Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair with the Mitraclip System in Barlow's Disease

n/

A randomized control trial to assess optical coherence tomography parameters of the Xlimus drug-eluting stent: the XLIMIT trial

BackgroundThird generation drug-eluting stents (DES) potentially offer better technical performance and reduced neointimal proliferation than previous generation DES. The XLIMIT non-inferiority trial evaluated the performance of the Xlimus (a novel sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system) in terms of endothelialization and tissue healing compared to the bioresorbable polymer Synergy DES.MethodsA total of 177 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio (2 Xlimus: 1 Synergy). The primary endpoints, defined as the in-stent neointimal volume weighted by the sum of the lengths of the implanted stent (ISNV) and the in-stent neointimal percent volume obstruction (%VO) were evaluated at 6–9 months by means of optical coherence tomography (OCT). Additional OCT parameters as well as clinical endpoints were also collected.ResultsMost of the patients were males (77.4%), and the mean age was 64 years. One third of the population had stable angina/silent ischemia. A total of 300 stents (237 lesions) were analyzed: 198 (152 lesions) were in the Xlimus group, and 102 (85 lesions) in the Synergy group. The ISNV in the Xlimus group was 30.7 ± 24.5 mm3 while in the Synergy group it was 26.5 ± 26.7 mm3: the difference between the two means was 0.08 (−0, 04–0, 45), p = 0.018, thus meeting the non-inferiority hypothesis. The %VO was 16.3% ± 10.4% and 13.3% ± 10.8% in the Xlimus and Synergy groups, respectively: the difference between the two means was 3.0 (−0, 06–4, 2), (p = 0.01), thus meeting the non-inferiority hypothesis. No difference was found with respect to the secondary OCT endpoints as well as for clinical endpoints.ConclusionsThe study results confirm that the biological interaction of the Xlimus and Synergy DES with the coronary artery is comparable, and that translates in very reassuring OCT parameters at follow-up: as such, the Xlimus is non-inferior to the Synergy.Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT03745053)

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in atrial functional mitral regurgitation: insights from the multi-center MITRA-TUNE registry

Background: A-FMR is considered a specific sub-type of secondary MR in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and preserved left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). Aim of the study was to investigate the acute and mid-term outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVr) with the MitraClip in atrial functional mitral regurgitation (A-FMR). Methods: The study included patients with A-FMR and concomitant AF who underwent to the MitraClip at 7 Italian Centers. Aim of the study was to assess the safety, efficacy and mid-term cardiovascular outcomes. Results: After reviewing 1153 patients with FMR treated with TMVr from 2009 to 2021, 87 patients (median age 81 years, 61% female) with A-FMR were identified. Technical success was achieved in 97%, 30-day device success in 83% and 30-day procedural success in 80%. All-cause death at 30-day was 5%. Estimated two-year freedom from all-cause death and cardiac death was 60% and 77%, respectively, whereas freedom from allcause death/heart failure hospitalization was 55%. Residual MR <= 2+ was encountered in 89% (n = 47/53) and improvement in NYHA class I/II in 79% (n = 48/61). Post-procedural MR > 2+ (HR 5.400, CI 1.371-21.268) and inter-commissural annular diameter > 35 mm (HR 4.159, CI 1.057-16.363) were independent predictors of all-cause death/heart failure hospitalization during the follow-up. Positive reverse remodeling of left atrium and mitral annular dimensions occurred after TMVr during the follow-up. Conclusions: MitraClip resulted to be a safe and effective option to treat A-FMR in elderly patients

Five-year clinical outcomes after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair: Insights from the multicenter GRASP-IT registry

Background Limited evidence is available on 5-year clinical outcomes after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.Methods The Getting Reduction of mitrAl inSufficiency by Percutaneous clip implantation in Frilly (GRASP-IT) is a multicenter registry including 304 consecutive patients undergoing Mitraclip between October 2008 and October 2013 at 4 Italian centers. Primary end point (all-cause mortality) and secondary end point (all-cause mortality or heart failure [HF] hospitalization) were evaluated up to 5 years and between 1 and 5 years.Results Cumulative incidence of the primary and secondary end points at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 15.1%, 26.4%, 35.5%, 42.1%, and 47.3% and 29.1%, 41.7%, 49.8%, 56%, and 62.3%, respectively. Landmark analysis between 1 and 5 years showed an incidence of primary and secondary end point of 37.9% and 46.8%, respectively. Five-year event rates were significantly higher in patients with functional ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) compared to other etiologies. MR recurrence and left ventricular ejection fraction <30% were associated with an increased risk of both primary and secondary end points. EuroSCORE II >5% was associated with an increased risk of 5-year mortality. Ischemic etiology of MR, baseline serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and previous HF hospitalizations were independent predictors of 5-year secondary end point.Conclusions At 5-year follow-up after Mitraclip, nearly half of patients died and almost two thirds died or were admitted for HF. MR recurrence, ischemic etiology, high comorbidity burden (ie, EuroSCORE II >5%, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and advanced cardiomyopathy (ie, left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, prior HF admission, creatinine >1.5 mg/dl) significantly increase the relative risk of 5-year clinical events

Bailout From Sinus Jailing

Redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may pose the risk of coronary flow obstruction. We report 2 cases of severe TAVR regurgitation due to different physiopathological mechanisms in which TAVR-in-TAVR could be at high risk for sinus sequestration. Both cases were successfully treated by in-series implantation of a second transcatheter heart valve, thus avoiding sinus sequestration. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.

Selection of the optimal candidate to mitraclip for secondary mitral regurgitation : Beyond mitral valve morphology

Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) occurs despite structurally normal valve apparatus due to an underlying disease of the myocardium leading to disruption of the balance between tethering and closing forces with ensuing failure of leaflet coaptation. In patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular dysfunction, secondary MR is independently associated with poor outcome, yet prognostic benefits related to the correction of MR have remained elusive. Surgery is not recommended for the correction of secondary MR outside coronary artery bypass grafting. Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) with MitraClip implantation has recently evolved as a new transcatheter treatment option of inoperable or high-risk patients with severe MR, with promising results supporting the extension of guideline recommendations. MitraClip is highly effective in reducing secondary MR in HF patients. However, the derived clinical benefit is still controversial as two randomized trials directly comparing PMVR vs. optimal medical therapy in severe secondary MR yielded virtually opposite conclusions. We reviewed current evidence to identify predictors of PMVR-related outcomes in secondary MR useful to improve the timing and the selection of patients who would derive maximal benefit from MitraClip intervention. Beyond mitral valve anatomy, optimal candidate selection should rely on a comprehensive diagnostic workup and a fine-tuned risk stratification process aimed at (i) recognizing the substantial heterogeneity of secondary MR and its complex interaction with the myocardium, (ii) foreseeing hemodynamic consequences of PMVR, (iii) anticipating futility and (iv) improving symptoms, quality of life and overall survival

Edge‐to‐edge percutaneous mitral repair for functional ischaemic and non‐ischaemic mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract Aim Randomized controlled trials comparing the use of the MitraClip device in addition to guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) to GDMT alone in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) have shown conflicting results. However, if these differences could be due to the underlying MR aetiology is still unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate if the effects of percutaneous edge‐to‐edge repair with MitraClip implantation could differ in patients with ischaemic (I‐MR) and non‐ischaemic mitral regurgitation (NI‐MR). Methods and results PubMed, Embase, BioMed Central, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for all studies including patients with secondary MR treated with the MitraClip device. Data were pooled using a random‐effects model. Primary endpoint was the composite of all‐cause death and heart failure‐related hospitalization. Secondary endpoints were the single components of the primary endpoint, New York Heart Association functional Classes III and IV, and mitral valve re‐intervention. Seven studies enrolling 2501 patients were included. Patients with I‐MR compared with patients with NI‐MR had a similar risk of the primary endpoint (odds ratio: 1.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 1.46; I2: 0%). The risk of all‐cause death was increased in patients with I‐MR (odds ratio: 1.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.07 to 1.62; I2: 0%), while no differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the other secondary endpoints. Conclusions The risk of mortality after MitraClip implantation is lower in patients with NI‐MR than in those with I‐MR. No absolute differences in the risk of heart failure related hospitalization were observed between groups