In situ preparation of crosslinked polymer electrolytes for lithium ion batteries

Solid polymer electrolytes for bipolar lithium ion batteries requiring electrochemical stability of 4.5 V vs. Li/Li+ are presented. Thus, imidazolium-containing poly(ionic liquid) (PIL) networks were prepared by crosslinking UV-photopolymerization in an in situ approach (i.e., to allow preparation directly on the electrodes used). The crosslinks in the network improve the mechanical stability of the samples, as indicated by the free-standing nature of the materials and temperature-dependent rheology measurements. The averaged mesh size calculated from rheologoical measurements varied between 1.66 nm with 10 mol% crosslinker and 4.35 nm without crosslinker. The chemical structure of the ionic liquid (IL) monomers in the network was varied to achieve the highest possible ionic conductivity. The systematic variation in three series with a number of new IL monomers offers a direct comparison of samples obtained under comparable conditions. The ionic conductivity of generation II and III PIL networks was improved by three orders of magnitude, to the range of 7.1 × 10−6 S·cm−1 at 20 °C and 2.3 × 10−4 S·cm−1 at 80 °C, compared to known poly(vinylimidazolium·TFSI) materials (generation I). The transition from linear homopolymers to networks reduces the ionic conductivity by about one order of magnitude, but allows free-standing films instead of sticky materials. The PIL networks have a much higher voltage stability than PEO with the same amount and type of conducting salt, lithium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI). GII-PIL networks are electrochemically stable up to a potential of 4.7 V vs. Li/Li+, which is crucial for a potential application as a solid electrolyte. Cycling (cyclovoltammetry and lithium plating-stripping) experiments revealed that it is possible to conduct lithium ions through the GII-polymer networks at low currents. We concluded that the synthesized PIL networks represent suitable candidates for solid-state electrolytes in lithium ion batteries or solid-state batteries

Binding Energy Referencing for XPS in Alkali Metal-Based Battery Materials Research (II): Application to Complex Composite Electrodes

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is a key method for studying (electro-)chemical changes in metal-ion battery electrode materials. In a recent publication, we pointed out a conflict in binding energy (BE) scale referencing at alkali metal samples, which is manifested in systematic deviations of the BEs up to several eV due to a specific interaction between the highly reactive alkali metal in contact with non-conducting surrounding species. The consequences of this phenomenon for XPS data interpretation are discussed in the present manuscript. Investigations of phenomena at surface-electrolyte interphase regions for a wide range of materials for both lithium and sodium-based applications are explained, ranging from oxide-based cathode materials via alloys and carbon-based anodes including appropriate reference chemicals. Depending on material class and alkaline content, specific solutions are proposed for choosing the correct reference BE to accurately define the BE scale. In conclusion, the different approaches for the use of reference elements, such as aliphatic carbon, implanted noble gas or surface metals, partially lack practicability and can lead to misinterpretation for application in battery materials. Thus, this manuscript provides exemplary alternative solutions

Oxide ceramic electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries – cost-cutting cell design and environmental impact

All-solid-state batteries are a hot research topic due to the prospect of high energy density and higher intrinsic safety, compared to conventional lithium-ion batteries. Of the wide variety of solid-state electrolytes currently researched, oxide ceramic lithium-ion conductors are considered the most difficult to implement in industrial cells. Although their high lithium-ion conductivity combined with a high chemical and thermal stability make them a very attractive class of materials, cost-cutting synthesis and scalable processing into full batteries remain to be demonstrated. Additionally, they are Fluorine-free and can be processed in air but require one or more high temperature treatment steps during processing counteracting their ecological benefits. Thus, a viable cell design and corresponding assessment of its ecological impact is still missing. To close this gap, we define a target cell combining the advantages of the two most promising oxidic electrolytes, lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO) and lithium aluminium titanium phosphate (LATP). Even though it has not been demonstrated so far, the individual components are feasible to produce with state-of-the-art industrial manufacturing processes. This model cell then allows us to assess the environmental impact of the ceramic electrolyte synthesis and cell component manufacturing not just on an abstract level (per kg of material) but also with respect to their contributions to the final cell. The in-depth life cycle assessment (LCA) analysis revealed surprising similarities between oxide-based all-solid-state batteries and conventional Li-ion batteries. The overall LCA inventory on the material level is still dominated by the cathode active material, while the fabrication through ceramic manufacturing processes is a major contributor to the energy uptake. A clear path that identifies relevant research and development directions in terms of economic benefits and environmental sustainability could thus be developed to promote the competitiveness of oxide based all-solid-state batteries in the market