Do optometrists see 20/20? A survey of vision care utilized by optometrists: Implications for the profession

Purpose: The American Optometric Association\u27s Optometric Clinical Practice Guidelines identify appropriate utilization strategies for eye and vision examinations. Optometrists, like all health care providers, should follow the recommended standard of care as a doctor and as a patient. The purpose of this survey was to evaluate if optometrists seek and recommend the standard of vision care. Method: A survey was mailed to 650 randomly selected optometrists in the states of Oregon and Washington. The survey provided data describing the optometrists\u27 personal demographics, medical conditions, visual conditions, and utilization of vision care. Additional data included a survey of the optometrists\u27 recommendation of preventive eye care for their patients. Results: A 41% response rate was achieved from the mailing. In evaluating the data from optometrists who reported no ocular or medical conditions, the data show that 70% of the doctors surveyed, between the age of twenty and forty, have met the AOA guidelines recommendation of having a refraction, anterior segment exam, posterior segment exam, and intraocular pressure measurement within the recommended three year interval. Sixty-four percent of the doctors surveyed, between the age of forty-one and sixty, have met the AOA guidelines recommendation of having all of the procedures listed performed within the past two years. Of the doctors surveyed over the age of sixty, 36% have met the AOA guidelines of having all the procedures listed performed within the past year. With respect to preventive vision care for their patients, 90% of doctors, of all ages, reported that they recommend the AOA guidelines recommendation for their patients between the age of twenty and forty. Eighty-one percent of doctors, of all ages, reported recommending the AOA guidelines to their patients between the age of forty-one and sixty. Of those doctors surveyed, 30% of the respondents recommend the AOA guidelines to their patients over the age of sixty. Conclusion: Most optometrists\u27 personal eye care is consistent with the AOA Optometric Clinical Practice Guidelines. Most optometrists are recommending to their patients care intervals that are consistent with these guidelines. However, optometrists over the age of sixty are not seeking the standard of vision care recommended by the AOA guidelines and optometrists off all ages are not recommending the AOA guidelines to their patients over the age of sixty. It is recommended that all optometrists be educated as to the reason for the frequency of optometric examinations for themselves as well as for their patients over the age of sixty

Susceptibility of Wild-Caught Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) Sand Flies to Insecticide After an Extended Period of Exposure in Western São Paulo, Brazil

Background In Brazil, members of the sand fly species complex Lutzomyia longipalpis transmit Leishmania infantum, a protist parasite that causes visceral leishmaniasis. Male Lu. longipalpis produce a sex pheromone that is attractive to both females and males. During a cluster randomised trial, to determine the combined effect of synthetic sex-aggregation pheromone and insecticide on Le. infantum transmission Lu. longipalpis had been continuously exposed to insecticide for 30 months. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of continuous exposure to the insecticides used in the trial on the susceptibility of Lu. longipalpis population. Methods During the trial the sand flies had been exposed to either lambda-cyhalothrin [pheromone + residual insecticide spray (PI)], deltamethrin [dog collars (DC)] or no insecticide [control (C)], for 30 months (November 2012 to April 2015). The insecticide treatment regime was kept in place for an additional 12 months (May 2015-April 2016) during this susceptibility study. Sand flies collected from the field were exposed to WHO insecticide-impregnated papers cyhalothrin (0.05%), deltamethrin (0.5%) and control (silicone oil) in a modified WHO insecticide exposure trial to determine their susceptibility. Results We collected 788 Lu. longipalpis using CDC-light traps in 31 municipalities across the three trial arms. Probit analysis showed that the knockdown times (KDTs) of Lu. longipalpis collected from the lambda-cyhalothrin exposed PI-arm [KDT50: 31.1 min, confidence interval (CI): 29.6–32.6 and KDT90: 44.2 min, CI: 42.1–46.7] were longer than the KDTs from the non-insecticide-treated C-arm (KDT50: 26.3 min, CI: 25.1–27.6 and KDT90: 38.2, CI: 36.5–40.2) (no-overlapping 95% CIs). KDTs of Lu. longipalpis collected from the deltamethrin exposed DC-arm had similar values (KDT50: 13.7 min, CI: 10.1–16.2 and KDT90: 26.7 min, CI: 21.8–30.6) to those for the C-arm (KDT50: 13.5 min; CI: 12.2–14.8 and KDT90: 23.2 min, CI: 21.4–25.4) (overlapping CIs). The wild-caught unexposed Lu. longipalpis (C-arm), took approximately twice as long to knock down as laboratory-colonised specimens for both insecticides. Conclusions Our study reveals slight changes in KDT, in sand flies after prolonged exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin in the presence of pheromone. These changes are not considered to have reached the reference levels indicative of resistance in sand flies suggesting that pheromone and insecticide treatment at the level indicated in this study do not constitute a significant risk of increased insecticide resistance. Prolonged exposure to deltamethrin in dog collars did not result in changes to KDT

A temporal comparison of sex-aggregation pheromone gland content and dynamics of release in three members of the Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) species complex

Background: Lutzomyia longipalpis is the South American vector of Leishmania infantum, the etiologic agent of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Male L. longipalpis produce a sex-aggregation pheromone that is critical in mating, yet very little is known about its accumulation over time or factors involved in release. This laboratory study aimed to compare accumulation of pheromone over time and determine factors that might influence release in three members of the L. longipalpis species complex. Methodology/Principal findings: We investigated male sex-aggregation pheromone gland content at different ages and the release rate of pheromone in the presence or absence of females under different light conditions by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Pheromone gland content was determined by extraction of whole males and pheromone release rate was determined by collection of headspace volatiles. Pheromone gland content appeared age-related and pheromone began to accumulate between 6 to 12 h post eclosion and gradually increased until males were 7–9 days old. The greatest amount was detected in 9-day old Campo Grande males ((S)-9-methylgermacrene-B; X ± SE: 203.5 ± 57.4 ng/male) followed by Sobral 2S males (diterpene; 199.9 ± 34.3) and Jacobina males ((1S,3S,7R)-3-methyl-α-himachalene; 128.8 ± 30.3) at 7 days old. Pheromone release was not continuous over time. During a 4-hour period, the greatest quantities of pheromone were released during the first hour, when wing beating activity was most intense. It was then substantially diminished for the remainder of the time. During a 24 h period, 4–5 day old male sand flies released approximately 63 ± 11% of the pheromone content of their glands, depending on the chemotype. The presence of females significantly increased pheromone release rate. The light regime under which the sand flies were held had little influence on pheromone release except on Sobral 2S chemotype. Conclusions/Significance: Accumulation of pheromone appears to occur at different rates in the different chemotypes examined and results in differing amounts being present in glands over time. Release of accumulated pheromone is not passive, but depends on biotic (presence of females) and abiotic (light) circumstances. There are marked differences in content and release between the members of the complex suggesting important behavioural, biosynthetic and ecological differences between them. Author summary: The Dipteran subfamily Phlebotominae includes the genera Lutzomyia and Phlebotomus among which several species are important vectors of parasitic and bacterial pathogens. The sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis is considered the main vector of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in the New World. Based on the main component of the male sex-aggregation pheromone gland, different sex pheromone-producing populations (chemotypes) of L. longipalpis are recognized in Brazil. Given the importance of the sex-aggregation pheromones in the biology of this species complex, we present here the first attempt to study how pheromone accumulates in the glands over time and factors that might influence its release in the three most common chemotypes from Brazil. Our results demonstrated that pheromone first starts to accumulate a few hours post-eclosion (6–12 h) and this continues over 15 days. Pheromone release is a dynamic process which varies between the 3 chemotypes depending on biotic factors, such as light regime and presence/absence of conspecific females. This work provides valuable information, critical to our understanding of the behaviour and ecology of L. longipalpis sand flies and which will contribute to investigations to improve field-based pheromone control and monitoring of L. longipalpis sand flies

The Shaping of T Cell Receptor Recognition by Self-Tolerance

SummaryDuring selection of the T cell repertoire, the immune system navigates the subtle distinction between self-restriction and self-tolerance, yet how this is achieved is unclear. Here we describe how self-tolerance toward a trans-HLA (human leukocyte antigen) allotype shapes T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) determinant (FLRGRAYGL). The recognition of HLA-B8-FLRGRAYGL by two archetypal TCRs was compared. One was a publicly selected TCR, LC13, that is alloreactive with HLA-B44; the other, CF34, lacks HLA-B44 reactivity because it arises when HLA-B44 is coinherited in trans with HLA-B8. Whereas the alloreactive LC13 TCR docked at the C terminus of HLA-B8-FLRGRAYGL, the CF34 TCR docked at the N terminus of HLA-B8-FLRGRAYGL, which coincided with a polymorphic region between HLA-B8 and HLA-B44. The markedly contrasting footprints of the LC13 and CF34 TCRs provided a portrait of how self-tolerance shapes the specificity of TCRs selected into the immune repertoire

Complete Genome Sequences of Genamy16 and NovaSharks, Two Gordonia rubripertincta Bacteriophages Isolated from Soil in Southeastern Florida

We report on two actinobacteriophages, Genamy16 and NovaSharks, that were isolated from soil in Florida using Gordonia rubripertincta NRRL B-16540. The genomes of both phages are ~65,000 bp, with similar GC contents, and, based on gene content similarity to phages in the Actinobacteriophage Database, were assigned to phage cluster DV

‘Remembering as Forgetting’: Organizational commemoration as a politics of recognition

This paper considers the politics of how organizations remember their past through commemorative settings and artefacts. Although these may be seen as ‘merely’ a backdrop to organizational activity, they form part of the lived experience of organizational spaces that its members enact on a daily basis as part of their routes and routines. The main concern of the paper is with how commemoration is bound up in the reflection and reproduction of hierarchies of organizational recognition. Illustrated with reference to two commemorative settings, the paper explores how organizations perpetuate a narrow set of symbolic ideals attributing value to particular forms of organizational membership while appearing to devalue others. In doing so, they communicate values that undermine attempts to achieve equality and inclusion. Developing a recognition-based critique of this process, the discussion emphasizes how commemorative settings and practices work to reproduce established patterns of exclusion and marginalization. To this end, traditional forms of commemorative portraiture that tend to close off difference are contrasted with a memorial garden, in order to explore the potential for an alternative, recognition-based ethics of organizational commemoration that is more open to the Other

The Benefits and Burdens of Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-Life Research: A Systematic Review

Objective: The aim of this study is to report the benefits and burdens of palliative research participation on children, siblings, parents, clinicians, and researchers. Background: Pediatric palliative care requires research to mature the science and improve interventions. A tension exists between the desire to enhance palliative and end-of-life care for children and their families and the need to protect these potentially vulnerable populations from untoward burdens. Methods: Systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines with prepared protocol registered as PROSPERO #CRD42018087304. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library were searched (2000–2017). English-language studies depicting the benefits or burdens of palliative care or end-of-life research participation on either pediatric patients and/or their family members, clinicians, or study teams were eligible for inclusion. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Twenty-four studies met final inclusion criteria. The benefit or burden of palliative care research participation was reported for the child in 6 papers; siblings in 2; parents in 19; clinicians in 3; and researchers in 5 papers. Benefits were more heavily emphasized by patients and family members, whereas burdens were more prominently emphasized by researchers and clinicians. No paper utilized a validated benefit/burden scale. Discussion: The lack of published exploration into the benefits and burdens of those asked to take part in pediatric palliative care research and those conducting the research is striking. There is a need for implementation of a validated benefit/burden instrument or interview measure as part of pediatric palliative and end-of-life research design and reporting

The Student Movement Volume 108 Issue 11: A Merry Christmas: From the SM Staff to You

HUMANS Meet the Professors: New Humans Series, Grace No Psychology Research, Interviewed by Grace No What\u27s The Deal With Santa Claus?, Reagan Westerman Student Worker Interview: Sam Namkung, Interviewed by Lauren Kim ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT A Flat World for Our Round One, Nate Miller Art & Music in Andrews\u27 History - Introduction, Aiko J. Ayala Rios Why Do I Fell Bad for President Snow?: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes Review, Corinna Bevier Have Yourself a Merry Little Hallmark Christmas, Lexie Dunham It\u27s Beginning to Sound a Lot Like Christmas: A Christmas Playlist, Madison Vath NEWS Questions Answered, Questions Avoided: AUSA Town Hall , Andrew Francis The Shift from Emmanuel Missionary College to Andrews University, Katie Davis Deliverance from Same-Sex Attraction? A History of Conversion Therapy in the Adventist Church, Jonathan Clough Introducing Andrews Through the Ages, Melissa Moore The New Diversity Position and Students\u27 Reaction To It, Nate Miller IDEAS Christmas Traditions, Katie Davis Coming Out Ministries: \u27Coming Out\u27 is Coming In, Two perspectives by Lexie Dunham & Bella Hamann How Can We Improve Andrews?, Abby Shim How to Combat Seasonal Depression, Robert Zhang PULSE Christmas or Paganmas: A Question of Celebration, Rodney Bell II Christmas Spirit, Please Don\u27t Go!, Reagan Westerman Civil Rights at Andrews: A Series, Wambui Karanja The Meaning of Christmas, Anna Rybachek LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Desmond Hartwell Murray, I Know Dilution! Shandelle Henson LAST WORD Sonder* in the Train Station, Amelia Stefanescuhttps://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/sm-108/1010/thumbnail.jp