How the Duration Period of Erythropoietin Treatment Influences the Oxidative Status of Hemodialysis Patients

Background: End-stage renal disease is a state of enhanced oxidative stress (OS) and hemodialysis (HD) and renal anemia further augment this disbalance. Anemia correction with erythropoietin (EPO) may improve oxidative status. However, there is no evidence of time dependent effects of EPO therapy on redox status of HD patients.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the duration of EPO treatment may affect OS parameters in uremic patients.Patients and methods: 104 HD patients and 29 healthy volunteers were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the duration of EPO treatment. Forth group consisted of HD patients without EPO treatment. Plasma and erythrocyte malondialdehyde (MDA, MDArbc), reactive carbonyl groups (RCG), plasma sulfhydryl (-SH) groups and total antioxidative capacity (TAC) levels were evaluated.Results: HD patients both with and without EPO treatment, showed a significant increase in all oxidative parameters without significance between EPO treated and -untreated group. The decrease in MDA and MDArbc levels coincided with the duration of EPO treatment. A negative correlation was observed between the duration of EPO treatment and serum MDA (r=&#727;0.309, p=0.003). Increasing periods of EPO treatment were associated with decrease in RCG, without significance between EPO groups. Increase in TAC accompanied increasing durations of EPO treatment, with EPO treatment for more than 24 months causing the most striking changes (p&#60;0.05). There were no significant differences in &#727;SH levels between EPO subgroups.Conclusion: Our results suggest that long term administration of EPO attenuated the lipid peroxidation process and restored the levels of antioxidants.</p

Immunosuppressive regimens following kidney transplantation in five European countries: The observational RECORD study

Objective: To examine current immunosuppressive regimens administered to kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in South-eastern Europe. Methods: This was a 12-month, multicenter, non- interventional, prospective, observational study of immunosuppressive regimens in adult de novo and maintenance KTRs. The primary endpoint was to identify the number, type, dosage and trough concentrations (C0) of immunosuppressive medications. Results: Data were available for 1774 KTRs from five countries (Bulgaria [n = 109], Croatia [n = 339], Romania [n = 647], Serbia [n = 434] and Slovenia [n = 245]). The most common immunosuppressive regimen in all countries was a triple therapy regimen (de novo KTRs, 67.9 – 100% at baseline and 67.3 – 100% at end of study ; maintenance KTRs, 48.8 – 90.7% and 43.2 – 90.1%, respectively). The most frequent regimen in de novo KTRs comprised tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or mycophenolate sodium (MPS), and corticosteroids. In maintenance KTRs, the most frequent regimen was tacrolimus or cyclosporine, and MMF or MPS, with or without corticosteroids. A C0 of <5 ng/mL was recorded in 40.2% of immediate-release and 48.7% of prolonged-release tacrolimus patients ; 79.5% of patients taking cyclosporine had a C0 of <75 ng/mL. Infections were the most common adverse event (358/597, 60.0%), mainly urinary tract infections (208/358, 58.1%). Conclusions: Triple therapy—comprising a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI ; tacrolimus or cyclosporine), antiproliferative drugs (MMF or MPS) and corticosteroids—was the most common immunosuppressive regimen used in KTRs in South- eastern Europe. Individual CNI C0 were below the target range in a substantial proportion of KTRs, highlighting the need to maintain therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive therapy in this patient population