Consumer behaviour related to rabbit meat as functional food

[EN] Rabbit is one of the most versatile livestock species, responding successfully to bio-economic principles, which promote a clever use of resources and their conversion into added value products, such as functional foods (FFs). The excellent nutritive and dietetic properties of rabbit meat justify granting it the attributes of FFs. Based on the premise that it is the consumer who ultimately decides what kind of meat to buy, a consumer focus should be a core factor in private or public meat sector strategies. Following this assumption, the aim of this study is to contribute to understanding Romanian consumer behaviour related to rabbit meat as a functional food and to provide information on how to better market rabbit meat as FF in the domestic market. As far as the authors know, this study is the first one to assess and report on Romanian consumer perceptions, knowledge and behaviours related to rabbit meat. Consequently, the variables investigated reflect rabbit meat consumption habits. They also reveal preferences related to the acquisition of rabbit meat, perceptions on future rabbit meat consumption, perceptions of rabbit meat characteristics, perceptions of rabbit meat main characteristics compared to other types of meat, and rabbit meat consumption deterrents. The survey results show that rabbit meat is perceived as lean and low cholesterol, healthier and tastier than other meats, but more expensive, that its consumption is low, being 2.2 times lower than chicken and 1.8 times lower than pork, and that 29.6% of people surveyed have never eaten rabbit meat. The findings ascertain that the understanding of Romanian consumer behaviour related to rabbit meat as FF is an optimal tool for changing behaviour patterns towards a more sustainable market. The transfer of this knowledge towards marketers mainly focusing on how to increase consumer satisfaction for FFs, especially meat, is the leverage for designing successful businesses regarding market re-orientation, development or even reduction of health cost.This study was partially developed through the research programme “The creation of a model for the evaluation of food quality from the point of view of consumer health and environmental protection”, selected within the bilateral cooperation between the Romanian Academy and Wallonia – WBI, FRS-FNRS. “La présente publication a été rendue possible grâce à l’Accord qui lie WBI, le FRS-FNRS et l’Académie Roumaine.Petrescu, DC.; Petrescu-Mag, RM. (2018). Consumer behaviour related to rabbit meat as functional food. World Rabbit Science. 26(4):321-333. doi:10.4995/wrs.2018.10435SWORD321333264Andersen H.J., Oksbjerg N., Young J.F., Therkildsen M. 2005. Feeding and meat quality -a future approach. Meat Sci., 70: 543-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.015Annunziata A., Vecchio R. 2010. Italian consumer attitudes toward products for well-being: the functional foods market. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 13: 19-50.Arnold C. 2009. Ethical marketing and the new consumer. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.Bastian B., Loughnan S., Haslam N., Radke H. R. 2012. Don't mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B., 38: 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211424291Baviera-Puig A., Buitrago-Vera J., Escribá-Pérez C., Montero-Vicente L. 2017. Rabbit meat sector value chain. World Rabbit Sci., 25: 95-108. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2017.6565Blaga B.C., Burny P. 2014. Rabbit production and rabbit market in Romania: the most frequent breeds, half-breeds and their characterization. Rabbit Gen., 4: 1-6.Bodnar K., Bodnar Skobrak E. 2014. Main traits of the rabbit meat in its marketing. Lucrări Științifice Management Agricol, 16: 104-108.Bodnar K., Horvath J. 2008a. Consumers' opinion about rabbit meat consumption in Hungary. In Proc.: 9th World Rabbit Congress, 10-13 June 2008, Verona, Italy. 1519-1522.Bodnar K., Horvath J. 2008b. Consumers' opinion about rabbit meat consumption in Hungary. In Proc: 9th World Rabbit Congress, 10-13 June 2008, Verona, Italy. 1519-1522.Boland M.J., Rae A.N., Vereijken J.M., Meuwissen M.P.M., Fischer A.R.H., van Boekel M.A.J.S., Rutherfurd S.M., Gruppen H., Moughan P.J., Hendriks W.H. 2013. The future supply of animalderived protein for human consumption. Trends Food Sci. Tech., 29: 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2012.07.002Buitrago-Vera J., Escribá-Pérez C., Baviera-Puig A., Montero-Vicente L. 2016. Consumer segmentation based on food-related lifestyles and analysis of rabbit meat consumption. World Rabbit Sci., 24: 169-182. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2016.4229Cheeke P. 1980. Editorial: The potential role of the rabbit in meeting world food needs. J. Appl. Rabbit Res., 3: 3-5.Corpet D.E. 2011. Red meat and colon cancer: should we become vegetarians, or can we make meat safer? Meat Sci., 89: 310-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.009Dalle Zotte A. 2002. Perception of rabbit meat quality and major factors influencing the rabbit carcass and meat quality. Livest. Prod. Sci., 75: 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00308-6Dalle Zotte A., Szendrő Z. 2011. The role of rabbit meat as functional food. Meat Sci., 88: 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.02.017De-Magistris T., Lopéz-Galán B. 2016. Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain. Public Health, 135, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.02.004Dinu V., Marchevski I., Dobrescu E., Petrescu R.M. 2010. Education and training needs in the field of consumer protection in the Lower Danube region. Amfiteatru Economic, 12: 709-734.Ecoduri, 2018. Date demografice Cluj-Napoca, Cluj statistica si rapoarte ale populatiei [Cluj-Napoca demographic data, Cluj statistics and population reports]. Available at: http://www.ecoduri.com/recensamantul-populatiei/Cluj/Cluj-Napoca.php#educatie Accessed December 2018.European Commission. 2012. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe, {SWD(2012) 11 final}. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/officialstrategy_en.pdf Accessed December 2018.EUROSTAT. 2015. Meat production statistics. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Meat_production_statistics#Data_sources_and_availability. Accessed December 2018.FAOSTAT. 2012. Food and Agricultural Organization statistical database. Available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostatgateway/go/to/download/Q/QL/E.Font-i-Furnols M., Guerrero L. 2014. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Sci., 98: 361-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.025González-Redondo P., Contreras-Chacón G.M. 2012. Perceptions among university students in Seville (Spain) of the rabbit as livestock and as a companion animal. World Rabbit Sci., 20: 155-162. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2012.1147González-Redondo P., Sánchez-Martínez R. 2014. Characterisation of wild rabbit commercial game farms in Spain. World Rabbit Sci., 22: 51-58. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2014.1213Grădinaru A.C. 2017. The Transylvanian Giant Rabbit: an efficient selection for qualitative and quantitative genetic traits. Rabbit Gen., 7: 1-6.Grunert K.G., Bredahl L., Brunsø K. 2004. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector -a review. Meat Sci., 66: 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00130-XHasnah Hassan S. 2011. Managing conflicting values in functional food consumption: the Malaysian experience. Brit. Food J., 113: 1045-1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701111153788Hoffman L.C., Nkhabutlane P., Schutte D.W., Vosloo C. 2004. Factors affecting the purchasing of rabbit meat: A study of ethnic groups in the Western Cape. J. Consum. Sci., 32: 26-35.Hung Y., de Kok T.M., Verbeke W. 2016. Consumer attitude and purchase intention towards processed meat products with natural compounds and a reduced level of nitrite. Meat Sci., 121:119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.06.002Ibrahim M., El-Banna H., Omara I., Suliman M.A. 2011. Evaluation of nutritive value of some citrus pulp as feedstuffs in rabbit diets. Pak. J. Nutr., 10: 667-674. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2011.667.674International Standardization Organization. 2015. ISO 9000. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards.htm Accessed December 2018.Jeltema M., Beckley J., Vahalik J. 2015. Model for understanding consumer textural food choice. Food Sci. Nutr., 3: 202-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.205Kallas Z., Gil J.M. 2012. A dual response choice experiments (DRCE) design to assess rabbit meat preference in Catalonia: A heteroscedastic extreme-value model. Brit. Food J., 114: 1394-1413. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701211262984Khan M. I., Arshad M. S., Anjum F. M., Sameen A., Gill W. T. 2011. Meat as a functional food with special reference to probiotic sausages. Food Res. Int., 44: 3125-3133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.07.033Kourouniotis S., Keast R., Riddell L., Lacy K., Thorpe M., Cicerale S. 2016. The importance of taste on dietary choice, behaviour and intake in a group of young adults. Appetite, 103, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.015Kubomura K. 1998. Japan redefines functional foods. Prepared Foods, 167: 129-131.Lukefahr S. 1998. Rabbit production in Uganda: Potential versus opportunity. World Rabbit Sci., 6: 331-340. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.1998.365Lukefahr S., Cheeke P. 1990. Rabbit project planning strategies for developing countries. (1) Practical considerations. Livest. Res. Rural Develop., 2: 1-21.Lukefahr S.D., Paschal J.C., Ford J.E. 1998. Backyard production of meat rabbits in Texas. Available at: https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/87730/pdf_645.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Accessed December 2018.McAfee A.J., Ibeagha-Awemu E.M., Cuskelly G.J., Moss B.W., Wallace J.M.W., Bonham M.P., Fearon A.M. 2010. Red meat consumption: An overview of the risks and benefits. Meat Sci., 84: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.029National Institute of Statistics. 2018. Available at: http://www.insse.ro/cms/en Accessed December 2018.Nistor E., Bampidis V.A., Păcală N., Pentea M., Tozer J., Prundeanu H. 2013. Nutrient content of rabbit meat as compared to chicken, beef and pork meat. J. Anim. Prod. Adv., 3: 172-176.Pappalardo G., Lusk J.L. 2016. The role of beliefs in purchasing process of functional foods. Food Qual. Prefer., 53: 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.009Petracci M., Soglia F., Leroy F. 2018. Rabbit meat in need of a hattrick: from tradition to innovation (and back). Meat Sci., 146: 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.08.003Petracci M., Cavani C. 2013. Rabbit meat processing: historical perspective to future directions. World Rabbit Sci., 21: 217-226. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2013.1329Petrescu D.C., Oroian I.G., Mihăiescu T., Paulette L., Varban D., Pătruțoiu T.C. 2013. Rabbit statistics overview: production, trade, market evolution. Rabbit Gen., 3: 15-22.Petrescu D.C., Petrescu-Mag R.M., Burny P. 2017. Resilience to environmental pressure through quality food demand: meat consumption in Romania. Environ. Eng. Manage. J. (EEMJ), 16: 2391-2400. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2017.247Petrescu-Mag I., Oroian I., Botha M., Covrig I., Vesa Ș.C. 2014. Transylvanian giant rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): rustic means also aggressive. Rabbit Gen., 4: 56-59.Petrescu-Mag R.M., Oroian I.G., Botha M., Covrig I., Petrescu-Mag I.V. 2014. Morphological, productive and reproductive characterization of the Transylvanian giant rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): first statistical report. North-Western J. Zool., 10:400-403.Pérez López S., Manuel Montes Peón J, Vázquez Ordás J.C. 2005. Organizational learning as a determining factor in business performance. The Learning Organization, 12: 227-245. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470510592494Popescu D.V., Voinea L., Negrea M.T. 2015. Nutritional Imbalance-Dominant Consumption Behaviour of Romanian Youth. Amfiteatru Economic, 17, 1228-1243.Ritchie H., Roser M. 2018. Meat and Seafood Production & Consumption. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/meat-and-seafood-production-consumption Accessed December 2018.Rhormens M.S., Pedrini A.D.G., Ghilardi-Lopes N.P. 2017. Implementation feasibility of a marine ecotourism product on the reef environments of the marine protected areas of Tinharé and Boipeba Islands (Cairu, Bahia, Brazil). Ocean Coast. Manage., 139: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.01.022Rousset S., Deiss V., Juillard E., Schlich P., Droit-Volet S. 2005. Emotions generated by meat and other food products in women. Brit. J. Nutr., 94: 609-619. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN20051538Sima N., Sima R. 2015. Perennial fodder plants - potential feed sources in nutrition of rabbits. Rabbit Gen., 5: 6-12.Stanciu S., Rizea R.D., Ilie A.G. 2015. Study on the Competitiveness of the Romanian Meat Processing Industry. Amfiteatru Economic, 17: 1331-1345.STATISTA. 2108a. Average retail price of rabbit meat in France from 2008 to 2015 (in euros per kilo). Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/454198/average-retail-price-forrabbit-meat-in-france/ Accessed December 2018.STATISTA. 2018b. Annual average price of rabbit meat in Spain from 2010 to 2015 (in euros per kilogram). Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/765113/price-mediumof-the-kilogram-from-meat-from-rabbit-in-spain/ Accessed December 2018.Szakaly Z., Szigeti O., Szente V. 2009. Analysis of consumer habits and attitudes on the Hungarian beef and rabbit market. Appl. Stud. Agribusiness Comm., 3: 67-70. https://doi.org/10.19041/Apstract/2009/1-2/7Vecchio R., Van Loo E.J., Annunziata A. 2016. Consumers' willingness to pay for conventional, organic and functional yogurt: evidence from experimental auctions. Int. J. Consumer Stud., 40: 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12264Verbeke W. 2005. Consumer acceptance of functional foods: socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Qual. Prefer., 16: 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.01.001Wang W., Xu S., Wu L. 2013. Consumer Perceptions of Attitudes Towards and Willingness to Consume Rabbit Meat in Urban China. J. Nutr. Ecol. Food Res., 1: 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnef.2013.102

A social perspective on soil functions and quality improvement : Romanian farmers’ perceptions

Agriculture is a key player in the conservation of natural resources and cultural landscapes and one of the most prominent interfaces between human activity and soil. The present paper reveals a social perspective on soil functions. In this context, it was assumed that perceptions of soil functions could transform themselves into components of agro-ecosystems and influence the whole decision-making process. Therefore, it is indispensable to look at farmers when approaching soil functions. The objective of this study was twofold. Firstly, Romanian farmers' perception of the importance of soil functions was investigated. Secondly, it was revealed how well farmers' perception of soil functions importance and socio-economic variables could predict the "Use of compost". Soil functions were selected based on an extensive literature review. Farmers' perceptions of soil functions and the use of compost as a measure taken to improve soil productivity were studied through a questionnaire applied to a sample of 278 Romanian farmers randomly selected from sixteen villages. Binary logistic regression revealed that the perceived importance of two soil functions could predict the use of compost - "Water quantity regulation" and "Water quality maintenance and enhancement". The study concluded that strengthening the importance of the "Water quantity regulation" function in farmers' minds can stimulate the use of compost. It was also inferred that because younger farmers are more prone to composting, they will be more receptive to marketing actions related to compost use, such as the acquisitions of materials and instruments useful for compost production and use. In a context where a real dialogue to elaborate well-grounded environmental policies is still elusive because of differences between farmers and policy-makers' views, investigation of farmers' perceptions can bring a significant contribution towards a bottom-up approach for sustainable soil management

Call for emergency action to restore dietary diversity and protect global food systems in times of COVID-19 and beyond: Results from a cross-sectional study in 38 countries

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the fragility of the global food system, sending shockwaves across countries\u27 societies and economy. This has presented formidable challenges to sustaining a healthy and resilient lifestyle. The objective of this study is to examine the food consumption patterns and assess diet diversity indicators, primarily focusing on the food consumption score (FCS), among households in 38 countries both before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study with 37 207 participants (mean age: 36.70 ± 14.79, with 77 % women) was conducted in 38 countries through an online survey administered between April and June 2020. The study utilized a pre-tested food frequency questionnaire to explore food consumption patterns both before and during the COVID-19 periods. Additionally, the study computed Food Consumption Score (FCS) as a proxy indicator for assessing the dietary diversity of households. Findings: This quantification of global, regional and national dietary diversity across 38 countries showed an increment in the consumption of all food groups but a drop in the intake of vegetables and in the dietary diversity. The household\u27s food consumption scores indicating dietary diversity varied across regions. It decreased in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries, including Lebanon (p \u3c 0.001) and increased in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries including Bahrain (p = 0.003), Egypt (p \u3c 0.001) and United Arab Emirates (p = 0.013). A decline in the household\u27s dietary diversity was observed in Australia (p \u3c 0.001), in South Africa including Uganda (p \u3c 0.001), in Europe including Belgium (p \u3c 0.001), Denmark (p = 0.002), Finland (p \u3c 0.001) and Netherland (p = 0.027) and in South America including Ecuador (p \u3c 0.001), Brazil (p \u3c 0.001), Mexico (p \u3c 0.0001) and Peru (p \u3c 0.001). Middle and older ages [OR = 1.2; 95 % CI = [1.125–1.426] [OR = 2.5; 95 % CI = [1.951–3.064], being a woman [OR = 1.2; 95 % CI = [1.117–1.367], having a high education (p \u3c 0.001), and showing amelioration in food-related behaviors [OR = 1.4; 95 % CI = [1.292–1.709] were all linked to having a higher dietary diversity. Conclusion: The minor to moderate changes in food consumption patterns observed across the 38 countries within relatively short time frames could become lasting, leading to a significant and prolonged reduction in dietary diversity, as demonstrated by our findings

An Evaluation of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Perceived Social Distancing Policies in Relation to Planning, Selecting, and Preparing Healthy Meals: An Observational Study in 38 Countries Worldwide

Objectives: To examine changes in planning, selecting, and preparing healthy foods in relation to personal factors (time, money, stress) and social distancing policies during the COVID-19 crisis. Methods: Using cross-sectional online surveys collected in 38 countries worldwide in April-June 2020 (N = 37,207, Mage 36.7 SD 14.8, 77% women), we compared changes in food literacy behaviors to changes in personal factors and social distancing policies, using hierarchical multiple regression analyses controlling for sociodemographic variables. Results: Increases in planning (4.7 SD 1.3, 4.9 SD 1.3), selecting (3.6 SD 1.7, 3.7 SD 1.7), and preparing (4.6 SD 1.2, 4.7 SD 1.3) healthy foods were found for women and men, and positively related to perceived time availability and stay-at-home policies. Psychological distress was a barrier for women, and an enabler for men. Financial stress was a barrier and enabler depending on various sociodemographic variables (all p < 0.01). Conclusion: Stay-at-home policies and feelings of having more time during COVID-19 seem to have improved food literacy. Stress and other social distancing policies relate to food literacy in more complex ways, highlighting the necessity of a health equity lens. Copyright 2021 De Backer, Teunissen, Cuykx, Decorte, Pabian, Gerritsen, Matthys, Al Sabbah, Van Royen and the Corona Cooking Survey Study Group.This research was funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (G047518N) and Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship (HBC.2018.0397). These funding sources had no role in the design of the study, the analysis and interpretation of the data or the writing of, nor the decision to publish the manuscript.Scopu

Agricultural land use conflict management—Vulnerabilities, law restrictions and negotiation frames. A wake-up call

peer reviewedConflict is part of all societies and conflict management can ensure stability and consistency for communities. This study ascertained and assessed a type of agricultural land use conflict (ALUC) specific to Romania's realities and identified a possible solution for conflict management like negotiation. An original structure of the analysis was developed based on the identification of four latent sources of conflict: land fragmentation; land grabbing; high natural value (HNV) farmland disappearance; and scarcity of young farmers. The paper cast light on several current frames of the agricultural land by investigating the roles that people assigned to it. Frames were studied through a non-probabilistic survey applied on a sample of 170 Romanian land owners. The dominant frame (among the five tested) was the one in which land had an important role in ensuring food safety. Understanding of land frames requires special effort and becomes essential in any situation where participants have different knowledge, values or economic status, as it is the case of conflict management or negotiation process related to agricultural land use. The results stand for awareness of agricultural land frames which should be considered valuable information for equitable land deals in a larger meaning − up to the society scale. © 2018 Elsevier Lt

DIVERSITATEA POLENULUI RECOLTAT DE HIMENOPTERELE APOIDEE – UN POSIBIL INDICATOR AL SĂNĂTĂŢII PAJIŞTILOR

Palinological diversity in honey of Apoidean bees – a possible indicator of meadows’ health. The paper shortly treats the importance of biodiversity studies and the possibility of using palinological method in analyze of meadows’ floristic diversity. The method confers some advantages and can be complementary for the classical ones. As well, the authors present here a short history of Palinology as science and of the lab palinological technique

Climate change perceptions_Health_Generations

Interview data with Millennials and Generation Z about climate change-health concern nexus.THIS DATASET IS ARCHIVED AT DANS/EASY, BUT NOT ACCESSIBLE HERE. TO VIEW A LIST OF FILES AND ACCESS THE FILES IN THIS DATASET CLICK ON THE DOI-LINK ABOV