Resolution of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

YesIntroduction. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first detected in China in December, 2019, and declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020. The current management of COVID-19 is based generally on supportive therapy and treatment to prevent respiratory failure. The effective option of antiviral therapy and vaccination are currently under evaluation and development. Areas covered. A literature search was performed using PubMed between December 1, 2019–June 23, 2020. This review highlights the current state of knowledge on the viral replication and pathogenicity, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, and management of COVID-19. This review will be of interest to scientists and clinicians and make a significant contribution toward development of vaccines and targeted therapies to contain the pandemic. Expert Opinion. The exit strategy for a path back to normal life is required, which should involve a multi-prong effort toward development of new treatment and a successful vaccine to protect public health worldwide and prevent future COVID-19 outbreaks. Therefore, the bench to bedside translational research as well as reverse translational works focusing bedside to bench is very important and would provide the foundation for the development of targeted drugs and vaccines for COVID-19 infections.Research carried out at TN laboratories are funded by the GrowMedtech, The Royal Society and University of Bradford. KH is supported by a project grant by the GrowMedtech awarded to TN. CW is funded by a Ph.D studentship

Tackling the Covid-19 pandemic

YesSince December 2019, a new type of coronavirus called novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV, or COVID-19) was identified in Wuhan, China and on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak a global pandemic. With more than 101,797,158 confirmed cases, resulting in 3,451,354 deaths as of May 21, 2021, the world faces an unprecedented economic, social, and health impact. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 has a wide range of manifestations, ranging from an asymptomatic state or mild respiratory symptoms to severe viral pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Several diagnostic methods are currently available for detecting the coronavirus in clinical, research, and public health laboratories. Some tests detect the infection directly by detecting the viral RNA using real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and other tests detect the infection indirectly by detecting the host antibodies. Additional techniques are using medical imaging diagnostic tools such as X-ray and computed tomography (CT). Various approaches have been employed in the development of COVID-19 therapies. Some of these approaches use drug repurposing (eg Remdesivir and Dexamethasone) and combinational therapy (eg Lopinavir/Ritonavir), whilst others aim to develop anti-viral vaccines (eg mRNA and antibody). Additionally, health experts integrate data sharing, provide with guidelines and advice to minimize the effects of the pandemic. These guidelines include wearing masks, avoiding direct contact with infectious people, respiratory and personal hygiene

Single Spin Asymmetry ANA_N in Polarized Proton-Proton Elastic Scattering at s=200\sqrt{s}=200 GeV

We report a high precision measurement of the transverse single spin asymmetry $A_N$ at the center of mass energy $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV in elastic proton-proton scattering by the STAR experiment at RHIC. The $A_N$ was measured in the four-momentum transfer squared $t$ range $0.003 \leqslant |t| \leqslant 0.035$ \GeVcSq, the region of a significant interference between the electromagnetic and hadronic scattering amplitudes. The measured values of $A_N$ and its $t$-dependence are consistent with a vanishing hadronic spin-flip amplitude, thus providing strong constraints on the ratio of the single spin-flip to the non-flip amplitudes. Since the hadronic amplitude is dominated by the Pomeron amplitude at this $\sqrt{s}$, we conclude that this measurement addresses the question about the presence of a hadronic spin flip due to the Pomeron exchange in polarized proton-proton elastic scattering.Comment: 12 pages, 6 figure

Effect of event selection on jetlike correlation measurement in d+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV

AbstractDihadron correlations are analyzed in sNN=200 GeV d+Au collisions classified by forward charged particle multiplicity and zero-degree neutral energy in the Au-beam direction. It is found that the jetlike correlated yield increases with the event multiplicity. After taking into account this dependence, the non-jet contribution on the away side is minimal, leaving little room for a back-to-back ridge in these collisions

Beam-energy Dependence Of Charge Balance Functions From Au + Au Collisions At Energies Available At The Bnl Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Balance functions have been measured in terms of relative pseudorapidity (Δη) for charged particle pairs at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider from Au + Au collisions at sNN=7.7GeV to 200 GeV using the STAR detector. These results are compared with balance functions measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider from Pb + Pb collisions at sNN=2.76TeV by the ALICE Collaboration. The width of the balance function decreases as the collisions become more central and as the beam energy is increased. In contrast, the widths of the balance functions calculated using shuffled events show little dependence on centrality or beam energy and are larger than the observed widths. Balance function widths calculated using events generated by UrQMD are wider than the measured widths in central collisions and show little centrality dependence. The measured widths of the balance functions in central collisions are consistent with the delayed hadronization of a deconfined quark gluon plasma (QGP). The narrowing of the balance function in central collisions at sNN=7.7 GeV implies that a QGP is still being created at this relatively low energy. © 2016 American Physical Society.942CNPq, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationMOE, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaMOST, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNRF-2012004024, National Research FoundationNSF, National Stroke FoundationConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq

Search for the Chiral Magnetic Effect in Au+Au collisions at sNN=27\sqrt{s_{_{\rm{NN}}}}=27 GeV with the STAR forward Event Plane Detectors

A decisive experimental test of the Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) is considered one of the major scientific goals at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) towards understanding the nontrivial topological fluctuations of the Quantum Chromodynamics vacuum. In heavy-ion collisions, the CME is expected to result in a charge separation phenomenon across the reaction plane, whose strength could be strongly energy dependent. The previous CME searches have been focused on top RHIC energy collisions. In this Letter, we present a low energy search for the CME in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm{NN}}}}=27$ GeV. We measure elliptic flow scaled charge-dependent correlators relative to the event planes that are defined at both mid-rapidity $|\eta|<1.0$ and at forward rapidity $2.1 < |\eta|<5.1$. We compare the results based on the directed flow plane ($\Psi_1$) at forward rapidity and the elliptic flow plane ($\Psi_2$) at both central and forward rapidity. The CME scenario is expected to result in a larger correlation relative to $\Psi_1$ than to $\Psi_2$, while a flow driven background scenario would lead to a consistent result for both event planes[1,2]. In 10-50\% centrality, results using three different event planes are found to be consistent within experimental uncertainties, suggesting a flow driven background scenario dominating the measurement. We obtain an upper limit on the deviation from a flow driven background scenario at the 95\% confidence level. This work opens up a possible road map towards future CME search with the high statistics data from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan Phase-II.Comment: main: 8 pages, 5 figures; supplementary material: 2 pages, 1 figur

Beam-energy Dependence Of Charge Separation Along The Magnetic Field In Au+au Collisions At Rhic

Local parity-odd domains are theorized to form inside a quark-gluon plasma which has been produced in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. The local parity-odd domains manifest themselves as charge separation along the magnetic field axis via the chiral magnetic effect. The experimental observation of charge separation has previously been reported for heavy-ion collisions at the top RHIC energies. In this Letter, we present the results of the beam-energy dependence of the charge correlations in Au+Au collisions at midrapidity for center-of-mass energies of 7.7, 11.5, 19.6, 27, 39, and 62.4 GeV from the STAR experiment. After background subtraction, the signal gradually reduces with decreased beam energy and tends to vanish by 7.7 GeV. This implies the dominance of hadronic interactions over partonic ones at lower collision energies. © 2014 American Physical Society.1135DOE; National Research Foundation; CNRS/IN2P3; NSF; National Research Foundation; NRF-2012004024; National Research FoundationVafa, C., Witten, E., (1984) Phys. Rev. Lett., 53, p. 535. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.535Lee, D.T., (1973) Phys. Rev. D, 8, p. 1226. , PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1226Lee, T.D., Wick, G.C., (1974) Phys. Rev. D, 9, p. 2291. , PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.2291Kharzeev, D.E., McLerran, L.D., Warringa, H.J., (2008) Nucl. Phys., A803, p. 227. , NUPBBO 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298Kharzeev, D., (2006) Phys. Lett. B, 633, p. 260. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.11.075Kharzeev, D., Zhitnitsky, A., (2007) Nucl. Phys., A797, p. 67. , NUPBBO 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.10.001Fukushima, K., Kharzeev, D.E., Warringa, H.J., (2008) Phys. Rev. D, 78, p. 074033. , PRVDAQ 1550-7998 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074033Kharzeev, E.D., (2010) Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam), 325, p. 205. , APNYA6 0003-4916 10.1016/j.aop.2009.11.002Gatto, R., Ruggieri, M., (2012) Phys. Rev. D, 85, p. 054013. , PRVDAQ 1550-7998 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.054013Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, p. 251601. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.251601Abelev, B.I., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, p. 054908. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.054908Adamczyk, L., (2013) Phys. Rev. C, 88, p. 064911. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064911Adamczyk, L., (2014) Phys. Rev. C, 89, p. 044908. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.044908Ajitanand, N.N., Esumi, S., Lacey, R.A., Proceedings of the RBRC Workshops, 2010, 96. , http://www.bnl.gov/isd/documents/74466.pdf, (PHENIX Collaboration), in, Vol.Ajitanand, N.N., Lacey, R.A., Taranenko, A., Alexander, J.M., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 83, p. 011901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.011901Abelev, B.I., (2013) Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, p. 012301. , (ALICE Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.012301Bzdak, A., Koch, V., Liao, J., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, p. 031901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.031901Liao, J., Koch, V., Bzdak, A., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 82, p. 054902. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.054902Kharzeev, D.E., Son, D.T., (2011) Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, p. 062301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.062301Voloshin, A.S., (2004) Phys. Rev. C, 70, p. 057901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.057901Anderson, M., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 499, p. 659. , NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01964-2Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Rev. C, 72, p. 014904. , (STAR Collaboration), ()PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.014904Agakishiev, G., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 86, p. 014904. , (STAR Collaboration), ()PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.014904Adamczyk, L., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 86, p. 054908. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.054908Poskanzer, A.M., Voloshin, S.A., (1998) Phys. Rev. C, 58, p. 1671. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1671Barrette, J., (1997) Phys. Rev. C, 56, p. 3254. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.3254Ollitrault, J.-Y., Poskanzer, A.M., Voloshin, S.A., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 80, p. 014904. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.014904Abelev, B.I., (2008) Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, p. 252301. , (STAR Collaboration), () and references therein. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.252301Bzdak, A., Koch, V., Liao, J., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 83, p. 014905. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.014905Ray, R.L., Longacre, R.S., arXiv:nucl-ex/0008009;Ray, R.L., Longacre, R.S., (private communication)Bass, S.A., (1998) Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 41, p. 255. , PPNPDB 0146-6410 10.1016/S0146-6410(98)00058-1Bleicher, M., (1999) J. Phys. G, 25, p. 1859. , JPGPED 0954-3899 10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308Ma, G.-L., Zhang, B., (2011) Phys. Lett. B, 700, p. 39. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.057Okorokov, A.V., (2013) Int. J. Mod. Phys. e, 22, p. 1350041. , IMPEER 0218-3013 10.1142/S0218301313500419Bzdak, A., Koch, V., Liao, J., (2013) Lect. Notes Phys., 871, p. 503. , LNPHA4 0075-8450 10.1007/978-3-642-37305-

Fluctuations Of Charge Separation Perpendicular To The Event Plane And Local Parity Violation In S Nn = 200 Gev Au + Au Collisions At The Bnl Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider

Previous experimental results based on data (∼15×106 events) collected by the STAR detector at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider suggest event-by-event charge-separation fluctuations perpendicular to the event plane in noncentral heavy-ion collisions. Here we present the correlator previously used split into its two component parts to reveal correlations parallel and perpendicular to the event plane. The results are from a high-statistics 200-GeV Au + Au collisions data set (57×106 events) collected by the STAR experiment. We explicitly count units of charge separation from which we find clear evidence for more charge-separation fluctuations perpendicular than parallel to the event plane. We also employ a modified correlator to study the possible P-even background in same- and opposite-charge correlations, and find that the P-even background may largely be explained by momentum conservation and collective motion. © 2013 American Physical Society.886NRF-2012004024; National Research FoundationLee, T.D., Yang, C.N., (1956) Phys. Rev., 104. , 1, 254. 0031-899X PHRVAO 10.1103/PhysRev.104.254Vafa, C., Witten, E., (1984) Phys. Rev. Lett., 53. , 2, 535. 0031-9007 PRLTAO 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.535Lee, T.D., (1973) Phys. Rev. D, 8. , 3, 1226. 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1226Lee, T.D., Wick, G.C., (1974) Phys. Rev. D, 9. , 4, 2291. 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.2291Kharzeev, D., Parity violation in hot QCD: Why it can happen, and how to look for it (2006) Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, 633 (2-3), pp. 260-264. , DOI 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.11.075, PII S0370269305017430Kharzeev, D., Zhitnitsky, A., (2007) Nucl. Phys. A, 797. , 6, 67. 0375-9474 NUPABL 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.10.001Kharzeev, D., McLerran, L.D., Warringa, H.J., (2008) Nucl. Phys. A, 803. , 7, 227. 0375-9474 NUPABL 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298Fukushima, K., Kharzeev, D.E., Warringa, H.J., (2008) Phys. Rev. D, 78. , 8, 074033. 1550-7998 PRVDAQ 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074033Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. Lett., 103. , 9 (STAR Collaboration), 251601. 0031-9007 PRLTAO 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103. 251601Abelev, B.I., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81. , 10 (STAR Collaboration), 054908. 0556-2813 PRVCAN 10.1103/PhysRevC.81. 054908Abelev, B.I., (2013) Phys. Rev. Lett., 110. , 11 (ALICE Collaboration), 012301. 0031-9007 PRLTAO 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 110.012301Ackermann, K.H., Adams, N., Adler, C., Ahammed, Z., Ahmad, S., Allgower, C., Amonett, J., Harris, J.W., STAR detector overview (2003) Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 499 (2-3), pp. 624-632. , DOI 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01960-5Adams, J., Aggarwal, M.M., Ahammed, Z., Amonett, J., Anderson, B.D., Arkhipkin, D., Averichev, G.S., Bai, Y., Directed flow in Au+Au collisions at sNN=62.4 GeV (2006) Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, 73 (3), pp. 1-7. , http://oai.aps.org/oai?verb=GetRecord&Identifier=oai:aps.org: PhysRevC.73.034903&metadataPrefix=oai_apsmeta_2, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.034903, 034903Adamczyk, L., (2012) Phys. Rev. Lett., 108. , 14 (STAR Collaboration), 202301. 0031-9007 PRLTAO 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 108.202301Voloshin, S.A., Parity violation in hot QCD: How to detect it (2004) Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, 70 (5), pp. 0579011-0579012. , DOI 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.057901, 057901Poskanzer, A.M., Voloshin, S.A., Methods for analyzing anisotropic flow in relativistic nuclear collisions (1998) Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, 58 (3), pp. 1671-1678. , DOI 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1671Ollitrault, J.-Y., Poskanzer, A.M., Voloshin, S.A., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 80. , 17, 014904. 0556-2813 PRVCAN 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.014904Pratt, S., Schlichting, S., Gavin, S., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 84. , 18, 024909. 0556-2813 PRVCAN 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.024909Schlichting, S., Pratt, S., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 83. , 19, 014913. 0556-2813 PRVCAN 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.014913Selyuzhenkov, I., Voloshin, S., (2008) Phys. Rev. C, 77. , 20, 034904. 0556-2813 PRVCAN 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.034904Kisiel, A., (2006) Comput. Phys. Commun., 174. , 21, 669. 0010-4655 CPHCBZ 10.1016/j.cpc.2005.11.010Bzdak, A., Koch, V., Liao, J., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 83. , 22, 014905. 0556-2813 PRVCAN 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.014905Adams, J., Aggarwal, M.M., Ahammed, Z., Amonett, J., Anderson, B.D., Arkhipkin, D., Averichev, G.S., Grebenyuk, O., Azimuthal anisotropy in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200GeV (2005) Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, 72 (1), pp. 1-23. , http://oai.aps.org/oai/?verb=ListRecords&metadataPrefix= oai_apsmeta_2&set=journal:PRC:72, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.014904, 014904Ray, R.L., Longacre, R.S., 24, arXiv:nucl-ex/0008009 and private communicationKopylov, G.I., Podgoretsky, M.I., Kopylov, G.I., Podgoretsky, M.I., (1972) Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., 15. , 25a, 219 ()25b, Phys. Lett. B. 50, 472 (1974) 0370-2693 PYLBAJ 10.1016/0370-2693(74)90263-925c, Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 20, 266 (1989)Goldhaber, G., Goldhaber, S., Lee, W., Pais, A., (1960) Phys. Rev., 120. , 26, 325. 0031-899X PHRVAO 10.1103/PhysRev.120.32