BPR1K653, a Novel Aurora Kinase Inhibitor, Exhibits Potent Anti-Proliferative Activity in MDR1 (P-gp170)-Mediated Multidrug-Resistant Cancer Cells

Over-expression of Aurora kinases promotes the tumorigenesis of cells. The aim of this study was to determine the preclinical profile of a novel pan-Aurora kinase inhibitor, BPR1K653, as a candidate for anti-cancer therapy. Since expression of the drug efflux pump, MDR1, reduces the effectiveness of various chemotherapeutic compounds in human cancers, this study also aimed to determine whether the potency of BPR1K653 could be affected by the expression of MDR1 in cancer cells.BPR1K653 specifically inhibited the activity of Aurora-A and Aurora-B kinase at low nano-molar concentrations in vitro. Anti-proliferative activity of BPR1K653 was evaluated in various human cancer cell lines. Results of the clonogenic assay showed that BPR1K653 was potent in targeting a variety of cancer cell lines regardless of the tissue origin, p53 status, or expression of MDR1. At the cellular level, BPR1K653 induced endo-replication and subsequent apoptosis in both MDR1-negative and MDR1-positive cancer cells. Importantly, it showed potent activity against the growth of xenograft tumors of the human cervical carcinoma KB and KB-derived MDR1-positive KB-VIN10 cells in nude mice. Finally, BPR1K653 also exhibited favorable pharmacokinetic properties in rats.BPR1K653 is a novel potent anti-cancer compound, and its potency is not affected by the expression of the multiple drug resistant protein, MDR1, in cancer cells. Therefore, BPR1K653 is a promising anti-cancer compound that has potential for the management of various malignancies, particularly for patients with MDR1-related drug resistance after prolonged chemotherapeutic treatments

Targeting autophagy with small molecules for cancer therapy

Autophagy is a conserved lysosomal-dependent catabolic process that maintains the cellular homeostasis by recycling misfolded proteins and damaged organelles. It involves a series of ordered events (initiation, nucleation, elongation, lysosomal fusion and degradation) that are tightly regulated/controlled by diverse cell signals and stress. It is like a double-edged sword that can play either a protective or destructive role in cancer, by pro-survival or apoptotic cues. Recently, modulating autophagy by pharmacological agents has become an attractive strategy to treat cancer. Currently, a number of small molecules that inhibit autophagy initiation (e.g., ULK kinase inhibitors), nucleation (e.g., Vps34 inhibitors), elongation (e.g., ATG4 inhibitors) and lysosome fusion (e.g., chloroquine, hydroxyl chloroquine, etc.) are reported in pre-clinical and clinical study. Also a number of small molecules reported to induce autophagy by targeting mammalian target of rapamycin (e.g., rapamycin analogs) or adenosine 5’-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (e.g., sulforaphane). The study results suggest that many potential “druggable” targets exist in the autophagy pathway that could be harnessed for developing new cancer therapeutics. In this review, we discuss the reported autophagy modulators (inhibitors and inducers), their molecular mode of action and their applications in cancer therapy

Delineating the active site architecture of G9a lysine methyltransferase through substrate and inhibitor binding mode analysis: a molecular dynamics study

<p>Mono- and di-methylation of the H3K9 residue in the histone tail by G9a lysine methyltransferase is associated with transcriptional suppression of genes. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulation and free energy calculations of five different modified/mutated G9a substrate peptides to elucidate the rationale behind the substrate binding to G9a. We also investigated the binding energy contribution based architecture of the active site of G9a to understand substrate and inhibitor binding. Wild-type peptide (H3K9) shows better binding affinity than mono- and di-methylated lysine (K9) and other modified peptides (K9A and R8A). Arg8 of the substrate peptide is crucial for determining the degree of conformational freedom/stability of the wild-type substrate peptide, as well as binding to G9a. Our results also suggest that the G9a active site is segregated into energy rich and low regions, and the energy rich region alone is used by the inhibitors for binding. These insights into the active site architecture should be taken into consideration in virtual screening experiments designed to discover novel inhibitors for G9a. In particular, compounds that could interact with the six residues of G9a – Asp1074, Asp1083, Leu1086, Asp1088, Tyr1154 and Phe1158 – should be preferentially tested in G9a inhibition biological assays.</p> <p>Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma</p