Real-world experience among patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma after Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure in Europe: The SCHOLAR-2 retrospective chart review study

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) after relapse is associated with poor prognosis. No standard of care exists and available evidence for treatments is limited, particularly in patients who fail Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy. This multicentre retrospective chart review study, SCHOLAR-2, addresses this knowledge gap and reports on data collected from 240 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in Europe who were treated with BTKi-based therapy between July 2012 and July 2018, and had experienced disease progression while on BTKi therapy or discontinued BTKi therapy due to intolerance. The median overall survival (OS) from initiation of first BTKi therapy was 14.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6–20.0) in the overall cohort, 5.5 months (95% CI 3.9–8.2) in 91 patients without post-BTKi therapy, and 23.8 months (95% CI 18.9–30.1) in 149 patients who received post-BTKi therapy (excluding chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment). In the latter group, patients received a median of one (range, one to seven) line of post-BTKi therapy, with lenalidomide-containing regimens and bendamustine plus rituximab being the most frequently administered; the median OS from initiation of first post-BTKi therapy was 9.7 months (95% CI 6.3–12.7). These results provide a benchmark for survival in patients with R/R MCL receiving salvage therapy after BTKi failure

Durable response with single-agent acalabrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have greatly improved the spectrum of treatment options in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) [1–4]. Acalabrutinib is a highly selective, orally administered, and potent BTK inhibitor with limited off-target activity [5]. Acalabrutinib was approved in 2017 by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL based on clinical data from the open-label, multicenter, phase 2 ACE-LY-004 study of acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily [1]. Here, we present updated results from the ACE-LY-004 study after a median 26-month follow-up. Eligibility criteria and study design were published previously (Supplementary methods) [1]. Analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) was conducted after complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was achieved using the quantitative ClonoSEQ next-generation sequencing (5 × 10−6 ) assay (Adpative Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA, USA) in consenting patients with available paired archival tumor and whole blood samples. Data are updated as of February 12, 2018

Durable response with single-agent acalabrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

N

Subcutaneous Rituximab-MiniCHOP compared with subcutaneous Rituximab-MiniCHOP plus Lenalidomide in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma for patients age 80 years or older.

peer reviewedPURPOSE The prognosis of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is worse than that of young patients. An attenuated dose of chemotherapy—cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab (R-miniCHOP)—is a good compromise between efficacy and safety in very elderly patients. In combination with R-CHOP (R2-CHOP), lenalidomide has an acceptable level of toxicity and may mitigate the negative prognosis of the non–germinal center B-cell–like phenotype. The Lymphoma Study association conducted a multicentric, phase III, open-label, randomized trial to compare R-miniCHOP and R2- miniCHOP. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients of age 80 years or older with untreated DLBCL were randomly assigned into the R-miniCHOP21 group or the R2-miniCHOP21 group for six cycles and stratified according to CD10 expression and age. The first cycle of rituximab was delivered by IV on D1 after a prephase and then delivered subcutaneously on D1 of cycles 2-6. Lenalidomide was delivered at a dose of 10 mg once daily on D1-D14 of each cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 249 patients with new DLBCL were randomly assigned (127 R-miniCHOP and 122 R2- miniCHOP). The median age was 83 years (range, 80-96), and 55% of the patients were classified as non-GCB. The delivered dose for each R-miniCHOP compound was similar in both arms. Over a median follow-up of 25.1 months, the intention-to-treat analysis revealed that R2-miniCHOP did not improve OS (2-year OS 66% in R-miniCHOP and 65.7% in R2-miniCHOP arm, P5 .98) in the overall population or in the non-GCB population. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 53% of patients with R-miniCHOP and in 81% of patients with R2- miniCHOP. CONCLUSION The addition of lenalidomide to R-miniCHOP does not improve OS. Rituximab delivered subcutaneously was safe in this population

Entropions et ectropions involutionnels. [Involutional entropion and ectropion]

Entropion and ectropion are very common among old people. These malpositions concern mostly the lower lids. Involutional entropion and ectropion have some pathophysiologic mechanisms in common: lower lid horizontal laxity and lid retractor detachment. However, orbicularis muscle hypertrophy occurs only in entropion, and excess of posterior lamella has to be considered in ectropion. Clinical examination will guide surgical treatment. The authors present the main surgical procedures according to clinical findings. The goal is to prevent recurrence

Eyelids metastases from uveal melanoma: clinical and histopathologic features of two cases and literature review.

To report the clinical and histopathologic features of two cases of eyelids metastases from uveal melanoma diagnosed in a metachronous and synchronous fashion. Monocentric retrospective case series of histopathologically proven eyelids metastases from uveal melanoma at our institution. Two patients were presented to our hospital for upper eyelids pigmented and firm lesions. Patient 1 had an history of left uveal melanoma treated conservatively with proton beam therapy 5 years earlier. Examination revealed bilateral upper eyelids lesions. Patient 2 had no malignancy history but was incidentally diagnosed with a cerebral nodule few months earlier. Examination revealed a right upper eyelid nodule and a previously unknown right uveal melanoma. Excisional biopsy was performed for both patients. Pathological assessment allowed the presence of melanoma cells. The lack of BAP1 nuclear expression on immunohistochemistry as well as the absence of cutaneous or mucosal melanoma were consistent with an uveal origin. Diffuse metastatic spread was noted for both patients. Systemic therapies were prescribed. Patient 1 died from metastatic spread (62 months and 4 months after uveal melanoma diagnosis and eyelids metastases removal, respectively) whereas patient 2 was still alive (14 months follow up). Eyelids metastases from uveal melanoma is an exceptional finding. Excisional biopsy and pathological assessment are of main importance to confirm the diagnosis and to identify genetic mutations for further targeted therapies. Currently, prognosis remains poor

Caractéristiques cliniques, radiologiques, anatomopathologiques, thérapeutiques et évolutives de l’amylose périoculaire et/ou intraorbitaire : à propos de 6 cas et revue de la littérature [Clinical, radiological, pathological features, treatment and follow-up of periocular and/or orbital amyloidosis: Report of 6 cases and literature review]

To assess demographic, clinical, radiological, pathological features, treatment and follow-up of periocular or/and orbital amyloidosis. We conducted an observational retrospective monocentric study from January 2004 to April 2017 in patients diagnosed with histologically proven periocular or/and orbital amyloidosis. Six patients were included (2 females, 4 males). Mean age was 76.8 years (range 66-88 years). Mean time between first ophthalmological symptoms and diagnosis was 27 months (range 11-36 months). The main symptoms were subconjunctival infiltration (6 patients; 100%), periocular pain or discomfort (4 patients; 66.6%) and subconjunctival hemorrhage (1 patient; 16.6%). Clinical findings included ptosis (4 patients; 66.6%), keratitis (3 patients; 50%) leading to corneal perforation in one patient, and proptosis (3 patients; 50%). One-half of the patients showed bilateral involvement. AL amyloidosis was identified on immunohistochemistry in 5 patients (83.3%). One case of B cell marginal zone orbital lymphoma was diagnosed. Systemic work-up was negative for all patients. Treatment consisted of simple monitoring (1 patient; 16.6%), surgical debulking (3 patients; 50%), ptosis surgery (1 patient; 16.6%), eyelid or eyelash malposition surgery (2 patients; 33.3%) and orbital radiation beam therapy (2 patients; 33.3%). Mean follow-up was 14.6 months (range 6-36 months), and no progression nor recurrence were noted. Periocular or/and orbital amyloidosis is rarely encountered. Diagnosis is based on pathological examination, and immunohistochemistry analysis should always be performed to guide systemic work-up. Orbital lymphoma and multiple myeloma should be ruled out if AL amyloidosis is diagnosed. Progression is slow, and surgery is the mainstay of treatment in symptomatic patients. Long-term multidisciplinary follow-up is advocated