Using the ecology model to describe the impact of asthma on patterns of health care

BACKGROUND: Asthma changes both the volume and patterns of healthcare of affected people. Most studies of asthma health care utilization have been done in selected insured populations or in a single site such as the emergency department. Asthma is an ambulatory sensitive care condition making it important to understand the relationship between care in all sites across the health service spectrum. Asthma is also more common in people with fewer economic resources making it important to include people across all types of insurance and no insurance categories. The ecology of medical care model may provide a useful framework to describe the use of health services in people with asthma compared to those without asthma and identify subgroups with apparent gaps in care. METHODS: This is a case-control study using the 1999 U.S. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Cases are school-aged children (6 to 17 years) and young adults (18 to 44 years) with self-reported asthma. Controls are from the same age groups who have no self-reported asthma. Descriptive analyses and risk ratios are placed within the ecology of medical care model and used to describe and compare the healthcare contact of cases and controls across multiple settings. RESULTS: In 1999, the presence of asthma significantly increased the likelihood of an ambulatory care visit by 20 to 30% and more than doubled the likelihood of making one or more visits to the emergency department (ED). Yet, 18.8% of children and 14.5% of adults with asthma (over a million Americans) had no ambulatory care visits for asthma. About one in 20 to 35 people with asthma (5.2% of children and 3.6% of adults) were seen in the ED or hospital but had no prior or follow-up ambulatory care visits. These Americans were more likely to be uninsured, have no usual source of care and live in metropolitan areas. CONCLUSION: The ecology model confirmed that having asthma changes the likelihood and pattern of care for Americans. More importantly, the ecology model identified a subgroup with asthma who sought only emergent or hospital services

Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study

Despite current guidelines, intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery remains widespread. Drains were not associated with earlier detection of intraperitoneal collections, but were associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased risk of surgical-site infections.Background Many surgeons routinely place intraperitoneal drains after elective colorectal surgery. However, enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines recommend against their routine use owing to a lack of clear clinical benefit. This study aimed to describe international variation in intraperitoneal drain placement and the safety of this practice. Methods COMPASS (COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery) was a prospective, international, cohort study which enrolled consecutive adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery (February to March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included: rate and time to diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections; rate of surgical site infections (SSIs); time to discharge; and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade at least III). After propensity score matching, multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate the independent association of the secondary outcomes with drain placement. Results Overall, 1805 patients from 22 countries were included (798 women, 44.2 per cent; median age 67.0 years). The drain insertion rate was 51.9 per cent (937 patients). After matching, drains were not associated with reduced rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 2.23; P = 0.287) or earlier detection (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 0.33 to 2.31; P = 0.780) of collections. Although not associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR 1.09, 0.68 to 1.75; P = 0.709), drains were associated with delayed hospital discharge (HR 0.58, 0.52 to 0.66; P < 0.001) and an increased risk of SSIs (OR 2.47, 1.50 to 4.05; P < 0.001). Conclusion Intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery is not associated with earlier detection of postoperative collections, but prolongs hospital stay and increases SSI risk

Prevalence of asthma and COPD in general practice in 1992: has it changed since 1977?

BACKGROUND: Asthma and COPD are common diseases of the airways which are mainly diagnosed and treated in general practice. AIM: Various studies have reported an increase in the morbidity of asthma and COPD. There are two possible reasons for such an increase. The first is an apparent increase caused by using different criteria in defining asthma/COPD, and by increased awareness of the disease by doctors and patients. The second is a real increase caused by an increase in the prevalence of airway pathology. The aim of this study was to determine the cause of the observed increase in morbidity. METHOD: In 1977, a sample of 2328 adults from the general population were screened for asthma and COPD. Those screened were then divided into five sub-groups (grades 1-5), according to severity of: (1) respiratory symptoms; and (2) loss in FEV1. The number of patients who were not known to the general practitioner prior to the screening as having asthma or COPD grades 1-5 were also assessed. In 1992, we studied a different sample of 1184 adults of the general population in the same area. We used the same criteria as in 1977 to analyse our results. The number of patients not known to the general practitioner prior to the screening was also studied. RESULTS: The overall prevalence (grades 1-5) of asthma and COPD has increased from +/- 19% in 1977 to +/- 31% in 1992 (range 21-42). The main reason for this is an increase in prevalence of very mild to moderate asthma and COPD (grades 1-3) from 17% in 1977 to 27% in 1992. The prevalence of severe cases (grades 4-5) increased from 2% in 1977 to 4% in 1992. In 1992, around 65% of the patients were not known to the general practitioner as having any grade of asthma or COPD. This was only slightly lower than the 72% in 1977. All patients with a severe disease (grade 5) were known to the general practitioner. CONCLUSIONS: There is a real increase in the prevalence of asthma and COPD, caused predominantly by an increase in the number of mild cases. The percentage of patients not known to the GP were predominantly mild cases