The DNA damage response at eroded telomeres and tethering to the nuclear pore complex

The ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes are protected by telomeres, which serve to ensure proper chromosome replication and to prevent spurious recombination at chromosome ends. In this study, we show by single cell analysis that in the absence of telomerase, a single short telomere is sufficient to induce the recruitment of checkpoint and recombination proteins. Notably, a DNA damage response at eroded telomeres starts many generations before senescence and is characterized by the recruitment of Cdc13 (cell division cycle 13), replication protein A, DNA damage checkpoint proteins and the DNA repair protein Rad52 into a single focus. Moreover, we show that eroded telomeres, although remaining at the nuclear periphery, move to the nuclear pore complex. Our results link the DNA damage response at eroded telomeres to changes in subnuclear localization and suggest the existence of collapsed replication forks at eroded telomeres

A phosphodegron controls nutrient-induced proteasomal activation of the signaling protease Ssy5

The Ssy1-Ptr3-Ssy5 (SPS) sensor of extracellular amino acids coordinates the sequential activity of general signaling factors and the 26S proteasome in a novel proteolytic activation cascade to activate the intracellular signaling protease Ssy5, which endoproteolytically activates two latent transcription factors

Uga3 and Uga35/Dal81 Transcription Factors Regulate UGA4 Transcription in Response to γ-Aminobutyric Acid and Leucine ▿

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae UGA4 gene encodes a permease capable of importing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and δ-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) into the cell. GABA-dependent induction of this permease requires at least two positive-acting proteins, the specific factor Uga3 and the pleiotropic factor Uga35/Dal81. UGA4 is subjected to a very complex regulation, and its induction is affected by the presence of extracellular amino acids; this effect is mediated by the plasma membrane amino acid sensor SPS. Our results show that leucine affects UGA4 induction and that the SPS sensor and the downstream effectors Stp1 and Stp2 participate in this regulation. Moreover, we found that the Uga3 and Uga35/Dal81 transcription factors bind to the UGA4 promoter in a GABA-dependent manner and that this binding is impaired by the presence of leucine. We also found that the Leu3 transcription factor negatively regulates UGA4 transcription, although this seems to be through an indirect mechanism