Patients with obesity have more inflamed joints and higher CRP levels during the disease course in ACPA-positive RA but not in ACPA-negative RA

BACKGROUND: Obese RA patients have higher disease activity scores (DAS). Previous research showed that obese RA patients have higher tender joint count (TJC) and VAS general health. However, it remains unclear whether DAS components measuring local and systemic inflammation (swollen joint count (SJC), CRP) are increased and if this is present in the total RA population or confined to an ACPA subgroup. As ACPA is suggested to enhance inflammatory responses, we hypothesized that the association of obesity with SJC and CRP is present especially in ACPA-positive RA. We therefore studied associations of obesity with courses of DAS components in ACPA subgroups. METHODS: We studied 649 RA patients (291 ACPA-positive), included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic. Five-year courses of DAS44 and DAS44 components (SJC-44, TJC-53, CRP, VAS (0-100)) were compared between RA patients with normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), and obesity (≥ 30.0), stratified for ACPA. Linear/Poisson mixed models with a knot at 4 months were used. RESULTS: Obese RA patients had + 0.32 higher DAS compared to normal weight during the 5-year follow-up. In ACPA-positive RA, obese patients had + 0.43 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.64) higher DAS, whereas in ACPA-negative RA, this difference was smaller and not statistically significant: + 0.19 (95% CI: - 0.01, 0.38). In ACPA-positive RA, all DAS components were significantly higher in obese patients compared to normal weight: SJC + 60% (IRR1.60; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.16), CRP + 3.7 mg/L (95% CI:0.95, 6.53), TJC + 55% (IRR1.55; 95% CI:1.15, 2.10), and VAS + 9 (95% CI: 4.0, 14.2). ACPA-negative obese RA patients tended to have higher TJC (IRR1.22; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.55) and VAS (β4.3; 95% CI: - 0.4, 9.0), while SJC (IRR1.07; 95% CI:0.85, 1.33) and CRP (β0.24; 95% CI: - 1.29, 3.32) were unaffected. CONCLUSION: The association of obesity with a worse DAS course is mainly present in ACPA-positive RA; especially SJC and CRP levels remain higher in ACPA-positive RA patients with obesity but not ACPA-negative RA patients. This is the first demonstration that obesity influences the disease course of ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA differently.</p

Patients with obesity have more inflamed joints and higher CRP levels during the disease course in ACPA-positive RA but not in ACPA-negative RA

BACKGROUND: Obese RA patients have higher disease activity scores (DAS). Previous research showed that obese RA patients have higher tender joint count (TJC) and VAS general health. However, it remains unclear whether DAS components measuring local and systemic inflammation (swollen joint count (SJC), CRP) are increased and if this is present in the total RA population or confined to an ACPA subgroup. As ACPA is suggested to enhance inflammatory responses, we hypothesized that the association of obesity with SJC and CRP is present especially in ACPA-positive RA. We therefore studied associations of obesity with courses of DAS components in ACPA subgroups. METHODS: We studied 649 RA patients (291 ACPA-positive), included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic. Five-year courses of DAS44 and DAS44 components (SJC-44, TJC-53, CRP, VAS (0-100)) were compared between RA patients with normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), and obesity (≥ 30.0), stratified for ACPA. Linear/Poisson mixed models with a knot at 4 months were used. RESULTS: Obese RA patients had + 0.32 higher DAS compared to normal weight during the 5-year follow-up. In ACPA-positive RA, obese patients had + 0.43 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.64) higher DAS, whereas in ACPA-negative RA, this difference was smaller and not statistically significant: + 0.19 (95% CI: - 0.01, 0.38). In ACPA-positive RA, all DAS components were significantly higher in obese patients compared to normal weight: SJC + 60% (IRR1.60; 95% CI: 1.18, 2.16), CRP + 3.7 mg/L (95% CI:0.95, 6.53), TJC + 55% (IRR1.55; 95% CI:1.15, 2.10), and VAS + 9 (95% CI: 4.0, 14.2). ACPA-negative obese RA patients tended to have higher TJC (IRR1.22; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.55) and VAS (β4.3; 95% CI: - 0.4, 9.0), while SJC (IRR1.07; 95% CI:0.85, 1.33) and CRP (β0.24; 95% CI: - 1.29, 3.32) were unaffected. CONCLUSION: The association of obesity with a worse DAS course is mainly present in ACPA-positive RA; especially SJC and CRP levels remain higher in ACPA-positive RA patients with obesity but not ACPA-negative RA patients. This is the first demonstration that obesity influences the disease course of ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA differently.</p

Forefoot inflammation in recent-onset ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA:clinically similar, but different in underlying inflamed tissues

OBJECTIVES: Although joint swelling is traditionally interpreted as synovitis, recent imaging studies showed that there is also inflammation of tenosynovium and intermetatarsal bursae in the forefoot. We aimed to increase our understanding of differences and similarities regarding forefoot involvement between ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at diagnosis. Therefore, we (1) compared metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint counts, walking disabilities and inflamed tissues between ACPA groups and (2) studied associations of joint swelling/tenderness and walking disabilities with underlying inflamed tissues within ACPA groups. METHODS: 171 ACPA-positive and 203 ACPA-negative consecutively diagnosed patients with RA had a physical joint examination (swollen joint count-66/tender joint count-68), filled a Health Assessment Questionnaire including the domain walking and underwent MRI of the MTP joints at diagnosis. Synovitis, tenosynovitis, osteitis and intermetatarsal bursitis (IMB) were assessed. Findings in age-matched healthy controls were applied to define abnormalities on MRI. RESULTS: While ACPA-negative RA patients had more swollen joints (mean SJC 8 vs 6 in ACPA-positives, p=0.003), the number of swollen MTP joints was similar (mean 1 in both groups); walking disabilities were also equally common (49% vs 53%). In contrast, inflamed tissues were all more prevalent in ACPA-positive compared with ACPA-negative RA. Within ACPA-positive RA, IMB was associated independently with MTP-joint swelling (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.0) and tenderness (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.0). While in ACPA-negatives, synovitis was associated independently with MTP-joint swelling (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.8) and tenderness (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.8). Tenosynovitis contributed most to walking disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Although the forefoot of ACPA-positives and ACPA-negatives share clinical similarities at diagnosis, there are differences in underlying inflamed tissues. This reinforces that ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA are different entities.</p

Response to: 'The cost of arthralgia 'pretreatment' to prevent rheumatoid arthritis' by Rothschild

Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease

Assessing the perceived quality of brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation studies for inclusion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews: Description of data employed in the development of a scoring tool based on currently accepted guidelines

Brachial artery Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) is widely used as a non-invasive measure of endothelial function. Adherence to expert consensus guidelines on FMD measurement has been found to be of vital importance to obtain reproducible data. This article lists the literature data which was considered in the development of a tool to aid in the objective judgement of the extent to which published studies adhered to expert guidelines for FMD measurement. Application of this tool in a systematic review of FMD studies © 2016 . (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.03.011) (Greyling et al., 2016 [1]) indicated that adherence to expert consensus guidelines is strongly correlated to the reproducibility of FMD data

Is Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody-Positive Rheumatoid Arthritis Still a More Severe Disease Than Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody-Negative Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Longitudinal Cohort Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Diagnosed From 2000 Onward

Pathophysiology and treatment of rheumatic disease