5 research outputs found
Treatment of Francisella philomiragia bacteremia in a dog
Abstract To describe the diagnosis and successful treatment of systemic francisellosis in a dog. An 11âyearâold female spayed Labrador retriever presented for progressive lethargy, hyporexia, and cough. The dog was febrile with a neutrophilia, nonregenerative anemia, thrombocytopenia, and had increased activity in serum of liverâderived enzymes. Francisella philomiragia was isolated from aerobic blood culture. The dog was treated for 6âweeks with enrofloxacin orally. Repeated aerobic blood cultures after 2 and 6âweeks of antibiotic therapy were negative. The dog was clinically normal 7âmonths after diagnosis with no evidence of relapse
Effect of esomeprazole with and without a probiotic on fecal dysbiosis, intestinal inflammation, and fecal shortâchain fatty acid concentrations in healthy dogs
Abstract Background Proton pump inhibitors can cause diarrhea and a transient increase in fecal dysbiosis index in dogs. It is unknown if concurrent probiotic administration mitigates these effects. Objective/Hypothesis To assess the fecal Canine Microbial Dysbiosis Index (CMDI), fecal short chain fatty acid (SCFA), and fecal calprotectin concentrations in dogs administered esomeprazole with and without a probiotic. Animals Eleven healthy dogs. Methods Prospective, withinâsubjects before and after study. All dogs received 7âday courses of esomeprazole (1âmg/kg PO q 24h) alone followed by esomeprazole with a probiotic (15 billion CFU/kg), separated by a 4âweek washout period. Data were compared between phases using mixed effects ANOVA or generalized estimating equations with postâhoc Holm adjustment for 2âway comparisons. Results Compared to baseline (mean CMDI â2.66, SD 3.04), fecal CMDI was not different with esomeprazole administration alone (mean CMDI â1.48, SD 3.32, Pâ=â.08), but there was a significant increase (Diff 3.05, 95% CI [1.37, 4.74], Pâ<â.001, Effect size 2.02) when esomeprazole and a probiotic were administered concurrently (mean CMDI 0.39, SD 2.83). CMDI was significantly higher when esomeprazole was administered with a probiotic than alone (Diff 1.87, 95% CI [0.19, 1.87], Pâ=â.02, Effect size 1.24). Fecal calprotectin and SCFA concentrations did not differ between phases. The occurrence of vomiting and diarrhea was not different from baseline when esomeprazole was administered alone (36%/27%) or with a probiotic (46%/9%). Conclusions and Clinical Importance In healthy dogs, concurrent administration of a probiotic is unlikely to lessen adverse effects associated with esomeprazole administration