Transcriptomics Comparison between Porcine Adipose and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells during In Vitro Osteogenic and Adipogenic Differentiation

Bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) are considered the gold standard for use in tissue regeneration among mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). The abundance and ease of harvest make the adipose-derived stem cells (ASC) an attractive alternative to BMSC. The aim of the present study was to compare the transcriptome of ASC and BMSC, respectively isolated from subcutaneous adipose tissue and femur of 3 adult pigs, during in vitro osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation for up to four weeks. At 0, 2, 7, and 21 days of differentiation RNA was extracted for microarray analysis. A False Discovery Rate ≤0.05 for overall interactions effect and P<0.001 between comparisons were used to determine differentially expressed genes (DEG). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and DAVID performed the functional analysis of the DEG. Functional analysis of highest expressed genes in MSC and genes more expressed in MSC vs. fully differentiated tissues indicated low immunity and high angiogenic capacity. Only 64 genes were differentially expressed between ASC and BMSC before differentiation. The functional analysis uncovered a potential larger angiogenic, osteogenic, migration, and neurogenic capacity in BMSC and myogenic capacity in ASC. Less than 200 DEG were uncovered between ASC and BMSC during differentiation. Functional analysis also revealed an overall greater lipid metabolism in ASC, while BMSC had a greater cell growth and proliferation. The time course transcriptomic comparison between differentiation types uncovered <500 DEG necessary to determine cell fate. The functional analysis indicated that osteogenesis had a larger cell proliferation and cytoskeleton organization with a crucial role of G-proteins. Adipogenesis was driven by PPAR signaling and had greater angiogenesis, lipid metabolism, migration, and tumorigenesis capacity. Overall the data indicated that the transcriptome of the two MSC is relatively similar across the conditions studied. In addition, functional analysis data might indicate differences in therapeutic application

Double mutation JAK2L611V/V617F dans un cas pédiatrique de polyglobulie

# 10-30International audienc

Multicentric MFI30 study: Standardization of flow cytometry analysis of CD30 expression in non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

International audienceCD30 transmembrane receptor, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family, is expressed in different lymphomas. Brentuximab vedotin (BV), a CD30 monoclonal antibody (Ab)-drug conjugate, is effective in CD30-positive lymphomas. However, the response to BV is not always correlated to CD30 expression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The objectives of this study were to standardize and evaluate CD30 intensity by flow cytometry (FCM) in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Twelve centers analyzed 161 cases on standardized cytometers using normalized median fluorescence intensity (nMFI30) of three different Abs, of which one clone can recognize the same epitope as BV. FCM distinguished four groups of cases: negative group (n = 110) which showed no expression with the three clones; high positive group (n = 13) which gave nMFI30 > 5% with all tested clones; dim positive group (n = 17) which showed nMFI30 > 1% with all tested clones and <5% for at least one; discordant group (n = 21) with positive and negative expression of the different clones. In consistency with the literature, CD30 was positive in all anaplastic large cell lymphomas, in some diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL), and in other rare lymphomas. FCM results were concordant with those of IHC in 77% of cases. Discrepancies could be explained by clones-related differences, microenvironment, or intracytoplasmic staining. Interestingly, FCM was more sensitive than IHC in 11% of cases, especially in DLBCL. Multicenter standardized FCM of specific CD30 could improve case detection and extend the treatment of BV to various CD30-positive lymphomas