primary lymphomas of the genitourinary tract a population based study

Abstract Objective We performed a population-based analysis focusing on primary extranodal lymphoma of either testis, kidney, bladder or prostate (PGUL). Methods We identified all cases of localized testis, renal, bladder and prostate primary lymphomas (PL) versus primary testis, kidney, bladder and prostate cancers within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1998–2015). Estimated annual proportion change methodology (EAPC), multivariable logistic regression models, cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression models were used. Results The rates of testis-PL, renal-PL, bladder-PL and prostate-PL were 3.04%, 0.22%, 0.18% and 0.01%, respectively. Patients with PGUL were older and more frequently Caucasian. Annual rates significantly decreased for renal-PL (EAPC: −5.6%; p = 0.004) and prostate-PL (EAPC: −3.6%; p = 0.03). In multivariable logistic regression models, older ager independently predicted testis-PL (odds ratio [OR]: 16.4; p Conclusion PGUL rates are extremely low and on the decrease in kidney and prostate but stable in testis and bladder. Relative to primary genitourinary tumors, PGUL are associated with worse CSM for testis-PL and renal-PL but not for bladder-PL and prostate-PL, even after adjustment for other-cause mortality

Neoadjuvant sutent induction therapy may effectively down-stage renal cell carcinoma atrial thrombi.

International audienceA 75-yr-old previously healthy woman presented with gross hematuria, European Cooperative Oncology Group 0, and an 11-cm renal mass with right atrial thrombus. The patient refused the sternotomy. She was offered two cycles of sunitinib maleate (Sutent) induction therapy to down-stage the thrombus and to reduce the extent of the surgery

Assessment of local tumor ablation and non-interventional management versus partial nephrectomy in T1a renal cell carcinoma

Local tumor ablation (LTA) and non-interventional management (NIM) emerged as alternative management options for T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We investigated trends and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) after LTA and NIM, compared to partial nephrectomy (PN)

Toxicities associated with the administration of sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus and their management in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

International audienceOBJECTIVE: To provide a systematic review of the side effects associated with sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus and to provide an outline of possible preventive or therapeutic measures. METHODS: We performed a PubMed-based systematic review of side effects associated with the three agents and relied on product monographs and prescribing information to provide an outline of treatments aimed at reducing these toxicities. RESULTS: Side effects range from <1% to 72%. Grade 3/4 side effects are less common and range from <1% to 13% for sorafenib, <1% to 16% for sunitinib, and 1% to 20% for temsirolimus. Overall, sunitinib causes the most grade 3/4 side effects and sorafenib causes the fewest grade 3/4 side effects, although head-to-head trials are required to compare safety profiles of all three kinase inhibitors. Virtually all side effects can be managed effectively. CONCLUSION: Prevention, recognition, and prompt management of side effects are of key importance and avoid unnecessary dose reductions, which may undermine treatment efficacy

Nephrectomy improves the survival of patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma.

International audienceOBJECTIVES: To examine the cancer-specific survival of patients treated with nephrectomy and compared it to that of patients managed without surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 43,143 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) identified in the 1988-2004 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, 7068 had locally advanced RCC and with no distant metastasis. These patients had a nephrectomy (6786, 96.0%) or no surgical therapy (282, 4.0%). Multivariable Cox regression models, and matched and unmatched Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, were used to compare the effect of nephrectomy vs non-surgical therapy on cancer-specific survival. Also, competing-risks regression models adjusted for the effect of other-cause mortality. Covariates and matching variables consisted of age, gender, tumour size and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival of patients who had nephrectomy was 88.9%, 88.1%, 68.6% and 57.5%, vs 44.8%, 30.6%, 14.5% and 10.6% for non-surgical therapy. In multivariable analyses, relative to nephrectomy, non-surgical therapy was associated with a 5.8-fold higher rate of cancer-specific mortality (P < 0.001). Non-surgical therapy was also associated with a 5.1-fold higher rate of cancer-specific mortality in matched analyses (P < 0.001). Finally, competing-risks regression confirmed the statistical significance of the variable defining treatment type (nephrectomy vs non-surgical therapy) in multivariable and matched analyses (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Relative to non-surgical treatment, nephrectomy improves the cancer-specific survival of patients with locally advanced RCC; our findings await prospective confirmation

Race affects access to nephrectomy but not survival in renal cell carcinoma.

International audienceOBJECTIVES: To assess whether, in contemporary patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), access to nephrectomy is the same between the Blacks and Whites, and that there is no difference in mortality after stratification for treatment type. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The effect of race has received little attention in RCC; only two reports have addressed and suggested the presence of racial disparities, including access to nephrectomy and survival after nephrectomy, where Black patients were disadvantaged relative to Whites. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data from 12 516 patients of all stages diagnosed and treated for RCC between 2000 and 2004. The effect of race (Black vs White) on nephrectomy rate was addressed in logistic regression and binomial regression models, and Cox regression models tested the effect of race on overall survival. RESULTS: Black patients were 50% less likely to have a nephrectomy than their White counterparts. However, race had no effect on overall survival when the entire cohort was assessed, as well as in subgroups of patients with or without nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although race is a determinant of access to nephrectomy, it should not be interpreted as a barrier to care, as survival was unaffected by race in patients having a nephrectomy or not. Instead, race might represent a proxy of comorbidity and life-expectancy, which represent surgical selection criteria for nephrectomy

Population-based assessment of survival after cytoreductive nephrectomy versus no surgery in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

International audienceOBJECTIVES: To examine the population-based survival rates of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy (CNT) and compare them with those of patients treated without surgery. METHODS: Of the 43,143 patients with RCC identified in the 1988-2004 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 5372 had metastatic RCC. Of those, 2447 were treated with CNT (45.5%) and 2925 (54.5%) were not. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models, as well as matched and unmatched Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, were used. The covariates consisted of age, sex, tumor size, and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rate of the patients treated with CNT was 53.6%, 36.3%, 19.4%, and 12.7% compared with 18.5%, 7.4%, 2.3%, and 1.2% for the no-surgery patients, respectively. The corresponding cancer-specific survival rates were 58.1%, 40.8%, 24.3%, and 18.8% and 24.4%, 11.0%, 4.1%, and 2.9% for the same patient groups. On multivariate analysis, independent predictor status was recorded for treatment type, tumor size, and patient age (all P <.001). Also, relative to CNT, the no-surgery group had a 2.5-fold greater rate of overall and cancer-specific mortality (P <.001). In the matched analyses, virtually the same effect was recorded (hazard ratio 2.6, P <.001). CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that CNT significantly improves the survival of patients with metastatic RCC