12 research outputs found

    ΠšΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ стромы Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹

    Get PDF
    Introduction. Prostate cancer is by far the most frequently diagnosed cancer among the male population and ranks fifth in the world in terms of mortality rates among malignant neoplasms. Today it is known that the tumor microenvironment plays an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Abundant data has accumulated indicating that cells of the inflammatory infiltrate of the tumor are involved in the onset, progression and response to treatment in cases of prostate cancer. However, their role in the context of disease progression has not yet been determined. In this work, we studied the phenotype of inflammatory infiltrate of prostate cancer and its association with the clinical and morphological characteristics of patients.The study objective is to determine the features of the inflammatory infiltrate of prostate cancer and its association with the clinical and morphological characteristics of patients with this disease.Materials and methods. The study included tumor samples obtained from 31 patients with prostate cancer. The expression of CD3, CD8, FoxP3, CD68, PU.1, CD204, CD163, IDO1, PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The relationship between markers and clinical and morphological characteristics was assessed using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test and Fisher’s exact test. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlations between contents of cells of different phenotypes. Differences were considered statistically significant at p <0.05.Results. This study describes the features of the stroma of prostate cancer. We have shown that an increased content of CD204+ cells is associated with an older age of patients (p = 0.0026), and the number of CD163+ and CD8+ cells with no metastases to regional lymph nodes (p = 0.0067 and p = 0.0069, respectively). It has been shown that PU.1 can be used as a general marker of macrophages. We also found significant correlations between the level of PU.1 and PD-L1 in the stroma (r = 0.421; p = 0.018) and IDO1 in the stroma (r = 0.557; p = 0.001) and in tumor cells (r = 0.393; p = 0.029), CD68 with IDO1 in the stroma (r = 0.535; p = 0.002), CD163 with PD-L1 and IDO1 in the stroma (r = 0.399; p = 0.026 and r = 0.220; p = 0.026, respectively).Conclusion. In this work, the characteristics of the stroma of prostate cancer were investigated. Our data indicate that tumor associated macrophages are the main cells expressing PD-L1 and IDO1 in the tumor stroma in the case of prostate cancer. Increased expression of IDO1 in tumor tissue is associated with the immunosuppressive phenotype of the inflammatory infiltrate. The fact that the number of macrophages directly correlates with the number of T-lymphocytes in the prostate stroma, and the number of M2 macrophages with cytotoxic T-cells indicates the interaction of the mechanisms of innate and acquired immunity during the progression of prostate cancer.Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π Π°ΠΊ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ Π½Π° сСгодняшний дСнь являСтся Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ часто диагностируСмым онкологичСским Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ срСди муТского насСлСния ΠΈ Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π΅Ρ‚ 5-Π΅ мСсто Π² ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π΅ ΠΏΠΎ показатСлям смСртности срСди злокачСствСнных Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π˜Π·Π²Π΅ΡΡ‚Π½ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠΎΠΊΡ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ³Ρ€Π°Π΅Ρ‚ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡˆΡƒΡŽ Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒ Π² ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π΅ заболСвания. НакоплСно ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ…, ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΡƒΡ‡Π°ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ Π² Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, прогрСссии ΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ Π½Π° Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² случаях Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹. Однако ΠΈΡ… Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒ Π² контСкстС прогрСссии заболСвания Π΅Ρ‰Π΅ Π½Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π°. Π² ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ прСдставлСно исслСдованиС Ρ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ° Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ассоциации с ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-морфологичСскими характСристиками ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ².ЦСль исслСдования – ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ особСнностСй Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ассоциации с ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-морфологичСскими характСристиками ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ исслСдованиС Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†Ρ‹ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚ 31 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° с Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹. Π‘ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ иммуногистохимичСского исслСдования ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° экспрСссия CD3, CD8, FoxP3, CD68, PU.1, CD204, CD163, IDO1 ΠΈ PD-L1 (Π»ΠΈΠ³Π°Π½Π΄Π° Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΌΠΈΡ€ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΈΠ±Π΅Π»ΠΈ 1). Для опрСдСлСния взаимосвязи ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-морфологичСских характСристик ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² использовались нСпарамСтричСский ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΉ манна–Уитни ΠΈ Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΉ Ρ„ΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ€Π°. Для Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° коррСляций ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ содСрТаниСм ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² примСняли коэффициСнт Ρ€Π°Π½Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ коррСляции спирмСна. Π²ΠΎ всСх Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ… Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ p ≀0,05 ΡΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ статистичСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΌ.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Π’ Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ исслСдования ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ‹ особСнности стромы Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹. Π‘Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ продСмонстрировано, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ содСрТаниС CD204+-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ ассоциировано с Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ€ΡˆΠΈΠΌ возрастом ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² (Ρ€ = 0,0026), Π° количСство CD163+- ΠΈ CD8+-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ – с отсутствиСм мСтастазов Π² Ρ€Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ€Π½Ρ‹Π΅ лимфатичСскиС ΡƒΠ·Π»Ρ‹ (Ρ€ = 0,0067 ΠΈ Ρ€ = 0,0069 соотвСтствСнно). Показано, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ PU.1 ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Ρ‚ΡŒ использован ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΎΠ². Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΌΡ‹ выявили достовСрныС коррСляции уровня PU.1 с PD-L1 Π² стромС (r = 0,421; Ρ€ = 0,018), IDO1 Π² стромС (r = 0,557; p = 0,001) ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Ρ… (r = 0,393; Ρ€ = 0,029), Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ CD68 c IDO1 (r = 0,535; p = 0,002) ΠΈ сD163 c PDL1 ΠΈ IDO1 Π² стромС (r = 0,399; p = 0,026 ΠΈ r = 0,220; p = 0,026 соотвСтствСнно).Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π‘Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ исслСдованы характСристики стромы Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹. ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΡƒΠΊΠ°Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ Π½Π° Ρ‚ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ основными ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΡΠΊΡΠΏΡ€Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌΠΈ PD-L1 ΠΈ IDO1 Π² стромС ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ, Π² случаС Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΈ, ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΡŒ. ΠŸΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ экспрСссия IDO1 Π² ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ ассоциирована с иммуносупрСссорным Ρ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΈΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°. Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‚ Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ количСство ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΎΠ² прямо ΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ с количСством Ρ‚-Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ² Π² стромС Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹, Π° ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡŒ содСрТания ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΎΠ² 2-Π³ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ° – с цитотоксичСскими Ρ‚-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΎ взаимодСйствии ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚Π° Π² процСссС прогрСссии ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ

    Π‘Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΈ sPD-1/sPD-L1 ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ΅ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ плоскоклСточном Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π°

    Get PDF
    Background. Implementation of immunotherapy in clinical oncological practice has significantly improved the results of cancer treatment. It resulted in the need for seeking new markers to assess the effectiveness of therapy and the disease prognosis.Aim. To analyze the content of soluble forms of PD-1 and PD-L1 immune checkpoint proteins in the blood serum of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and their association with clinical and morphological characteristics of the disease and the disease prognosis.Materials and methods. The study included tumor samples obtained from 43 patients with non-small cell lung cancer and 21 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The concentration of sPD-L1 and sPD-1 in the blood serum was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The Mann – Whitney test was used to determine statistically significant differences in independent groups. A correlation analysis was performed using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Overall survival was analyzed by constructing survival curves using the Kaplan – Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model. The differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.Results. The study showed that sPD-1 and sPD-L1 were found in the blood serum of both cancer patients and healthy donors, and their concentrations did not differ significantly. It was shown that the high concentration of sPD-L1 in the blood serum of patients with non-small cell lung cancer was significantly associated with the late stage of the disease and was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor. It should be noted that for patients with esophageal cancer, an unfavorable prognostic marker was the high concentration of the soluble form of PD-1 protein, and not PD-L1 ligand, as in case of lung cancer.Conclusion. The content of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 in the blood serum can have different prognostic significance for various types of cancer, and further studies are required to confirm their clinical usability.Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. АктивноС Π²Π½Π΅Π΄Ρ€Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΡƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ ΡƒΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ лСкарствСнного лСчСния ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ. Π­Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΎ ΠΊ нСобходимости поиска Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ², с ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ· заболСвания.ЦСль исслСдования – Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· содСрТания растворимых Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π΅ΠΊ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚Π° sPD-1 ΠΈ PD-L1 Π² сывороткС ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ плоскоклСточным Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π°, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΈΡ… ассоциации с ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-морфологичСскими характСристиками заболСвания ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ исслСдованиС Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†Ρ‹ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡ‚ 43 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ 21 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° с плоскоклСточным Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π°. ΠšΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡŽ sPD-L1 ΠΈ sPD-1 опрСдСляли Π² сывороткС ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ с ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΡ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°. Для опрСдСлСния статистичСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠΉ Π² нСзависимых Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ… использовали ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΉ Манна – Π£ΠΈΡ‚Π½ΠΈ. ΠšΠΎΡ€Ρ€Π΅Π»ΡΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ с ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ опрСдСлСния коэффициСнта Ρ€Π°Π½Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ коррСляции Π‘ΠΏΠΈΡ€ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°. Анализ ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅ΠΉ выТиваСмости – ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΌ построСния ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… доТития ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ Каплана – ΠœΠ΅ΠΉΠ΅Ρ€Π° ΠΈ с использованиСм ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡ€Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… рисков Кокса. БтатистичСски достовСрными ΡΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ различия ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ€ < 0,05.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Показано, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ sPD-1ΠΈ sPD-L1 ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π² сывороткС ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с онкологичСскими заболСваниями, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ², ΠΈ ΠΈΡ… ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎ Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ. Показано, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ высокая концСнтрация sPD-L1 Π² сывороткС ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ассоциирована с ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ стадиСй заболСвания ΠΈ являСтся нСзависимым нСблагоприятным прогностичСским Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΌ. НСобходимо ΠΎΡ‚ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ для ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π° нСблагоприятным прогностичСским ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠΌ являСтся высокоС содСрТаниС растворимой Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡ‹ Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π° PD-1, Π° Π½Π΅ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΠ³Π°Π½Π΄Π° PD-L1, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ для Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ.Π’Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π‘ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² сывороткС ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ sPD-1ΠΈ sPD-L1 ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΡŒ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ΅ прогностичСскоС Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ для злокачСствСнных ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° для клиничСского примСнСния Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ дальнСйшСго изучСния

    Π˜ΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΡΡƒΠΏΡ€Π΅ΡΡΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Π΅ особСнности Ρ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ° стромы ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… гистологичСских Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²

    Get PDF
    Background. Renal cell carcinoma is a heterogeneous group of tumors characterized by high vascularization and immunogenicity. Immunotherapy has made a breakthrough in the treatment of this pathology, however, the lack of development of criteria for its use does not allow to achieve even greater success. It is known that the tumor stroma plays an important role in the success of immunotherapy. Among the various histological types of kidney tumors, the stroma of the clear cell renal cell carcinoma has been studied in sufficient detail. However, the remaining histological types are practically not studied.Objective: description of the immunosuppressive phenotype of the stroma of kidney tumors of various histological types.Materials and methods. The study included tumor samples obtainedfrom 44patients with renal cell carcinoma of various histological types (16 samples of chromophobe cancer, 15 samples of clear cell and 13 samples of papillary renal cell carcinoma). The method of immunohis-tochemistry evaluated the expression of tumor stromal markers, namely CD68, CD206, PU.1, CD3, IDO1 and PD-L1 in the studied samples.Results. Analysis of the total number of macrophages associated with the tumor showed that the smallest number is observed in samples of chromophobe renal cancer, while in the samples of clear cell cancer their number is greatest. A similar situation is observed for T-cells: the largest number of CD3+ cells is observed in clear cell tumors. In chromophobe and papillary tumors, their number is reduced. Papillary tumors are also characterized by an almost complete absence of expression of PD-L1 and IDO1 compared to other histological types of kidney tumors. We also showed that for PU.1 there is a strong positive correlation between its quantity and localization, as in CD68. Thus, PU.1 can be used as a general marker for describing stromal macrophages in kidney tumors.Conclusion. The study showed that kidney tumors of various histological types strongly and significantly differ in the composition of their microenvironment. These data, of course, must be considered when choosing immune therapy in the treatment of this pathology.Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠŸΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎ-клСточная ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ° прСдставляСт собой Π³Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡƒΡŽ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡƒ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΡƒΡŽΡΡ высокой Π²Π°ΡΠΊΡƒΠ»ΡΡ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ. Π˜ΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠΈΠ»Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π² Π² Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ΅Π² Π΅Π΅ примСнСния Π½Π΅ позволяСт Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒΡΡ Π΅Ρ‰Π΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡˆΠΈΡ… успСхов. Π˜Π·Π²Π΅ΡΡ‚Π½ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π² успСхС ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΡƒΡŽ Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒ ΠΈΠ³Ρ€Π°Π΅Ρ‚ опухолСвая строма. Π‘Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… гистологичСских Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ строма свСтлоклСточного Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎ-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ†ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ‹ ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π° достаточно ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ€ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎ. Однако ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ гистологичСскиС Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΡ‹ практичСски Π½Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹.ЦСль исслСдования β€” описаниС иммуносупрСссорного Ρ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ° стромы ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… гистологичСских Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ². ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ исслСдованиС Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†Ρ‹ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚ 44 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎ-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… гистологичСских Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² (16 ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†ΠΎΠ² Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ„ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, 15 ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†ΠΎΠ² свСтлоклСточного ΠΈ 13 ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†ΠΎΠ² папиллярного Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ). Π’ исслСдуСмых ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†Π°Ρ… иммуногистохимичСски ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° экспрСссии ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ стромы, Π° ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ CD68, CD206, PU.1, CD3, IDO1 ΠΈ PD-L1.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Анализ ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ числа ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΎΠ², ассоциированных с ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡŽ, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π», Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ наимСньшСС ΠΈΡ… количСство Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ΡΡ Π² ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†Π°Ρ… Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ„ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎ врСмя ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π² ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†Π°Ρ… свСтлоклСточного Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΈΡ… количСство наибольшСС. Для Π’-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½Π° похоТая ситуация: наибольшСС число CD3+-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ΡΡ Π² свСтлоклСточных опухолях. Π’ Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ„ΠΎΠ±Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ папиллярных опухолях ΠΈΡ… количСство сниТСно. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ папиллярныС ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ практичСски ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ отсутствиСм экспрСссии PD-L1 ΠΈ IDO1 ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡ€Π°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ с Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ гистологичСскими Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΌΡ‹ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ для PU.1 Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ΡΡ сильная ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ коррСляция Π΅Π³ΠΎ количСства с Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ для CD68. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠΌ, PU.1 ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π² качСствС ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€Π° для описания ΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΎΠ² Π² опухолях ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ.Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ исслСдования ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… гистологичСских Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² сильно ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ составу своСго микроокруТСния. Π­Ρ‚ΠΎ, нСсомнСнно, Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹Π²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€Π΅ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π² Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ

    Value orientations of the student youth in religious and secular universities

    No full text
    The article presents the results of the factor analysis applied to the data of mass survey on the value orientations of the students of secular and religious universities - Moscow Orthodox Theological Academy and Seminary, Lomonosov Moscow State University and Saint Petersburg State University. First, the authors provide a brief overview of the current state of sociological studies of values and value orientations of the youth and Russians with an emphasis on cross-cultural and other comparative contexts, which are so popular today. The article also considers different emphases in the sociological interpretation of the concepts of values and value orientations on the theoretical and empirical levels including the historical perspective. Since the research project consisted of several stages so as to solve a number of tasks and used different formats of the questionnaire for different samples (administration, professors and students), the article presents only a small part of the project designed to reveal the value orientations of students of secular and religious universities with the help of S. Schwartz and B. Bilski technique. The authors used this technique to identify similarities and differences in values and motives of students of secular and religious universities; suggest four factorial types of motivation; offer an interpretation of the observed factors and their manifestations in different student subsamples, such as the different circumstances of life of students in secular and religious universities and the more β€œexpert” status of the latter in the (Christian, Orthodox) moral discourse, unlike the majority of students of secular universities, who can hardly be considered experts in secular ethics

    Gd3+-Doped Magnetic Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications

    No full text
    Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) made of iron oxides with cubic symmetry (Fe3O4, Ξ³-Fe2O3) are demanded objects for multipurpose in biomedical applications as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging, magnetically driven carriers for drug delivery, and heaters in hyperthermia cancer treatment. An optimum balance between the right particle size and good magnetic response can be reached by a selection of a synthesis method and by doping with rare earth elements. Here, we present a microwave-assisted polyol synthesis of iron oxide MNPs with actual gadolinium (III) doping from 0.5 to 5.1 mol.%. The resulting MNPs have an average size of 14 nm with narrow size distribution. Their surface was covered by a glycol layer, which prevents aggregation and improves biocompatibility. The magnetic hyperthermia test was performed on 1 and 2 mg/ml aqueous colloidal solutions of MNPs and demonstrated their ability to rise the temperature by 3Β°C during a 20–30 min run. Therefore, the obtained Gd3+ MNPs are the promising material for biomedicine

    Immunosuppressive peculiarities of stromal cells of various kidney tumor types

    Get PDF
    Background. Renal cell carcinoma is a heterogeneous group of tumors characterized by high vascularization and immunogenicity. Immunotherapy has made a breakthrough in the treatment of this pathology, however, the lack of development of criteria for its use does not allow to achieve even greater success. It is known that the tumor stroma plays an important role in the success of immunotherapy. Among the various histological types of kidney tumors, the stroma of the clear cell renal cell carcinoma has been studied in sufficient detail. However, the remaining histological types are practically not studied.Objective: description of the immunosuppressive phenotype of the stroma of kidney tumors of various histological types.Materials and methods. The study included tumor samples obtainedfrom 44patients with renal cell carcinoma of various histological types (16 samples of chromophobe cancer, 15 samples of clear cell and 13 samples of papillary renal cell carcinoma). The method of immunohis-tochemistry evaluated the expression of tumor stromal markers, namely CD68, CD206, PU.1, CD3, IDO1 and PD-L1 in the studied samples.Results. Analysis of the total number of macrophages associated with the tumor showed that the smallest number is observed in samples of chromophobe renal cancer, while in the samples of clear cell cancer their number is greatest. A similar situation is observed for T-cells: the largest number of CD3+ cells is observed in clear cell tumors. In chromophobe and papillary tumors, their number is reduced. Papillary tumors are also characterized by an almost complete absence of expression of PD-L1 and IDO1 compared to other histological types of kidney tumors. We also showed that for PU.1 there is a strong positive correlation between its quantity and localization, as in CD68. Thus, PU.1 can be used as a general marker for describing stromal macrophages in kidney tumors.Conclusion. The study showed that kidney tumors of various histological types strongly and significantly differ in the composition of their microenvironment. These data, of course, must be considered when choosing immune therapy in the treatment of this pathology

    ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ комплСксной ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ экспрСссии Ki-67, Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π° Π½Π΅ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ·Π° ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Ξ±, CD20 ΠΈ CD31 ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ΅ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ

    Get PDF
    Introduction. Non-small cell lung cancer is a common cancer with a poor prognosis. Modern researchers conduct many studies devoted to understanding the molecular mechanisms of its pathogenesis. Modern advances in immunotherapy have significantly improved the prognosis of patients with this pathology, but this is still not enough to control the course of the disease.Objective – to the study of tumor (Ki-67, tumor necrosis factor Ξ± (TNF-Ξ±)) and stromal (TNF-Ξ±, CD20 and CD31) markers in non-small cell lung cancer and their prognostic significance.Materials and methods. The study included tumor samples obtained from 100 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The expression of Ki-67, TNF-Ξ±, CD20 and CD31 was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Survival analysis was carried out by constructing survival curves using the Kaplan–Meier method. To analyze the association of the expression of studied markers with clinical and morphological characteristics, the Mann–Whitney test was used. Differences were considered statistically significant at p <0.05.Results. We analyzed the expression of Ki-67, TNF-Ξ±, CD20 and CD31 in non-small cell lung cancer tumors. Ki-67 expression was detected in tumor cells in 99 % of the samples studied and was not observed in stromal cells. In tumor and stromal cells, TNF-Ξ± expression was detected in 100 % of the samples. CD31 positive cells were also found in all samples studied, and CD20+B cells were present in 95 % of cases. TNF-Ξ± expression in tumor cells and tumor stroma is not associated with clinical and morphological characteristics. For the expression of CD20 in the tumor stroma, there was an association with tumor localization (p = 0.0435), with the stage of the disease (p = 0.0044), tumor size (p = 0.0017), and the presence of regional metastases (p = 0.0071). For Ki-67, there was a strong association with the histological type of tumor (p <0.0001), its localization (p = 0.0012) and the presence of regional metastases (p = 0.0020). The analysis of prognostic significance showed that TNF-Ξ± expression in tumor stroma cells is a favorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio 0.5547; p = 0.0139), while a high content of CD31+ cells is a factor of poor prognosis (hazard ratio 2.335; p = 0.0355). Next, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the prognostic significance of the two identified markers simultaneously. It turned out that their combination of TNF-Ξ±/stroma (high expression)+CD31 (low expression) is a much more significant prognostic factor, in contrast to the individual analysis (hazard ratio 0.1966; p = 0.0048).Conclusion. The study showed that a complex rather than an individual assessment of the predictive value of several markers simultaneously more effectively reflects their predictive ability.Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. НСмСлкоклСточный Ρ€Π°ΠΊ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ являСтся распространСнной онкологичСской ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉΡΡ нСблагоприятным ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ. БСгодня проводится большоС количСство исслСдований, посвящСнных пониманию молСкулярных ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² прогрСссии Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ заболСвания. Π‘ΠΎΠ²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ успСхи ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ ΡƒΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ· ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ для контроля Π½Π°Π΄ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ этого ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ° нСдостаточно.ЦСль исслСдования – ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… (Ki-67, Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ Π½Π΅ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ·Π° ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Ξ± (TNF-Ξ±)) ΠΈ ΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… (TNF-Ξ±, CD20 ΠΈ CD31) ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ² Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΈΡ… прогностичСской значимости.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ исслСдованиС Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†Ρ‹ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚ 100 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ. Π‘ помошью иммуногистохимичСского ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° экспрСссии Ki-67, TNF-Ξ±, CD20 ΠΈ CD31. Анализ выТиваСмости обсущСствляли ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΌ построСния ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… доТития ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ ΠšΠ°ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π°β€“ΠœΠ°ΠΉΠ΅Ρ€Π°. Для ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ассоциации экспрСссии исслСдуСмых ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ² с ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-морфологичСскими характСристиками использовали ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΉ ΠœΠ°Π½Π½Π°β€“Π£ΠΈΡ‚Π½ΠΈ. Различия ΡΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ статистичСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ p <0,05.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ΠœΡ‹ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· экспрСссии Ki-67, TNF-Ξ±, CD20 ΠΈ CD31 Π² ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Ρ… Π½Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΊΠΎΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° Π»Π΅Π³ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ. ЭкспрСссия Ki-67 ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π°ΡΡŒ Π² 99 % исслСдованных ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π½Π΅ наблюдалась Π² ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Ρ… стромы. Π’ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ ΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Ρ… экспрСссия TNF-Ξ± наблюдалась Π² 100 % ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†ΠΎΠ². CD31+-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‹ Π²ΠΎ всСх исслСдованных ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†Π°Ρ…, Π° CD20+-B-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ присутствовали Π² 95 % случаСв. ЭкспрСссия TNF-Ξ± Π² ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Ρ… ΠΈ стромС ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π΅ ассоциирована с ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-морфологичСскими характСристиками. Π’ случаС экспрСссии CD20 Π² стромС наблюдалась ассоциация c Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ (p = 0,0435), со стадиСй заболСвания (p = 0,0044), Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ (p = 0,0017) ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ€Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… мСтастазов (p = 0,0071). Π’ случаС экспрСссии Ki-67 наблюдалась сильная ассоциация с гистологичСским Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ (p <0,0001), Π΅Π΅ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ (p = 0,0012) ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ€Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… мСтастазов (p = 0,0020). Анализ прогностичСской значимости ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π», Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ экспрСссия TNF-Ξ± Π² ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Ρ… ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ стромы являСтся благоприятным прогностичСским Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΌ (ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ рисков (ОР) 0,5547; p = 0,0139), Π² Ρ‚ΠΎ врСмя ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ высокоС содСрТаниС CD31+-ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ – Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΌ нСблагоприятного ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° (ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ рисков 2,335; p = 0,0355). Π—Π°Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌ ΠΌΡ‹ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈ комплСксный Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· прогностичСской значимости ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ 2 выявлСнных ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ². Оказалось, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ сочСтаниС TNF-Ξ±/строма (высокая экспрСссия)+CD31 (низкая экспрСссия) являСтся Π½Π°ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΌ прогностичСским Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΌ, Π² ΠΎΡ‚Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Β (ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ рисков 0,1966; p = 0,0048).Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ исслСдованиС ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ комплСксная, Π° Π½Π΅ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° прогностичСской значимости ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ² Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ эффСктивно ΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ°Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΈΡ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡƒΡŽ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ

    ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ экспрСссии CD204 ΠΈ IDO1 Π² опухолях ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π°

    Get PDF
    Introduction. Cancer of the esophagus ranks sixth in mortality among malignant neoplastic diseases. To understand the molecular mechanisms of its progression, it is necessary to study not only tumor cells directly, but also cells of the microenvironment. In this work, we studied tumor-associated macrophages and their different phenotypes using membrane protein, indoleamine 2,3‑dioxygenase-1 (IDO1) as a marker for type 1 macrophages and macrophage scavenger receptor (CD204) as a marker for type 2 macrophages.The objective of this work was to study the expression of IDO1 and CD204 in tumors of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and to assess its prognostic value.Materials and methods. The study included tumor samples obtained from 48 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The expression of CD204 and IDO1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Survival analysis was carried out by constructing survival curves using the Kaplan–Meier method. Comparison of the significance of differences was performed using the logarithmic rank test. Differences were considered statistically significant at p <0.05.Results. We analyzed the expression of CD204 and IDO1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tumors. Expression of CD204 was detected in stromal macrophages in 100 % of cases and was not detected in tumor cells. We have shown that in esophageal cancer, IDO1 is expressed in both stromal and tumor cells. In tumor cells, the expression of IDO1 was found in 44 % of the samples, in stromal cells, IDO1 was expressed in 92 % of cases. No association with clinical and morphological characteristics was observed for CD204 in stromal cells and IDO1 in tumor cells. For IDO1 expressed in stromal cells, an association with the stage of the disease (p = 0.0450) and the presence of regional metastases (p = 0.0279) was observed. Survival analysis showed that CD204 is a marker of a favorable prognosis for esophageal cancer (hazard ratio 0.455, p = 0.0419).Conclusion. This study has shown that the expression of IDO1 in the tumor stroma is associated with more favorable clinical characteristics. It has also been shown that an increased content of CD204+ macrophages is a marker of a good prognosis for esophageal cancer.Π’Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π Π°ΠΊ ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π° находится Π½Π° 6‑м мСстС ΠΏΠΎ показатСлям смСртности срСди злокачСствСнных Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Для понимания молСкулярных ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² Π΅Π³ΠΎ прогрСссии Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½Π΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ нСпосрСдствСнно ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ микроокруТСния ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ. Π’ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ ΠΌΡ‹ исслСдовали ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΈ, ассоциированныС с ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡŽ, ΠΈ ΠΈΡ… Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Ρ„Π΅Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΏΡ‹, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±Ρ€Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΎΠΊ, ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ½-ΠΏΠΈΡ€Ρ€ΠΎΠ»-2,3‑диоксигСназа (indoleamine 2,3‑dioxygenase- 1, IDO1) Π² качСствС ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€Π° ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΎΠ² 1‑го Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΈ скавСндТСр-Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΎΠ² (CD204) Π² качСствС ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€Π° ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΎΠ² 2‑го Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠ°.ЦСль Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ – исслСдованиС экспрСссии IDO1 ΠΈ CD204 Π² опухолях плоскоклСточного Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΈ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π΅Π΅ прогностичСской значимости.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ исслСдованиС Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†Ρ‹ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚ 48 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… плоскоклСточным Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π°. Π‘ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ иммуногистохимичСского исслСдования ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° экспрСссии CD204 ΠΈ IDO1. Анализ выТиваСмости осущСствляли ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΌ построСния ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… доТития ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ ΠšΠ°ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Π°β€“ΠœΠ°ΠΉΠ΅Ρ€Π°. Π‘Ρ€Π°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ достовСрности Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΠΈ логарифмичСского Ρ€Π°Π½Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ критСрия. Различия ΡΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ статистичСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ€ <0,05.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ЭкспрСссия CD204 Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° Π² ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³Π°Ρ… стромы Π² 100 % исслСдуСмых ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° Π² ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Ρ…. Π‘Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ выявлСно, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π° IDO1 экспрСссируСтся ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π² ΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Ρ… (92 % ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†ΠΎΠ²), Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… (44 % ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ†ΠΎΠ²). Для CD204 Π² ΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ IDO1 Π² ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Ρ… Π½Π΅ наблюдалось ассоциации с ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-морфологичСскими характСристиками Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ…. Для IDO1 Π² стромС ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ выявлСна ассоциация со стадиСй заболСвания (p = 0,0450) ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ€Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… мСтастазов (p = 0,0279). Анализ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ выТиваСмости продСмонстрировал, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ CD204+ являСтся ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ΠΎΠΌ благоприятного ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π° (ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ рисков 0,455, p = 0,0419).Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π’ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ исслСдовании Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ экспрСссия IDO1 Π² стромС ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ассоциирована с Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ благоприятными ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-морфологичСскими характСристиками ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ². Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ выявлСно, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ содСрТаниС Π² стромС ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ CD204+ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π°Π³ΠΎΠ² слуТит ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΌ Ρ…ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° для Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π°
    corecore