61 research outputs found
A Systematic Review of Existing Clinical Guidelines for the Assessment and Treatment of Tinnitus in Adults
Background: Though clinical guidelines for assessment and treatment of chronic
subjective tinnitus do exist, a comprehensive review of those guidelines has
not been performed. The objective of this review was to identify current
clinical guidelines, and compare their recommendations for the assessment and
treatment of subjective tinnitus in adults. Method: We systematically searched
a range of sources for clinical guidelines (as defined by the Institute of
Medicine, United States) for the assessment and/or treatment of subjective
tinnitus in adults. No restrictions on language or year of publication were
applied to guidelines. Results: Clinical guidelines from Denmark, Germany,
Sweden, The Netherlands, and the United States were included in the review.
There was a high level of consistency across the guidelines with regard to
recommendations for audiometric assessment, physical examination, use of a
validated questionnaire(s) to assess tinnitus related distress, and referral
to a psychologist when required. Cognitive behavioral treatment for tinnitus
related distress, use of hearing aids in instances of hearing loss and
recommendations against the use of medicines were consistent across the
included guidelines. Differences between the guidelines centered on the use of
imaging in assessment procedures and sound therapy as a form of treatment for
tinnitus distress respectively. Conclusion: Given the level of commonality
across tinnitus guidelines from different countries the development of a
European guideline for the assessment and treatment of subjective tinnitus in
adults seems feasible. This guideline would have the potential to benefit the
large number of clinicians in countries where clinical guidelines do not yet
exist, and would support standardization of treatment for patients across
Europe
Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in clinical trials of tinnitus treatments in adults
BACKGROUND: There is no evidence-based guidance to facilitate design decisions for confirmatory trials or systematic reviews investigating treatment efficacy for adults with tinnitus. This systematic review therefore seeks to ascertain the current status of trial designs by identifying and evaluating the reporting of outcome domains and instruments in the treatment of adults with tinnitus. METHODS: Records were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE CINAHL, EBSCO, and CENTRAL clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN, ICTRP) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Eligible records were those published from 1 July 2006 to 12 March 2015. Included studies were those reporting adults aged 18 years or older who reported tinnitus as a primary complaint, and who were enrolled into a randomised controlled trial, a before and after study, a non-randomised controlled trial, a case-controlled study or a cohort study, and written in English. Studies with fewer than 20 participants were excluded. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-eight studies were included. Thirty-five different primary outcome domains were identified spanning seven categories (tinnitus percept, impact of tinnitus, co-occurring complaints, quality of life, body structures and function, treatment-related outcomes and unclear or not specified). Over half the studies (55 %) did not clearly define the complaint of interest. Tinnitus loudness was the domain most often reported (14 %), followed by tinnitus distress (7 %). Seventy-eight different primary outcome instruments were identified. Instruments assessing multiple attributes of the impact of tinnitus were most common (34 %). Overall, 24 different patient-reported tools were used, predominantly the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (15 %). Loudness was measured in diverse ways including a numerical rating scale (8 %), loudness matching (4 %), minimum masking level (1 %) and loudness discomfort level (1 %). Ten percent of studies did not clearly report the instrument used. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate poor appreciation of the basic principles of good trial design, particularly the importance of specifying what aspect of therapeutic benefit is the main outcome. No single outcome was reported in all studies and there was a broad diversity of outcome instruments. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: The systematic review protocol is registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews): CRD42015017525. Registered on 12 March 2015 revised on 15 March 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1399-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users
Indoor Sonic Boom Reproduction Using ANC
The European programs for development of supersonic air-flights involve new studies on the human perception of sonic boom. Because this noise includes high-level components at very low-frequency, the usual psycho-acoustic tests with headphones are not relevant; instead, the original sound-field can be reproduced with many loudspeakers in a small room, but the loudspeakers must be controlled for an accurate reproduction, both in time and space, in an area large enough to enclose a listener's head. In this paper, Active Noise Control is applied to sonic boom reproduction through Boundary Surface Control (as named by S.Ise) of the acoustic pressure around a listener. A small room was built at LMA with sixteen powerful low-frequency acoustic sources in the walls. Frequency and time-domain numerical simulations of sonic boom reproduction in this room are given, including a sensitivity study of the coupling between a listener's head and the incident sonic boom wave which combine into the effective sound-field to be reproduced
THE PRACTICAL VALUE OF THE FROG TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF NORMAL AND PATHOLOGICAL PREGNANCY
- …