Effect of adalimumab on neutrophil function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Neutrophils are known to be targets for the biological activity of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the pathogenensis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Therefore, these cells may be among the targets of anti-TNF-α therapy. In this study we evaluated the effect of therapy with adalimumab (a fully human anti-TNF-α mAb; dosage: 40 mg subcutaneously every other week) on certain phenotypic and functional aspects of neutrophils obtained from 10 selected patients with RA and 20 healthy control individuals. Peripheral blood neutrophils were obtained at baseline and during anti-TNF-α therapy (2, 6 and 12 weeks after the first administration of adalimumab). All patients had been receiving a stable regimen of hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and prednisone for at least 3 months before and during the study. Baseline neutrophil chemotaxis was significantly decreased in RA patients when compared with control individuals (P < 0.001). Two weeks after the first administration of adalimumab, chemotactic activity was completely restored, with no differences noted between patients and control individuals; these normal values were confirmed 6 and 12 weeks after the start of anti-TNF-α therapy. Phagocytic activity and CD11b membrane expression on neutrophils were similar between RA patients and control individuals; no modifications were observed during TNF-α neutralization. The production of reactive oxygen species, both in resting and PMA (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate)-stimulated cells, was significantly higher in RA patients at baseline (P < 0.05) and was unmodified by anti-TNF-α mAb. Finally, we showed that the activation antigen CD69, which was absent on control neutrophils, was significantly expressed on neutrophils from RA patients at baseline (P < 0.001, versus control individuals); however, the molecule was barely detectable on cells obtained from RA patients during adalimumab therapy. Because CD69 potentially plays a role in the pathogenesis of arthritis, our findings suggest that neutrophils are among the targets of anti-TNF-α activity in RA and may provide an insight into a new and interesting mechanism of action of anti-TNF-α mAbs in the control of inflammatory arthritis

Co-expression of the CD8 receptor in a human CD4+ T-cell clone influences proliferation, cytosolic Ca2+ release and cytokine production

In normal human subjects a small proportion of peripheral blood T-cells simultaneously express both CD4 and CD8 differentiation antigens. In this study we characterized a subset of CD4+ clones, from a healthy donor, that is specific for the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) and that showed cells co-expressing the CD8 receptor. To address whether the expression of the CD8 receptor on the cell membrane was associated to differences in the physiology of the T-cells, we isolated, from the same clone, CD4 single positive (SP) cells from those co-expressing CD4/CD8 receptors (DP cells) and stimulated them in vitro with antigen presenting cells (APC) carrying TSHR. The results demonstrated that CD8 co-expression has a profound effect on the physiology of T helper (Th) cells. In comparison to cells expressing the CD4 receptor alone, DP T-cells showed: (1) increased proliferation; (2) higher and more sustained release of free Ca2+ in the cytosol, under stimulus; (3) lower levels of IL-2 and IL-4 released in the supernatants; (4) increased amounts of IFN-gamma released

Regulatory CD8+ T cells control thyrotropin receptor-specific CD4+ clones in healthy subjects

One of the mechanisms ensuring immunological unresponsiveness or tolerance depends on the action of CD8(+) lymphocytes. In this paper, we report that, in healthy subjects, a subset of CD8(+)CD28(-) T cells suppresses the specific response to TSH receptor (TSHR) of CD4(+) clones. Suppression was highly specific, required cell-cell interaction, and was not mediated by cytotoxicity. Co-incubation of CD8(+) and CD4(+) clones, followed by the removal of the CD8(+) cells from the cultures before testing CD4(+) responsiveness to TSHR, demonstrated that CD4(+) cells were anergic since they showed low response to the antigen and a significant impairment of IL-2 production. In CD8-mediated anergy induction, the T-cell receptor (TCR) on both CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells seems to play a role. Our results indicate that one of the mechanisms ensuring peripheral tolerance involve CD8(+)CD28(-) cells. A disregulation in the control of autoreactive clones by this subset might be important for the onset of autoimmune thyroid diseases

Appropriateness of antiplatelet therapy for primary and secondary cardio- and cerebrovascular prevention in acutely hospitalized older people

Aims: Antiplatelet therapy is recommended for the secondary prevention of cardio- and cerebrovascular disease, but for primary prevention it is advised only in patients at very high risk. With this background, this study aims to assess the appropriateness of antiplatelet therapy in acutely hospitalized older people according to their risk profile. Methods: Data were obtained from the REPOSI register held in Italian and Spanish internal medicine and geriatric wards in 2012 and 2014. Hospitalized patients aged ≥65 assessable at discharge were selected. Appropriateness of the antiplatelet therapy was evaluated according to their primary or secondary cardiovascular prevention profiles. Results: Of 2535 enrolled patients, 2199 were assessable at discharge. Overall 959 (43.6%, 95% CI 41.5–45.7) were prescribed an antiplatelet drug, aspirin being the most frequently chosen. Among patients prescribed for primary prevention, just over half were inappropriately prescribed (52.1%), being mainly overprescribed (155/209 patients, 74.2%). On the other hand, there was also a high rate of inappropriate underprescription in the context of secondary prevention (222/726 patients, 30.6%, 95% CI 27.3–34.0%). Conclusions: This study carried out in acutely hospitalized older people shows a high degree of inappropriate prescription among patients prescribed with antiplatelets for primary prevention, mainly due to overprescription. Further, a large proportion of patients who had had overt cardio- or cerebrovascular disease were underprescribed, in spite of the established benefits of antiplatelet drugs in the context of secondary prevention