47 research outputs found

    Non-Motor Symptoms in Patients with Primary Dystonia

    Get PDF
    Isolated dystonia, previously referred to as primary, is the third most common movement disorder, characterized by involuntary muscle contractions causing abnormal movements and postures with or without the presence of tremor. No matter monogenic or sporadic, the form of dystonia is a growing evidence, suggesting the presence of non-motor components to the disorder. Dystonia patients suffer from reduced quality of life, which might be related not only to the dystonic movements itself but to different non-motor symptoms and signs, as well. Based on literature review, this chapter aims to focus on the association of different types of isolated/primary dystonia (forms of focal, segmental, and generalized dystonia) with some non-motor disorders, including sleep and psychiatric disorders, cognition, as though as pain and sensory symptoms, their pathophysiological and biochemical mechanisms, relations with the symptomatic treating strategies for the abnormal movements, and specific treatment for the non-motor signs

    НационалСн консСнсус Π·Π° диагностика, Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, прослСдяванС ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π½Π° Ρ…Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ€Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° транстирСтиновата Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ·Π°

    Get PDF
    АмилоидозитС са ΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠΊ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΡŠΡ€ ΠΎΡ‚ заболявания, Π΄ΡŠΠ»ΠΆΠ°Ρ‰ΠΈ сС Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π² Π±Π΅Π»Ρ‚ΡŠΡ‡Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° структура, Π² Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Π»Π½ΠΎ Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ‚Π²ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΌ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π½ Π±Π΅Π»Ρ‚ΡŠΠΊ слСд дСстабилизация Π½Π° Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚Π²ΡŠΡ€Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° структура ΠΈ послСдващ Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΏΠ°Π΄ Π΄ΠΎ свободни ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΡƒΠ²Π° Π½Π΅Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ‚Π²ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π²ΡŠΠ½ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΡŠΡ‡Π½ΠΈ Ρ„ΠΈΠ±Ρ€ΠΈΠ»Π½ΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½Π½Π° дисфункция. Всички Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ ΡΡŠΠ΄ΡŠΡ€ΠΆΠ°Ρ‚ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ основСн Ρ„ΠΈΠ±Ρ€ΠΈΠ»Π΅Π½ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΈΠ½, ΠΊΠΎΠΉΡ‚ΠΎ опрСдСля Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π° Π½Π° Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π°, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ-ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ. Над 20 Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ Ρ„ΠΈΠ±Ρ€ΠΈΠ»Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΈΠ½Π°, асоциирани с Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ·ΠΈ са описани ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ…ΠΎΡ€Π°, всяка ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΊΠΎΠΈΡ‚ΠΎ ΠΈΠΌΠ° Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Π°. Π•Π΄ΠΈΠ½ Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΡŠΠ² Π±Π΅Π»Ρ‚ΡŠΠΊ, ΠΊΠΎΠΉΡ‚ΠΎ Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π° Ρ‡ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡˆΠΊΠΈ Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΈ Ρ„ΠΈΠ±Ρ€ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ, Π΅ транстирСтина (Ando Y. ΠΈ ΡΡŠΡ‚Ρ€. 2005). TTΠ  дСйства ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎ транспортСн Π±Π΅Π»Ρ‚ΡŠΠΊ Π·Π° тироксин Π² ΠΏΠ»Π°Π·ΠΌΠ°. TTΠ  ΡΡŠΡ‰ΠΎ транспортира Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ» (Π²ΠΈΡ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ½ А) Ρ‡Ρ€Π΅Π· ΡΠ²ΡŠΡ€Π·Π²Π°Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΌΡƒ с Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ»-ΡΠ²ΡŠΡ€Π·Π²Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΈΠ½. Π’ΠΎΠΉ Ρ†ΠΈΡ€ΠΊΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€Π° ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ ΠΎΡ‚ Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ субСдиници. TTΠ  ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π° бъдС ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ Π² ΠΏΠ»Π°Π·ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π° ΠΈ Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ²ΠΎΡ€Π°. Π‘ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ€Π° сС Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎ Π² чСрния Π΄Ρ€ΠΎΠ± ΠΈ хориоидния плСксус Π½Π° мозъка ΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠΎ-ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΊΠ° стСпСн - Π² Ρ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ‚Π°. Π“Π΅Π½ΡŠΡ‚ TTΠ  Π΅ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½ Π²ΡŠΡ€Ρ…Ρƒ Π΄ΡŠΠ»Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΎ Π½Π° Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌΠ° 18 ΠΈ ΡΡŠΠ΄ΡŠΡ€ΠΆΠ° 4 Π΅ΠΊΠ·ΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΈ 3 ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Π°. БистСмнитС Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ·ΠΈ сС ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π²Π°Ρ‚ с Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½Π° Π±ΡƒΠΊΠ²Π° А (Π·Π° Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΈΠ΄), слСдвана ΠΎΡ‚ ΡΡŠΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ‰Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π·Π° химичСската ΡΡŠΡ‰Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ Π½Π° фибрилния ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΈΠ½. Π’Π°ΠΊΠ° Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€, TTΠ  Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ·Π° сС ΡΡŠΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ‰Π°Π²Π° ATTΠ , Π° Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ·Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚Π»Π°Π³Π°Π½Π΅ Π½Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ³ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΈΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΠ³Π»ΠΎΠ±ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ – AΠ› (Saraiva M. ΠΈ ΡΡŠΡ‚Ρ€., 1984; Connors L. ΠΈ ΡΡŠΡ‚Ρ€., 2003; Ando Y. ΠΈ ΡΡŠΡ‚Ρ€. 2005). ΠšΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π½ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π° молСкулярно-Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ тСстовС ΠΈ тяхната интСрпрСтация. ΠžΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° патогСнността Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚ трябва Π΄Π° сС ΠΈΠ·Π²ΡŠΡ€ΡˆΠ²Π° Π½Π° Π±Π°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° Π½Π°ΡƒΡ‡Π½ΠΈ доказатСлства ΠΈ спорСд ΡƒΠ½ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°Π½Π° Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ»Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π° ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π°. Π’ΡŠΠ² Π²Ρ€ΡŠΠ·ΠΊΠ° с Ρ‚ΠΎΠ²Π°, ΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠΊΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π·Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈ мутация ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡ€Ρ„ΠΈΠ·ΡŠΠΌ са Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈ с класификация Π½Π° Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ, спорСд която сС обособяват 5 ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ: ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π½, вСроятно ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π½, Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚ с нСясно ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, вСроятно Π½Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π½ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π½ (Richards S. ΠΈ ΡΡŠΡ‚Ρ€., 2015; Nykamp K. И ΡΡŠΡ‚Ρ€., 2017)

    Efficacy and safety of adjunctive padsevonil in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy: Results from two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials

    Get PDF
    Antiepileptic drug; Antiseizure medication; TolerabilityFΓ‘rmaco antiepilΓ©ptico; Medicamento anticonvulsivo; TolerabilidadMedicament antiepilΓ¨ptic; Medicament anticonvulsiu; TolerabilitatObjective To characterize efficacy, safety/tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of padsevonil (PSL) administered concomitantly with ≀3 antiseizure medications (ASMs) for observable focal seizures in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials. Methods The phase 2b dose-finding trial (EP0091/NCT03373383) randomized patients 1:1:1:1:1 to PSL 50/100/200/400 mg or placebo twice daily (b.i.d.). The phase 3 efficacy trial (EP0092/NCT03739840) randomized patients 1:1:1:1 to PSL 100/200/400 mg or placebo b.i.d. Patients with observable (focal aware with motor symptoms, focal impaired awareness, focal to bilateral tonic–clonic) focal seizures for β‰₯3 years, experiencing them β‰₯4 times per 28 days including during the 4-week baseline period despite treatment with β‰₯4 lifetime ASMs including current ASMs, were enrolled. Results In EP0091 and EP0092, 410 and 231 patients, respectively, were randomized and received at least one dose of trial medication. In patients in EP0091 on PSL 50/100/200/400 mg b.i.d. (n = 80/82/81/81, respectively) versus placebo (n = 81), outcomes included percentage reductions over placebo in observable focal seizure frequency during the 12-week maintenance period: 17.2%, 19.1% (p = 0.128), 19.2% (p = 0.128), 12.4% (p = 0.248); 75% responder rates (p-values for odds ratios): 13.8%, 12.2% (p = 0.192), 11.1% (p = 0.192), 16.0% (p = 0.124) versus 6.2%; 50% responder rates: 33.8% (p = 0.045), 31.7% (p = 0.079), 25.9% (p = 0.338), 32.1% (p = 0.087), versus 21.0%; TEAEs were reported by 82.7% (67/81), 78.3% (65/83), 74.4% (61/82), 90.1% (73/81) versus 78.3% (65/83). In patients in EP0092 on PSL 100/200/400 mg b.i.d. (n = 60/56/56, respectively) versus placebo (n = 54), outcomes included percentage reductions over placebo: βˆ’5.6% (p = 0.687), 6.5% (p = 0.687), 6.3% (p = 0.687); 75% responder rates: 15.3% (p = 0.989), 12.5% (p = 0.989), 14.3% (p = 0.989) versus 13.0%; 50% responder rates: 35.6% (p = 0.425), 33.9% (p = 0.625), and 42.9% (p = 0.125) versus 27.8%; TEAEs were reported by 80.0% (48/60), 78.9% (45/57), 83.1% (49/59) versus 67.3% (37/55). Significance In both trials, the primary outcomes did not reach statistical significance in any PSL dose group compared with placebo. PSL was generally well tolerated, and no new safety signals were identified

    Clinical profile of levodopa-carbidopa-entacapone intestinal gel infusion in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Parkinson’s disease in its advanced stage is a progressive condition that can be treated with levodopa. The long-term complications of this treatment are difficult to manage. A new device-aided therapy has recently been developed to minimize these effects. Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the intestinal gel containing levodopa - carbidopa - entacapone, as well as to see if it had any impact on the disease’s non-motor symptoms. Additionally, we sought to identify the criteria for selecting among the various treatments that were offered. Materials and methods: This study includes the first five patients who started receiving the levodopa-carbidopa-entacapone gel for Parkinson’s disease in the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry at St Naum University Hospital for Active Treatment in Sofia, Bulgaria. To evaluate the influence of motor and non-motor symptoms of the disease, we used neurological examination and the Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. The Parkinson’s Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life of the patients. Results: All patients showed improvement in their motor functions, quality of life, and sleep problems in comparison with those receiving oral levodopa. No patient experienced an increase in the dyskinesias. The postural stability continued to be impaired. For now, the medication has shown a protective effect against the levodopa-induced polyneuropathy. The main side effects were diarrhea and weight loss. Conclusions: Levodopa-carbidopa-entacapone therapy is a promising new modality of treatment for advanced Parkinson’s disease. The medication has been found to improve the patients’ motor functions and exert a positive effect on some non-motor symptoms. The drug has shown a good safety profile and tolerance. There is still a lack of clear criteria for choosing between the levodopa-carbidopa-entacapone and levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gels

    Prevalence of claw disorders in dairy farms with tie stalls

    Get PDF
    In intensive rearing conditions, dairy cows are exposed to many factors that can cause health disorders and significant economic loses. Today, claw diseases are the main problem in high-milk cow's herd, along with metabolic diseases, mastitis and reproduction disorders. Claw diseases can have direct effects on reproductive parameters. The aim of our research was to determine the frequency of certain diseases of the locomotor apparatus of dairy cows on farms with tie stall system. In the period of two years, a total of 37,893 cows were examined, wherein the following has been found: Laminitis in 34,217 cows (90.30%), Dermatitis interdigitalis in 25,876 cows (68.29%), Dermatitis digitalis in 11,817 cows (31.18%), Rusterholz ulcer in 8,272 cows (21.83%), Fibroma in 3063 cows (8.08%), and Panaritium in 618 cows (1.63%). The results show that laminitis dominate in the herds. Considering the etiology of diseases determined at the farms it is primarily to focus on preventing the formation of metabolic disorders and adequate nutrition of the animals, and then on the improvement of housing conditions and the regular implementation of measures to prevent the spread of infectious claw diseases

    EAN Guideline on Palliative Care of People with Severe, Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

    Get PDF
    Background and Purpose: Patients with severe, progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) have complex physical and psychosocial needs, typically over several years. Few treatment options are available to prevent or delay further clinical worsening in this population. The objective was to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the palliative care of patients with severe, progressive MS. Methods: This guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Formulation of the clinical questions was performed in the Patients–Intervention– Comparator–Outcome format, involving patients, carers and healthcare professionals (HPs). No uniform definition of severe MS exists: in this guideline, constant bilateral support required to walk 20m without resting (Expanded Disability Status Scale score >6.0) or higher disability is referred to. When evidence was lacking for this population, recommendations were formulated using indirect evidence or good practice statements were devised. Results: Ten clinical questions were formulated. They encompassed general and specialist palliative care, advance care planning, discussing with HPs the patient’s wish to hasten death, symptom management, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, interventions for caregivers and interventions for HPs. A total of 34 recommendations (33 weak, 1 strong) and seven good practice statements were devised. Conclusions: The provision of home-based palliative care (either general or specialist) is recommended with weak strength for patients with severe, progressive MS. Further research on the integration of palliative care and MS care is needed. Areas that currently lack evidence of efficacy in this population include advance care planning, the management of symptoms such as fatigue and mood problems, and interventions for caregivers and HPs

    Structured headache services as the solution to the ill-health burden of headache: 1. Rationale and description

    Get PDF
    In countries where headache services exist at all, their focus is usually on specialist (tertiary) care. This is clinically and economically inappropriate: most headache disorders can effectively and more efficiently (and at lower cost) be treated in educationally supported primary care. At the same time, compartmentalizing divisions between primary, secondary and tertiary care in many health-care systems create multiple inefficiencies, confronting patients attempting to navigate these levels (the β€œpatient journey”) with perplexing obstacles. High demand for headache care, estimated here in a needs-assessment exercise, is the biggest of the challenges to reform. It is also the principal reason why reform is necessary. The structured headache services model presented here by experts from all world regions on behalf of the Global Campaign against Headache is the suggested health-care solution to headache. It develops and refines previous proposals, responding to the challenge of high demand by basing headache services in primary care, with two supporting arguments. First, only primary care can deliver headache services equitably to the large numbers of people needing it. Second, with educational supports, they can do so effectively to most of these people. The model calls for vertical integration between care levels (primary, secondary and tertiary), and protection of the more advanced levels for the minority of patients who need them. At the same time, it is amenable to horizontal integration with other care services. It is adaptable according to the broader national or regional health services in which headache services should be embedded. It is, according to evidence and argument presented, an efficient and cost-effective model, but these are claims to be tested in formal economic analyses

    Patient and caregiver involvement in the formulation of guideline questions: findings from the European Academy of Neurology guideline on palliative care of people with severe multiple sclerosis

    Get PDF
    Background and purpose: Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guideline development is recommended to increase guideline trustworthiness and relevance. The aim was to engage multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and caregivers in the definition of the key questions to be answered in the European Academy of Neurology guideline on palliative care of people with severe MS. Methods: A mixed methods approach was used: an international online survey launched by the national MS societies of eight countries, after pilot testing/debriefing on 20 MS patients and 18 caregivers, focus group meetings of Italian and German MS patients and caregivers. Results: Of 1199 participants, 951 (79%) completed the whole online survey and 934 from seven countries were analysed: 751 (80%) were MS patients (74% women, mean age 46.1) and 183 (20%) were caregivers (36% spouses/partners, 72% women, mean age 47.4). Participants agreed/strongly agreed on inclusion of the nine pre-specified topics (from 89% for β€˜advance care planning’ to 98% for β€˜multidisciplinary rehabilitation’), and <5% replied β€˜I prefer not to answer’ to any topic. There were 569 free comments: 182 (32%) on the pre-specified topics, 227 (40%) on additional topics (16 guideline-pertinent) and 160 (28%) on outcomes. Five focus group meetings (three of MS patients, two of caregivers, and overall 35 participants) corroborated the survey findings. In addition, they allowed an explanation of the guideline production process and the exploration of patient-important outcomes and of taxing issues. Conclusions: Multiple sclerosis patient and caregiver involvement was resource and time intensive, but rewarding. It was the key for the formulation of the 10 guideline questions and for the identification of patient-important outcomes

    Π‘ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π² ΡˆΠΈΡΡ‚Π°

    No full text
    ЦСрвикалният Π³Ρ€ΡŠΠ±Π½Π°ΠΊ Π΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ ΠΈ чСсто сС Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π²ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°. Π’ ΡˆΠΈΡΡ‚Π° са Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈ мноТСство чувствитСлни към Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ° структури. Етиологията Π½Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π½Π°ΠΉ-чСсто Π΅ ΡΠ²ΡŠΡ€Π·Π°Π½Π° с мускулно-скСлСтната систСма ΠΈ Π°ΠΏΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ·Π΅Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ стави. Π‘ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π²ΡŠΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ²Π°Ρ‚ остро ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π²Π°Ρ‚ спонтанно ΠΈ рядко Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ‚. ΠžΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° (нСспСцифична) Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ° Π² ΡˆΠΈΡΡ‚Π° Π΅ Π΅ΠΊΠ²ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»Π΅Π½Ρ‚ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ° Π² ΠΊΡ€ΡŠΡΡ‚Π° ΠΈ Π΅ с нСясна Стиология, Π½ΠΎ с мускулСн ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΠ·Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄. ОсвСн Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ° ΠΈ спазъм Π½Π° ΡˆΠΈΠΉΠ½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ мускули Π½Π΅ сС установяват ΠΎΡ‚ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ симптоми. Π‘ΠΈΠ½Π΄Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ° Π½Π° ΡƒΠ²Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π° ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΡˆΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ ΡƒΠ΄Π°Ρ€ сС Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π° с ΡƒΠ²Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π°Ρ‚Π°, Π½Π°ΡΡ‚ΡŠΠΏΠ²Π°Ρ‰Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΡˆΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° Π³Π»Π°Π²Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚ с ΠΌΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΎ срСдство. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π° с Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π² ΡˆΠΈΡΡ‚Π°, ΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π·Π΅Π½Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ° Π² Π³Π»Π°Π²Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΉΠ½ΠΈΡ†ΠΈ. НосСнСто Π½Π° шийна яка няма Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚. Π Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ миофасциални синдроми ΠΎΠ±Ρ…Π²Π°Ρ‰Π°Ρ‚ Π³ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡ‚Π΅ мускули Π½Π° ΡˆΠΈΡΡ‚Π° ΠΈ рамСнният пояс. Π₯Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ‚ сС с Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ³Π΅Ρ€Π½ΠΈ Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ Π² ΡˆΠΈΠΉΠ½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ мускули, мускулСн спазъм, Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ двиТСния Π² ΡˆΠΈΡΡ‚Π° ΠΈ Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ. Π”Π΅Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π² ΡˆΠΈΠΉΠ½Π°Ρ‚Π° област ΠΏΠΎ-рядко водят Π΄ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ компрСсия Π½Π° Π½Π΅Ρ€Π²Π½ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡ€Π΅Π½Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°Π΄ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ-ΡˆΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠΊΠΈΡ спиналСн ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π». Дисковата хСрния Π² ΡˆΠΈΠΉΠ½Π°Ρ‚Π° област, Π·Π° Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡ‚ Π»ΡƒΠΌΠ±Π°Π»Π½Π°Ρ‚Π°, Π½Π΅ Π΅ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°Π²Π°Ρ‰Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Π° Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΡ€Π΅Π½Ρ‡Π΅Π²Π° ΡƒΠ²Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π°. Π¦Π΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° спондилоза, хипСртрофията Π½Π° Π°ΠΏΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ·Π΅Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ стави ΠΈ остСофитозата са Π΅Π΄Π½Π° ΠΎΡ‚ Π½Π°ΠΉ-чСститС ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ Π·Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π² ΡˆΠΈΡΡ‚Π°. Π‘ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π° Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΄Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΎΡ‚ мускулСн спазъм, стСгнатост ΠΈ ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½Π° подвиТност Π½Π° Π³Ρ€ΡŠΠ±Π½Π°ΠΊΠ°, Π±Π΅Π· ΠΎΡ‚ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ симптоми. Π‘ΠΈΠ½Π΄Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΡŠΡ‚ Π½Π° Ρ†Π΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π°ΠΏΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ·Π΅Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ стави ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π° с Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ° Π² Π³ΠΎΡ€Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° част Π½Π° Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π°, ΠΈΡ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ‰Π° ΠΎΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»Π½ΠΎ, ΠΏΠ°Ρ€ΠΈΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ към ипсилатСралната Ρ„Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Π°Π»Π½Π° област. Анкилозиращият спондилит, рСвматоидният Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΈ polymyalgia rheumatica са чСста ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½Π° Π·Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π² ΡˆΠΈΠΉΠ½Π°Ρ‚Π° област. Атлантоаксиалната нСстабилност ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π° с ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎ СкстСнзивСн ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΌ Π½Π° Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°Π΄ΠΈ ΡƒΠ²Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½Π΅ Π½Π° трансвСрзалния Π»ΠΈΠ³Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ Π½Π° атласа ΠΈ Π΄Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ Ρ„Π°ΡΠ΅Ρ‚ΡŠΡ‡Π½ΠΈ стави. Π‘ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚ Π°Ρ‚Π»Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠΎΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ стави Π½Π°ΡΡ‚ΡŠΠΏΠ²Π°Ρ‚ вслСдствиС Π½Π° Π΄Π΅Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π½ Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π²ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° ΡƒΠ²Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π°, ΡΠ²ΡŠΡ€Π·Π°Π½Π° с рязко ускоряванС ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ намаляванС Π½Π° ускоряванСто ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π‘ΠΈΠ½Π΄Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΡŠΡ‚ β€žΡˆΠΈΡ-Сзик” ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π° с Π²Π½Π΅Π·Π°ΠΏΠ½Π° Сдностранна остра ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°Ρ‰Π° ΠΈ силна Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ° Π² ΠΎΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π² Π³ΠΎΡ€Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° шийна област, ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΄Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΈΠ·Ρ‚Ρ€ΡŠΠΏΠ²Π°Π½Π΅, дизСстСзия, Π°Π±Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ½ΠΈ усСщания ΠΈ ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ипсилатСралната част Π½Π° Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΊΠ°. Π¦Π΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎ Π³Π»Π°Π²ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ΅ прСдставлява Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ°, ΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π·Π΅Π½Π° ΠΎΡ‚ Π³ΠΎΡ€Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° Π·Π°Π΄Π½Π° част Π½Π° ΡˆΠΈΡΡ‚Π° към Π³Π»Π°Π²Π°Ρ‚Π°. Π’ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π² ΡˆΠΈΠΉΠ½Π°Ρ‚Π° област ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π° ΠΎΡ‚ Ρ‚Π΅Π·ΠΈ Π² лумбосакралната област

    Pain and tension-type headache: a review of the possible pathophysiological mechanisms

    No full text
    corecore