Response to sequential treatment schedules in childhood epilepsy Risk for development of refractory epilepsy

AbstractPurposeTo investigate response to sequential treatment schedules and risk of development of refractory epilepsy in childhood.MethodsAll children younger than 14 years with two or more unprovoked seizures seen at our hospital between 1994 and 2004 were included and prospectively followed. “Seizure control” was defined as a 2-year seizure-free interval without further recurrences except those related to attempts of medication withdrawal and “refractory epilepsy” as failure of >2 drugs plus >1 seizure/month for ≥18 months.Results343 Patients were included, 191 males and 152 females. Mean age at diagnosis was 4y 10 mo (SD 3 year 10 month). Mean follow-up period was 76.2 mo (SD 35.2). The probability of achieving “seizure control” was 70% and 86% at 5 and 10 years. 59% of patients were “controlled” with the first drug used. Among patients failing the first, second and third therapeutic regimen due to lack of efficacy, 39%, 23% and 12% respectively were finally “controlled” with subsequent treatment schedules Risk of development of refractory epilepsy was 8% and 12% at 6 and 10 years.ConclusionAfter failing a first drug, a significant proportion of children can still be controlled with subsequent therapeutic schedules. Only a small proportion develops refractory epilepsy

Nuevos fármacos antiepilépticos en Pediatría

Se estima que unos 70 millones de personas padecen epilepsia a nivel mundial de los cuales más de la mitad son niños, en los que la prevalencia estimada se sitúa en torno al 0,5-0,8%. Aunque existen diversas terapias, el tratamiento de la epilepsia se basa mayoritariamente en fármacos, que en función de su año de comercialización se clasifican como de primera, segunda o tercera generación. En el presente artículo se revisan las principales características de los fármacos antiepilépticos de última generación (lacosamida, acetato de eslicarbazepina, brivaracetam, perampanel, retigabina, everolimus y cannabidiol) que, con excepción de la retigabina (ya no está comercializada), se consideran seguros y efectivos en población pediátrica. El everolimus y el cannabidiol tienen indicaciones muy concretas (esclerosis tuberosa, síndrome de Dravet y síndrome de Lennox Gastaut) mientras que el resto están indicados en el manejo de crisis de origen focal en niños a partir de 4 años. Estas nuevas moléculas han sido desarrolladas para aportar un perfil farmacocinético y de tolerancia superior a los fármacos previamente disponibles y es previsible que a medida que aumente su uso, se vaya perfilando y ampliando su verdadero potencial. Además, por primera vez en epileptología pediátrica, se ha utilizado la extrapolación de datos de efectividad en adultos (junto con estudios de seguridad y farmacocinética específicos en población pediátrica), para acelerar la aprobación de uso en población infantil.It is estimated that about 70 million people all over the world suffer from epilepsy, half of which are children, in whom the prevalence is around 0.5 to 0.8%. Although there are several therapies, the treatment of epilepsy is based mainly on drugs, which, depending on the year of coming onto the market are classified as first, second, or third generation. In this article, a description is presented on the main characteristics of the latest generation of antiepileptic drugs (lacosamide, eslicarbazepine acetate, brivaracetam, perampanel, retigabine, everolimus and cannabidiol). These, with the exception of retigabine (is not yet on the market), are considered safe and effective in the paediatric population. Everolimus and cannabidiol have very specific indications (tuberous sclerosis, Dravet syndrome, and Lennox Gastaut syndrome), while the rest are indicated in the management of seizures of focal origin in children from 4 years-old. These new molecules have been developed in order to provide a pharmaceutical profile and tolerance superior to the previously available drugs, and it is forecast that as their use increases, their true potential and profile will widen. Furthermore, for the first time in Paediatric Epileptology,the extrapolation ofthe efficacy data in adults have been used (together with specific safety and pharmacokinetic studies in the paediatric population), in order to speed up their approval for use in the child population

Validated outcome of treatment changes according to International League Against Epilepsy criteria in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Although many studies have attempted to describe treatment outcomes in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, results are often limited by the adoption of nonhomogeneous criteria and different definitions of seizure freedom. We sought to evaluate treatment outcomes with a newly administered antiepileptic drug (AED) in a large population of adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) outcome criteria. METHODS: This is a multicenter, observational, prospective study of 1053 patients with focal epilepsy diagnosed as drug-resistant by the investigators. Patients were assessed at baseline and 6, 12, and 18 months, for up to a maximum of 34 months after introducing another AED into their treatment regimen. Drug resistance status and treatment outcomes were rated according to ILAE criteria by the investigators and by at least two independent members of an external expert panel (EP). RESULTS: A seizure-free outcome after a newly administered AED according to ILAE criteria ranged from 11.8% after two failed drugs to 2.6% for more than six failures. Significantly fewer patients were rated by the EP as having a "treatment failure" as compared to the judgment of the investigator (46.7% vs 62.9%, P < 0.001), because many more patients were rated as "undetermined outcome" (45.6% vs 27.7%, P < 0.001); 19.3% of the recruited patients were not considered drug-resistant by the EP. SIGNIFICANCE: This study validates the use of ILAE treatment outcome criteria in a real-life setting, providing validated estimates of seizure freedom in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy in relation to the number of previously failed AEDs. Fewer than one in 10 patients achieved seizure freedom on a newly introduced AED over the study period. Pseudo drug resistance could be identified in one of five cases

Stopping Antiepileptic Drugs: When and Why?

After a patient has initiated an antiepileptic drug (AED) and achieved a sustained period of seizure freedom, the bias towards continuing therapy indefinitely can be substantial. Studies show that the rate of seizure recurrence after AED withdrawal is about two to three times the rate in patients who continue AEDs, but there are many benefits to AED withdrawal that should be evaluated on an individualized basis. AED discontinuation may be considered in patients whose seizures have been completely controlled for a prolonged period, typically 1 to 2 years for children and 2 to 5 years for adults. For children, symptomatic epilepsy, adolescent onset, and a longer time to achieve seizure control are associated with a worse prognosis. In adults, factors such as a longer duration of epilepsy, an abnormal neurologic examination, an abnormal EEG, and certain epilepsy syndromes are known to increase the risk of recurrence. Even in patients with a favorable prognosis, however, the risk of relapse can be as high as 20% to 25%. Before withdrawing AEDs, patients should be counseled about their individual risk for relapse and the potential implications of a recurrent seizure, particularly for safety and driving

Clinical rating scale for pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration: A pilot study

Pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration is a progressive neurological disorder occurring in both childhood and adulthood. The objective of this study was to design and pilot-test a disease-specific clinical rating scale for the assessment of patients with pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

La epilepsia infantil tiene un buen pronóstico a largo plazo

Conclusiones de los autores del estudio: el pronóstico a largo plazo de la epilepsia es favorable. La epilepsia continúa activa tan solo en un 30% de los casos y resulta intratable en menos de un 10%. La mortalidad es más elevada que en la población general únicamente en los casos de etiología sintomática remota. Comentario de los revisores: se trata de un estudio prospectivo con un seguimiento de 15 años sobre el pronóstico de la epilepsia. La metodología es en líneas generales adecuada y las conclusiones son relevantes para la práctica clínica