Immunohistochemical evaluation of bone metastases

  Introduction. Metastases are the most common type of malignancy involving the bone, while bone is the third most frequent site for metastases, after the lung and liver. In some patients, medical history, physical and laboratory exami­nation are not conclusive to identify the primary tumor site. In such cases a bone biopsy and immunohistochemical analysis may contribute to the diagnosis, determination of appropriate treatment and evaluation of prognosis. In this study, we tried to evaluate the imunochistochemical expression in bone metastases. Material and methods. We reviewed 125 patients, with a mean age of 63 years, treated for bone metastases in our institution. All patients received palliative orthopaedic surgery for bone metastatic carcinoma. Fifty-eight patients had already an established diagnosis of the primary tumor, while 67 patients presented metastases with an unknown primary tumor origin. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to intra-operative bone biopsy specimens. The expression of cytokeratine 7, cytokeratin 20 and the expression of a panel of other organ-specific markers were re­corded. In patients with a known primary tumor, we examined the relationship between the origin of metastases, as suggested by the cytokeratin phenotype, compared with the one indicated by the initial histological diagnosis. We also recorded the efficacy of organ-specific markers to identify the primary tumor origin in epithelial bone metastases and we evaluated the prognosis between patients with a immunohistologically determined primary tumor origin, with those with an undetermined one. Results. Associations of cytokeratine 7 and cytokeratine 20 expression confirmed diagnosis in 51 out of the 58 patients (88%) with a known primary tumor (Cohen’s K test 0.79 SE 0.80, P < 0.0005). Immunohistochemical analysis also contributed to establish the diagnosis of patients with an unknown primary tumor, yielding diagnosis in 35 out of the 67 cases (52%). Patients with an immunochistologically undetermined primary tumor site presented a statisti­cally significant poorer prognosis. Conclusions. Cytokeratine 7 and cytokeratine20 are useful immunochistochemical markers in determining a pre­liminary evaluation of bone metastases. Organ-specific immunohistochemical markers have a reliable role in either suggesting or confirming the possible origin of metastases. An indeterminate immunohistochemical phenotype seems to relate to a less differentiated lesion, with a worse prognosis

Immunohistochemical evaluation of bone metastases

  Introduction. Metastases are the most common type of malignancy involving the bone, while bone is the third most frequent site for metastases, after the lung and liver. In some patients, previous medical history, physical and laboratory examination are not conclusive to identify the primary tumor site. In such cases a bone biopsy and im­munohistochemical analysis may contribute to the diagnosis, determination of appropriate treatment and evaluation of prognosis. In this study, we tried to evaluate the imunochistochemical expression in bone metastases. Material and methods. We reviewed 125 patients, with a mean age of 63 years, treated for bone metastases in our institution. All patients received palliative orthopaedic surgery for bone metastatic carcinoma. Fifty-eight patients had already an established diagnosis of the primary tumor, while 67 patients presented metastases with an unknown primary tumor origin. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to intra-operative bone biopsy specimens. The expression of cytokeratine 7, cytokeratin 20 and the expression of a panel of other organ-specific markers were re­corded. In patients with a known primary tumor, we examined the relationship between the origin of metastases, as suggested by the cytokeratin phenotype, compared with the one indicated by the initial histological diagnosis. We also recorded the efficacy of organ-specific markers to identify the primary tumor origin in epithelial bone metastases and we evaluated the prognosis between patients with a immunohistologically determined primary tumor origin, with those with an undetermined one. Results. Associations of cytokeratine 7 and cytokeratine 20 expression confirmed diagnosis in 51 out of the 58 patients (88%) with a known primary tumor (Cohen’s K test 0.79 SE 0.80, P < 0.0005). Immunohistochemical analysis also contributed to establish the diagnosis of patients with an unknown primary tumor, yielding diagnosis in 35 out of the 67 cases (52%). Patients with an immunochistologically undetermined primary tumor site presented a statisti­cally significant poorer prognosis. Conclusions. Cytokeratine 7 and cytokeratine20 are useful immunochistochemical markers in determining a pre­liminary evaluation of bone metastases. Organ-specific immunohistochemical markers have a reliable role in either suggesting or confirming the possible origin of metastases. An indeterminate immunohistochemical phenotype seems to relate to a less differentiated lesion, with a worse prognosis. Introduction. Metastases are the most common type of malignancy involving the bone, while bone is the third most frequent site for metastases, after the lung and liver. In some patients, previous medical history, physical and laboratory examination are not conclusive to identify the primary tumor site. In such cases a bone biopsy and im­munohistochemical analysis may contribute to the diagnosis, determination of appropriate treatment and evaluation of prognosis. In this study, we tried to evaluate the imunochistochemical expression in bone metastases. Material and methods. We reviewed 125 patients, with a mean age of 63 years, treated for bone metastases in our institution. All patients received palliative orthopaedic surgery for bone metastatic carcinoma. Fifty-eight patients had already an established diagnosis of the primary tumor, while 67 patients presented metastases with an unknown primary tumor origin. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to intra-operative bone biopsy specimens. The expression of cytokeratine 7, cytokeratin 20 and the expression of a panel of other organ-specific markers were re­corded. In patients with a known primary tumor, we examined the relationship between the origin of metastases, as suggested by the cytokeratin phenotype, compared with the one indicated by the initial histological diagnosis. We also recorded the efficacy of organ-specific markers to identify the primary tumor origin in epithelial bone metastases and we evaluated the prognosis between patients with a immunohistologically determined primary tumor origin, with those with an undetermined one. Results. Associations of cytokeratine 7 and cytokeratine 20 expression confirmed diagnosis in 51 out of the 58 patients (88%) with a known primary tumor (Cohen’s K test 0.79 SE 0.80, P < 0.0005). Immunohistochemical analysis also contributed to establish the diagnosis of patients with an unknown primary tumor, yielding diagnosis in 35 out of the 67 cases (52%). Patients with an immunochistologically undetermined primary tumor site presented a statisti­cally significant poorer prognosis. Conclusions. Cytokeratine 7 and cytokeratine20 are useful immunochistochemical markers in determining a pre­liminary evaluation of bone metastases. Organ-specific immunohistochemical markers have a reliable role in either suggesting or confirming the possible origin of metastases. An indeterminate immunohistochemical phenotype seems to relate to a less differentiated lesion, with a worse prognosis

Osteosynthesis-associated infection of the lower limbs by multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a multicentre cohort study

Purpose: The purpose of this study was the clinical and therapeutic assessment of lower-limb osteosynthesis-associated infection (OAI) by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), which have been poorly studied to date. Methods: A prospective multicentre observational study was conducted on behalf of ESGIAI (the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group on Implant-Associated Infections). Factors associated with remission of the infection were evaluated by multivariate and Cox regression analysis for a 24-month follow-up period. Results: Patients (n=57) had a history of trauma (87.7 %), tumour resection (7 %) and other bone lesions (5.3 %). Pathogens included Escherichia coli (n=16), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=14; XDR 50 %), Klebsiella spp. (n=7), Enterobacter spp. (n=9), Acinetobacter spp. (n=5), Proteus mirabilis (n=3), Serratia marcescens (n=2) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n=1). The prevalence of ESBL (extended-spectrum β-lactamase), fluoroquinolone and carbapenem resistance were 71.9 %, 59.6 % and 17.5 % respectively. Most patients (n=37; 64.9 %) were treated with a combination including carbapenems (n=32) and colistin (n=11) for a mean of 63.3 d. Implant retention with debridement occurred in early OAI (66.7 %), whereas the infected device was removed in late OAI (70.4 %) (p=0.008). OAI remission was achieved in 29 cases (50.9 %). The type of surgery, antimicrobial resistance and duration of treatment did not significantly influence the outcome. Independent predictors of the failure to eradicate OAI were age &gt;60 years (hazard ratio, HR, of 3.875; 95 % confidence interval, CI95 %, of 1.540–9.752; p=0.004) and multiple surgeries for OAI (HR of 2.822; CI95 % of 1.144–6.963; p=0.024). Conclusions: Only half of the MDR/XDR GNB OAI cases treated by antimicrobials and surgery had a successful outcome. Advanced age and multiple surgeries hampered the eradication of OAI. Optimal therapeutic options remain a challenge.</p

Marika Daniilidou, MD. The First Female Orthopaedic Surgeon in Greece

Dr Marika Daniilidou was born in 1902 in Asia Minor. Her family was forced to immigrate to Greece, in 1922. Despite the horrendous difficulties of the era, she pursued undergraduate and postgraduate studies in the University of Berlin, Germany, and she specialized in orthopaedic surgery. In 1937, she became the first female certified orthopaedic surgeon in Greece. In 1947, she was the only female orthopaedic surgeon among the 22 founders of the Hellenic Association of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (HAOST). She became a true role model for the next generations of Greek women surgeons

Neuromuscular activity of the lower‐extremities during running, landing and changing‐of‐direction movements in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of electromyographic studies

Abstract Purpose Running, jumping/landing and cutting/change of direction (CoD) are critical components of return to sport (RTS) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), however the electromyographic (EMG) activity patterns of the operated leg during the execution of these tasks are not clear. Methods A systematic review was conducted to retrieve EMG studies during running, jumping/landing and cutting/(CoD) in ACLR patients. MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases were searched from 2000 to May, 2022 using a combination of keywords and their variations: “anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction” OR “ACLR”, “electromyography” OR “EMG”, “running”, “jumping” OR “landing”, “cutting” OR “change‐of‐direction” OR “CoD”. The search identified studies comparing EMG data during running, landing and cutting/(CoD) between the involved limb and contralateral or control limbs. Risk of bias was assessed and quantitative analyses using effect sizes were performed. Results Thirty two studies met the inclusion criteria. Seventy five percent (24/32) of the studies reported altered EMG activity pattern of the ACLR leg during running, jumping/landing and cutting/(CoD) when compared with either the healthy control leg or the contra‐lateral leg. Twelve studies showed decreased, delayed or earlier onset and delayed peak in quadriceps EMG activity with small to large effect sizes and 9 studies showed increased, delayed or earlier onset and delayed peak in hamstrings EMG activity with small to large effect sizes. Four studies showed a “hamstrings‐dominant” strategy i.e. decreased quadriceps coupled with increased hamstrings EMG activity in both running and jumping/landing irrespective of graft type. One study reported that on the grounds of decreased quadriceps activity, lower hamstrings EMG activity was predictive of ipsilateral re‐injury in ACLR patients. Conclusion This systematic review of Level III evidence showed that the ACLR leg displays decreased quadriceps or increased hamstrings EMG activity or both despite RTS. Simultaneous decreased quadriceps and increased hamstrings EMG activity was shown for both running and jumping/landing. From a clinical perspective this “hamstrings dominant” strategy can serve as a protective mechanism against graft re‐injury. Level of evidence III

Giant cell tumor of bone revisited

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is a locally aggressive benign neoplasm that is associated with a large biological spectrum ranging from latent benign to highly recurrent and occasionally metastatic malignant bone tumor. It accounts for 4–10% of all bone tumors and typically affects the meta-epiphyseal region of long bones of young adults. The most common site involved is the distal femur, followed by the distal radius, sacrum, and proximal humerus. Clinical symptoms are nonspecific and may include local pain, swelling, and limited range of motion of the adjacent joint. Radiographs and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the imaging modalities of choice for diagnosis. Surgical treatment with curettage is the optimal treatment for local tumor control. A favorable clinical outcome is expected when the tumor is excised to tumor-free margins, however, for periarticular lesions this is usually accompanied with a suboptimal functional outcome. Local adjuvants have been used for improved curettage, in addition to systematic agents such as denosumab, bisphosphonates, or interferon alpha. This article aims to discuss the clinicopathological features, diagnosis, and treatments for GCT of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone revisited

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is a locally aggressive benign neoplasm that is associated with a large biological spectrum ranging from latent benign to highly recurrent and occasionally metastatic malignant bone tumor. It accounts for 4-10% of all bone tumors and typically affects the meta-epiphyseal region of long bones of young adults. The most common site involved is the distal femur, followed by the distal radius, sacrum, and proximal humerus. Clinical symptoms are nonspecific and may include local pain, swelling, and limited range of motion of the adjacent joint. Radiographs and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the imaging modalities of choice for diagnosis. Surgical treatment with curettage is the optimal treatment for local tumor control. A favorable clinical outcome is expected when the tumor is excised to tumor-free margins, however, for periarticular lesions this is usually accompanied with a suboptimal functional outcome. Local adjuvants have been used for improved curettage, in addition to systematic agents such as denosumab, bisphosphonates, or interferon alpha. This article aims to discuss the clinicopathological features, diagnosis, and treatments for GCT of bone