462 research outputs found
Study Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Navigation-Activation to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities
Abstract Background Cancer health disparities affecting low-income and minority patients are well documented. Root-causes are multifactorial, including diagnostic and treatment delays, social and financial barriers, and poor communication. Patient navigation and communication coaching (activation) are potential interventions to address disparities in cancer treatment. The purpose of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of an intervention combining patient navigation and activation to improve cancer treatment. Methods/Design The Rochester Patient Navigation Research Program (PNRP) is a National Cancer Institute-sponsored, patient-level randomized trial (RCT) of patient navigation and activation, targeting newly-diagnosed breast and colorectal cancer patients in Rochester, NY. The goal of the program is to decrease cancer health disparities by addressing barriers to receipt of cancer care and promoting patient self-efficacy. The intervention uses trained, paraprofessional patient navigators recruited from the target community, and a detailed training and supervisory program. Recruited patients are randomly assigned to receive either usual care (except for baseline and follow-up questionnaires and interviews) or intervention. The intervention patients receive tailored assistance from their patient navigators, including phone calls, in-person meetings, and behind-the-scenes coordination of care. A total of 344 patients have been recruited. Outcomes measured at three month intervals include timeliness of care, patient adherence, patient satisfaction, quality of life, self-efficacy, health literacy, and cancer knowledge. Discussion This unique intervention combining patient navigation and patient activation is designed to address the multifactorial problem of cancer health disparities. If successful, this study will affect the design and implementation of patient navigation programs. Trials Registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00496678http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78254/1/1471-2407-10-551.xmlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78254/2/1471-2407-10-551.pdfPeer Reviewe
Can consumers learn to ask three questions to improve shared decision making? A feasibility study of the ASK (AskShareKnow) Patient–Clinician Communication Model® intervention in a primary health-care setting
Funded by Informed Medical Decisions Foundation. Grant Number: #0175-1 National Health and Medical Research Council Public Health Training Fellowship. Grant Number: 568962Peer reviewedPublisher PD
Parent-Reported Homework Problems in the MTA Study: Evidence for Sustained Improvement with Behavioral Treatment
Parent-report of child homework problems was examined as a treatment outcome variable in the
MTA-Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
Five hundred seventy-nine children ages 7.0 to 9.9 were randomly assigned to either medication
management, behavioral treatment, combination treatment, or routine community care. Results showed that
only participants who received behavioral treatment (behavioral and combined treatment) demonstrated
sustained improvements in homework problems in comparison to routine community care. The magnitude of
the sustained effect at the 10-month follow-up assessment was small to moderate for combined and
behavioral treatment over routine community care (d=.37, .40, respectively). Parent ratings of initial ADHD
symptom severity was the only variable found to moderate these effects
The social and behavioral influences (SBI) study: study design and rationale for studying the effects of race and activation on cancer pain management
Background
Racial disparities exist in the care provided to advanced cancer patients. This article describes an investigation designed to advance the science of healthcare disparities by isolating the effects of patient race and patient activation on physician behavior using novel standardized patient (SP) methodology. Methods/design
The Social and Behavioral Influences (SBI) Study is a National Cancer Institute sponsored trial conducted in Western New York State, Northern/Central Indiana, and lower Michigan. The trial uses an incomplete randomized block design, randomizing physicians to see patients who are either black or white and who are “typical” or “activated” (e.g., ask questions, express opinions, ask for clarification, etc.). The study will enroll 91 physicians. Discussion
The SBI study addresses important gaps in our knowledge about racial disparities and methods to reduce them in patients with advanced cancer by using standardized patient methodology. This study is innovative in aims, design, and methodology and will point the way to interventions that can reduce racial disparities and discrimination and draw links between implicit attitudes and physician behaviors
Relationship Between Peer Assessment During Medical School, Dean’s Letter Rankings, and Ratings by Internship Directors
BACKGROUND: It is not known to what extent the dean’s letter (medical student performance evaluation [MSPE]) reflects peer-assessed work habits (WH) skills and/or interpersonal attributes (IA) of students. OBJECTIVE: To compare peer ratings of WH and IA of second- and third-year medical students with later MSPE rankings and ratings by internship program directors. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 281 medical students from the classes of 2004, 2005, and 2006 at a private medical school in the northeastern United States, who had participated in peer assessment exercises in the second and third years of medical school. For students from the class of 2004, we also compared peer assessment data against later evaluations obtained from internship program directors. RESULTS: Peer-assessed WH were predictive of later MSPE groups in both the second (F = 44.90, P < .001) and third years (F = 29.54, P < .001) of medical school. Interpersonal attributes were not related to MSPE rankings in either year. MSPE rankings for a majority of students were predictable from peer-assessed WH scores. Internship directors’ ratings were significantly related to second- and third-year peer-assessed WH scores (r = .32 [P = .15] and r = .43 [P = .004]), respectively, but not to peer-assessed IA. CONCLUSIONS: Peer assessment of WH, as early as the second year of medical school, can predict later MSPE rankings and internship performance. Although peer-assessed IA can be measured reliably, they are unrelated to either outcome
The APOKASC Catalog: An Asteroseismic and Spectroscopic Joint Survey of Targets in the Kepler Fields
We present the first APOKASC catalog of spectroscopic and asteroseismic
properties of 1916 red giants observed in the Kepler fields. The spectroscopic
parameters provided from the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution
Experiment project are complemented with asteroseismic surface gravities,
masses, radii, and mean densities determined by members of the Kepler
Asteroseismology Science Consortium. We assess both random and systematic
sources of error and include a discussion of sample selection for giants in the
Kepler fields. Total uncertainties in the main catalog properties are of order
80 K in Teff , 0.06 dex in [M/H], 0.014 dex in log g, and 12% and 5% in mass
and radius, respectively; these reflect a combination of systematic and random
errors. Asteroseismic surface gravities are substantially more precise and
accurate than spectroscopic ones, and we find good agreement between their mean
values and the calibrated spectroscopic surface gravities. There are, however,
systematic underlying trends with Teff and log g. Our effective temperature
scale is between 0-200 K cooler than that expected from the Infrared Flux
Method, depending on the adopted extinction map, which provides evidence for a
lower value on average than that inferred for the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC).
We find a reasonable correspondence between the photometric KIC and
spectroscopic APOKASC metallicity scales, with increased dispersion in KIC
metallicities as the absolute metal abundance decreases, and offsets in Teff
and log g consistent with those derived in the literature. We present mean
fitting relations between APOKASC and KIC observables and discuss future
prospects, strengths, and limitations of the catalog data.Comment: 49 pages. ApJSupp, in press. Full machine-readable ascii files
available under ancillary data. Categories: Kepler targets, asteroseismology,
large spectroscopic survey
- …