The Presidency and the Executive Branch in Latin America: What We Know and What We Need to Know

The presidential politics literature depicts presidents either as all- powerful actors or figureheads and seeks to explain outcomes accordingly. Th e president and the executive branch are nonetheless usually treated as black boxes, particularly i n developing countries, even though the presidency has evolved into an extremely complex branch of government. While these developments have been studied in the U nited States, far less i s known in other countries, particularly in Latin America, where presi dential systems have been considered the source of all goods and evils. To help close the knowledge gap and explore differences in policymaking characteristics not only between Latin America and the US but also across Latin American countries, this paper s ummarizes the vast literature on the organization and resources of the Executive Branch in the Americas and sets a research agenda for the study of Latin American presidencies.Fil: Bonvecchi, Alejandro. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Departamento de Ciencia Política y Estudios Internacionales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Scartascini, Juan Carlos. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Estados Unido

Prevention of congenital malformations and other adverse pregnancy outcomes with 4.0 mg of folic acid : community-based randomized clinical trial in Italy and the Netherlands

Background: In 2010 a Cochrane review confirmed that folic acid (FA) supplementation prevents the first- and second-time occurrence of neural tube defects (NTDs). At present some evidence from observational studies supports the hypothesis that FA supplementation can reduce the risk of all congenital malformations (CMs) or the risk of a specific and selected group of them, namely cardiac defects and oral clefts. Furthermore, the effects on the prevention of prematurity, foetal growth retardation and pre-eclampsia are unclear.Although the most common recommendation is to take 0.4 mg/day, the problem of the most appropriate dose of FA is still open.The aim of this project is to assess the effect a higher dose of peri-conceptional FA supplementation on reducing the occurrence of all CMs. Other aims include the promotion of pre-conceptional counselling, comparing rates of selected CMs, miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, small for gestational age, abruptio placentae.Methods/Design: This project is a joint effort by research groups in Italy and the Netherlands. Women of childbearing age, who intend to become pregnant within 12 months are eligible for the studies. Women are randomly assigned to receive 4 mg of FA (treatment in study) or 0.4 mg of FA (referent treatment) daily. Information on pregnancy outcomes are derived from women-and-physician information.We foresee to analyze the data considering all the adverse outcomes of pregnancy taken together in a global end point (e.g.: CMs, miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, small for gestational age). A total of about 1,000 pregnancies need to be evaluated to detect an absolute reduction of the frequency of 8%. Since the sample size needed for studying outcomes separately is large, this project also promotes an international prospective meta-analysis.Discussion: The rationale of these randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is the hypothesis that a higher intake of FA is related to a higher risk reduction of NTDs, other CMs and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Our hope is that these trials will act as catalysers, and lead to other large RCTs studying the effects of this supplementation on CMs and other infant and maternal outcomes.Trial registration: Italian trial: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01244347.Dutch trial: Dutch Trial Register ID: NTR3161

A multi-element psychosocial intervention for early psychosis (GET UP PIANO TRIAL) conducted in a catchment area of 10 million inhabitants: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial

Multi-element interventions for first-episode psychosis (FEP) are promising, but have mostly been conducted in non-epidemiologically representative samples, thereby raising the risk of underestimating the complexities involved in treating FEP in 'real-world' services

High altitude exposure reduce bronchial responsiveness to hypo-osmolar aerosol in lowland asthmatics

It is well-known that many patients with asthma undergo clinical improvement during a stay at high altitude. At high altitude, the atmospheric and climatic conditions (such as hypoxia, cold and dry air inhalation) could modify the bronchial responsiveness in asthmatics. Our study was designed to assess the difference in bronchial responsiveness to hypotonic aerosol between sea level and high altitudes in nonresident asthmatic subjects. The results were obtained during two mountaineering expeditions above 4,000 m i.e. at 4,559 m on Mt Rosa, Italy; and at 5,050 m near the Mt Everest base camp in Nepal. Eleven mild asthmatics performed standard bronchial challenges with ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (5 min inhalation, delivery 2 mL \ub7 min-1) at sea level and after staying at least 72 h at the above mentioned altitudes. The decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline was used as index of bronchial response. There was no significant difference in pre-challenge FEV1 between sea level and high altitude in either study. However, the bronchoconstriction response to ultrasonically nebulized distilled water was significantly reduced at high altitude in both studies. At sea level the mean FEV1 decrease was 22.2% (range 15-35%), whereas at the maximal altitude it was 6.7% (range 2-11%). Our results indicate that there is a reduction in bronchial responsiveness to hypoosmolar aerosol at high altitude. This suggests that atmospheric and climatic conditions, or physiological adaptations, via mediators such as atrial natriuretic peptide, are beneficial to patients with asthma at high altitude

Cutaneous mastocytosis in adults with a serum tryptase level < 20 ng mL –1: why we should investigate further

International audienceDear Editor, Mastocytosis is a rare disease characterized by the accumulation/proliferation of abnormal mast cells (MCs).1 Mastocytosis is categorized into isolated cutaneous mastocytosis (CM), where only the skin is infiltrated by abnormal MC, and systemic mastocytosis (SM), where at least one internal organ is involved.2 SM is diagnosed according to the criteria defined by the World Health Organization (WHO).3 The major criterion consists of the presence of multifocal dense infiltrates of MC in a bone marrow (BM) biopsy or extracutaneous tissues. The minor criteria comprise the following: the presence of > 25% of MC with abnormal cytology out of all MCs in a BM biopsy or in other nonskin tissues; abnormal expression of CD2 and/or CD25 on MCs in an immunohistochemistry study and/or by flow cytometry analysis; the presence of the KIT codon D816V mutation in BM aspirate and a serum tryptase level (STL) > 20 ng mL–1. SM is diagnosed if the major criterion and at least one minor criterion or three minor criteria are present. For the diagnosis of SM, performing a BM aspirate and/or a BM biopsy is mandatory. For a patient presenting with CM, the first question for the physician is whether the disease is limited to the skin or does it involve internal organs? Answering this question is of relevance as specific treatments are available or under investigation in patients with SM – especially those with disabling MC activation symptoms or advanced SM. Screening basal STL in patients with CM is considered to be a cost-effective first-line tool to distinguish possible SM from isolated CM