International randomised controlled trial for the treatment of newly diagnosed EWING sarcoma family of tumours - EURO EWING 2012 Protocol

[Background] Although there have been multiple randomised trials in newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma family of tumours (ESFT) and these have been conducted over many years and involved many international cooperative groups, the outcomes for all stages of disease have plateaued. Internationally, the standard treatment of ESFT is not defined, and there is a need to add new agents other than conventional chemotherapy to improve outcomes. This trial will compare two different induction/consolidation chemotherapy regimens: (1) vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin and etoposide (VIDE) induction and vincristine, actinomycin D, ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide, or busulfan and mephalan (VAI/VAC/BuMel) consolidation and (2) vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC/IE) induction and ifosfamide and etoposide, vincristine and cyclophosphamide, vincristine, actinomycin D and ifosfamide, or busulfan and mephalan (IE/VC/VAI/BuMel) consolidation (randomisation 1, or R1). A second randomisation (R2) will determine whether the addition of zoledronic acid to consolidation chemotherapy, as assigned at R1, is associated with improved clinical outcome.[Methods] EURO EWING 2012 is an international, multicentre, phase III, open-label randomised controlled trial. There are two randomisations: R1 and R2. Patients are randomly assigned at two different time points: at entry to the trial (R1) and following local control therapy (R2). The primary outcome measure is event-free survival. The secondary outcome measures include overall survival, adverse events and toxicity, histological response of the primary tumour, response of the primary tumour, regional lymph nodes or metastases (or both), and achievement of local control at the end of treatment.[Discussion] This study will establish which is the “standard regimen” of chemotherapy, taking into account both clinical outcomes and toxicity. This will form the chemotherapy backbone for future interventional studies where we may want to add new targeted agents. It will also determine the role of zoledronic acid in conjunction with the separate EE2008 trial. Any trial in ESFT needs to take into account the rarity of the tumour and consider that international cooperation is needed to provide answers in a timely manner.[Trial registration] Registered with EudraCT number 2012-002107-17 on 26 February 2012. Registered with ISRCTN number 92192408 on 4 November 2013.This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement n°602856. The NCC in France, CLB, receives additional funding from SFCE and Ligue contre le cancer. The coordinating sponsor (the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK) is funded by Cancer Research UK (grant award reference C5952/A14745)

A biobank of pediatric patient-derived-xenograft models in cancer precision medicine trial MAPPYACTS for relapsed and refractory tumors

Pediatric patients with recurrent and refractory cancers are in most need for new treatments. This study developed patient-derived-xenograft (PDX) models within the European MAPPYACTS cancer precision medicine trial (NCT02613962). To date, 131 PDX models were established following heterotopical and/or orthotopical implantation in immunocompromised mice: 76 sarcomas, 25 other solid tumors, 12 central nervous system tumors, 15 acute leukemias, and 3 lymphomas. PDX establishment rate was 43%. Histology, whole exome and RNA sequencing revealed a high concordance with the primary patient's tumor profile, human leukocyte-antigen characteristics and specific metabolic pathway signatures. A detailed patient molecular characterization, including specific mutations prioritized in the clinical molecular tumor boards are provided. Ninety models were shared with the IMI2 ITCC Pediatric Preclinical Proof-of-concept Platform (IMI2 ITCC-P4) for further exploitation. This PDX biobank of unique recurrent childhood cancers provides an essential support for basic and translational research and treatments development in advanced pediatric malignancies

Comparison of two chemotherapy regimens in patients with newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma (EE2012):an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

Background: Internationally, a single standard chemotherapy treatment for Ewing sarcoma is not defined. Because different chemotherapy regimens were standard in Europe and the USA for newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma, and in the absence of novel agents to investigate, we aimed to compare these two strategies. Methods: EURO EWING 2012 was a European investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial done in 10 countries. We included patients aged 2–49 years, with any histologically and genetically confirmed Ewing sarcoma of bone or soft tissue, or Ewing-like sarcomas. The eligibility criteria originally excluded patients with extrapulmonary metastatic disease, but this was amended in the protocol (version 3.0) in September, 2016. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the European regimen of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide induction, and consolidation using vincristine, actinomycin D, with ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide, or busulfan and melphalan (group 1); or the US regimen of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide induction, plus ifosfamide and etoposide, and consolidation using vincristine and cyclophosphamide, or vincristine, actinomycin D, and ifosfamide, with busulfan and melphalan (group 2). All drugs were administered intravenously. The primary outcome measure was event-free survival. We used a Bayesian approach for the design, analysis, and interpretation of the results. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were considered in the safety analysis. The trial was registered with EudraCT, 2012-002107-17, and ISRCTN, 54540667. Findings: Between March 21, 2014, and May 1, 2019, 640 patients were entered into EE2012, 320 (50%) randomly allocated to each group. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 47 months (range 0–84). Event-free survival at 3 years was 61% with group 1 and 67% with group 2 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [95% credible interval 0·55–0·92 in favour of group 1). The probability that the true HR was less than 1·0 was greater than 0·99. Febrile neutropenia as a grade 3–5 treatment toxicity occurred in 234 (74%) patients in group 1 and in 183 (58%) patients in group 2. More patients in group 1 (n=205 [64%]) required at least one platelet transfusion compared with those in group 2 (n=138 [43%]). Conversely, more patients required blood transfusions in group 2 (n=286 [89%]) than in group 1 (n=277 [87%]). Interpretation: Dose-intensive chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide is more effective, less toxic, and shorter in duration for all stages of newly diagnosed Ewing sarcoma than vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide induction and should now be the standard of care for Ewing sarcoma. Funding: The European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development, and Demonstration; The National Coordinating Centre in France, Centre Léon Bérard; SFCE; Ligue contre le cancer; Cancer Research UK

DataSheet_1_Heightened metabolic responses in NK cells from patients with neuroblastoma suggests increased potential for immunotherapy.pdf

High risk neuroblastoma is responsible for 15% of deaths in pediatric cancer patients. The introduction of anti-GD2 immunotherapy has significantly improved outcomes but there is still only approximately a 50% 5 year event-free-survival for these children and improvements in treatments are urgently required. Anti-GD2 immunotherapy uses the patients’ own immune system to kill cancer cells. In particular, Natural Killer (NK) cells kill antibody coated tumor cells by a process called antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). However, our previous work has highlighted metabolic exhaustion of NK cells in circulating blood of adult cancer patients, identifying this as a potential therapeutic target. In this study, we investigated circulating NK cells in patients newly diagnosed with neuroblastoma. We found evidence of activation of NK cells in vivo by the cancer itself. While some evidence of NK cell dysfunction was observed in terms of IFNγ production, most results indicated that the NK cell compartment remained relatively intact. In fact, some aspects of metabolic and functional activities were actually increased in patients compared to controls. Glycolytic responses, which we show are crucial for ADCC, were actually enhanced in patients and CD16, the NK cell receptor that mediates ADCC, was also expressed at high levels in some patients. Overall, the data suggest that patient NK cells could be harvested at diagnosis for subsequent beneficial autologous use during immunotherapy. Enhancing glycolytic capacity of cell therapies could also be a strategic goal of future cell therapies for patients with neuroblastoma and indeed other cancers.</p

Bevacizumab, irinotecan, or topotecan added to temozolomide for children with relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma: results of the ITCC-SIOPEN BEACON-Neuroblastoma trial

Purpose: outcomes for children with relapsed and refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (rr-hrnb) remain dismal. The beacon neuroblastoma trial (eudract 2012-000072-42) evaluated three backbone chemotherapy regimens and the addition of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab (b).Materials and methods: patients age 1-21 years with rr-hrnb with adequate organ function and performance status were randomly assigned in a 3 3 2 factorial design to temozolomide (t), irinotecan-temozolomide (it), or topotecan-temozolomide q:5 (tto) with or without b. The primary end point was best overall response (complete or partial) rate (orr) during the first six courses, by recist or international neuroblastoma response criteria for patients with measurable or evaluable disease, respectively. Safety, progression-free survival (pfs), and overall survival (os) time were secondary end points.Results: one hundred sixty patients with rr-hrnb were included. For b random assignment (n 5 160), the orr was 26% (95% ci, 17 to 37) with b and 18% (95% ci, 10 to 28) without b (risk ratio [rr], 1.52 [95% ci, 0.83 to 2.77]; p 5 .17). Adjusted hazard ratio for pfs and os were 0.89 (95% ci, 0.63 to 1.27) and 1.01 (95% ci, 0.70 to 1.45), respectively. For irinotecan (n 5 121) and topotecan (n 5 60) random assignments, rrs for orr were 0.94 and 1.22, respectively. A potential interaction between irinotecan and b was identified. For patients in the bevacizumab-irinotecan-temozolomide (bit) arm, the orr was 23% (95% ci, 10 to 42), and the 1-year pfs estimate was 0.67 (95% ci, 0.47 to 0.80).Conclusion: the addition of b met protocol-defined success criteria for orr and appeared to improve pfs. Within this phase ii trial, bit showed signals of antitumor activity with acceptable tolerability. Future trials will confirm these results in the chemoimmunotherapy era.<br/

Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, or Topotecan Added to Temozolomide for Children With Relapsed and Refractory Neuroblastoma: Results of the ITCC-SIOPEN BEACON-Neuroblastoma Trial.

PURPOSE Outcomes for children with relapsed and refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (RR-HRNB) remain dismal. The BEACON Neuroblastoma trial (EudraCT 2012-000072-42) evaluated three backbone chemotherapy regimens and the addition of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab (B). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients age 1-21 years with RR-HRNB with adequate organ function and performance status were randomly assigned in a 3 × 2 factorial design to temozolomide (T), irinotecan-temozolomide (IT), or topotecan-temozolomide (TTo) with or without B. The primary end point was best overall response (complete or partial) rate (ORR) during the first six courses, by RECIST or International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria for patients with measurable or evaluable disease, respectively. Safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) time were secondary end points. RESULTS One hundred sixty patients with RR-HRNB were included. For B random assignment (n = 160), the ORR was 26% (95% CI, 17 to 37) with B and 18% (95% CI, 10 to 28) without B (risk ratio [RR], 1.52 [95% CI, 0.83 to 2.77]; P = .17). Adjusted hazard ratio for PFS and OS were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.27) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.45), respectively. For irinotecan ([I]; n = 121) and topotecan (n = 60) random assignments, RRs for ORR were 0.94 and 1.22, respectively. A potential interaction between I and B was identified. For patients in the bevacizumab-irinotecan-temozolomide (BIT) arm, the ORR was 23% (95% CI, 10 to 42), and the 1-year PFS estimate was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80). CONCLUSION The addition of B met protocol-defined success criteria for ORR and appeared to improve PFS. Within this phase II trial, BIT showed signals of antitumor activity with acceptable tolerability. Future trials will confirm these results in the chemoimmunotherapy era