A cross sectional study investigating the association between exposure to food outlets and childhood obesity in Leeds, UK

BACKGROUND: Current UK policy in relation to the influence of the ‘food environment’ on childhood obesity appears to be driven largely on assumptions or speculations because empirical evidence is lacking and findings from studies are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to investigate the number of food outlets and the proximity of food outlets in the same sample of children, without solely focusing on fast food. METHODS: Cross sectional study over 3 years (n = 13,291 data aggregated). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated for each participant, overweight and obesity were defined as having a BMI >85(th) (sBMI 1.04) and 95(th) (sBMI 1.64) percentiles respectively (UK90 growth charts). Home and school neighbourhoods were defined as circular buffers with a 2 km Euclidean radius, centred on these locations. Commuting routes were calculated using the shortest straight line distance, with a 2 km buffer to capture varying routes. Data on food outlet locations was sourced from Leeds City Council covering the study area and mapped against postcode. Food outlets were categorised into three groups, supermarkets, takeaway and retail. Proximity to the nearest food outlet in the home and school environmental domain was also investigated. Age, gender, ethnicity and deprivation (IDACI) were included as covariates in all models. RESULTS: There is no evidence of an association between the number of food outlets and childhood obesity in any of these environments; Home Q4 vs. Q1 OR = 1.11 (95% CI = 0.95-1.30); School Q4 vs. Q1 OR = 1.00 (95% CI 0.87 – 1.16); commute Q4 vs. Q1 OR = 0.1.00 (95% CI 0.83 – 1.20). Similarly there is no evidence of an association between the proximity to the nearest food outlet and childhood obesity in the home (OR = 0.77 [95% CI = 0.61 – 0.98]) or the school (OR = 1.01 [95% CI 0.84 – 1.23]) environment. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides little support for the notion that exposure to food outlets in the home, school and commuting neighbourhoods increase the risk of obesity in children. It seems that the evidence is not well placed to support Governmental interventions/recommendations currently being proposed and that policy makers should approach policies designed to limit food outlets with caution

A qualitative study of the experiences of individuals who did not complete the NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme Pilot

Background: Attrition remains a significant public health challenge as individuals who do not complete programmes are likely to have poorer programme outcomes. On calorie- restricted diets, including the NHS Low Calorie Diet (LCD) Programme pilot, approximately 50% of people are discharged prematurely, and thus do not complete the programme. Reducing attrition therefore has the potential to improve programme efficacy, impact and cost-effectiveness. Methods: Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively sampled individuals who did not complete the NHS LCD programme. Interviews explored service user experiences of the programme and experiences of being discharged. Interview data were analysed thematically. Results: Four core themes were identified: 1) the pre- programme struggles of service users and their route to LCD; 2) a positive and impactful programme; 3) life gets in the way; and 4) a perceived lack of support from the provider. These findings show that individuals had pre-programme struggles and a series of life events that constrained their good intentions, and whilst they were positive about the programme, they were critical of the support they received from providers to deal with their life circumstances. Conclusions: Policy makers and providers can act proportionately to ensure that programmes, such as the NHS LCD Programme pilot, recognise the circumstances and context of people’s lives, and take a more person-centred approach

Participant experiences during the NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme pilot. Findings from an online survey.

Background: In 2020, NHS England commissioned independent commercial service providers to deliver a Low Calorie Diet Programme pilot, offering Total Diet Replacement alongside behavioural support. Methods: This paper presents participant experiences of the programme using both quantitative and qualitative data derived from four cross-sectional surveys, and examines differences by sociodemographics, delivery model and provider. Results: The majority of participants reported a positive experience with the referral process, with a small proportion feeling that insufficient information was provided and that they did not feel respected or listened to by their healthcare professional. Participants’ relationship with their coach was generally positive throughout each phase of the programme, and highlights the importance of coach-participant relationships. The relationship with the coach via digital delivery was less favourable compared to other delivery models, as was the perceived adequacy of support provided. Conclusions: The experience of the referral from general practice and the relationship with the coach are key elements of the participant experience. They demonstrate the importance of, and need for, person-centred care

After the RCT: who comes to a family-based intervention for childhood overweight or obesity when it is implemented at scale in the community?

Background: When implemented at scale, the impact on health and health inequalities of public health interventions depends on who receives them in addition to intervention effectiveness. Methods: The MEND 7–13 (Mind, Exercise, Nutrition…Do it!) programme is a family-based weight management intervention for childhood overweight and obesity implemented at scale in the community. We compare the characteristics of children referred to the MEND programme (N=18 289 referred to 1940 programmes) with those of the population eligible for the intervention, and assess what predicts completion of the intervention. Results: Compared to the MEND-eligible population, proportionally more children who started MEND were: obese rather than overweight excluding obese; girls; Asian; from families with a lone parent; living in less favourable socioeconomic circumstances; and living in urban rather than rural or suburban areas. Having started the programme, children were relatively less likely to complete it if they: reported ‘abnormal’ compared to ‘normal’ levels of psychological distress; were boys; were from lone parent families; lived in less favourable socioeconomic circumstances; and had participated in a relatively large MEND programme group; or where managers had run more programmes. Conclusions: The provision and/or uptake of MEND did not appear to compromise and, if anything, promoted participation of those from disadvantaged circumstances and ethnic minority groups. However, this tendency was diminished because programme completion was less likely for those living in less favourable socioeconomic circumstances. Further research should explore how completion rates of this intervention could be improved for particular groups

Normalisation and equity of referral to the NHS Low Calorie Diet programme pilot; a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of health care staff

Background: Health and wellbeing can be profoundly impacted by both obesity and type 2 diabetes, while the normalisation and equity of care for people living with these non-communicable diseases remain as challenges for local health systems. The National Health Service Low Calorie Diet programme in England, aims to support people to achieve type 2 diabetes remission, while also reducing health inequalities. We have explored the experiences of health care staff who have made a referral to the LCD programme, while identifying effective and equitable delivery of programme referrals, and their normalisation into routine care. Methods: Nineteen individual semi-structured interviews were completed health care staff in the first year of the Low Calorie Diet programme. Interviewees were purposively sampled from the ten localities who undertook the Low Calorie Diet programme pilot. Each interview explored a number of topics of interest including communication and training, referrals, equity, and demands on primary care, before being subjected to a thematic analysis. Results: From the data, five core themes were identified: Covid-19 and the demands on primary care, the expertise and knowledge of referrers, patient identification and the referral process, barriers to referrals and who gets referred to the NHS LCD programme. Our findings demonstrate the variation in the real world settings of a national diabetes programme. It highlights the challenge of COVID-19 for health care staff, whereby the increased workload of referrals occurred at a time when capacity was curtailed. We have also identified several barriers to referral and have shown that referrals had not yet been normalised into routine care at the point of data collection. We also raise issues of equity in the referral process, as not all eligible people are informed about the programme. Conclusions: Referral generation had not yet been consistently normalised into routine care, yet our findings suggest that the LCD programme runs the risk of normalising an inequitable referral process. Inequalities remain a significant challenge, and the adoption of an equitable referral process, normalised at a service delivery level, has the capacity to contribute to the improvement of health inequalities

Equity and local health systems: a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of local health service leads during the first two years of the NHS Low Calorie Diet programme pilot

Background: Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) can both profoundly impact health and wellbeing. Their prevalence largely follows a social gradient. The National Health Service Low Calorie Diet programme in England aims to support people to achieve T2DM remission while also reducing health inequalities. We aimed to explore the experiences of local health service leads and identify barriers and facilitators in relation to the equitable mobilisation of the Low Calorie Diet programme. Methods: Twenty semi-structured interviews were completed with 24 locality leads across the first two years of the Low Calorie Diet programme. Interviewees were purposively sampled from the 10 localities who undertook the Low Calorie Diet programme pilot. Each interview explored a number of topics of interest, including referrals, training, communication, incentivisation, governance and engagement, before being subjected to a thematic analysis. Results: From the data, seven core themes were identified: COVID-19 and primary care capacity and engagement; methods of communication; approaches to training; approaches to incentivisation; approaches to referrals; barriers to referrals; and the importance of collaboration. COVID-19 presented a specific challenge to the mobilisation and delivery of the Low Calorie Diet programme; however, our findings demonstrate the large variation and differences in the approaches taken when delivering the programme across 10 geographically and demographically distinct pilot sites. We also identified a lack of a recognised approach or strategy to mobilisation and delivery support for the Low Calorie Diet programme, such as proportionate universalism, which is a social policy response to tackling health inequalities by ensuring that service delivery is equitable. Conclusions: Health inequalities remain a significant challenge, and health service leads have the potential to adopt an equity perspective from the start of programme mobilisation. In doing so, resources at their disposal can be managed equitably and can therefore contribute to efforts to reduce the potential occurrence of intervention-generated inequalities

Barriers and facilitators to self-management of asthma in adolescents:an interview study to inform development of a novel intervention

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Despite literature that spans twenty years describing the barriers to asthma self-management in adolescents, successful, clinically-based interventions to address this important issue are lacking. Given the limitations of some of the previous studies, we conducted a study that aimed to gain a broader insight into barriers and facilitators to self-management of asthma by adolescents, not just adherence to treatment, and triangulated their views with those of their parents and healthcare professionals. METHODS: Focus groups and interviews were conducted separately for 28 adolescents with asthma aged 12-18 years, 14 healthcare professionals, and 12 parents. Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded and transcripts from each participant group were analysed separately using inductive thematic analysis. We triangulated the three perspectives by comparing themes that had emerged from each analysis. RESULTS: Adolescents', parents', and healthcare professionals' views were summarised into ten related themes that included forgetting and routines, knowledge, embarrassment and confidence, communication with healthcare professionals, triggers, support at school, apathy, and taking responsibility. We found that adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals raised similar barriers and facilitators to self-management and our results provide further validation for previous studies. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our study highlights that healthcare professionals may need to consider a range of psychological and contextual issues influencing adolescents' ability to effectively self-manage their asthma, in particular, how they implement treatment routines and the understanding that adolescents have of their condition and treatments. Crucially, healthcare professionals need to consider how this information is communicated and ensure they facilitate open, inclusive, two-way consultations. From this more comprehensive understanding, we have developed interventional strategies that healthcare professionals can utilise to empower adolescents to improve their asthma self-management. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Psychosocial Interventions in the Treatment of Severe Adolescent Obesity: The SHINE Programme

Purpose: Psychosocial Interventions (PSI) are characterised by three phases: 1) an initial in-depth assessment, 2) an intensive multifaceted intervention to stem a condition, and 3) an extensive maintenance programme. PSIs are often used for treatment of mental health conditions, however applicability in the treatment of adolescent obesity is unknown. This paper sought to evaluate the service-level outcomes of a PSI for young people (aged 10-17) with severe obesity. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of participants attending the SHINE programme between 2011-2016 (n = 435; Age: 13.1±2.1 years, Male: 51%, White: 87.4%, BMI: 33.5±7.5 kg/m2, BMI SDS: 3.1±0.5 units). Anthropometric measurements (BMI and WC) were collected at baseline, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months. Psychosocial measures (anxiety, depression, and self-esteem) were collected at baseline and 3 months. Participant retention was also assessed. Results: After 3 months, 95% of participants remained with a mean BMI SDS reduction of 0.19 units (95% CI: 0.17, 0.21). Anxiety, depression, and self-esteem improved by 50%, 54% and 38% respectively. BMI SDS reductions of 0.29, 0.35 and 0.41 were found at 6-, 9-, and 12- months. Fifty-four percent of participants chose to attend the final intervention phase. A higher baseline BMI SDS and a greater reduction in BMI SDS predicted final intervention phase attendance. Conclusion: The SHINE PSI demonstrated positive mean reductions in all measurements across all time points. In contrast to other community-based weight management services, these results suggest the utility of, and further exploration of, PSIs in the treatment of severe adolescent obesity