Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Adolescents and Young Adults with Head and Neck Sarcomas

Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with head and neck sarcomas (HNSs) treated with pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) and to report quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight AYAs (aged 15 to 39 years) with HNS treated between January 2001 and July 2022 at our institution were included. The median age was 21.6 years. Rhabdomyosarcoma (39.3%), Ewing sarcoma (17.9%), chondrosarcoma (14.3%), and osteosarcoma (14.3%) were the most frequent diagnoses. Three (10.7%) patients were metastatic before PBSPT and 13 (46.4%) patients had a tumor with intracranial extension. The median total radiation dose was 63 GyRBE (range, 45 to 74 GyRBE). Thirteen (46.4%) patients received concomitant chemotherapy. Toxicity was reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0 (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. QoL was assessed using a PEDQOL (Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire) questionnaire. Self-reported outcomes were assessed using institutional questionnaires. Results: With a median follow-up of 57 months (range, 3.7 to 243 months), 5 patients (17.8%) had local failure (LF) only, 2 (7.1%) experienced distant failure (DF) only, and 2 (7.1%) had LF and DF. The estimated 5-year local control (LC) and distant control (DC) rates were 71.8% and 80.5%, respectively. The median times to LF and DF were 13.4 and 22.2 months, respectively. Four (14.3%) patients died, all but one from their HNS. Estimated 5-year overall survival was 90.7%. Six (21.4%) patients developed nonocular grade ≥3 toxicity, which consisted of otitis media (n = 2), hearing impairment (n = 2), osteoradionecrosis (n = 1), and sinusitis (n = 1). Four (14.3%) patients developed cataracts that required surgery. The 5-year freedom from nonocular grade 3 toxicity was 91.1%. No grade 4 or higher toxicity was observed. Adolescents rated their quality of life before treatment worse than their parents did. Conclusion: Excellent outcomes with acceptable late-toxicity rates were observed for AYAs with HNS after PBSPT

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries