43 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Impact of mesoscale eddy transfer heat uptake in an eddy-parameterizing ocean model
Using a set of experiments with an eddy-parameterizing ocean model, it is found that the strength of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) intensifies with the decrease of the density-dependent mesoscale eddy transfer. However, the intensification is weaker than that suggested by simple scaling relationships previously applied. Perturbing the model control sea surface temperature (SST) to mimic its change in response to doubling of CO2, it is shown that the associated ocean heat uptake (OHU) increases and penetrates deeper with the decrease of the mesoscale eddy transfer. It is shown that the OHU correlates with the AMOC strength, and both these quantities are affected by the mesoscale eddy transfer. Passive tracer experiments in the ocean model provide a possible explanation for the finding in coupled-model climate simulations that the ocean heat uptake efficiency (OHUE) increases with the AMOC strength and decreases with the eddy energy generated from the mean state. It is also found that the OHU in the SST-perturbation experiments scales with the net downward advection of heat. The contribution of the AMOC to the downward heat flux is illustrated using a streamfunction in depth-temperature space
The Energetics of Southern Ocean Upwelling
The oceanβs meridional overturning circulation is closed by the upwelling of dense, carbon-rich waters to the surface of the Southern Ocean. It has been proposed that upwelling in this region is driven by strong westerly winds, implying that the intensification of Southern Ocean winds in recent decades may have enhanced the rate of upwelling, potentially affecting the global overturning circulation. However, there is no consensus on the sensitivity of upwelling to winds or on the nature of the connection between Southern Ocean processes and the global overturning circulation. In this study, the sensitivity of the overturning circulation to changes in Southern Ocean westerly wind stress is investigated using an eddy-permitting oceanβsea ice model. In addition to a suite of standard circulation metrics, an energy analysis is used to aid dynamical interpretation of the model response. Increased Southern Ocean wind stress enhances the upper cell of the overturning circulation through creation of available potential energy in the Southern Hemisphere, associated with stronger upwelling of deep water. Poleward shifts in the Southern Ocean westerlies lead to a complicated transient response, with the formation of bottom water induced by increased polynya activity in the Weddell Sea and a weakening of the upper overturning cell in the Northern Hemisphere. The energetic consequences of the upper overturning cell response indicate an interhemispheric connection to the input of available potential energy in the Northern Hemisphere
Recommended from our members
Separating the influence of projected changes in air temperature and wind on patterns of sea level change and ocean heat content
We present ocean model sensitivity experiments aimed at separating the influence of the projected changes in the βthermalβ (near-surface air temperature) and βwindβ (near-surface winds) forcing on the patterns of sea level and ocean heat content. In the North Atlantic, the distribution of sea level change is more due to the βthermalβ forcing, whereas it is more due to the βwindβ forcing in the North Pacific; in the Southern Ocean, the βthermalβ and βwindβ forcing have a comparable influence. In the ocean adjacent to Antarctica the βthermalβ forcing leads to an inflow of warmer waters on the continental shelves, which is somewhat attenuated by the βwindβ forcing. The structure of the vertically integrated heat uptake is set by different processes at low and high latitudes: at low latitudes it is dominated by the heat transport convergence, whereas at high latitudes it represents a small residual of changes in the surface flux and advection of heat. The structure of the horizontally integrated heat content tendency is set by the increase of downward heat flux by the mean circulation and comparable decrease of upward heat flux by the subgrid-scale processes; the upward eddy heat flux decreases and increases by almost the same magnitude in response to, respectively, the βthermalβ and βwindβ forcing. Regionally, the surface heat loss and deep convection weaken in the Labrador Sea, but intensify in the Greenland Sea in the region of sea ice retreat. The enhanced heat flux anomaly in the subpolar Atlantic is mainly caused by the βthermalβ forcing
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
Π ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π½Π΅ΠΌ Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊ, Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ², Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΡΡΡ, Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π·Π°Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°, ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΎΡ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
. ΠΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΡ Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π°Π·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Π½Π° Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π±Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΊ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΠ°Π±Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Ρ Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠΎΠ²: (1) Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅, (2) ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΊΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ (3) ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° (ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°), Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ β Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°ΠΌΡΡΡΡ. Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
, ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΠΊΠ΅ΡΡ, ΡΠΈΡΠΊΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π΄Π»Ρ Π½Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΈΠ±Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΊ
Recommended from our members
Contribution of ocean physics and dynamics at different scales to heat uptake in low-resolution AOGCMs
Using an ensemble of atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) in an idealized climate change experiment, this study quantifies the contributions to ocean heat uptake (OHU) from ocean physical parameterizations and resolved dynamical processes operating at different scales. Analysis of heat budget diagnostics reveals a leading-order global heat balance in the sub-surface upper ocean in a steady state between the large-scale circulation warming it and mesoscale processes cooling it, and shows that there are positive contributions from processes on all scales to the subsurface OHU during climate change. There is better agreement among the AOGCMs in the net OHU than in the individual scales/processes contributing to it. In the upper ocean and at high latitudes, OHU is dominated by small-scale diapycnal processes. Below 400 m, OHU is dominated by the super-residual transport, representing large-scale ocean dynamics combined with all parameterized mesoscale and submesoscale eddy effects. Weakening of the AMOC leads to less heat convergence in the subpolar North Atlantic and less heat divergence at lower latitudes, with a small overall effect on the net Atlantic heat content. At low latitudes, the dominance of advective heat redistribution is contrary to the diffusive OHU mechanism assumed by the commonly used upwelling-diffusion model. Using a density watermass framework, it is found that most of the OHU occurs along isopycnal directions. This feature of OHU is used to accurately reconstruct the global vertical ocean warming profile from the surface heat flux anomalies, supporting advective (rather than diffusive) models of OHU and sea-level rise
Recommended from our members
OceanβOnly FAFMIP: Understanding Regional Patterns of Ocean Heat Content and Dynamic Sea Level Change
n/
Recommended from our members
What causes the spread of model projections of ocean dynamic sea-level change in response to greenhouse gas forcing?
Sea levels of different atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) respond to climate change forcing in different ways, representing a crucial uncertainty in climate change research. We isolate the role of the ocean dynamics in setting the spatial pattern of dynamic sea-level (zeta) change by forcing several AOGCMs with prescribed identical heat, momentum (wind) and freshwater flux perturbations. This method produces a zeta projection spread comparable in magnitude to the spread that results from greenhouse gas forcing, indicating that the differences in ocean model formulation are the cause, rather than diversity in surface flux change. The heat flux change drives most of the global pattern of zeta change, while the momentum and water flux changes cause locally confined features. North Atlantic heat uptake causes large temperature and salinity driven density changes, altering local ocean transport and zeta. The spread between AOGCMs here is caused largely by differences in their regional transport adjustment, which redistributes heat that was already in the ocean prior to perturbation. The geographic details of the zeta change in the North Atlantic are diverse across models, but the underlying dynamic change is similar. In contrast, the heat absorbed by the Southern Ocean does not strongly alter the vertically coherent circulation. The Arctic zeta change is dissimilar across models, owing to differences in passive heat uptake and circulation change. Only the Arctic is strongly affected by nonlinear interactions between the three air-sea flux changes, and these are model specific.Peer reviewe