13 research outputs found
Adjusted Comparison of Outcomes between Patients from CARTITUDE-1 versus Multiple Myeloma Patients with Prior Exposure to PI, Imid and Anti-CD-38 from a German Registry
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with the potential for long-term disease control in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). As cilta-cel was assessed in the single-arm CARTITUDE-1 clinical trial, we used an external cohort of patients from the Therapie Monitor registry fulfilling the CARTITUDE-1 inclusion criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of cilta-cel for overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) vs. real-world clinical practice. Individual patient data allowed us to adjust the comparisons between both cohorts, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPW; average treatment effect in the treated population (ATT) and overlap population (ATO) weights) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Outcomes were compared in intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0.13 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.24); OS: 0.14 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.25); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.49); OS: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.54)) and modified intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.67); OS: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.84); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.59); OS: 0.31 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.79)) populations. All the comparisons were statistically significant in favor of cilta-cel. These results highlight cilta-cel’s potential as a novel, effective treatment to address unmet needs in patients with RRMM
Meta-analysis of ciltacabtagene autoleucel versus physician’s choice therapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
[Objective]: In the absence of head-to-head trials, indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) between ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; in CARTITUDE-1) and treatments used in real-world clinical practice (physician’s choice of treatment [PCT]), were previously conducted. We conducted multiple meta-analyses using available ITC data to consolidate the effectiveness of cilta-cel versus PCT for patients with triple-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
[Methods]: Five ITCs were assessed for similarity to ensure robust comparisons using meta-analysis. Effectiveness outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall response rate (ORR). A robust variance estimator was used to account for the use of CARTITUDE-1 in each pairwise ITC. Analyses were conducted in both treated and enrolled populations of CARTITUDE-1.
[Results]: Four ITCs were combined for evaluation of OS. Results were statistically significantly in favor of cilta-cel versus PCT in treated patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22–0.26). Three ITCs were combined for evaluation of PFS and TTNT. Cilta-cel reduced the risk of progression and receiving a subsequent treatment by 80% (HR: 0.20 [95% CI: 0.06, 0.70]) and 83% (HR: 0.17 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.26]), respectively. Three ITCs were combined for evaluation of ORR. Cilta-cel increased the odds of achieving an overall response by 86-times versus PCT in treated patients. Findings were consistent in the enrolled populations and across sensitivity analyses.
[Conclusions]: Evaluating multiple indirect comparisons, cilta-cel demonstrated a significantly superior advantage over PCT, highlighting its effectiveness as a therapy in patients with triple-class exposed RRMM.The CARTITUDE-1 study and these analyses were funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and Legend Biotech, Inc. Medical writing support was provided by EVERSANA and funded by Janssen Global Services, LLC
LocoMMotion:a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma
Despite treatment advances, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) often progress through standard drug classes including proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). LocoMMotion (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04035226) is the first prospective study of real-life standard of care (SOC) in triple-class exposed (received at least a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 mAb) patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Patients (N = 248; ECOG performance status of 0–1, ≥3 prior lines of therapy or double refractory to a PI and IMiD) were treated with median 4.0 (range, 1–20) cycles of SOC therapy. Overall response rate was 29.8% (95% CI: 24.2–36.0). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 4.6 (95% CI: 3.9–5.6) and 12.4 months (95% CI: 10.3–NE). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 83.5% of patients (52.8% grade 3/4). Altogether, 107 deaths occurred, due to progressive disease (n = 74), TEAEs (n = 19), and other reasons (n = 14). The 92 varied regimens utilized demonstrate a lack of clear SOC for heavily pretreated, triple-class exposed patients with RRMM in real-world practice and result in poor outcomes. This supports a need for new treatments with novel mechanisms of action
Meta-analysis of ciltacabtagene autoleucel versus physician’s choice therapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma [Dataset]
Figure A.1: Selection of Comparator Arms for ITC Analyses
Figure A.2: Results of sensitivity analyses with OIs removed for OS at all (A) and first (B) index dates
Figure A.3: Results of sensitivity analyses with LocoMMotion removed for OS at all (A) and first (B) index dates, and PF at first index dates (C)
Table A.1: Characteristics of Data Sources for PCT arms in ITCs
Table A.2: Published ITC Results and Augmented Results Included in Meta-analyses (All Index Dates)
Table A.3: Published ITC Results and Augmented Results Included in Meta-analyses (First Index Dates)
Table A.4: Baseline Covariates After Adjustment (mITT Populations; All Index Dates)
Table A.5: Baseline Covariates After Adjustment (mITT Populations; First Index Dates)
Table A.6: Outcome Definitions in ITC Analyses[Objective]: In the absence of head-to-head trials, indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) between ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; in CARTITUDE-1) and treatments used in real-world clinical practice (physician’s choice of treatment [PCT]), were previously conducted. We conducted multiple meta-analyses using available ITC data to consolidate the effectiveness of cilta-cel versus PCT for patients with triple-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
[Methods]: Five ITCs were assessed for similarity to ensure robust comparisons using meta-analysis. Effectiveness outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall response rate (ORR). A robust variance estimator was used to account for the use of CARTITUDE-1 in each pairwise ITC. Analyses were conducted in both treated and enrolled populations of CARTITUDE-1.
[Results]: Four ITCs were combined for evaluation of OS. Results were statistically significantly in favor of cilta-cel versus PCT in treated patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22–0.26). Three ITCs were combined for evaluation of PFS and TTNT. Cilta-cel reduced the risk of progression and receiving a subsequent treatment by 80% (HR: 0.20 [95% CI: 0.06, 0.70]) and 83% (HR: 0.17 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.26]), respectively. Three ITCs were combined for evaluation of ORR. Cilta-cel increased the odds of achieving an overall response by 86-times versus PCT in treated patients. Findings were consistent in the enrolled populations and across sensitivity analyses.
[Conclusions]: Evaluating multiple indirect comparisons, cilta-cel demonstrated a significantly superior advantage over PCT, highlighting its effectiveness as a therapy in patients with triple-class exposed RRMM.Peer reviewe
Adjusted Comparison of Outcomes between Patients from CARTITUDE-1 versus Multiple Myeloma Patients with Prior Exposure to PI, Imid and Anti-CD-38 from a German Registry
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with the potential for long-term disease control in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). As cilta-cel was assessed in the single-arm CARTITUDE-1 clinical trial, we used an external cohort of patients from the Therapie Monitor registry fulfilling the CARTITUDE-1 inclusion criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of cilta-cel for overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) vs. real-world clinical practice. Individual patient data allowed us to adjust the comparisons between both cohorts, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPW; average treatment effect in the treated population (ATT) and overlap population (ATO) weights) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Outcomes were compared in intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0.13 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.24); OS: 0.14 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.25); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.49); OS: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.54)) and modified intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.67); OS: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.84); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.59); OS: 0.31 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.79)) populations. All the comparisons were statistically significant in favor of cilta-cel. These results highlight cilta-cel’s potential as a novel, effective treatment to address unmet needs in patients with RRMM
Adjusted Comparison of Outcomes between Patients from CARTITUDE-1 versus Multiple Myeloma Patients with Prior Exposure to PI, Imid and Anti-CD-38 from a German Registry
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with the potential for long-term disease control in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). As cilta-cel was assessed in the single-arm CARTITUDE-1 clinical trial, we used an external cohort of patients from the Therapie Monitor registry fulfilling the CARTITUDE-1 inclusion criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of cilta-cel for overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) vs. real-world clinical practice. Individual patient data allowed us to adjust the comparisons between both cohorts, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPW; average treatment effect in the treated population (ATT) and overlap population (ATO) weights) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Outcomes were compared in intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0.13 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.24); OS: 0.14 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.25); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.49); OS: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.54)) and modified intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.67); OS: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.84); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.59); OS: 0.31 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.79)) populations. All the comparisons were statistically significant in favor of cilta-cel. These results highlight cilta-cel’s potential as a novel, effective treatment to address unmet needs in patients with RRMM
Adjusted Comparison of Outcomes between Patients from CARTITUDE-1 versus Multiple Myeloma Patients with Prior Exposure to PI, Imid and Anti-CD-38 from a German Registry
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with the potential for long-term disease control in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). As cilta-cel was assessed in the single-arm CARTITUDE-1 clinical trial, we used an external cohort of patients from the Therapie Monitor registry fulfilling the CARTITUDE-1 inclusion criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of cilta-cel for overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) vs. real-world clinical practice. Individual patient data allowed us to adjust the comparisons between both cohorts, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPW; average treatment effect in the treated population (ATT) and overlap population (ATO) weights) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Outcomes were compared in intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0.13 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.24); OS: 0.14 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.25); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.49); OS: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.54)) and modified intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.67); OS: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.84); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.59); OS: 0.31 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.79)) populations. All the comparisons were statistically significant in favor of cilta-cel. These results highlight cilta-cel’s potential as a novel, effective treatment to address unmet needs in patients with RRMM
MM-153 Phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 Study (Cohort B): Updated Clinical Data and Biological Correlative Analyses of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-Directed CAR-T Cell Therapy, in Patients With Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Early Relapse After Initial Therapy
Context : CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) Cohort B is evaluating cilta-cel in patients with MM and early relapse after initial therapy. These patients have functionally high-risk disease and unmet medical needs, as early relapse post-ASCT is associated with a poor prognosis. Objective : To present updated results from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort B. Design : Phase 2, multicohort study. Patients : Eligible patients had MM, 1 prior LOT (PI and IMiD required), disease progression per IMWG, and no previous treatment with CAR-T/anti-BCMA therapies. Intervention : Single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T-cells/kg) post lymphodepletion. Main Outcome Measures : Safety and efficacy were evaluated. Primary endpoint was MRD negativity at 10-5. Management strategies were used to reduce the risk of movement/neurocognitive AEs (MNTs). Assessments included pharmacokinetics (PK) (Cmax, Tmax of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood), CRS-related cytokine (eg, IL-6) levels over time, peak cytokine levels by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with ICANS, and CAR+ T-cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results : As of January 2022 (median follow-up 13.4 months), 19 patients (median age 58.0 years; 74% male; 79% with prior ASCT) received cilta-cel. ORR was 100% (90% ≥CR and 95% ≥VGPR). Median time to first response was 0.95 months and median time to best response was 5.1 months. Median DOR was not reached. Of 15 MRD-evaluable patients, 14 (93%) achieved MRD 10-5 negativity. At 12 months, the event-free rate was 88.9% and PFS rate was 90%. CRS occurred in 16 (84.2%) patients (1 gr 4); median time to onset was 8 days. CRS resolved in all patients. 1 patient had ICANS (gr 1); 1 patient had MNT (gr 3; previously reported). 1 death occurred post-cilta-cel due to progressive disease (day 158). Preliminary PK data showed CAR-T cell peak expansion on day 13.1 and median persistence was 76.9 days. Conclusions : A single cilta-cel infusion resulted in deep and durable responses and manageable safety in functionally high-risk patients with MM and early clinical relapse/treatment failure to initial therapy. We will present updated and detailed PK/cytokine/CAR-T subset analyses and clinical correlations to provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy/safety in this population
CARTITUDE-2: Efficacy and safety of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with progressive multiple myeloma (MM) after one to three prior lines of therapy.
MM-153 Phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 Study (Cohort B): Updated Clinical Data and Biological Correlative Analyses of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-Directed CAR-T Cell Therapy, in Patients With Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Early Relapse After Initial Therapy
Context: CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) Cohort B is evaluating cilta-cel in patients with MM and early relapse after initial therapy. These patients have functionally high-risk disease and unmet medical needs, as early relapse post-ASCT is associated with a poor prognosis. Objective: To present updated results from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort B. Design: Phase 2, multicohort study. Patients: Eligible patients had MM, 1 prior LOT (PI and IMiD required), disease progression per IMWG, and no previous treatment with CAR-T/anti-BCMA therapies. Intervention: Single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T-cells/kg) post lymphodepletion. Main Outcome Measures: Safety and efficacy were evaluated. Primary endpoint was MRD negativity at 10-5. Management strategies were used to reduce the risk of movement/neurocognitive AEs (MNTs). Assessments included pharmacokinetics (PK) (Cmax, Tmax of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood), CRS-related cytokine (eg, IL-6) levels over time, peak cytokine levels by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with ICANS, and CAR+ T-cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results: As of January 2022 (median follow-up 13.4 months), 19 patients (median age 58.0 years; 74% male; 79% with prior ASCT) received cilta-cel. ORR was 100% (90% ≥CR and 95% ≥VGPR). Median time to first response was 0.95 months and median time to best response was 5.1 months. Median DOR was not reached. Of 15 MRD-evaluable patients, 14 (93%) achieved MRD 10-5 negativity. At 12 months, the event-free rate was 88.9% and PFS rate was 90%. CRS occurred in 16 (84.2%) patients (1 gr 4); median time to onset was 8 days. CRS resolved in all patients. 1 patient had ICANS (gr 1); 1 patient had MNT (gr 3; previously reported). 1 death occurred post-cilta-cel due to progressive disease (day 158). Preliminary PK data showed CAR-T cell peak expansion on day 13.1 and median persistence was 76.9 days. Conclusions: A single cilta-cel infusion resulted in deep and durable responses and manageable safety in functionally high-risk patients with MM and early clinical relapse/treatment failure to initial therapy. We will present updated and detailed PK/cytokine/CAR-T subset analyses and clinical correlations to provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy/safety in this population