11 research outputs found

    The lay health worker-patient relationship in promoting pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in COPD: What makes it work?

    Get PDF
    Lay health workers (LHWs) can improve access to services and adherence to treatment, as well as promoting self-care and prevention. Their effect in promoting uptake and adherence in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been tested. PR is the most effective treatment for the symptoms and disability of COPD, but this effectiveness is undermined by poor rates of completion. Trained LHWs with COPD, who also have first-hand experience of PR, are well placed to help overcome the documented barriers to its completion. The relationship between LHWs and patients may be one of the keys to their effectiveness but it has been little explored. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were used with the aim of examining the LHW-patient partnership in a feasibility study of trained PR-experienced LHWs used to support COPD patients referred to PR. Twelve volunteers with COPD who completed LHW training supported 66 patients referred for PR. All 12 of these LHWs gave end-of-study interviews, 21 COPD patients supported by LHWs were also interviewed. Patients reported that the LHWs were keen to share their experiences of PR, and that this had a positive impact. The enthusiasm of the LHWs for PR was striking. The common bond between LHWs and patients of having COPD together with the LHWs positive, first-hand experience of PR were dominant and recurring themes in their relationship.This article presents independent research funded by the NIHR under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG0214-30052). SL receives additional funding from the South African Medical Research Council. SJCT was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North Thames at Bart’s Health NHS Trust

    Clinicians' and patients' experiences of managing heart failure during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), also known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), resulted in unprecedented societal and healthcare provision change, which has been implemented at pace. Little is known about the indirect impacts of these changes and what the future effects may be. AIM: To explore patients' and clinicians' experiences of managing heart failure (HF) during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative study in three regions of the UK: Cambridgeshire, Greater Manchester, and the West Midlands. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews (n = 30) were conducted with older adults with established HF and healthcare providers from primary and secondary health services involved in their care. Interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Compliance with the government guidance 'Stay at home, protect the NHS, and save lives' during the COVID-19 pandemic, and perceptions relating to risk from COVID-19 and underlying morbidity, drove 'being careful' behaviours and organisational changes. Enacting behavioural change and implementing organisational change resulted in opportunities and challenges for health and healthcare practice. CONCLUSION: Perception of risk led to significant behavioural and organisational change during the pandemic. Some changes described by both patients and clinicians, such as enhanced relationships and self-monitoring, present as opportunities, and consideration should be given as to how to maintain or develop these. Equally, indirect impacts of COVID-19 and the associated lockdown, such as disengagement and withdrawal, and the fallout from reluctance to access health services, should be acknowledged and interventions to address these challenges are needed

    Intrapartum-related perinatal deaths in births planned in midwifery-led settings in Great Britain: findings and recommendations from the ESMiE confidential enquiry.

    Full text link
    OBJECTIVE:To review quality of care in births planned in midwifery-led settings, resulting in an intrapartum-related perinatal death. DESIGN:Confidential enquiry SETTING: England, Scotland and Wales SAMPLE: Intrapartum stillbirths and intrapartum-related neonatal deaths in births planned in alongside midwifery units, freestanding midwifery units or at home, sampled from national perinatal surveillance data for 2015-16 (alongside midwifery units) and 2013-2016 (freestanding midwifery units and home births). METHODS:Multi-disciplinary panels reviewed medical notes for each death, assessing and grading quality of care by consensus, with reference to national standards and guidance. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. RESULTS:64 deaths were reviewed, 30 stillbirths and 34 neonatal deaths. At the start of labour care, 23 women were planning birth in an alongside midwifery unit, 26 in a freestanding midwifery unit and 15 at home. In 75% of deaths, improvements in care were identified which may have made a difference to the outcome for the baby. Improvements in care were identified which may have made a difference to the mother's physical and psychological health and wellbeing in 75% of deaths. Issues with care were identified around risk assessment and decisions about planning place of birth; intermittent auscultation; transfer during labour; resuscitation and neonatal transfer; follow-up and local review. CONCLUSIONS:These confidential enquiry findings do not address the overall safety of midwifery-led settings for healthy women with straightforward pregnancies, but suggest areas where the safety of care can be improved. Maternity services should review their care with respect to our recommendations. FUNDING:This paper reports research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme through the Policy Research Unit in Maternal Health and Care, 108/0001. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. SK was part funded by the NIHR Applied Research Centre (ARC) West Midlands

    Aerobic or Resistance Training and Pulse Wave Velocity in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A 12-Week Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (the Exercise in Renal Transplant [ExeRT] Trial)

    No full text
    Background: Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in kidney transplant recipients. This pilot study examined the potential effect of aerobic training or resistance training on vascular health and indexes of cardiovascular risk in kidney transplant recipients. Study Design: Single-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel trial. Setting & Participants: 60 participants (mean age, 54 years; 34 men) were randomly assigned to aerobic training (n = 20), resistance training (n = 20), or usual care (n = 20). Participants were included if they had a kidney transplant within 12 months prior to baseline assessment. Patients were excluded if they had unstable medical conditions or had recently started regular exercise. Intervention: Aerobic training and resistance training were delivered 3 days per week for a 12-week period. The usual-care group received standard care. Outcomes & Measurements: Pulse wave velocity, peak oxygen uptake (Vo 2peak), sit-to-stand 60, isometric quadriceps force, and inflammatory biomarkers were assessed at 0 and 12 weeks. Results: The anticipated 60 participants were recruited within 12 months. 46 participants completed the study (aerobic training, n=13; resistance training, n=13; and usual care, n=20), resulting in a 23% attrition rate. Analyses of covariance, adjusted for baseline values, age, and dialysis vintage pretransplantation, revealed significant mean differences between aerobic training and usual care in pulse wave velocity of-2.20.4 (95% CI,-3.1 to-1.3) m/s (P <0.001) and between resistance training and usual care of-2.60.4 (95% CI,-3.4 to-1.7) m/s (P <0.001) at 12 weeks. Secondary analyses indicated significant improvements in Vo 2peak in the aerobic training group and in Vo 2peak, sit-to-stand 60, and isometric muscle force in the resistance training group compared with usual care at 12 weeks. There were no reported adverse events, cardiovascular events, or hospitalizations as a result of the intervention. Limitations: Pilot study, small sample size, no measure of endothelial function. Conclusions: Both aerobic training and resistance training interventions appear to be feasible and clinically beneficial in this patient population. 2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.sch_phy66pub3985pub

    ERS International Congress 2021: highlights from the Respiratory Clinical Care and Physiology Assembly.

    Get PDF
    It is a challenge to keep abreast of all the clinical and scientific advances in the field of respiratory medicine. This article contains an overview of laboratory-based science, randomised controlled trials and qualitative research that were presented during the 2021 European Respiratory Society International Congress within the sessions from the five groups of the Assembly 1 - Respiratory clinical care and physiology. Selected presentations are summarised from a wide range of topics: clinical problems, rehabilitation and chronic care, general practice and primary care, electronic/mobile health (e-health/m-health), clinical respiratory physiology, exercise and functional imaging

    The identification of 7-[(R)-2-((1S,2S)-2-benzyloxycyclopentylamino)-1- hydroxyethyl]-4-hydroxybenzothiazolone as an inhaled long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist

    No full text
    The optimisation of two series of 4-hydroxybenzothiazolone derived β2-adrenoceptor agonists, bearing α-substituted cyclopentyl and β-phenethyl amino-substituents, as inhaled long-acting bronchodilators is described. Analogues were selected for synthesis using a lipophilicity based hypothesis to achieve the targeted rapid onset of action in combination with a long duration of action. The profiling of the two series led to identification of the α-substituted cyclopentyl analogue 2 as the optimal compound with a comparable profile to the inhaled once-daily long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist indacaterol. On the basis of these data 2 was promoted as the backup development candidate to indacaterol from the Novartis LABA project. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
    corecore