110 research outputs found
Charged Particle Pseudorapidity Distributions in Au+Al, Cu, Au, and U Collisions at 10.8 AGeV/c
We present the results of an analysis of charged particle pseudorapidity
distributions in the central region in collisions of a Au projectile with Al,
Cu, Au, and U targets at an incident energy of 10.8~GeV/c per nucleon. The
pseudorapidity distributions are presented as a function of transverse energy
produced in the target or central pseudorapidity regions. The correlation
between charged multiplicity and transverse energy measured in the central
region, as well as the target and projectile regions is also presented. We give
results for transverse energy per charged particle as a function of
pseudorapidity and centrality.Comment: 31 pages + 12 figures (compressed and uuencoded by uufiles), LATEX,
Submitted to PR
Measurement of the Total Active 8B Solar Neutrino Flux at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory with Enhanced Neutral Current Sensitivity
The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) has precisely determined the total
active (nu_x) 8B solar neutrino flux without assumptions about the energy
dependence of the nu_e survival probability. The measurements were made with
dissolved NaCl in the heavy water to enhance the sensitivity and signature for
neutral-current interactions. The flux is found to be 5.21 +/- 0.27 (stat) +/-
0.38 (syst) x10^6 cm^{-2}s^{-1}, in agreement with previous measurements and
standard solar models. A global analysis of these and other solar and reactor
neutrino results yields Delta m^{2} = 7.1^{+1.2}_{-0.6}x10^{-5} ev^2 and theta
= 32.5^{+2.4}_{-2.3} degrees. Maximal mixing is rejected at the equivalent of
5.4 standard deviations.Comment: Submitted to Phys. Rev. Let
Electron Antineutrino Search at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Upper limits on the \nuebar flux at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory have
been set based on the \nuebar charged-current reaction on deuterium. The
reaction produces a positron and two neutrons in coincidence. This distinctive
signature allows a search with very low background for \nuebar's from the Sun
and other potential sources. Both differential and integral limits on the
\nuebar flux have been placed in the energy range from 4 -- 14.8 MeV. For an
energy-independent \nu_e --> \nuebar conversion mechanism, the integral limit
on the flux of solar \nuebar's in the energy range from 4 -- 14.8 MeV is found
to be \Phi_\nuebar <= 3.4 x 10^4 cm^{-2} s^{-1} (90% C.L.), which corresponds
to 0.81% of the standard solar model 8B \nu_e flux of 5.05 x 10^6 cm^{-2}
s^{-1}, and is consistent with the more sensitive limit from KamLAND in the 8.3
-- 14.8 MeV range of 3.7 x 10^2 cm^{-2} s^{-1} (90% C.L.). In the energy range
from 4 -- 8 MeV, a search for \nuebar's is conducted using coincidences in
which only the two neutrons are detected. Assuming a \nuebar spectrum for the
neutron induced fission of naturally occurring elements, a flux limit of
Phi_\nuebar <= 2.0 x 10^6 cm^{-2} s^{-1}(90% C.L.) is obtained.Comment: submitted to Phys. Rev.
Measurement of the rate of nu_e + d --> p + p + e^- interactions produced by 8B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Solar neutrinos from the decay of B have been detected at the Sudbury
Neutrino Observatory (SNO) via the charged current (CC) reaction on deuterium
and by the elastic scattering (ES) of electrons. The CC reaction is sensitive
exclusively to nu_e's, while the ES reaction also has a small sensitivity to
nu_mu's and nu_tau's. The flux of nu_e's from ^8B decay measured by the CC
reaction rate is
\phi^CC(nu_e) = 1.75 +/- 0.07 (stat)+0.12/-0.11 (sys.) +/- 0.05(theor) x 10^6
/cm^2 s.
Assuming no flavor transformation, the flux inferred from the ES reaction
rate is
\phi^ES(nu_x) = 2.39+/-0.34 (stat.)+0.16}/-0.14 (sys) x 10^6 /cm^2 s.
Comparison of \phi^CC(nu_e) to the Super-Kamiokande Collaboration's precision
value of \phi^ES(\nu_x) yields a 3.3 sigma difference, providing evidence that
there is a non-electron flavor active neutrino component in the solar flux. The
total flux of active ^8B neutrinos is thus determined to be 5.44 +/-0.99 x
10^6/cm^2 s, in close agreement with the predictions of solar models.Comment: 6 pages (LaTex), 3 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev. Letter
Π‘ΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠ±Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²ΠΎΠΉΠ½Ρ
Oncology was officially acknowledged as a separate branch of medical science 75 years ago. Historically, it was landmarked by Order No. 323 of the Peopleβs Commissariat for Health of the USSR of April 30, 1945 βOn efforts to improve national oncology careβ. This decision triggered deployment of a network of oncological institutions that covered almost the entire country in relatively short time and persists today. Aside to rapid revival of existing cancer institutions, new research centres for oncology and radiology, cancer dispensaries and rooms were being set up to gear universal and comprehensive case archival, due-time tumour diagnostics and vocational training, along with manifold other measures to contain cancer. A milestone event was the erection of the Oncological Society in 1954 by the Scientific Council Presidium of the USSR Ministry of Health. The Moscow and All-Union oncological societies contributed greatly to establishment of the Oncology Service and promoted the prestige of Soviet oncology, professional activity in the Unionβs republics and overall effectiveness against cancer. Involvement of outstanding scientists, leading oncologists and healthcare decision makers in fostering the Oncology Service cannot be overstated. Today, a progress is made towards understanding the roots of cancer, supply of medical institutions with state-of-the-art equipment, implementation of effective diagnostic and therapy practices. Nevertheless, as yet timely remain further enhancement of preventive medicine, deployment of regional programs for cancer monitoring, education and higher-level professional training, remodelling of diagnostics and care in specialised oncological and primary medical institutions, creation of a unified system for prevention, earlier diagnosis and treatment of cancer.ΠΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ 75 Π»Π΅Ρ Π½Π°Π·Π°Π΄ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½Π° ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠ°Π» ΠΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π· β 323 ΠΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²Π° Π‘Π‘Π‘Π ΠΎΡ 30 Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅Π»Ρ 1945 Π³. Β«Π Π±ΠΎΡΡΠ±Π΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΒ». ΠΡΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΎΡ
Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠ°Ρ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ Π·Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΡΡΠΎΠΊ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ. ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ΄Ρ Ρ Π±ΡΡΡΡΡΠΌ Π²ΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ³Π΅Π½ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΏΠ°Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ½Π΅ΡΡ, ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ, ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠ°Π΄ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ Π±ΠΎΡΡΠ±Π΅ Ρ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² 1954 Π³. ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΌΠ° Π£ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ° ΠΠΈΠ½Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²Π° Π‘Π‘Π‘Π ΠΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ². ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² Π±ΡΠ» Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΉ Π²ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ Π² ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠ±Ρ. ΠΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ° ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΡΠ·Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊ, ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΡΡΠ±Ρ. ΠΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ Π²ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ Π² ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠ±Ρ Π²ΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡ
, ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ. Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³Π½ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ
ΠΈ Π² ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ- ΡΠΈΠ½ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ°, Π² ΠΎΡΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ, Π²ΠΎ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊ Π² ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΡ. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΠΏΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ; ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΡΡΠ±Π΅; ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ°Π΄ΡΠΎΠ²; ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎ-Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° Π² ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ; ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π΅ΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ
Constraints on Nucleon Decay via "Invisible" Modes from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory have been used to constrain the
lifetime for nucleon decay to ``invisible'' modes, such as n -> 3 nu. The
analysis was based on a search for gamma-rays from the de-excitation of the
residual nucleus that would result from the disappearance of either a proton or
neutron from O16. A limit of tau_inv > 2 x 10^{29} years is obtained at 90%
confidence for either neutron or proton decay modes. This is about an order of
magnitude more stringent than previous constraints on invisible proton decay
modes and 400 times more stringent than similar neutron modes.Comment: Update includes missing efficiency factor (limits change by factor of
2) Submitted to Physical Review Letter
Flow Measurements via Two-particle Azimuthal Correlations in Au + Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 130 GeV
Two particle azimuthal correlation functions are presented for charged
hadrons produced in Au + Au collisions at RHIC sqrt(s_NN) = 130 GeV. The
measurements permit determination of elliptic flow without event-by-event
estimation of the reaction plane. The extracted elliptic flow values v_2 show
significant sensitivity to both the collision centrality and the transverse
momenta of emitted hadrons, suggesting rapid thermalization and relatively
strong velocity fields. When scaled by the eccentricity of the collision zone,
epsilon, the scaled elliptic flow shows little or no dependence on centrality
for charged hadrons with relatively low p_T. A breakdown of this epsilon
scaling is observed for charged hadrons with p_T > 1.0 GeV/c for the most
central collisions.Comment: 6 pages, RevTeX 3, 4 figures, 307 authors, submitted to Phys. Rev.
Lett. on 11 April 2002. Plain text data tables for the points plotted in
figures for this and previous PHENIX publications are (will be made) publicly
available at http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/phenix/WWW/run/phenix/papers.htm
Net Charge Fluctuations in Au + Au Interactions at sqrt(s_NN) = 130 GeV
Data from Au + Au interactions at sqrt(s_NN) = 130 GeV, obtained with the
PHENIX detector at RHIC, are used to investigate local net charge fluctuations
among particles produced near mid-rapidity. According to recent suggestions,
such fluctuations may carry information from the Quark Gluon Plasma. This
analysis shows that the fluctuations are dominated by a stochastic distribution
of particles, but are also sensitive to other effects, like global charge
conservation and resonance decays.Comment: 6 pages, RevTeX 3, 3 figures, 307 authors, submitted to Phys. Rev.
Lett. on 21 March, 2002. Plain text data tables for the points plotted in
figures for this and previous PHENIX publications are (will be made) publicly
available at http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/phenix/WWW/run/phenix/papers.htm
Event-by-event fluctuations in Mean and Mean in sqrt(s_NN) = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions
Distributions of event-by-event fluctuations of the mean transverse momentum
and mean transverse energy near mid-rapidity have been measured in Au+Au
collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 130 GeV at RHIC. By comparing the distributions to
what is expected for statistically independent particle emission, the magnitude
of non-statistical fluctuations in mean transverse momentum is determined to be
consistent with zero. Also, no significant non-random fluctuations in mean
transverse energy are observed. By constructing a fluctuation model with two
event classes that preserve the mean and variance of the semi-inclusive p_T or
e_T spectra, we exclude a region of fluctuations in sqrt(s_NN) = 130 GeV Au+Au
collisions.Comment: 10 pages, RevTeX 3, 7 figures, 4 tables, 307 authors, submitted to
Phys. Rev. C on 22 March 2002. Plain text data tables for the points plotted
in figures for this and previous PHENIX publications are (will be made)
publicly available at
http://www.phenix.bnl.gov/phenix/WWW/run/phenix/papers.htm
Centrality Dependence of Charged Particle Multiplicity in Au-Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=130 GeV
We present results for the charged-particle multiplicity distribution at
mid-rapidity in Au - Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=130 GeV measured with the
PHENIX detector at RHIC. For the 5% most central collisions we find
. The results,
analyzed as a function of centrality, show a steady rise of the particle
density per participating nucleon with centrality.Comment: 307 authors, 43 institutions, 6 pages, 4 figures, 1 table Minor
changes to figure labels and text to meet PRL requirements. One author added:
M. Hibino of Waseda Universit
- β¦