La comunicación asertiva a través de juegos cooperativos en estudiantes de 10 grado del Colegio Gimnasio la Alameda, Soacha, Cundinamarca

La presente investigación aborda las dificultades en habilidades blandas que tienen los estudiantes del grado 10° con un rango de edad de los 14 a los 16 años; se evidencia la falta de comunicación asertiva, dónde la comunicación y expresión de pensamientos, sentimientos y opiniones no son comprendidas por los demás, no se valora ni respeta las opiniones del otro. En este mismo orden de ideas, se plantea la falta de participación por parte de los estudiantes en las sesiones on-line, efecto que generó la pandemia Covid-19 debido al aislamiento al que fue sometida la población y al impacto negativo sobre la calidad de vida de los estudiantes en su salud física y mental, generando como problemática la afectación de la comunicación y las relaciones interpersonales del grado 10° en la institución. Por lo anterior, se implementa un enfoque cualitativo con estudio descriptivo, ya que, se buscó fortalecer la comunicación asertiva y aplicar desde el área de Educación física 8 juegos cooperativos que permitan contribuir con los procesos de socialización e interacción en los estudiantes a través de una propuesta pedagógica aplicada durante 2 meses. Como conclusión de esta investigación, se influenció de forma significativa a la población objeto tras la intervención de la propuesta pedagógica mediante los juegos cooperativos, porque se mejoró y fortaleció la comunicación asertiva en los estudiantes, viéndose reflejado en las respuestas que dieron los estudiantes en la entrevista no estructurada en el grupo focal.This research addresses the difficulties in soft skills that 10th grade students have with an age range of 14 to 16 years; the lack of assertive communication is evident, where the communication and expression of thoughts, feelings and opinions are not understood by others, the opinions of the other are not valued or respected. In this same order of ideas, the lack of participation by the students in the online sessions is raised, an effect generated by the Covid-19 pandemic due to the isolation to which the population was subjected and the negative impact on the quality of life of the students in their physical and mental health, generating as a problem the affectation of communication and interpersonal relationships of the 10th grade in the institution. Due to the above, a qualitative approach with a descriptive study is implemented, since it sought to strengthen assertive communication and apply 8 cooperative games from the Physical Education area that allow contributing to the processes of socialization and interaction in students through a pedagogical proposal applied for 2 months. As a conclusion of this investigation, the target population was significantly influenced after the intervention of the pedagogical proposal through cooperative games, because assertive communication in the students was improved and strengthened, being reflected in the answers that the students gave in the unstructured interview in the focus group

Comunicación asertiva y juegos cooperativos, una experiencia desde la educación física

Las habilidades sociales permiten al ser humano desarrollarse plenamente en sociedad. Es fundamental brindar un espacio desde la educación física para fortalecer la comunicación asertiva que potencie el ser social, para interactuar y mantener una continua relación con las demás personas. Estas habilidades se deben trabajar en todas las etapas de desarrollo, porque son esenciales para la vida e inciden en el aprendizaje, el comportamiento, el trabajo grupal y, en términos generales, en diferentes aspectos de la vida

FULL Investiga Julio a Diciembre de 2022 Número 6

Siempre es muy grato para la Dirección de Investigaciones, adscrita a la Vicerrectoría Académica, presentar un nuevo número de la Revista Full Investiga. Full Investiga es un espacio para la difusión de procesos investigativos alrededor de la ciencia, las humanidades y las artes. Su propósito es trazar nexos entre diferentes disciplinas, centros de enseñanza y aprendizaje y las necesidades de la sociedad, con el fin de generar sinergias que motiven co-creaciones, innovaciones y soluciones para problemáticas sociales con miras al desarrollo sostenible global. La portada fue ilustrada por @elnativoilustra, estudiante de diseño gráfico de los Libertadores e, inserta en nuestro contexto, da cuenta de cómo la academia sigue creando, produciendo, proponiendo y conectando en los tiempos de ocio. Este sexto número contó con artículos de investigadora(e)s provenientes de instituciones tales como la Universidad de Buenos Aires, la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, la Orquesta Cuerdas del Plata, LCI Education Network, la Universidad Popular de Barrios de Pie, la Universidad de Lanús y de varias facultades de la Fundación Universitaria los Libertadores.Contiene: 1. Vitalidad urbana: desarrollo de una metodología para el diseño comunitario de intervenciones urbanas en barrios populares. -- 2. El tango nuevo: entre la tradición, la investigación y la contrapropuesta. -- 3. Diseño de investigación: representaciones simbólicas no binarias en una ciudad diversa. -- 4. Una invitación a la contabilidad de los conflictos socio-ambientales. -- 5. El diseño de servicios como contribución al Consultorio Móvil de la Responsabilidad Social de la FULL. -- 6. Selección de CRM en las pymes colombianas con B2C del sector de telecomunicaciones: recomendaciones. -- 7. Aportes de la automatización al email marketing de las tiendas Dafiti de Bogotá. -- 8. Comunicación asertiva y juegos cooperativos, una experiencia desde la educación física. -- 9. A los pelaos de hoy no les gusta leer, ¿por qué será?

Prospective observational cohort study on grading the severity of postoperative complications in global surgery research

Background The Clavien–Dindo classification is perhaps the most widely used approach for reporting postoperative complications in clinical trials. This system classifies complication severity by the treatment provided. However, it is unclear whether the Clavien–Dindo system can be used internationally in studies across differing healthcare systems in high- (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods This was a secondary analysis of the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), a prospective observational cohort study of elective surgery in adults. Data collection occurred over a 7-day period. Severity of complications was graded using Clavien–Dindo and the simpler ISOS grading (mild, moderate or severe, based on guided investigator judgement). Severity grading was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data are presented as frequencies and ICC values (with 95 per cent c.i.). The analysis was stratified by income status of the country, comparing HICs with LMICs. Results A total of 44 814 patients were recruited from 474 hospitals in 27 countries (19 HICs and 8 LMICs). Some 7508 patients (16·8 per cent) experienced at least one postoperative complication, equivalent to 11 664 complications in total. Using the ISOS classification, 5504 of 11 664 complications (47·2 per cent) were graded as mild, 4244 (36·4 per cent) as moderate and 1916 (16·4 per cent) as severe. Using Clavien–Dindo, 6781 of 11 664 complications (58·1 per cent) were graded as I or II, 1740 (14·9 per cent) as III, 2408 (20·6 per cent) as IV and 735 (6·3 per cent) as V. Agreement between classification systems was poor overall (ICC 0·41, 95 per cent c.i. 0·20 to 0·55), and in LMICs (ICC 0·23, 0·05 to 0·38) and HICs (ICC 0·46, 0·25 to 0·59). Conclusion Caution is recommended when using a treatment approach to grade complications in global surgery studies, as this may introduce bias unintentionally

The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis

© 2017 British Journal of Anaesthesia Background: The surgical safety checklist is widely used to improve the quality of perioperative care. However, clinicians continue to debate the clinical effectiveness of this tool. Methods: Prospective analysis of data from the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), an international observational study of elective in-patient surgery, accompanied by a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature. The exposure was surgical safety checklist use. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. In the ISOS cohort, a multivariable multi-level generalized linear model was used to test associations. To further contextualise these findings, we included the results from the ISOS cohort in a meta-analysis. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We included 44 814 patients from 497 hospitals in 27 countries in the ISOS analysis. There were 40 245 (89.8%) patients exposed to the checklist, whilst 7508 (16.8%) sustained ≥1 postoperative complications and 207 (0.5%) died before hospital discharge. Checklist exposure was associated with reduced mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.49 (0.32–0.77); P\u3c0.01], but no difference in complication rates [OR 1.02 (0.88–1.19); P=0.75]. In a systematic review, we screened 3732 records and identified 11 eligible studies of 453 292 patients including the ISOS cohort. Checklist exposure was associated with both reduced postoperative mortality [OR 0.75 (0.62–0.92); P\u3c0.01; I2=87%] and reduced complication rates [OR 0.73 (0.61–0.88); P\u3c0.01; I2=89%). Conclusions: Patients exposed to a surgical safety checklist experience better postoperative outcomes, but this could simply reflect wider quality of care in hospitals where checklist use is routine

Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit:prospective analysis of data from 27 countries

Purpose: As global initiatives increase patient access to surgical treatments, there is a need to define optimal levels of perioperative care. Our aim was to describe the relationship between the provision and use of critical care resources and postoperative mortality. Methods: Planned analysis of data collected during an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective in-patient surgery. We used risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models to evaluate the association between admission to critical care immediately after surgery and in-hospital mortality. We evaluated hospital-level associations between mortality and critical care admission immediately after surgery, critical care admission to treat life-threatening complications, and hospital provision of critical care beds. We evaluated the effect of national income using interaction tests. Results: 44,814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 countries were available for analysis. Death was more frequent amongst patients admitted directly to critical care after surgery (critical care: 103/4317 patients [2%], standard ward: 99/39,566 patients [0.3%]; adjusted OR 3.01 [2.10–5.21]; p < 0.001). This association may differ with national income (high income countries OR 2.50 vs. low and middle income countries OR 4.68; p = 0.07). At hospital level, there was no association between mortality and critical care admission directly after surgery (p = 0.26), critical care admission to treat complications (p = 0.33), or provision of critical care beds (p = 0.70). Findings of the hospital-level analyses were not affected by national income status. A sensitivity analysis including only high-risk patients yielded similar findings. Conclusions: We did not identify any survival benefit from critical care admission following surgery