1,518 research outputs found
THE EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING ON THE STUDENTβS INTEGRAL INDIVIDUALITY STRUCTURE
Introduction. New Federal State Standards of the higher education impose increased requirements not only to the level of professional competence of university graduates, but also to their personal readiness for implementation of successful professional activity. Psychological well-being is one of the integrative personal bases defining effective and full realization of labour functions by an expert. This has caused the research relevance stated in the article. The aim of this article is to analyze the specifics of the relationships of studentsβ integrated individuality of depending with the expression level of psychological well-being. Methodology and research methods. Methodological base of work involve the concept of psychological well-being by K. Riff, and the theory of integrated identity by V. S. Merlin. The research was conducted with the use of a package of diagnostic methods: Β«Scales of psychological well-beingΒ» by K. Ryff modified by D. G. Orlova; methodsΒ of studying the temperament by J. Strelau (adaptation by N. N. Danilova and A. G. Shmelyov); Structure Of Temperament Questionnaire by V. M. Rusalov (STQ); Five-Factor Personal Questionnaire (5PFQ) in A. B. Khromovβs adaptation. Results and scientific novelty. The retrospective analysis of researches on a psychological well-being phenomenon in foreign and Russian psychology is carried out. The author made an attempt to show the principle of polymorphism as one of the fundamental principles of the integrated identity theory on the example of studying the role of psychological well-being in the structure of a student identity. An empirical part of the present research, carried out on the basis of four higher educational institutions of Perm, showed the existence of general characteristics and significant distinctions on indicators of neurodynamic, psychodynamic and personal levels of integrated identity between two groups of respondents β students with low and high values of psychological well-being. In each group it was succeeded to reveal some unique correlations in interrelations of indicators of these levels. Interrelations of temperament indicators between nervous system and personality indicators, as well as interrelation of personality indicators between each other are specific to a group with low psychological well-being. Only interrelations of temperament indicators between each other are specific to a group with high psychological well-being.Practical significance. The materials and findings provided in the article can be used for organization of the educational process in higher educational institutions.ΠΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΠΊ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π²ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ², Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΊ ΠΈΡ
Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ β ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ· ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ² ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ΠΌ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Ρ Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π±Π°Π·ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ Π. Π ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π΄Π»Π΅ΠΆΠΈΡ Π. Π‘. ΠΠ΅ΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½Ρ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠ°ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ° Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊ: ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π. Π ΠΈΡΡ Β«Π¨ΠΊΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡΒ» Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ° ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ; ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π―. Π‘ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ (Π² Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π. Π. ΠΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ, Π. Π. Π¨ΠΌΠ΅Π»Π΅Π²Π°); ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π. Π. Π ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ²Π° (ΠΠ‘Π’) ΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° 5PFQ (Π² Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π. Π. Π₯ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ²Π°). Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°. ΠΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ Π² Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ΅ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠ°. ΠΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ,Β ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡ Π½Π° Π±Π°Π·Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Ρ
Π²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π³. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΌΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»Π° Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡ
Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊ ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π΄Π²ΡΠΌΡ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² β ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ. Π ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΠ»Ρ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ Ρ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Ρ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠΌ. ΠΠ»Ρ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π΄ΡΡΠ³ Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠΌ. ΠΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π² ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° Π² Π²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
.
Auto-generated chemical reaction networks for polymerization processes
In this paper we consider the application of automatic reaction network generation on a polymerization process. Such networks characterize transformations that molecules undergo until they turn into final, stable products using a graphical representation of reactions and chemical compounds. The automatic generation of such networks allows treating complex reaction systems like biological pathways or pyrolysis of hydrocarbons in an elegant manner. Complex polymerization problems like the drying of oils with high unsaturation content offer a challenge for the application of reaction network generation for polymers. A major problem arises considering polymerization processes, as the molecular species grow to the infinite size, which makes explicit representation of such molecular species prohibitive. Therefore, we introduce the so-called βmonomer approachβ into the field of reaction networks and adjust a methodology so that it allows us to work with polymers [1].
Please click Additional Files below to see the full abstract
Photosynthesis intensity of poic plants of left bank Ukraineβs Forestβsteppe
ΠΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π·Π° Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ 20 ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ΠΉΡΡΠ² ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° Magnoliophyta (Angiospermae). ΠΡΡΡΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ Π΄Π²ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ (Π½Π° 10,0 %). ΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΡ 3,6 Π΄ΠΎ 39,3Β ΠΌΠ³ Π‘Π2/Π΄ΠΌ2 Π³ΠΎΠ΄. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π°ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π‘Π2. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ ΠΎΡ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈ Π³ΠΈΠ³ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡ. ΠΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΡΡΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ½Π΅Π²ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΡ
Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π° ΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ.ΠΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π·Ρ Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΠΊΡΠ² 20 ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ Π²ΡΠ΄Π΄ΡΠ»Ρ Magnoliophyta (Angiospermae). ΠβΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡ ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ²Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π· ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ (Π½Π° 10,0 %). ΠΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Ρ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π· ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π²ΡΠ΄ 3,6 Π΄ΠΎ 39,3 ΠΌΠ³ Π‘Π2/Π΄ΠΌ2 Π³ΠΎΠ΄. ΠΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ Π·Π° Π·Π΄Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΎ Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡ Π‘Π2. ΠΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π·Π°Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π²ΡΠ΄ Π±ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ° Π³ΡΠ³ΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΌ. ΠΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π΅Π²ΠΈΡΠ½Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΉΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ²Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΡ
Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΡΠΊΡ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΆ ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Ρ ΡΠ° Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ² Π½Π° Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΌΠΎΠ².Β The intensity of photosynthesis is studied in species of 20 families of Magnoliophyta (Angiospermae). It is revealed that in general, dicotyledons have a higher rate in comparison with the monocotyledonous plant by 10.0 %. The average values with limits from 3.6 to 39.3 mg Π‘Π2/dm2 per year are given. The studied species are classified by the ability to assimilate Π‘Π2. The rate dependence on a biomorph and hygromorph is determined. It is stressed that rhizome species have sufficient and high values of that rate. The dynamics of values during ontogenesis and impact of weather conditions on them are shown
THE EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING ON THE STUDENTβS INTEGRAL INDIVIDUALITY STRUCTURE
Introduction. New Federal State Standards of the higher education impose increased requirements not only to the level of professional competence of university graduates, but also to their personal readiness for implementation of successful professional activity. Psychological well-being is one of the integrative personal bases defining effective and full realization of labour functions by an expert. This has caused the research relevance stated in the article.The aim of this article is to analyze the specifics of the relationships of studentsβ integrated individuality of depending with the expression level of psychological well-being.Methodology and research methods. Methodological base of work involve the concept of psychological well-being by K. Riff, and the theory of integrated identity by V. S. Merlin. The research was conducted with the use of a package of diagnostic methods: Β«Scales of psychological well-beingΒ» by K. Ryff modified by D. G. Orlova; methodsΒ of studying the temperament by J. Strelau (adaptation by N. N. Danilova and A. G. Shmelyov); Structure Of Temperament Questionnaire by V. M. Rusalov (STQ); Five-Factor Personal Questionnaire (5PFQ) in A. B. Khromovβs adaptation.Results and scientific novelty. The retrospective analysis of researches on a psychological well-being phenomenon in foreign and Russian psychology is carried out. The author made an attempt to show the principle of polymorphism as one of the fundamental principles of the integrated identity theory on the example of studying the role of psychological well-being in the structure of a student identity. An empirical part of the present research, carried out on the basis of four higher educational institutions of Perm, showed the existence of general characteristics and significant distinctions on indicators of neurodynamic, psychodynamic and personal levels of integrated identity between two groups of respondents β students with low and high values of psychological well-being. In each group it was succeeded to reveal some unique correlations in interrelations of indicators of these levels. Interrelations of temperament indicators between nervous system and personality indicators, as well as interrelation of personality indicators between each other are specific to a group with low psychological well-being. Only interrelations of temperament indicators between each other are specific to a group with high psychological well-being.Practical significance. The materials and findings provided in the article can be used for organization of the educational process in higher educational institutions
ΠΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΡΡΡΡ Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ² ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΡ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈ
ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² Π»ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ² ΠΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΈ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΈΠ½Ρ. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° Π»ΡΠ³Π°, Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΈ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ. ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π»ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»Π° Π½Π°Π΄Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ
Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ Π·Π°Π»ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π»ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ² β ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π°, ΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠ½Π½ΡΡ
β ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Ρ. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ° ΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΠΈ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ.Research results on the productivity of different types of poic plant communities of the left bank forest-steppe of Ukraine are presented. It is shown that the accumulation of aboveground mass depends on the type of a meadow, its part and weather conditions. The accumulation rate can be divided into three groups. Most of the studied meadowshad the mean value of aboveground mass: ahalf of water meadows and from a third to a half of upland and lowlandmeadows. The conservation status and reducing the economic burden increase the productivity.ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π²ΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ·Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠΏΡΠ² Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ² ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΡ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈ. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ½Π° Π·Π°Π»Π΅ΠΆΠΈΡΡ Π²ΡΠ΄ ΡΠΈΠΏΡ Π»ΡΠΊ, ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΌΠΎΠ². ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ½Π° ΡΠΎΠ·ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΈ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΈ. ΠΡΠ»ΡΡΠ° ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
Π»ΡΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ²Π°Π»Π° Π½Π°Π΄Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ½Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ²Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ. Π£ Π²ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π΄ΠΊΡ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ»Π°Π²Π½ΠΈΡ
β ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½Π°, ΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Ρ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΈΡ
β Π²ΡΠ΄ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ³ΡΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π·Π±ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π²ΡΠΎΠΆΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π·Π° ΡΠΌΠΎΠ² ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΡ ΡΠ° Π·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°Π²Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ.
ΠΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΡ Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½ Π»ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΡ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈ
The intensity of respiration of poic species of Magnoliopsida 14 families (Dycotyledons) class and 2Β families of Liliopsida (Monocotyledons) class was studied. The variation limits of that value were from 0.1Β up to 1.54 mg Π‘02/g of wet weight per hour. The most species had the respiration intensity at a level of 0.21β0.59 mg Π‘02βg of wwt per hour. It was found that the annual species had low and medium values as well as the xerophytic species. It depends on the environmental conditions and a phase of ontogenyΠΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄ΡΡ
Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π»ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ 14 ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ΠΉΡΡΠ² ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ° Magnoliopsida (Dycotyledores) ΠΈ Π΄Π²ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ΠΉΡΡΠ² ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ° Liliopsida (Monocotyledones). ΠΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ βΠΎΡ 0,10 Π΄ΠΎ 1,54 ΠΌΠ³ Π‘Π2/Π³ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ Π² ΡΠ°Ρ. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. Π£ ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄ΡΡ
Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΡΡ. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π° Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Ρ ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π°ΠΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΡ
Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΠΊΡΠ² 14 ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡ Magnoliopsida (Dycotyledores) ΡΠ° Π΄Π²ΠΎΡ
ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡ Liliopsida (Monocotyledones). ΠΠ΅ΠΆΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° β Π²ΡΠ΄ 0,10 Π΄ΠΎ 1,54 ΠΌΠ³ Π‘Π2/Π³ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΡ Π²Π°Π³ΠΈ Π·Π° Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Ρ. ΠβΡΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΠ½Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΡΠΊΡ ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Ρ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ. Π£ ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ² ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΡ
Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π½ΠΈΠ·ΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Ρ. ΠΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π·Π°Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π²ΡΠ΄ ΡΠΌΠΎΠ² Π½Π°Π²ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠ° ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈ ΠΎΠ½ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·ΡΡ
Π₯ΡΠΌΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ Melilotus (Fabaceae) ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΠ°Π²ΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ
Chemical composition of above-ground mass of Melilotus albus Medik. and M. officinalis (L.) Pall. is considered. The quantitative descriptions of content of organic (protein, fat, cellulose, nitrogen-free extractive substances) and mineral (total ash, calcium, phosphorus) matters are presented. The dynamics of their accumulation is shown. The ways of usage of these species are indicated.Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π² Π½Π°Π΄Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠelilotusalbusMedik. ΠΈ M. officinalis (L.) Pall. ΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
(ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΈΠ½Π°, ΠΆΠΈΡΠ°, ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ, Π±Π΅Π·Π°Π·ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ
ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²) ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
(ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π·ΠΎΠ»Ρ, ΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ°) Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ². ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ ΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. Π£ΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ².Π ΠΎΠ·Π³Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠΎ Ρ
ΡΠΌΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄ Π½Π°Π΄Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈ Πelilotus albus Medik. Ρ M. officinalis (L.) Pall. ΠΠ°Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΠΊΡΡΠ½Ρ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΌΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
(ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Ρ, ΠΆΠΈΡΡ, ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ, Π±Π΅Π·Π°Π·ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ
Π΅ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½) Ρ ΠΌΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
(Π·Π°Π³Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡ Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΡΡΡ, ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΡ) ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½. ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΡΠΊΡ ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ. ΠΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ»ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ²
Π€ΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠ² ΠΏΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π»ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΡ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈ
The accumulation of litter on upland meadows in the studied area was calculated as 30.9β190.1 g/m2. For convenience the reserves can be divided into three groups. Depending on the weather conditions (temperature and rainfall) the litter consists of particular groupsand has specific content of solid matter. The energy content of the studied meadowsβ litter fluctuated in the range of 36.9β837.0 kkal/m2 and depends onthe part of grass stand: upper, middle or lower one.Β ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π»ΡΠ³Π°Ρ
ΠΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΈ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΠΈΠ½Ρ. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π»ΡΠ³Π°Ρ
Π½Π°Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Ρ
30,9β190,1 Π³/ΠΌ2. Π£ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΡ Π΅Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΈ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ. Π Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ (ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ, ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄ΠΊΠΎΠ²) Π½Π° Π»ΡΠ³Π°Ρ
Π½Π°ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°. ΠΠ°ΠΏΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π±Π»ΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π°Π»Π΅ 36,9β837,0 ΠΊΠΊΠ°Π»/ΠΌ2 ΠΈ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ (Π²Π΅ΡΡ
Π½Π΅ΠΉ, ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ½Π΅ΠΉ) ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π².Β ΠΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π»ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΡ Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈ. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π»ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΡΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π°Ρ 30,9β190,1 Π³/ΠΌ2. Π£ΠΌΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈ ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΈ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΈ. ΠΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΄ ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΌΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΠΊΡ (ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΠ°Π΄ΡΠ²) Π½Π° Π»ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΈ ΡΠ½ΡΠΎΡ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΈ Π· Π±ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΌ Π°Π±ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΌ Π²ΠΌΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΡ
ΠΎΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ. ΠΠ°ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈ Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ³ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ°Ρ
36,9β837,0 ΠΊΠΊΠ°Π»/ΠΌ2 Ρ Π·Π°Π»Π΅ΠΆΠ°ΡΡ Π²ΡΠ΄ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈ (Π²Π΅ΡΡ
Π½ΡΠΎΡ, ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΡΠΎΡ ΡΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ½ΡΠΎΡ) ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ².
- β¦