Pros and Cons of Peginterferon Versus Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B

The emergence of new and more potent treatment options has markedly changed the treatment landscape of chronic hepatitis B. Both peginterferon and nucleos(t)ide analogues have considerable advantages and limitations, and current treatment guidelines refrain from clearly suggesting a first-line treatment option. Peginterferon offers the advantage of higher sustained response rates in both hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, at the price of considerable side effects and high costs. Nucleos(t)ide analogues offer easy daily oral dosing, and newly registered agents can maintain viral suppression for prolonged treatment duration. However, relapse is common after therapy discontinuation and extended therapy therefore often necessary. Prolonged treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues may enhance chances of virologic and serologic response at the potential cost of the emergence of viral resistance and side effects. Baseline and on-treatment prediction of response may help select patients for peginterferon therapy and can aid individualized treatment decisions concerning therapy continuation or discontinuation

Pros and cons of different therapeutic antibody formats for recombinant antivenom development.

Antibody technologies are being increasingly applied in the field of toxinology. Fuelled by the many advances in immunology, synthetic biology, and antibody research, different approaches and antibody formats are being investigated for the ability to neutralize animal toxins. These different molecular formats each have their own therapeutic characteristics. In this review, we provide an overview of the advances made in the development of toxin-targeting antibodies, and discuss the benefits and drawbacks of different antibody formats in relation to their ability to neutralize toxins, pharmacokinetic features, propensity to cause adverse reactions, formulation, and expression for research and development (R&D) purposes and large-scale manufacturing. A research trend seems to be emerging towards the use of human antibody formats as well as camelid heavy-domain antibody fragments due to their compatibility with the human immune system, beneficial therapeutic properties, and the ability to manufacture these molecules cost-effectively

Treatment of chronic hepatitis type B

Paper presented at the International conference on Hepatitis BAvailable from Centro de Informacion y Documentacion Cientifica CINDOC. Joaquin Costa, 22. 28002 Madrid. SPAIN / CINDOC - Centro de Informaciòn y Documentaciòn CientìficaSIGLEESSpai

Long-term follow-up of antiviral combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B

For patients with chronic hepatitis B e (HBe)-positive hepatitis, long-term results of pilot studies with lymphoblastoid interferon-alpha, acyclovir, or a combination, and of a randomized controlled trial of interferon/desciclovir combination therapy are presented. HBe seroconversion was observed in more than 40 percent of patients treated with combination therapy, 30 percent with interferon therapy, 18 percent with acyclovir, and 0 percent with no treatment. HBe reactivation occurred in two patients with cirrhosis. Hepatitis B surface seroconversion followed HBe seroconversion in 11 to 30 percent of treated patients. HBe seroconversion was significantly related to initial low levels of viral replication and to transient aminotransferase elevation during the second half of the interferon treatment of 16 weeks. Clinical improvement and persistent normalization of aspartate aminotransferase was observed in all patients with HBe seroconversion. Conversion to a state of virus latency (HBe negative) mostly occurred after therapy, suggesting that the specific immunologic host response had been brought about by the suppression of virus replication through antiviral agents. Recommendations for selection of patients for antiviral combination therapy are made on the basis of these long-term result