Study of using marker assisted selection on a beef cattle breeding program by model comparison

[EN] A data set of a commercial Nellore beef cattle selection program was used to compare breeding models that assumed or not markers effects to estimate the breeding values, when a reduced number of animals have phenotypic, genotypic and pedigree information available. This herd complete data set was composed of 83,404 animals measured for weaning weight (WW), post-weaning gain (PWG), scrotal circumference (SC) and muscle score (MS), corresponding to 116,652 animals in the relationship matrix. Single trait analyses were performed by MTDFREML software to estimate fixed and random effects solutions using this complete data. The additive effects estimated were assumed as the reference breeding values for those animals. The individual observed phenotype of each trait was adjusted for fixed and random effects solutions, except for direct additive effects. The adjusted phenotype composed of the additive and residual parts of observed phenotype was used as dependent variable for models' comparison. Among all measured animals of this herd, only 3160 animals were genotyped for 106 SNP markers. Three models were compared in terms of changes on animals' rank, global fit and predictive ability. Model 1 included only polygenic effects, model 2 included only markers effects and model 3 included both polygenic and markers effects. Bayesian inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods performed by TM software was used to analyze the data for model comparison. Two different priors were adopted for markers effects in models 2 and 3, the first prior assumed was a uniform distribution (U) and, as a second prior, was assumed that markers effects were distributed as normal (N). Higher rank correlation coefficients were observed for models 3_U and 3_N, indicating a greater similarity of these models animals' rank and the rank based on the reference breeding values. Model 3_N presented a better global fit, as demonstrated by its low DIC. The best models in terms of predictive ability were models 1 and 3_N. Differences due prior assumed to markers effects in models 2 and 3 could be attributed to the better ability of normal prior in handle with collinear effects. The models 2_U and 2_N presented the worst performance, indicating that this small set of markers should not be used to genetically evaluate animals with no data, since its predictive ability is restricted. In conclusion, model 3_N presented a slight superiority when a reduce number of animals have phenotypic, genotypic and pedigree information. It could be attributed to the variation retained by markers and polygenic effects assumed together and the normal prior assumed to markers effects, that deals better with the collinearity between markers. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.We are grateful to the Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP), Merialilgenity and Conselho Nacional de apoio a Pesquisa (CNPq) for the financial support, to Agro-Pecuaria CFM for data set and the Institut de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agroalimentarias de Cataluña (IRTA) as the host institution for its full backing while preparing the research and the manuscript.Rezende, F.; Ferraz, J.; Eler, J.; Silva, R.; Mattos, E.; Ibáñez-Escriche, N. (2012). Study of using marker assisted selection on a beef cattle breeding program by model comparison. Livestock Science. 147(1-3):40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.03.017S40481471-

Machine availability and productivity during timber harvester machine operator training

Machine availability and timber harvest productivity in commercial forestry are influenced in part by operator performance. This work aimed to evaluate the behavior of these two variables; machine availability and productivity during the training period for the harvester operators. The study was conducted within a forestry company in Brazil. A sample of 30 individuals were trained and assessed over 11 months for their productivity and machine availability data. Monthly average data were compared using the Tukey test, in both evaluated variables. The results showed a significant difference in productivity and also in machine availability data during the training period, simultaneously presenting a productivity increase until the sixth month of operation and a decrease in machine availability. Productivity started with an average of 9 m.PMH0-1 reaching 24 m.PMH0-1 at its peak and stabilizing around 20 m.PMH0-1. Machine availability started at 84%, decreased to an average of 78%, and increased to around 88% until present. Both demonstrated a tendency towards stabilization until the ninth month of operation. The harvester operator training period influenced machine availability and productivity, with this study’s results serving as important information in support of the operational planning, staff sizing, and resources during forest harvesting machine operator training period.The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author