5 research outputs found

    Spinal cord hemorrhage in a patient with neurosarcoidosis on long-term corticosteroid therapy: case report

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND: Central nervous system bleeding is a rare complication of neurosarcoidosis: only 18 cases of spontaneous cerebral hematoma have been reported. We present the first recorded case of spinal cord hemorrhage in neurosarcoidosis.CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old Caucasian woman had relapsing neurosarcoidosis for 5 years, with inflammatory spinal and cerebral lesions. While on 20 mg corticosteroids, she experienced subacute paraparesia with right leg pain. A spine MRI revealed a low thoracic hematomyelia at the T10-T11 level. Despite high doses of corticosteroids, her condition continued to worsen. Surgical evacuation of the hematoma was performed 10 days after the onset of bleeding, and she partially recovered.CONCLUSION: This report highlights the possibility of spinal cord hemorrhage secondary to sarcoid vasculitis. The patient improved after surgical evacuation of the intramedullary hematoma. Immuno-modulating agents must be envisaged in severe neurosarcoidosis, to prevent complication

    Impact of automatic tools for detecting new lesions on therapeutic strategies offered to patients with MS by neurologists

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Automatic tools for detecting new lesions in patients with MS between two MRI scans are now available to clinicians. They have been assessed from the radiologist's point of view, but their impact on the therapeutic strategies that neurologists offer their patients has not yet been documented.Objectives: To compare neurologist’s decisions according to whether a lesion detection support system had been used and describe variability between neurologists on decision-making for the same clinical cases.Methods: We submitted 28 clinical cases associated with pairs of MRI images and radiological reports (produced by the same radiologist without vs. with the help of a system to detect new lesions) to 10 neurologists who regularly follow patients with MS. They examined each clinical case twice (without vs. with support system) in two sessions several weeks apart, and their patient management decisions were recorded.Results: There was considerable variability between neurologists on decision-making (both with and without support system). When the support system had been used, neurologists more often made changes to patient management (75% vs. 68% of cases, p = 0.01) and spent significantly less time analyzing the clinical cases (249 s vs. 216 s, p = 3.10-4).Conclusion: The use of a lesion detection support system has an impact not only on radiologists' reports, but also on neurologists' subsequent decision-making. This observation constitutes another strong argument for promoting the wider use of such systems in clinical routine. However, despite their use, there is still considerable variability in decision-making across neurologists, which should encourage us to refine the guidelines

    Impact of automatic tools for detecting new lesions on therapeutic strategies offered to patients with MS by neurologists

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Automatic tools for detecting new lesions in patients with MS between two MRI scans are now available to clinicians. They have been assessed from the radiologist's point of view, but their impact on the therapeutic strategies that neurologists offer their patients has not yet been documented.Objectives: To compare neurologist's decisions according to whether a lesion detection support system had been used and describe variability between neurologists on decision-making for the same clinical cases.Methods: We submitted 28 clinical cases associated with pairs of MRI images and radiological reports (produced by the same radiologist without vs. with the help of a system to detect new lesions) to 10 neurologists who regularly follow patients with MS. They examined each clinical case twice (without vs. with support system) in two sessions several weeks apart, and their patient management decisions were recorded.Results: There was considerable variability between neurologists on decision-making (both with and without support system). When the support system had been used, neurologists more often made changes to patient management (75 % vs. 68 % of cases, p = 0.01) and spent significantly less time analyzing the clinical cases (249 s vs. 216 s, p == 3.10-4).Conclusion: The use of a lesion detection support system has an impact not only on radiologists' reports, but also on neurologists' subsequent decision-making. This observation constitutes another strong argument for promoting the wider use of such systems in clinical routine. However, despite their use, there is still considerable variability in decision-making across neurologists, which should encourage us to refine the guidelines

    Successful Thrombectomy Improves Functional Outcome in Tandem Occlusions with a Large Ischemic Core

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Emergent stenting in tandem occlusions and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of acute ischemic stroke related to large vessel occlusion (LVO-AIS) with a large core are tested independently. We aim to assess the impact of reperfusion with MT in patients with LVO-AIS with a large core and a tandem occlusion and to compare the safety of reperfusion between large core with tandem and nontandem occlusions in current practice. Methods: We analyzed data of all consecutive patients included in the prospective Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry in France between January 2015 and March 2023 who presented with a pretreatment ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) of 0–5 and angiographically proven tandem occlusion. The primary end point was a favorable outcome defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–3 at 90 days. Results: Among 262 included patients with a tandem occlusion and ASPECTS 0–5, 203 patients (77.5%) had a successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b-3). Reperfused patients had a favorable shift in the overall mRS score distribution (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.57 [1.22–2.03]; P < 0.001), higher rates of mRS score 0–3 (aOR, 7.03 [2.60–19.01]; P < 0.001) and mRS score 0–2 at 90 days (aOR, 3.85 [1.39–10.68]; P = 0.009) compared with nonreperfused. There was a trend between the occurrence of successful reperfusion and a decreased rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR, 0.5 [0.22–1.13]; P = 0.096). Similar safety outcomes were observed after large core reperfusion in tandem and nontandem occlusions. Conclusions: Successful reperfusion was associated with a higher rate of favorable outcome in large core LVO-AIS with a tandem occlusion, with a safety profile similar to nontandem occlusion
    corecore