used in nonsurgical and surgical bleeds, with high efficacy rates, irrespective of platelet antibodies/refractoriness status. The mechanisms underpinning rFVIIa effectiveness in GT have been studied. At therapeutic concentrations, rFVIIa binds to activated platelets and directly activates FX to FXa, resulting in a burst of thrombin generation. Thrombin converts fibrinogen to fibrin and also enhances GT platelet adhesion and aggregation mediated by the newly converted (polymeric) fibrin, leading to primary hemostasis at the wound site. In addition, thrombin improves the final clot structure and activates thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor to decrease clot lysis

Identifying Nonresponsive Bleeding Episodes in Patients With Haemophilia and Inhibitors: A Consensus Definition

International audienceIntroduction: Assessing response to treatment with bypassing agents presents a substantial challenge in the treatment of patients with haemophilia and inhibitors. Rapid and accurate identification of bleeding episodes that are nonresponsive to bypassing therapy with either Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA; Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria) or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven®, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) is essential to guide treatment decisions and optimise patient outcomes through early intervention. Although both bypassing agents are effective, differential responses to therapy necessitate multiple therapeutic options. Aim: This paper provides a consensus definition for non-life-threatening joint and muscle bleeds that are nonresponsive to bypassing agents. Methods: An international panel of 7 physicians met in December 2008 to develop the consensus definition using a modified National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference method. Results: The consequent definition of non-life-threatening bleeding episodes that are nonresponsive to bypassing treatment provides a global picture of the condition of the patient during such an event. Identification of nonresponsiveness is based on various criteria: pain, swelling/tension, mobility, patient perception, and laboratory parameters. Criteria can be assessed subjectively by the patient/parent, and/or objectively by the clinician. Although the precise timing of each determination should be at the discretion of the physician, bleeds should be considered nonresponsive if the clinical situation meets the specified criteria 24 hours from the start of treatment. Conclusion: Although it is not intended to replace clinical judgment, this definition can guide the optimal course of treatment for patients with haemophilia and inhibitors

Cancer detection and management in patients with haemophilia: A retrospective European multicentre study

Lymphomas or hepatocarcinomas related to blood-borne transmitted diseases are well-known malignancies in persons with haemophilia (PWH). However, rising life expectancy has increased the number of PWH suffering from other malignancies. This study aimed to collect cancer occurrence data in PWH followed in five European haemophilia treatment centres (Brussels, Geneva, Marseille, Montpellier and Paris-Bicêtre) over the last 10 years and to analyse some particular features of cancer occurring in PWH. In total, 45 malignancies were diagnosed in 1067 PWH. The most common malignancies were hepatocellular carcinoma (12/45) and urogenital tract tumours (9/45). Bleeding at presentation or changes in bleeding pattern was indicative of cancer in four patients. Three patients with mild haemophilia developed anti-factor VIII inhibitors after intensive substitution therapy prior to surgery or invasive procedures. There was no bleeding associated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. A few bleeding complications occurred following invasive (3/39) or surgical procedures (2/27) as a result of insufficient hemostatic coverage or in spite of adequate substitution. No bleeding was noted after liver or prostate biopsies. Following cancer diagnosis, five patients were switched from on-demand to prolonged prophylaxis substitution. In the majority of cases, the standard cancer treatment protocol was not modified on account of concomitant haemophilia. Thus, oncological treatments are not contraindicated and should not be withheld in PWH assuming that adequate haemostasis correction is undertaken. As shown by our study results, a change in bleeding pattern in adult PWH should raise suspicion of a malignancy. Intensive substitution must be considered a risk factor for inhibitor development. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Partnering to change the world for people with haemophilia: 6(th) Haemophilia Global Summit, Prague, Czech Republic, 24-26(th) September 2015

The 6(th) Haemophilia Global Summit was held in Prague, Czech Republic, in September 2015. The programme was designed by an independent Scientific Steering Committee of haemophilia experts and aimed to share optimal management strategies for haemophilia at all life stages, explore recent potential advances in the management of haemophilia A and B and discuss challenges in haemophilia care. In this supplement from the meeting, Dan Hart reviews the lessons that can be learnt from cost-constrained environments with regard to improving care for people with haemophilia globally. Sébastien Lobet discusses the importance of physical activity for optimising care and Roseline d'Oiron and Jan Blatný consider the role of real-world data in understanding the effect of treatment in a clinical setting over the long term and the true impact of treatment on the day-to-day life of the patient. Gili Kenet addresses the current challenges relating to the optimal management of prophylaxis, and Gerry Dolan and Cedric Hermans discuss the value of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in informing treatment decisions. Cedric Hermans and Valérie Libotte explore the importance of considering social and occupational development factors as an integral part of haemophilia care, and Jan Astermark reviews key strategies to predict and prevent inhibitor development

Deletion of alanine 2201 in the FVIII C2 domain results in mild hemophilia A by impairing FVIII binding to VWF and phospholipids and destroys a major FVIII antigenic determinant involved in inhibitor development

The C2 domain of factor VIII (FVIII) mediates FVIII binding to von Willebrand factor (VWF) and phospholipids (PLs), thereby determining the stability and the activity of FVIII. A deletion of Ala2201 (Del2201) was identified in the FVIII C2 domain of 2 unrelated patients with mild hemophilia A (FVIII:C 11%-33%). This mutation prevents FVIII binding to a human monoclonal antibody recognizing the C2 domain and inhibiting FVIII binding to VWF and phospholipids. By comparison to healthy FVIII, Del2201 FVIII had a significantly reduced binding to VWF, which likely contributes to reduced FVIII levels in plasma. Del2201 FVIII interaction with phospholipids was evaluated in an FXa generation assay, using various concentrations of synthetic phospholipid vesicles mimicking an activated platelet surface. At the lowest phospholipid concentration allowing FXa generation, Del2201 FVIII activity was reduced 3-fold. This is the first report of a mutation altering FVIII binding to phospholipids and occurring in patients with hemophilia A.status: publishe

Recombinant factor VIII products and inhibitor development in previously untreated boys with severe hemophilia A.

International audienceSix recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products have been marketed worldwide. In 2013, the Research of Determinants of Inhibitor Development (RODIN) study group reported an unexpectedly high risk of inhibitor development with a second-generation full-length rFVIII (Product D) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A (HA). In 1994, French public health authorities established a prospective cohort to monitor hemophilia treatment safety. A PUP subgroup was designed to investigate inhibitor risk factors. We analyzed this subcohort in view of the RODIN findings. After excluding 50 patients who participated in the RODIN study, the primary analysis focused on 303 boys with severe HA first treated with a rFVIII product. A clinically significant inhibitor was detected in 114 boys (37.6%). The inhibitor incidence was higher with Product D vs the most widely used rFVIII product (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-2.49). Similar results were found for high-titer inhibitors and in 10 sensitivity analyses. No heterogeneity was observed between RODIN and our results. Combined aHRs were 1.58 (95% CI, 1.17-2.14) for all inhibitors and 1.70 (95% CI, 1.15-2.52) for high-titer inhibitors. Our results confirm the higher immunogenicity of Product D vs other rFVIII products in PUPs with severe HA