13 research outputs found

    N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive women

    Get PDF
    SummaryIntroductionNo agreement has been reached regarding the best strategy to detect left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). This study examined the role of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the diagnosis of LVH in hypertensive patients and the potential factors that may influence its diagnostic performance.MethodsThe global accuracy of NT-proBNP in diagnosing LVH was assessed using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The influence of patients’ characteristics on test accuracy was studied with a ROC regression based on a probit model. Ninety-three subjects were included. All had NT-proBNP measured and underwent electrocardiography and echocardiography, with calculation of the left ventricular mass index (LVMI).ResultsThe diagnostic performance of NT-proBNP in LVH varied slightly depending on the indexation mode of LVMI. In cases of body surface area indexation, the area under the ROC curve of 81.6% suggested a good performance. The accuracy of the marker was significantly higher in women than in men (p<0.0001). There were no significant effects of age, treatment, body mass index, left ventricular mass index, 24-h systolic blood pressure, or creatinine clearance on the test performance. Slight differences were observed when an indexation to height2.7 instead of body surface area was used.ConclusionsThe present results may lead to a new strategy for risk stratification in hypertension: in women, NT-proBNP alone or preferably in combination with electrocardiography seems sufficient to confirm or exclude diagnosis of LVH. In men, echocardiography would only be needed in cases of negative electrocardiography and NT-proBNP test

    Risk stratification in hypertension

    No full text
    International audienc

    Gain in net survival from hypertension control over the last half-century

    No full text
    International audienceAbstract Aims This study determined whether the improvements in hypertension management over the last five decades have influenced subjects’ prognosis. Methods and results The study considered 5693 eligible subjects seen January 1969 to February 1991 (follow-up until December 2003) or January 1995 to October 2014 (follow-up until July 2016) in an all-grade hypertension reference centre. Missing data or incomplete follow-ups led to exclude 1036 subjects (18%). The outcome was all-cause death. An adjusted modelling of the excess mortality rate assessed subjects’ net survival over five inclusion periods to allow for the increase in life expectancy of the general population during the same periods. The analysis of 4657 records (mean age: 47 years; 43.2% women) showed that the proportion of subjects with grade 3 hypertension decreased significantly from 43.3% (1142) to only 6.3% (22) over the five periods and that the net survival improved in men and women regardless of the hypertension grade; i.e. the gain in net survival at 15 years was estimated at 12.3% (95% confidence interval: 8.1–22.3). The 15-year restricted mean survival was estimated at 13 years over the first period and 14.8 years over the last period, which is nearly a 2-year gain in life expectancy at 15 years. Conclusion Since the 70s and the advent of modern management, the excess mortality of hypertensive subjects (vs. the general population) was markedly reduced. Within a context of trivialization of blood pressure measurement and reluctance to long-term treatments, physicians should consider this advantage and use it to promote blood pressure control
    corecore