Tumores cardíacos: 10 anos de experiência

Objetivo: Avaliar a experiência cirúrgica do grupo no tratamento dos tumores cardíacos durante o período de janeiro de 1985 a dezembro de 1994. Casuística e Métodos: De um total de 2268 cirurgias cardíacas com circulação extracorpórea realizadas neste período de 10 anos, 6 foram para extirpação de tumores intracavitários, perfazendo 0,26% dos casos. Destes, 3 eram mixomas de átrio esquerdo, 1 fibroelastoma papilar de valva mitral, 1 rabdomioma de ventrículo esquerdo e 1 fibroma de ventrículo esquerdo. A forma clínica de apresentação foi embolia sistêmica (3 casos) ou insuficiência cardíaca (3 casos). O diagnóstico foi ecocardiográfico (5 casos) e angiográfico (6 casos). Resultados: Todos os pacientes tiveram evolução imediata favorável, exceto 1 deles, com mixoma de átrio equerdo, que evoluiu com mediastinite e septicemia, vindo a falecer e constituindo o único óbito hospitalar. O seguimento pós-operatório tardio, obtido em 4 pacientes (15 a 111 meses - média 49 ± 36,8 meses), não detectou qualquer recidiva, encontrando-se todos em classe funcional I (NYHA). Conclusões: Os autores concluem que os tumores cardíacos são bastante raros, de fácil diagnóstico desde que considerados, na grande maioria benignos e que cursam favoravelmente com a extirpação cirúrgica.<br>Purpose: To review the surgical experience of our group in the treatment of primary cardiac tumors, during a 10 year period beginning January 1985 till December 1994. Material and Methods: From a total of 2268 cardiac surgeries with the aid of extracorporeal circulation performed during this 10 year period, there were 6 cases of intracavitary tumor resection, an incidence of 0.26%. Three were myxomas of the left atrium, 1 papillary fibroelastoma of the mitral valve, 1 rhabdomyoma of the left ventricule and 1 fibroma of the left ventricle. Three patients presented systemic embolism and the other three congestive heart failure. The diagnosis was confirmed by echocardiography (5 cases) and angiography (all 6 cases). Results: All patients had uneventful revovery, except 1, with atrial myxoma, who developed mediastinitis and sepsys, dying on the 14th. post-operative day and becoming the unique hospital death. The follow up obtained in 4 patients with mean duration of 49 ± 36.8 months (range, 15 to 111 months) showed that all of them were in functional class I (NYHA) and with no evidence of recurrence. Conclusions: Cardiac tumors are rare, easily diagnosed "as long as you think of them" (Soma Weiss), most of them bening and have a favorable outcome with surgical resection

Precisão do diagnóstico clínico da síndrome do desconforto respiratório agudo quando comparado a achados de necropsia Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome in comparison with autopsy findings

OBJETIVO: Comparar a definição de síndrome do desconforto respiratório agudo (SDRA) estabelecida pela American-European Consensus Conference (AECC, Conferência Americano-Européia) com achados de necropsia. MÉTODOS: Avaliaram-se todos os pacientes que morreram na unidade de terapia intensiva do Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora entre 1995 e 2003 e que foram submetidos à necropsia. Seus prontuários foram revisados para estabelecer a presença ou não dos critérios clínicos de SDRA, cujo diagnóstico histológico foi definido pela presença de dano alveolar difuso (DAD). RESULTADOS: No período, 592 pacientes faleceram e 22 foram submetidos à necropsia. Destes, 10 pacientes (45%) preencheram os critérios de SDRA pela AECC e sete (32%) preencheram os critérios histopatológicos de DAD. A sensibilidade da definição clínica foi de 71% (IC95%: 36-92%) e a especificidade foi de 67% (IC95%: 42-85%). Os valores preditivos positivo e negativo foram, respectivamente, 50 e 83%; e as razões de verossimilhança positiva e negativa foram, respectivamente, 2,33 e 0,47. Os achados histopatológicos nos cinco pacientes que preencheram os critérios clínicos de SDRA, mas não apresentavam DAD, foram pneumonia (n = 2), embolia pulmonar (n = 1), tuberculose (n = 1) e criptococose (n = 1). CONCLUSÃO: A precisão dos critérios da AECC para diagnóstico de SDRA não é tão boa. Em função do baixo valor preditivo positivo e da baixa razão de verossimilhança positiva do diagnóstico clínico, outras hipóteses devem ser consideradas quando há suspeita de SDRA.<br>OBJECTIVE: To compare the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to autopsy findings. METHODS: All patients who died in the intensive care unit of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora University Hospital between 1995 and 2003 and were submitted to autopsy were included in the study. Patient clinical charts were reviewed to establish whether cases met the AECC criteria for a diagnosis of ARDS, histologically defined as the presence of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD). RESULTS: During the study period, 592 patients died, and 22 were submitted to autopsy. Of those 22 patients, 10 (45%) met the AECC criteria, and 7 (32%) met the histopathological criteria for DAD. The AECC clinical criteria presented a sensitivity of 71% (95%CI: 36-92%) and a specificity of 67% (95%CI: 42-85%). The positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 50 and 83%, whereas the positive and negative likelihood ratios were, respectively, 2.33 and 0.47. The histopathological findings in the 5 patients who met AECC criteria but did not present DAD were pneumonia (n = 2), pulmonary embolism (n = 1), tuberculosis (n = 1), and cryptococcosis (n = 1). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the AECC definition of ARDS was godless than satisfactory. Due to the low positive predictive value and the low positive likelihood ratio, other hypotheses must be considered when ARDS is suspected

Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

Background: General anaesthesia (GA) during endovascular thrombectomy has been associated with worse patient outcomes in observational studies compared with patients treated without GA. We assessed functional outcome in ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel anterior circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy under GA, versus thrombectomy not under GA (with or without sedation) versus standard care (ie, no thrombectomy), stratified by the use of GA versus standard care. Methods: For this meta-analysis, patient-level data were pooled from all patients included in randomised trials in PuMed published between Jan 1, 2010, and May 31, 2017, that compared endovascular thrombectomy predominantly done with stent retrievers with standard care in anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients (HERMES Collaboration). The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed by ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days in the GA and non-GA subgroups of patients treated with endovascular therapy versus those patients treated with standard care, adjusted for baseline prognostic variables. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modelling with a random effect for trials incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane method. The meta-analysis was prospectively designed, but not registered. Findings: Seven trials were identified by our search; of 1764 patients included in these trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy and 893 were assigned standard care. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 did not undergo the procedure and two had missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236 (30%) of 797 patients who had endovascular procedures were treated under GA. At baseline, patients receiving GA were younger and had a shorter delay between stroke onset and randomisation but they had similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared with patients who did not have GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months both in patients who had GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95% CI 1·09–2·11, p=0·014) and in those who did not have GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95% CI 1·75–3·10, p&lt;0·0001) versus standard care. However, outcomes were significantly better for patients who did not receive GA versus those who received GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95% CI 1·14–2·04, p=0·0044). The risk of bias and variability between studies was assessed to be low. Interpretation: Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons