7 research outputs found

    French legal framework relating to human tissues and cells

    No full text

    Kidney preservation with IGL-1 solution: a preliminary report

    No full text
    The University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is the most commonly used preservation solution. However, a new preservation solution-IGL-1-contains an inversion of K and Na concentrations and substitution of polyethylene glycol for hydroxyethyl starch in the UW solution. The present study is the first clinical experience on the outcome of kidneys preserved in IGL-1 solution. From June 2003 to June 2004, 119 cadaveric kidneys were retrieved and stored in IGL-1 solutions; among the 119 organs, this study includes 37 IGL-1-preserved kidneys that were locally transplanted versus 33 kidneys stored in University of Wisconsin (UW) solution that were also locally transplanted. The groups were comparable with regard to donor and recipient characteristics. Renal function outcome was evaluated by comparing delayed graft function (DGF) rates, the evolution of serum creatinine, daily urine output, and creatinine clearance. Biopsies were performed after reperfusion to evaluate apoptosis. The incidence of DGF was 5.71% among IGL-1 kidneys and 13.79% among UW kidneys. Creatinine values were significantly lower among the IGL-1 group from 2 to 14 days postoperative and at 1 month. Daily urinary output did not show any significant differences between the two groups. IGL-1 kidneys had a superior creatinine clearance during the first 15 postoperative days compared to UW kidneys. Kidneys preserved in IGL-1 solution showed fewer apoptotic cells compared to kidneys preserved in UW solution. This preliminary report suggests a superiority of IGL-1 for the immediate outcome of transplanted kidneys

    Immunohistochemical evaluation of two antibodies against PD-L1 and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in epithelioid peritoneal malignant mesothelioma: A RENAPE study.

    No full text
    Epithelioid peritoneal malignant mesothelioma (EPMM) is the most common subtype of this aggressive tumor. We compared two antibodies against PD-L1, a recent theranostic biomarker, and evaluated the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression by mesothelial and immune cells in EPMM. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 45 EPMM. Clinical and pathological data were extracted from the RENAPE database. Using E1L3N and SP142 clones, inter-observer agreement, PD-L1 expression by mesothelial and immune cells and inter-antibody agreement were evaluated. The prognostic relevance of PD-L1 expression was evaluated in 39 EPMM by univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Inter-observer agreement on E1L3N immunostaining was moderate for mesothelial and immune cells, and fair for mesothelial and poor for immune cells using SP142. Using E1L3N, 31.1% of mesothelial and 15.6% of immune cells expressed PD-L1, and 22.2% of mesothelial and 26.7% of immune cells using SP142. Inter-antibody agreement was moderate. In most positive cases, 1-5% of tumor cells were positive. Using E1L3N, PD-L1 expression by lymphocytes was associated with better OS and PFS by both univariate and multivariate analysis. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy predicted better prognosis than other treatments. Solid subtype was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS. E1L3N appeared easier to use than SP142 to evaluate PD-L1 expression. A minority of EPMM expressed PD-L1, and only a few cells were positive. PD-L1 expression by immune cells evaluated with E1L3N was an independent prognostic factor in EPMM

    Immunohistochemical evaluation of two antibodies against PD-L1 and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in epithelioid peritoneal malignant mesothelioma: A RENAPE study

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND:Epithelioid peritoneal malignant mesothelioma (EPMM) is the most common subtype of this aggressive tumor. We compared two antibodies against PD-L1, a recent theranostic biomarker, and evaluated the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression by mesothelial and immune cells in EPMM.METHODS:Immunohistochemistry was performed on 45 EPMM. Clinical and pathological data were extracted from the RENAPE database. Using E1L3N and SP142 clones, inter-observer agreement, PD-L1 expression by mesothelial and immune cells and inter-antibody agreement were evaluated. The prognostic relevance of PD-L1 expression was evaluated in 39 EPMM by univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).RESULTS:Inter-observer agreement on E1L3N immunostaining was moderate for mesothelial and immune cells, and fair for mesothelial and poor for immune cells using SP142. Using E1L3N, 31.1% of mesothelial and 15.6% of immune cells expressed PD-L1, and 22.2% of mesothelial and 26.7% of immune cells using SP142. Inter-antibody agreement was moderate. In most positive cases, 1-5% of tumor cells were positive. Using E1L3N, PD-L1 expression by lymphocytes was associated with better OS and PFS by both univariate and multivariate analysis. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy predicted better prognosis than other treatments. Solid subtype was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS.CONCLUSION:E1L3N appeared easier to use than SP142 to evaluate PD-L1 expression. A minority of EPMM expressed PD-L1, and only a few cells were positive. PD-L1 expression by immune cells evaluated with E1L3N was an independent prognostic factor in EPMM
    corecore