Development of a limits of stability protocol for use in transtibial prosthesis users: learning effects and reliability of outcome variables

The aims of this study were to empirically quantify reliability and learning effects of a Limits of Stability protocol for transtibial prosthesis users. Outcome variables from center of pressure and center of mass were tested on: 1) multiple test repetitions within a single test occasion; and 2) between multiple test occasions. Trantibial prosthesis users (n=7) and matched controls (n=7) executed five trials of the Limits of Stability protocol on two occasions per day, on two consecutive days. Inter-trial learning effects and reliability of outcomes extracted via center of mass and center of pressure were evaluated utilizing standard biomechanics laboratory equipment. Reliability was good to excellent except the reaction time variable which was poor (Pooled 95%CI of ICC=0.248-0.484). An inter-trial learning effect was present in directional control for prosthesis users when the first trial was included in analysis (center of mass: 95%CI of r=0.065-0.239; center of pressure: 95%CI of r=0.076-0.249). The use of standard biomechanics lab equipment can produce reliable results for the Limits of Stability protocol. Researchers should be aware of low reliability of reaction time variable in the protocol assessed and should execute at least one practice trial prior to that which is used in subsequent analysis

Assessing control of postural stability in community-living older adults using performance-based limits of stability

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Balance disability measurements routinely used to identify fall risks in frail populations have limited value in the early detection of postural stability deficits in community-living older adults. The objectives of the study were to 1) measure performance-based limits of stability (LOS) in community-living older adults and compare them to theoretical LOS computed from data proposed by the Balance Master^®system, 2) explore the feasibility of a new measurement approach based on the assessment of postural stability during weight-shifting tasks at performance-based LOS, 3) quantify intra-session performance variability during multiple trials using the performance-based LOS paradigm.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twenty-four healthy community-living older adults (10 men, 14 women) aged between 62 to 85 (mean age ± sd, 71.5 ± 6 yrs) participated in the study. Subjects' performance-based LOS were established by asking them to transfer their body weight as far as possible in three directions (forward, right and left) without changing their base of support. LOS were computed as the maximal excursion of the COP in each direction among three trials. Participants then performed two experimental tasks that consisted in controlling, with the assistance of visual feedback, their centre of pressure (COP) within two predefined targets set at 100% of their performance-based LOS. For each tasks 8 trials were performed. Ground reaction forces and torques during performance-based LOS evaluation and experimental tasks were recorded with a force plate. Sway area and medio-lateral mean COP displacement speed variables were extracted from force plate recordings.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Significant differences between theoretical LOS computed from maximum leaning angles derived from anthropometric characteristics and performance-based LOS were observed. Results showed that a motor learning effect was present as the participants optimized their weight-shifting strategy through the first three trials of each task using the visual biofeedback provided on their COP. Reliable measures of control of postural stability at performance-based LOS can be obtained after two additional trials after the learning phase (0.69 > ICC > 1.0).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Establishing performance-based LOS instead of relying on estimations of theoretical LOS offers a more individualized and realistic insight on the true LOS of an individual. Performance-based LOS can be used as targets during weight-shifting postural tasks with real time visual feedback of the COP displacement to assess postural stability of community-living older adults. In order to obtain reliable results, a learning phase allowing subjects to learn how to control their COP displacement is needed.</p

Balance dysfunction in adults with haemophilia

The main focus of lower limb physical performance assessment in people with haemophilia (PWH) has usually been on function, muscle strength and joint flexibility. The impact of haemophilic arthropathy on balance and falls risk is relatively under-explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate balance and related performance in PWH compared with age and gender matched healthy controls. It involved a comprehensive suite of clinical and laboratory measures of static and dynamic balance, mobility, strength, physical activity and falls efficacy completed in 20 PWH (mean age 39.4, 100% male) and 20 controls. Fifty percent of PWH reported falls in the past 12 months. Moderate impairment of balance and related measures were identified in PWH compared with the controls, with an average 35% difference between groups. Significant differences were evident between groups on both clinical and laboratory measures, including measures of dynamic bilateral stance balance [limits of stability measures on the laboratory test, functional reach; (P &lt; 0.001); dynamic single leg balance (Step Test, P &lt; 0.001)], gait and mobility (gait speed, step width and turning measures on the laboratory test, timed up and go test; P &lt; 0.001); muscle strength (timed sit to stand, P = 0.002; quadriceps strength, P &lt; 0.001); and activity level and falls efficacy, (P &lt; 0.004). The dynamic clinical and laboratory measures testing similar domains of balance, gait and mobility had moderate correlations (0.310 &lt; r &lt; 0.531, P &lt; 0.01). Moderate impairments in balance, mobility and related measures were identified in PWH, compared with the control group. Clinicians should include assessments of balance and related measures when reviewing adults with haemophilia. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd