22 research outputs found

    Enteric Nervous System Remodeling in a Rat Model of Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study

    No full text
    International audienceThe physiopathology of digestive disorders in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) remains largely unknown, particularly the involvement of the enteric nervous system (ENS). We aimed in a rat model of chronic thoracic SCI to characterize (1) changes in the neurochemical coding of enteric neurons and their putative consequences upon neuromuscular response, and (2) the inflammatory response of the colon. Ex vivo motility of proximal and distal colon segments of SCI and control (CT) rats were studied in an organ chamber in response to electrical field stimulation (EFS) and bethanechol. Immunohistochemical analysis of proximal and distal segments was performed using antibodies again Hu, neuronal nitric oxide synthase, (nNOS), and choline acetyltransferase. Colonic content of acetylcholine and acetylcholinesterase was measured; messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of inflammatory cytokines was measured using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) approaches. Compared with the CT rats, the contractile response to bethanechol was significantly decreased in the proximal colon of SCI rats but not in the distal colon. The proportion of nNOS immunoreactive (IR) neurons was significantly reduced in the proximal but not distal colon of SCI rats. No change in proportion of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-IR was reported; the tissue concentration of acetylcholine was significantly decreased in the proximal colon of SCI rats. The expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) was significantly reduced in the proximal and distal colon of SCI rats. This study demonstrates that functional motor and enteric neuroplastic changes affect preferentially the proximal colon compared with the distal colon. The underlying mechanisms and factors responsible for these changes remain to be discovered

    Synthetic mid-urethral slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: a systematic review

    No full text
    International audienceIntroduction and hypothesis: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficiency and safety of synthetic mid-urethral slings (sMUS) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD).Methods: A systematic review was performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane controlled trials databases were systematically searched from January 1995 to April 2021. Studies including adult women with NLUTD who had a sMUS for SUI were considered for inclusion. Primary outcome was success of the surgery according to study criteria. Secondary outcomes were complications, especially de novo urgency, urinary retention, tape exposure and revision for complications.Results: A total of 752 abstracts were screened and 9 studies were included, representing 298 patients. The mean age was 52 years and median follow-up was 41.3 months. sMUS insertion was successful in 237 patients (79.5%). The median rate of de novo urgency was 15.7% (range 8.3-30%). In patients with spontaneous voiding, the median rate of retention was 19.3% (range 0-46.7%) and 21 out of 26 patients required intermittent self-catheterisation. Four cases of tape exposure were reported, and 8 patients underwent a revision for complications.Conclusions: This review suggests that sMUS might offer interesting success rates and acceptable morbidity and could be considered for the treatment of SUI in women with NLUTD. Further studies are required to define which patients would be more likely to benefit from this intervention, as well as its place among the other surgical treatments for SUI

    Neurogenic bladder in patients with paraplegia: a two-center study of the real-life experience of the patients’ journey

    No full text
    International audienceIntroduction: Several patterns of urological dysfunctions have been described following spinal cord injury (SCI), depending on the level and the completeness of the injury. A better understanding of the natural history of neurogenic bladder in patients with SCI, and the description of their successive therapeutic lines based on their clinical and urodynamic pattern is needed to improve their management. This study aimed to describe the real-life successive therapeutic lines in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) following SCI. Methods: We conducted a two-center retrospective review of medical files of patients with SCI followed in two French specialized departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation between January 2000 and January 2018. All patients with SCI with a level of lesion bellow T3 and older than 18 years old were eligible. The primary outcome was the description of the natural journey of neurogenic bladder in this population, from the awakening bladder contraction to the last therapeutic line. Survival curves were calculated with a 95-confidence interval using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: One hundred and five patients were included in this study. Most of the patients were young men with a complete SCI lesion. The median time of treatment introduction was 1 and 9 years for anticholinergics and intradetrusor injection of BoNT/A, respectively. Median duration of effect of treatments was 4 and 6 years post-introduction of anticholinergics and BoNT/A, respectively. Conclusion: This study describes NLUTD journey of patients with SCI demonstrating the mid-term efficacy of the two first therapeutic lines of NDO management. An improvement of non-surgical therapeutics is needed

    Prioritization of risk situations in neuro-urology: guidelines from Association Française d’Urologie (AFU), Association Francophone Internationale des Groupes d’Animation de la ParaplĂ©gie (A.F.I.G.A.P.), Groupe de Neuro-urologie de Langue Française (GENULF), SociĂ©tĂ© Française de MĂ©decine Physique et de RĂ©adaptation (SOFMER) and SociĂ©tĂ© Interdisciplinaire Francophone d’UroDynamique et de Pelvi-PĂ©rinĂ©ologie (SIFUD-PP)

    No full text
    International audiencePurposeThe current health crisis has drastically impacted patient management in many fields, including neuro-urology, leading to a mandatory reorganization. The aim of this work was to establish guidelines regarding the prioritization and optimal timing of each step of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction management.MethodsA steering committee included urologists and physical medicine and rehabilitation practitioners. Based on a literature review and their own expertise, they established a comprehensive risk-situation list and built a risk scale, allowing multiple other experts to score each clinical situation. New recommendations were generated using a Delphi process approach.ResultsForty-nine experts participated in the rating group. Among the 206 initial items, 163 were selected and divided into four domains, diagnosis and assessment, treatment, follow-up, and complications, and two sub-domains, general (applicable for all neurological conditions) and condition-specific [varying according to the neurological condition (spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, brain injury, Parkinsonism, dysraphism, lower motor neuron lesions)]. The resulted guidelines are expert opinions established by a panel of French-speaking specialists, which could limit the scalability of this work.ConclusionsThe present multidisciplinary collaborative work generates recommendations which complement existing guidelines and help clinicians to reorganize their patients’ list in the long term with a personalized medicine approach, in the context of health crisis or not

    Priorisation des situations Ă  risque en neuro-urologie : recommandations par mĂ©thode Delphi de l’Association française d’urologie (AFU), l’Association francophone internationale des groupes d’animation de la paraplĂ©gie (AFIGAP), le Groupe de neuro-urologie de langue française (GENULF), la SociĂ©tĂ© française de mĂ©decine physique et de rĂ©adaptation (SOFMER) et la SociĂ©tĂ© interdisciplinaire francophone d’urodynamique et de pelvi-pĂ©rinĂ©ologie (SIFUD-PP)

    No full text
    International audiencePurposeDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, a care reorganization was mandatory, and affected patients in different areas, including management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. This work aims to provide validated schedule concerning the assessment and management of patients in neuro-urology.MethodsBased on a literature review and their own expertise, a steering committee composed of urologists and physical medicine and rehabilitation practitioners generated a comprehensive risk-situation list and built a risk scale. A panel of French-speaking experts in neuro-urology was asked to define the timing for each clinical situation and validated these new recommendations through a Delphi process approach.ResultsThe 49 experts included in the rating group validated 163 propositions among the 206 initial items. The propositions were divided into four domains – diagnosis and assessment, treatment, follow-up, and complications – and two sub-domains – general (applicable for all neurological conditions) and condition-specific (varying according to the neurological condition (spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, brain injury, Parkinsonism, spinal dysraphism, lower motor neuron lesions)).ConclusionsThis multidisciplinary collaborative work generates recommendations based on expert opinion, providing a validated timing for assessment and management of patients in neuro-urology which may help clinicians to reorganize their patients’ list with a personalized medicine approach, in a context of health crisis or not.IntroductionLa crise sanitaire liĂ©e Ă  l’épidĂ©mie de COVID-19 a drastiquement impactĂ© la prise en charge des patients dans de nombreux domaines, dont la neuro-urologie, nĂ©cessitant une rĂ©organisation des soins. L’objectif de ce travail Ă©tait d’établir des recommandations pour la priorisation des soins et de dĂ©finir le dĂ©lai optimal pour chaque Ă©tape de la prise en charge des troubles pelvi-pĂ©rinĂ©aux d’origine neurologique, quel que soit le contexte sanitaire.MatĂ©rielUn comitĂ© de pilotage constituĂ© d’urologues et de spĂ©cialistes en mĂ©decine physique et de rĂ©adaptation (MPR) a Ă©tabli une liste de situations Ă  risque potentiel en neuro-urologie, basĂ©e sur une revue de la littĂ©rature et l’expĂ©rience d’experts dans ce domaine. Chaque proposition a ensuite Ă©tĂ© scorĂ©e sur une matrice de criticitĂ© par un groupe d’experts francophones afin de dĂ©finir un degrĂ© d’accord et de valider le dĂ©lai de prise en charge proposĂ© selon une mĂ©thode Delphi.RĂ©sultatsQuarante neufs experts ont participĂ© au groupe de cotation. Parmi les 206 propositions initiales, 163 ont Ă©tĂ© validĂ©es, rĂ©parties en quatre domaines – diagnostic et Ă©valuation, traitement, suivi, complications – et en deux sous catĂ©gories – gĂ©nĂ©rales (applicables quelle que soit la pathologie) ou spĂ©cifiques (variant en fonction de la condition neurologique, i.e. blessĂ© mĂ©dullaire, sclĂ©rose en plaques, cĂ©rĂ©brolĂ©sĂ©, syndrome parkinsonien, dysraphisme spinal ou atteinte pĂ©riphĂ©rique)ConclusionCe travail collaboratif a permis de crĂ©er des recommandations complĂ©mentaires de celles existantes qui pourront aider les cliniciens Ă  rĂ©organiser leur file active de patients sur le long terme grĂące Ă  une approche mĂ©dicale personnalisĂ©e, quel que soit le contexte sanitaire

    Could a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiologies lead to more informed treatment choices in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction due to an acontractile or underactive detrusor? ICI-RS 2023

    No full text
    Introduction: The underlying pathophysiology behind a diagnosis of acontractile or underactive detrusor at invasive urodynamics is very heterogeneous. Lack of etiological classification currently limits the possibility of stratifying therapy. // Methods: This subject was discussed at a think-tank on the subject at the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society held in Bristol, June 2023. This manuscript is a result of those deliberations and the subsequent discussions of the think-tank. // Results: There are challenges in defining abnormalities of detrusor contraction with resultant implications for available evidence. Pathology at any level of the neuromuscular pathway can impair or prevent a detrusor voiding contraction. Attempts have been made to identify clinical markers that might predict an underactive detrusor but strong supporting evidence is lacking. Hence, a holistic approach to phenotyping requires specialized neuro-imaging as well as physiological investigations. Several general measures can help individuals with an abnormal detrusor contraction. The search for a molecule to enhance the detrusor voiding contraction remains elusive but there are promising new candidates. Neuromodulation can help select individuals but data is not well stratified by underlying etiology. Manipulation of central neurotransmitters might offer an alternate therapeutic option. // Conclusions: A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiologies behind an abnormality of the detrusor voiding contraction is needed for improving management. Towards this goal, the think-tank proposes a classification of the underactive detrusor that might help in selecting and reporting more well-defined patient cohorts

    Impact of experience and technical changes on acute urinary and rectal morbidity in low-dose prostate brachytherapy using loose seeds real-time implantation.

    No full text
    International audiencePURPOSE: To assess the impact of experience and technical changes on morbidity during the first year after permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From July 2003 to May 2010, 150 patients with prostate cancer underwent low-dose iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy as a monotherapy by the same medical team (one urologist and one radiation oncologist). Patients were divided into three periods: P1 (n = 64), P2 (n = 45), and P3 (n = 41) according to technical changes: use of an automatic stepper from P2, use of a high-frequency ultrasound probe in P3. Urinary toxicity was analyzed according to the incidence of acute urinary retention (AUR), Delta International Prostate Symptom Score (Δ IPSS) defined as IPPS maximal - IPSS at baseline, and proportion of patients with Δ IPSS ≄5 and IPSS total >15. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group classification was used to evaluate the rectal morbidity. RESULTS: The incidence of AUR (6% overall) decreased significantly with time: 12.5% (8/64) during P1, 2.2% (1/45) in P2, and 0% in P3 (p = 0.014). Mean Δ IPSS (11.6) remained stable during the three periods. Patients with Δ IPSS ≄5 and IPSS total >15 were 58.7%, 58.1%, and 56.1% for P1, P2, and P3 (p = 0.96), respectively. Grade 1 and 2 proctitis were observed in 15.3% and 9.3% of the patients without any significant difference between the three periods. CONCLUSION: The incidence of AUR decreased significantly with time. This was probably because of the experience of the practitioner and the use of an automatic stepper that allowed reducing prostatic traumatism. Experience and technical changes did not seem to affect rectal morbidity

    Prostate interventions in patients with mild haemophilia: Safe and feasible

    No full text
    International audienceIntroduction: To date, there is no specific recommendation or evaluation of the morbidity of prostate surgery in patients with haemophilia (PWH) although this surgery is common and at high risk of bleeding.Aim: To assess the post-operative morbidity of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) surgeries and of oncological prostate interventions in patients with mild haemophilia A or B.Methods: We performed a monocentre, epidemiological, in real life study. Data were collected between 1 January, 1997 and 1 September, 2020 and focused on prostate biopsy, radical prostatectomy, prostate radiotherapy, simple prostatectomy, transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and laser-vaporisation in patients with mild haemophilia A or B.Results: Between 1 January, 1997 and 1 September, 2020, 51 interventions were performed on 30 patients with mild haemophilia. Haemophilia A represented 93.33% of the population and haemophilia B 6.67%. For prostate biopsies (n = 24), median length of hospitalisation was 4 days and only one patient needed a blood transfusion. No patient needed re-admission. For prostatectomy (n = 10), one patient presented with intra-operative and post-operative bleeding. Two patients required re-admission. The other patients did not present any significant haemorrhagic symptoms. For radiotherapy (n = 4), two patients presented a grade II complication (radiocystitis and radiorectitis). For BPH surgeries, during hospitalisation, laser-vaporisation (n = 5) was less haemorrhagic than TURP (n = 5) but after hospital discharge, 60% of patients presented a haemorrhagic complication with two readmissions and one surgical re-explorations.Conclusion: Performed in a specialised centre, prostate surgeries and interventions in patients with mild haemophilia is feasible with acceptable morbidity
    corecore