Drugs of Abuse Can Entrain Circadian Rhythms

Circadian rhythms prepare organisms for predictable events during the Earth's 24-h day. These rhythms are entrained by a variety of stimuli. Light is the most ubiquitous and best known zeitgeber, but a number of others have been identified, including food, social cues, locomotor activity, and, most recently drugs of abuse. Given the diversity of zeitgebers, it is probably not surprising that genes capable of clock functions are located throughout almost all organs and tissues. Recent evidence suggests that drugs of abuse can directly entrain some circadian rhythms. We have report here that entrainment by drugs of abuse is independent of the suprachiasmatic nucleus and the light/dark cycle, is not dependent on direct locomotor stimulation, and is shared by a variety of classes of drugs of abuse. We suggest that drug-entrained rhythms reflect variations in underlying neurophysiological states. This could be the basis for known daily variations in drug metabolism, tolerance, and sensitivity to drug reward. These rhythms could also take the form of daily periods of increased motivation to seek and take drugs, and thus contribute to abuse, addiction and relapse

Circadian entrainment by food and drugs of abuse

Circadian rhythms organize behavior and physiological processes to be appropriate to the predictable cycle of daily events. These rhythms are entrained by stimuli that provide time of day cues (zeitgebers), such as light, which regulates the sleep-wake cycle and associated rhythms. But other events, including meals, social cues, and bouts of locomotor activity, can act as zeitgebers. Recent evidence shows that most organs and tissues contain cells that are capable of some degree of independent circadian cycling, suggesting the circadian system is more broadly and diffusely distributed. Within laboratory studies of behavior, circadian rhythms tend to be treated as a complication to be minimized, but they offer a useful model of predictable shifts in behavioral tendencies. In the present review, we summarize the evidence that formed the basis for a hypothesis that drugs of abuse can entrain circadian rhythms and describe the outcome of a series of experiments designed to test that hypothesis. We propose that such drug-entrained rhythms may contribute to demonstrated daily variations in drug metabolism, tolerance, and sensitivity to drug reward. Of particular importance, these rhythms may be evoked by a single episode of drug taking, strengthen with repeated episodes, and reemerge after long periods of abstinence, thereby contributing to drug abuse, addiction, and relapse

Chronic stress and comfort foods: self-medication and abdominal obesity

Central corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) networks are recruited by chronic stressors and elevated glucocorticoids (GCs) that initiate recruitment of central CRF activity in the amygdala. Increased central activity of the CRF network stimulates all monoaminergic cell groups, as well as premotor autonomic and other limbic structures resulting in the typical arousal, behavioral changes, autonomic, and neuroendocrine changes that accompany the chronic imposition of a stressor. By contrast, elevated GCs appear, through a variety of means to counteract the effects of central CRF, which they have initiated. Together with insulin, the GCs stimulate drive for and ingestion of "comfort foods" that may directly result in reduction of the negative effects of the chronic stressor in the nucleus Accumbens, through stimulation of the anterior, more pleasure-associated part of this cell group, thus reducing the weight of the stress-stimulated posterior, more defensive part. Furthermore, the shift in caloric intake from chow to preference for "comfort foods," together with elevated GCs and insulin, reorganize energy stores from a peripheral to a central distribution, primarily as abdominal fat. A signal associated with this fat depot appears, as with eating "comfort foods," to reduce the influence of the chronic stress network on behaviors, autonomic, and neuroendocrine outflo

Minireview: glucocorticoids--food intake, abdominal obesity, and wealthy nations in 2004

Glucocorticoids have a major effect on food intake that is underappreciated, although the effects of glucocorticoids on metabolism and abdominal obesity are quite well understood. Physiologically appropriate concentrations of naturally secreted corticosteroids (cortisol in humans, corticosterone in rats) have major stimulatory effects on caloric intake and, in the presence of insulin, preference. We first address the close relationship between glucocorticoids and energy balance under both normal and abnormal conditions. Because excess caloric intake is stored in different fat depots, we also address the systemic effects of glucocorticoids on redistribution of stored energy preponderantly into intraabdominal fat depots. We provide strong evidence that glucocorticoids modify feeding and then discuss the role of insulin on the choice of ingested calories, as well as suggesting some central neural pathways that may be involved in these actions of glucocorticoids and insulin. Finally, we discuss the evolutionary utility of these actions of the stress hormones, and how dysregulatory effects of chronically elevated glucocorticoids may occur in our modern, rich societie

Glucocorticoids, the etiology of obesity and the metabolic syndrome

In mammals, glucocorticoid actions appear to have evolved to maintain and enhance energy stores to be used for life-saving gluconeogenesis. They act on the brain to stimulate search behaviors, palatable feeding and emotionally relevant memories, and they act on the body to mobilize stored peripheral energy and direct it to central depots that serve the substrate needs of the liver. Our work in rats shows that searching and intake of palatable foods (sucrose, saccharin and lard) are stimulated by corticosterone in a dose-related fashion. Adrenalectomized rats gain weight poorly, have low fat content, increased sympathetic neural and hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal outflow, and altered behaviors. Replacement with corticosterone reverses these effects. Surprisingly, when such rats are provided with 30% sucrose to drink, in addition to saline, all of the usual effects of adrenalectomy are corrected without corticosterone. We hypothesize that there is a metabolic feedback system that decreases stress-responsiveness. Although we have not yet identified the signal associated with sucrose drinking, the weight of mesenteric fat correlates inversely with hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF). When rats eat lard and sucrose ad libitum, fat stores increase and CRF, ACTH and corticosterone responses are reduced. During stress, chow intake decreases but intake of lard and sucrose does not. Our current working model suggests that palatability signals and neural signals from fat stores act on brain to reduce activity in the central stress response system. Correlative results from a clinical study support the powerful role of small changes in glucocorticoids in type 2 diabete

Disengaging insulin from corticosterone: roles of each on energy intake and disposition

Corticosterone and insulin play complex roles in the amount and composition of calories ingested, and the utilization and deposition of this energy. Understanding the interplay of these two hormones is complicated because increasing concentrations of corticosterone dose-dependently increase circulating insulin levels. We addressed individual contributions of each hormone by controlling, at steady-state levels, corticosterone (by adrenalectomy and exogenous replacement) and insulin (by streptozotocin-induced destruction of pancreatic β-cells and exogenous replacement) across a spectrum of concentrations in rats, creating 8 hormonal combinations. For 5 days after surgery, all rats received chow. At day 5, they were subdivided into those that continued to receive chow and those that had a choice between chow, lard, and 32% sucrose for a further 5 days. During the choice/chow period, total calories ingested were stimulated by corticosterone and choice diet, and subject to a corticosterone-insulin interaction. Sucrose, but not lard, intake was stimulated by insulin. Body weight was increased by insulin, decreased by high corticosterone, and unaffected by diet. White adipose tissue depot weights were stimulated by insulin, corticosterone, and diet. Plasma triglycerides, free fatty acids, total ketone bodies, glucose, and glycerol were all significantly increased by corticosterone and the choice diet but inhibited by insulin. In contrast, plasma leptin was only increased by insulin and diet, plasma glucagon and liver glycogen was only affected by insulin and liver triglycerides, and arcuate nucleus proopiomelanocortin mRNA was only influenced by diet. Collectively, these data show that corticosterone and insulin determine the intake, form, and compartmentalization of energy both independently and interactively

Glucocorticoids, chronic stress, and obesity

Glucocorticoids either inhibit or sensitize stress-induced activity in the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, depending on time after their administration, the concentration of the steroids, and whether there is a concurrent stressor input. When there are high glucocorticoids together with a chronic stressor, the steroids act in brain in a feed-forward fashion to recruit a stress-response network that biases ongoing autonomic, neuroendocrine, and behavioral outflow as well as responses to novel stressors. We review evidence for the role of glucocorticoids in activating the central stress-response network, and for mediation of this network by corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF). We briefly review the effects of CRF and its receptor antagonists on motor outflows in rodents, and examine the effects of glucocorticoids and CRF on monoaminergic neurons in brain. Corticosteroids stimulate behaviors that are mediated by dopaminergic mesolimbic "reward" pathways, and increase palatable feeding in rats. Moreover, in the absence of corticosteroids, the typical deficits in adrenalectomized rats are normalized by providing sucrose solutions to drink, suggesting that there is, in addition to the feed-forward action of glucocorticoids on brain, also a feedback action that is based on metabolic well being. Finally, we briefly discuss the problems with this network that normally serves to aid in responses to chronic stress, in our current overindulged, and underexercised societ

Palatable Foods, Stress, and Energy Stores Sculpt Corticotropin-Releasing Factor, Adrenocorticotropin, and Corticosterone Concentrations after Restraint

Previous studies have shown reduced hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal responses to both acute and chronic restraint stressors in rats allowed to ingest highly palatable foods (32% sucrose ± lard) prior to restraint. In this study we tested the effects of prior access (7 d) to chow-only, sucrose/chow, lard/chow, or sucrose/lard/chow diets on central corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) expression in rats studied in two experiments, 15 and 240 min after onset of restraint. Fat depot, particularly intraabdominal fat, weights were increased by prior access to palatable food, and circulating leptin concentrations were elevated in all groups. Metabolite concentrations were appropriate for values obtained after stressors. For unknown reasons, the 15-min experiment did not replicate previous results. In the 240-min experiment, ACTH and corticosterone responses were inhibited, as previously, and CRF mRNA in the hypothalamus and oval nucleus of the bed nuclei of the stria terminalis were reduced by palatable foods, suggesting strongly that both neuroendocrine and autonomic outflows are decreased by increased caloric deposition and palatable food. In the central nucleus of the amygdala, CRF was increased in the sucrose-drinking group and decreased in the sucrose/lard group, suggesting that the consequence of ingestion of sucrose uses different neural networks from the ingestion of lard. The results suggest strongly that ingestion of highly palatable foods reduces activity in the central stress response network, perhaps reducing the feeling of stressors