Exploring the compassion deficit debate

Several recent high profile failures in the UK health care system have promoted strong debate on compassion and care in nursing. A number of papers articulating a range of positions within this debate have been published in this journal over the past two and a half years. These articulate a diverse range of theoretical perspectives and have been drawn together here in an attempt to bring some coherence to the debate and provide an overview of the key arguments and positions taken by those involved. In doing this we invite the reader to consider their own position in relation to the issues raised and to consider the impact of this for their own practice. Finally the paper offers some sense of how individual practitioners might use their understanding of the debates to ensure delivery of good nursing care

Four-year longitudinal impact evaluation of the action for children UK neglect project : outcomes for the children, families, action for children, and the UK

Neglect has a devastating impact on children and is the most pervasive form of child maltreatment in the United Kingdom. The study purpose was to establish outcomes for neglected children following structured assessment and intervention to ascertain what worked and why it worked. This prospective cohort study included 85 cases of neglected children under 8 years of age from 7 centers across the United Kingdom. Data were collected between 2008 and 2012 through serial quantitative recording of the level of concern about neglect. Serial review of qualitative casefile data was undertaken for detail of assessment, interventions, and evidence of outcomes for the child. Data analysis was undertaken by paired t-test, Chi Square, descriptive statics for categorical data, and, for narrative data, identification of recurring factors and patterns, with correlation of presenting factors, interventions, and outcomes. Paired t-test demonstrated significant decrease in overall Action for Children Assessment Tool scores between assessment (M = 43.77, SD = 11.09) and closing the case (M = 35.47,SD = 9.6, t(84) = 6.77, p < 0.01). Improvement in the level of concern about neglect was shown in 79% of cases, with only 21% showing no improvement. In 59% of cases, concern about neglect was removed completely. Use of the assessment tool fostered engagement by parents. The relationship between lack of parental engagement and children being taken into care was statistically significant, with a large effect size (χ2 10.66, df1, p = 0.0001,OR = 17.24). When parents refused or were unable to respond positively to the intervention, children benefited from an expedited move into care

Research dissemination: The art of writing an abstract for conferences

This article aims to assist readers with developing an abstract for a conference in order to have a paper accepted for presentation at a conference, whether it is in poster or an oral format. This is important as the authors argue that use of conferences as a method of disseminating research findings and good practice is expanding each year. Drawing on author experiences, both as members of scientific review panels and as submitters of abstracts, the article includes a practical review about the meaning of an abstract, how to get started and then breaks down in clear sections what reviewers look for in a good abstract. There are also some key points on the actual process of review, which are helpful in understanding of what happens to an abstract following submission. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Ten steps to developing an abstract for conferences

There is an increasing importance being placed on the dissemination of research and other high quality evidence. This article will assist you in ensuring that your work is presented in the best light at the conference of your choice. In this first article we guide you through the ten steps you need to take to ensure that you submit the best possible abstract to the scientific committee. We also will guide you through the process of selection. </jats:p

A survey of research skills of members of the Association of British Paediatric Nurses

This report has been prepared for and funded by The Association of British Paediatric Nurses (ABPN) and presents the findings of a small survey about research skills of their members. The project aims were: · To find out about and improve the research awareness and skills of ABPN members. · Identification of children’s nursing research within one database in the U.K. A specifically devised questionnaire was distributed to 1,050 members during 2006. Although the response rate was poor, the final response was just 13% (n=129). However, results were very interesting. The study population largely consisted of children’s nurses with over 15 years experience in their field. Overall the survey highlighted that, in those who replied, there was a sound base of educational qualifications. Participants holding academic and split academic-clinical posts demonstrated higher mean scores for self-assessed research knowledge. Only one participant stated that they were not interested in pursuing research further. Areas of greatest knowledge included systematic reviews, critical appraisal and qualitative research, and areas of least knowledge included funding, personal publication profiles, research development and governance