Polymorphism of SERPINE2 gene is associated with pulmonary emphysema in consecutive autopsy cases

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The <it>SERPINA1</it>, <it>SERPINA3</it>, and <it>SERPINE2 </it>genes, which encode antiproteases, have been proposed to be susceptible genes for of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and related phenotypes. Whether they are associated with emphysema is not known.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Twelve previously reported single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in <it>SERPINA1 </it>(rs8004738, rs17751769, rs709932, rs11832, rs1303, rs28929474, and rs17580), <it>SERPINA3 </it>(rs4934, rs17473, and rs1800463), and <it>SERPINE2 </it>(rs840088 and rs975278) were genotyped in samples obtained from 1,335 consecutive autopsies of elderly Japanese people. The association between these SNPs and the severity of emphysema, as assessed using macroscopic scores, was determined.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Emphysema of more than moderate degree was detected in 189 subjects (14.1%) and showed a significant gender difference (males, 20.5% and females, 7.0%; p < 0.0001). Among the 12 examined SNPs, only rs975278 in the <it>SERPINE2 </it>gene was positively associated with emphysema. Unlike the major alleles, homozygous minor alleles of rs975278 were associated with emphysema (odds ratio (OR) = 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-2.30; p = 0.037) and the association was very prominent in smokers (OR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.29-3.15; p = 0.002).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p><it>SERPINE2 </it>may be a risk factor for the development of emphysema and its association with emphysema may be stronger in smokers.</p

Incentive Effects of Class Actions and Punitive Damages Under Alternative Procedural Regimes

In an economic perspective, punitive damages and class actions can be viewed as sharing a common economic function – creating optimal deterrence. Building on Parisi and Cenini (2010), we study the effect of alternative procedural regimes on the effectiveness of punitive damages and class actions. Specifically, we compare the workings of punitive damages and class actions in the American and English (“loser-pays”) regimes. Our findings help explain the limited use and late adoption of class actions and punitive damages in Europe