Prognostic Value of D-dimer to Lymphocyte Ratio (DLR) in Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients: A Validation Study in a National Cohort

Background: This study aimed to validate the role of the D-dimer to lymphocyte ratio (DLR) for mortality prediction in a large national cohort of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter, observational study that included hospitalized patients due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in Spain was conducted from March 2020 to March 2022. All biomarkers and laboratory indices analyzed were measured once at admission. Results: A total of 10,575 COVID-19 patients were included in this study. The mean age of participants was 66.9 (+/- 16) years, and 58.6% (6202 patients) of them were male. The overall mortality rate was 16.3% (n = 1726 patients). Intensive care unit admission was needed in 10.5% (n = 1106 patients), non-invasive mechanical ventilation was required in 8.8% (n = 923 patients), and orotracheal intubation was required in 7.5% (789 patients). DLR presented a c-statistic of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68-0.71) for in-hospital mortality with an optimal cut-off above 1. Multivariate analysis showed an independent association for in-hospital mortality for DLR > 1 (adjusted OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.09-4.04; p = 0.03); in the same way, survival analysis showed a higher mortality risk for DLR > 1 (HR 2.24; 95% CI 2.03-2.47; p < 0.01). Further, no other laboratory indices showed an independent association for mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: This study confirmed the usefulness of DLR as a prognostic biomarker for mortality associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, being an accessible, cost-effective, and easy-to-use biomarker in daily clinical practice

Standardized incidence ratios and risk factors for cancer in patients with systemic sclerosis: Data from the Spanish Scleroderma Registry (RESCLE)

Aim: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are at increased risk of cancer, a growing cause of non-SSc-related death among these patients. We analyzed the increased cancer risk among Spanish patients with SSc using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and identified independent cancer risk factors in this population. Material and methods: Spanish Scleroderma Registry data were analyzed to determine the demographic characteristics of patients with SSc, and logistic regression was used to identify cancer risk factors. SIRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) relative to the general Spanish population were calculated. Results: Of 1930 patients with SSc, 206 had cancer, most commonly breast, lung, hematological, and colorectal cancers. Patients with SSc had increased risks of overall cancer (SIR 1.48, 95% CI 1.36-1.60; P < 0.001), and of lung (SIR 2.22, 95% CI 1.77-2.73; P < 0.001), breast (SIR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.54; P = 0.003), and hematological (SIR 2.03, 95% CI 1.52-2.62; P < 0.001) cancers. Cancer was associated with older age at SSc onset (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001), the presence of primary biliary cholangitis (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.18-4.68; P = 0.015) and forced vital capacity <70% (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.24-2.70; P = 0.002). The presence of anticentromere antibodies lowered the risk of cancer (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97; P = 0.036). Conclusions: Spanish patients with SSc had an increased cancer risk compared with the general population. Some characteristics, including specific autoantibodies, may be related to this increased risk

Actuación en urgencias ante una crisis convulsiva en adultos

Se describe la actuación a seguir en urgencias ante una crisis convulsiva, diferenciando entre la: A) Una primera crisis en la que es fundamental descartar posibles causas que pueden originarla. La atención debe ser preferente. Durante la crisis deben establecerse las medidas de soporte vital básico que hay que mantener durante el estado postcrítico en el que debe hacerse una vigilancia estrecha del nivel de consciencia. Mediante anamnesis, exploracción física y pruebas complementarias se podrá evaluar adecuadamente el estado del paciente y descartar las causas de epilepsia secundaria. Se señalan las indicaciones de tomografía computadorizada craneal y de hospitalización. Se discute la necesidad de iniciar o no tratamiento anticonvulsivante en urgencias y los fármacos disponibles para ello, destacando ácido valproico, hidantoína y carbamacepina. B) Crisis convulsiva en paciente epiléptico conocido en el que la actuación inicial es semejante y para diferenciarse posteriormente. C) Estado epiléptico en el que la actuación va encaminada a abortar las crisis (diacepam o loracepan intravenosos), tratar las complicaciones y prevenir nuevas crisis (valproato sódico o difenilhidantoína)

In-hospital mortality among immunosuppressed patients with COVID-19: Analysis from a national cohort in Spain

Background: Whether immunosuppressed (IS) patients have a worse prognosis of COVID-19 compared to non-IS patients is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcome of IS patients hospitalized with COVID-19 compared to non-IS patients. Methods: We designed a retrospective cohort study. We included all patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, a large multicentre national cohort in Spain, from March 27th until June 19th, 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of in-hospital death among IS compared to non-IS patients. Results: Among 13 206 included patients, 2 111 (16.0%) were IS. A total of 166 (1.3%) patients had solid organ (SO) transplant, 1081 (8.2%) had SO neoplasia, 332 (2.5%) had hematologic neoplasia, and 570 (4.3%), 183 (1.4%) and 394 (3.0%) were receiving systemic steroids, biological treatments, and immunosuppressors, respectively. Compared to non-IS patients, the aOR (95% CI) for in-hospital death was 1.60 (1.43-1.79) for all IS patients, 1.39 (1.18-1.63) for patients with SO cancer, 2.31 (1.76-3.03) for patients with haematological cancer and 3.12 (2.23-4.36) for patients with SO transplant. The aOR (95% CI) for death for patients who were receiving systemic steroids, biological treatments and immunosuppressors compared to non-IS patients were 2.16 (1.80-2.61), 1.97 (1.33-2.91) and 2.06 (1.64-2.60), respectively. IS patients had a higher odds than non-IS patients of in-hospital acute respiratory distress syndrome, heart failure, myocarditis, thromboembolic disease and multiorgan failure. Conclusions: IS patients hospitalized with COVID-19 have a higher odds of in-hospital complications and death compared to non-IS patients.Sin financiación3.752 JCR (2021) Q2, 29/73 Multidisciplinary Sciences0.852 SJR (2021) Q1, 16/138 MultidisciplinaryNo data IDR 2020UE

Comparison of the birmingham vasculitis activity score and the five factors score to assess survival in anca-associated vasculitis

On behalf of the Spanish Registry of systemic vasculitis (REVAS); Autoimmune Systemic Diseases Study Group (GEAS); Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.[Objective] to compare the accuracy of Birmingham Vasculitis score (BVAS ) v.3, and Five Factors Score (FFS ) v.1996 and v.2009, to assess survival in ANCA ‐associated Vasculitis (AAV ). [Methods] 550 patients with AAV (41.1% GPA , 37.3% MPA , 21.6% EGPA ) diagnosed between 1990‐2016 were analyzed. ROC curves and multivariable Cox analysis were used to assess the relationships between the outcome and the different scores. [Results] Overall mortality was 33.1%. The mean BVAS at diagnosis was 17.96±7.82, and was significantly higher in non‐survivors than in survivors (20.0±8.14 vs. 16.95±7.47, p<0.001). The mean 1996FFS and 2009FFS were 0.81±0.94 and 1.47±1.16, respectively, and were significantly higher in non‐survivors than in survivors (1.17±1.07 vs. 0.63±0.81, p<0.001; 2.13±1.09 vs. 1.15±1.05, p<0.001). Mortality rates increased accordingly to the different 1996FFS and 2009FFS categories. In multivariate analysis BVAS , 1996FFS and 2009FFS were significantly related to death (p=0.007, p=0.020, p<0.001), but the stronger predictor was the 2009FFS (HR 2.9, 2.4‐3.6). When the accuracy of BVAS , 1996FFS and 2009FFS to predict survival was compared in the global cohort, ROC analysis yielded AUC values of 0.60, 0.65 and 0.74, respectively, indicating that 2009FFS had the best performance. Similar results were obtained when comparing these scores in patients diagnosed before and after 2001, and assessing the 1‐year, 5‐years and long‐term mortality. Correlation among BVAS and 1996FFS was modest (r=0.49, p<0.001), but higher than between BVAS and 2009FFS (r=0.28, p<0.001). [Conclusion] BVAS and FFS are useful to predict survival in AAV , but 2009FFS has the best prognostic accuracy at any point of the disease course. [Significance and innovation] This is the first study comparing the BVAS , 1996FFS and 2009FFS accuracy to assess survival in patients with AAV , and the first to validate 2009FFS in these patients

Pulmonary hypertension in Spanish patients with systemic sclerosis. Data from the RESCLE registry

[Introduction]: Our objective was to evaluate the pulmonary hypertension (PH) data for Spanish patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), define the PH types and determine the associated factors.[Method]: Descriptive study of PH-related data from the multicentre RESCLE registry. Estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (esPAP), measured via echocardiogram was considered elevated if ≥ 35 mmHg. Left heart disease (LHD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) were identified. When performed, data from right heart catheterisation (RHC) were collected.[Results]: esPAP was elevated in 350 of 808 patients (43.3%). One hundred and forty-four patients (17.8%) were considered to have PH (88 via RHC and the rest due to elevated esPAP along with evidence of significant LHD or ILD): PAH 3.7%, secondary to ILD 8.3%, secondary to LHD 2.8% and unclassified 3%. Prevalence of elevated esPAP was greater in diffuse SSc (dSSc) than in limited scleroderma (lSSc) (50.5 vs. 42.2%, p 0.046). In the group with elevated esPAP, a lower prevalence of anti-centromere antibodies (41.9% vs. 52.3%, p 0.006) and a greater prevalence of anti-topoisomerase-1 antibodies (ATA) (25.1% vs. 18.6%, p 0.04) were observed compared to the group with normal esPAP. Patients with elevated esPAP had a lower rate of digital ulcers (50.6% vs. 60.2%, p 0.007) and esophageal involvement (83.6% vs. 88.7%, p 0.07) and higher rate of renal crisis (4.6% vs. 1.8%, p 0.066).[Conclusions]: Prevalence of PAH was lower than expected (3.7%). Probability of having elevated esPAP was higher among patients with dSSc and among those with ATA

Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Mortality in Very Old Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in Spain.

Advanced age is a well-known risk factor for poor prognosis in COVID-19. However, few studies have specifically focused on very old inpatients with COVID-19. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics of very old inpatients with COVID-19 and identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality at admission. We conducted a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective, observational study in patients ≥ 80 years hospitalized with COVID-19 in 150 Spanish hospitals (SEMI-COVID-19) Registry (March 1-May 29, 2020). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A uni- and multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of mortality at admission. A total of 2772 consecutive patients (49.4% men, median age 86.3 years) were analyzed. Rates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, dementia, and Barthel Index This first large, multicenter cohort of very old inpatients with COVID-19 shows that age, male sex, and poor preadmission functional status-not comorbidities-are independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Severe COVID-19 at admission is related to poor prognosis